Episode 3 Theories
Was wondering if anyone else felt like the Vicki Vale reveal was odd?
Reasons:
1. This was a twist just for the sake of a random reveal
2. We couldn't have guessed it
3. Vicki has no motivation (unless they expand upon her story in future episodes)
4. The leader of the children of arkham wears different masks in episode 2 and episode 3
(https://images.nowloading.co/images/c_limit,q_auto,w_710/dbup3ua0qpxloxq2hxdc/the-leader-of-the-children-of-arkham.jpg)](http://www.icxm.net/team/uploads/batman+telltale+ep+3+review+3.jpg)]
So...
*Vicki is Lady Arkham: the leader of the children of arkham, and telltale just changed the design
*Vicki is Lady Arkham: one of the leaders of the children of arkham (maybe there's a guy Arkham)
- Vicki could be being impersonated by someone like clayface (too similar to Arkham City)
- Part of the sequence of events could be inside of a dream or a fear sequence
As you can see, I am quite skeptical of Vicki being a villain and all behind this, but this is its own original batman story so anything is possible. What do you guys think?
Comments
Well first off the 2 versions of Lady Arkham is not different, Telltale has introduced a character in a past episode and then the next episode update their model and look in the next episode, Handsome Jack from Tales from the Borderlands is probably the best example.
Also Im sure we will learn more about Vicki's motive, as of now we are sort of left in the dark, but f you think about it, it does make sense that it is Vicki. She was at the police station when Montya was drugged, she just happened to be the person who was hostage on the stage and had to drug Harvey and Hill, and just happened to get the private interview with the Children of Arkham. Its also why Lady Arkham knew Batman was at the train station, she wouldnt have known if she didnt tell Batman to come there as Vicki.