At the end choices didnt matter at all
You still ended up a loser with your house destroyed. There should have been a "perfect" playthrough where u can save your house kill all the whitehills and prosper if u picked the exact right choices throughout the season but it seems that doesn't even matter cause at the end u still end up where u are. infact non of the choices made in previous episodes mattered the entire outcome here was solely based on choices u made in the last episode. i know there are many different branches u can go and its hard to design that many outcomes but there should have been a good outcome if u played smart or even was given the opportunity to play smart (especially regarding Mira).
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
A 'perfect' ending wouldn't really be realistic. Even if you make some pretty perfect choices, you're still pretty much outnumbered in every way. Also, in terms of budget and time, Telltale wouldn't be able to make such a huge difference to your story in Season 2 depending on whether your House fell or not in Season 1.
But, still, you get a LOT of variations to your ending
Rodrik alive, with Duncan OR Royland and Talia.
Asher alive with Duncan OR Royland OR Gwyn and Talia.
The house still falls, but it sets a lot up to be varied in Season 2.
Stop being unrealistic. If you picked all the right choices and the House prospered, how would a Season 2 tie in there? Telltale still has to tell a tale, it's in their name after all. Not even game series like Mass Effect offer that wide a variety: Shepard always does the same thing in the end of Mass Effect 2 and 3, the difference is how you play Shepard. It's the exact same thing with this game. It's simply impossible for a game like this and a company like Telltale to have thousands of different paths, of which some are even totally different.
For a Telltale game, the choices in this game mattered a lot. You end up with a finale that is completely different depending on who you had survive Episode 5, and that brother even survives to see Season 2. You can end up with three different people in the end, two of which have very different motives depending on how you played the game. One POV character is either dead or alive depending on a decision you made.
Again, for a Telltale game, the choices really mattered a lot more than in all previous games, maybe excluding Tales from the Borderlands. Anything more and most companies (not only Telltale) would be in over their heads.
they can tell a tale in 1 season. they had 6 episodes to do so. also if you believe that the second season will revolve around the forresters you are foolish. the forresters are done.
They've pretty much confirmed it'll revolve around the Forresters...
The ending made it pretty clear. Royland, in mine, literally says that their 'war isn't over' yet.
The North Grove was also teased in their Season 2 post. The North Grove is about the Forresters. Isn't hard to put 2 and 2 together.
They also mentioned choices that we made affecting Season 2, and our choices won't really affect anyone except the Forresters. You get where I'm going. I could probably make a list that shows how they'll be in Season 2, but yeah.
too many of the forresters' faith is determinant to have a 2nd season about them. im sure they will be in the game but it wont be about them.
The second Season most definitley will revolve around the Forresters, the entire final Episode is setting up for that. The Forresters lost an important battle and many members of their family/household, but one brother, Royland/Duncan, Talia and Ryon are still alive. There's still Malcolm in Essos and Beskha with Ryon who can serve as new POVs.
I want to know why you are so certain about this? If you got any proves, facts or anything to support your theory, then I believe you. Because considering how the season ended, everything points to that we will continue the Forrester's story in Season 2.
so they are going to do a full season with 2 sepereate dialogues for asher and rodrick, same with duncan and the other sentinel....ryon there or not there ludd or griffin, u really think they are going that route for a full season???
also Mira there and not there. u think they will create a FULL subplot for Mira even though 60% of the players had her killed?
Rodrik and Asher are determinant. That's only one playable character (as in you can't have BOTH of them by the end of the season). Mira isn't on the main menu no matter what, so we can assume she'll have no part in Season 2. Determinants likely won't be playable, or will die within the first episode.
They said that they're taking into account how we've responded to certain characters. Talia, Ryon, Gared, Beskha... it doesn't HAVE to be just Forresters we play as. House Forrester have fallen, it's the perfect opportunity to tell a story about what happens with them next. I think the endings, with Beskha taking Ryon who-knows-where, and Rodrik/Asher and Talia on the run, as well as Gared beyond the Wall, is them setting up what happens next. Perhaps Rodrik/Asher will die, leading to Talia being playable-- like Clementine in TWD.
As for the determinant sentinel, they did a full Season with that, so I imagine they'd do another. The Whitehill's will likely not be involved. They won the fight, no reason for us to go back to see them.
Apparently I'm writing an essay on this now.
Ryon's there no matter what? No matter your choices, he's there with Beskha in the end.
What's the problem? They have already done that with episode 6.