The red and blue dots are completely wrong to the story

Seriously, they would consider tearing somebody's heart out of their body a strategic move and giving someone a quick death bold. What the hell, also poison is not a brutality choice, it is strategic and a planned battle is a brutality choice. Submitting to somebody is not a bold move. Standing up to gryff is not a strategic choice.
Of course the worst of all is, blaming somebody for your action is not a strategic choice, taking the full blame for somebody is not a bold choice
Have a great day and please explain what all this crap is suppose to mean with the red and blue dots

Comments

  • It means nothing. I though myself "Mhhh a Nice summary of my choices you have there, But it doesn't make them matter in any way!"

  • Taking Cotters heart is strategic. I'm not sure how to word it but you're being pragmatic and smart by keeping Elsera's warriors under control. The choices are basically did you act emotionally or use your head.

  • But how is sumbiiting to gryff emotional

    AgentZ46 posted: »

    Taking Cotters heart is strategic. I'm not sure how to word it but you're being pragmatic and smart by keeping Elsera's warriors under control. The choices are basically did you act emotionally or use your head.

  • I don't bloody know. So he wouldn't hurt Talia?

    You realize you're complaining because specific words aren't the colour you think they should be?

    But how is sumbiiting to gryff emotional

Sign in to comment in this discussion.