What pcs do u play tomi on?

2

Comments

  • edited September 2009
    Frogacuda wrote: »
    I have a cheap system, but fairly current and solid for gaming. I'd rather spend $500 every couple of years than try to spend $1500 and drag the system out for longer than it's viable.

    Core2Duo @ 4GHz,
    Geforce 8800
    3 GB RAM

    Runs perfectly on 9.

    I have a similar philosophy, however with mine I use the same PC, and alternate which parts I upgrade. Like next year I am planning to upgrade my motherboard, whereas my past couple upgrades have been video card, cooling, power supply, and RAM. So really it's the same PC, but it slowly evolves. :)
  • edited September 2009
    Ah, a "pimp-my-monkey-island-playing-rig" thread :)

    Mine:
    CPU: Intel Q9550
    Memory: 4GB, 1066MHz @CL5
    Chipset: Intel X38
    VGA: GeForce 9600GT-512MB

    It runs perfectly on level 9, not dipping below the fps cap. My monitor limits the resolution at 1280x1024, but I'm sure it would run similarly up to 1920x1200.
  • edited September 2009
    Frogacuda wrote: »
    I have a cheap system, but fairly current and solid for gaming. I'd rather spend $500 every couple of years than try to spend $1500 and drag the system out for longer than it's viable.

    Core2Duo @ 4GHz,
    Geforce 8800
    3 GB RAM

    Runs perfectly on 9.

    a 4GHz Core2Duo???? wow... those are VERY rare (as in: don't exist)... or did you overclock the proc.???
  • edited September 2009
    iMac 24 " Intel Core 2 Duo 3,06 GHz 4 GB RAM
    Windows 7 RC, Nvidia GeForce 8800 GS 512 MB

    Runs perfectly in 1920 x 1200 (except I must restart to run Windows, of course).
  • edited September 2009
    AMD 64 X2 Dual
    Core processor 5000+
    2GB ram (2.61GHz)
    Nvidia Gforce 8800 GT
    Windows XPpro SP2


    Runs perfectly at 1680x1050 in 9
  • edited September 2009
    AMD Athlon 63 3200+ with 2 Ghz
    1 Gbyte RAM
    GeForce FX 5700

    The only way to play the game smooth with my specs is quality level 3.
  • edited September 2009
    108 Stars wrote: »
    AMD Athlon 63 3200+ with 2 Ghz
    1 Gbyte RAM
    GeForce FX 5700

    The only way to play the game smooth with my specs is quality level 3.

    I have a similar PC. I think your main problem is the video card.

    I can run the game at 1440X900 at maximum detail 9

    AMD 64 3000+
    1.5 Gb RAM
    GeForce 6600 GT
  • edited September 2009
    108 Stars wrote: »
    AMD Athlon 63 3200+ with 2 Ghz
    1 Gbyte RAM
    GeForce FX 5700

    The only way to play the game smooth with my specs is quality level 3.

    If you're using Vista, 1gb of RAM is also painfully low.
  • edited September 2009
    Pentium MMX 200MHz (OC'd to 3.2GHz, added 3 more cores)
    ATI Rage AGP 8MB (OC'd to the max)
    98304kb of RAM (need to download more)
    2 X 3.2GB HDD in RAID1 (I OC'd that too, mind you)
    1KW Power Supply
    MS-DOS

    On a more serious note

    Q6600@3.0GHZ
    4GB of RAM at 1000mhz
    9800GTX oc'd to 824/1238
    Win7 64bit

    9 all the way
  • edited September 2009
    Ok,
    considering I started this topic, and you guys have told me your specs, its only fair that I say mine:

    Os:Windows Vista Ultimate-32 bit
    RAM:4gb
    Gfx:9400GT
    CPU:Intel Core 2 Duo 3 ghz
    It plays fantastically on 1280x720 res, quality at 9. Chapter 3 will be my first proper experience with doing this, since my laptop was rubbish and had to be put down to 1 in order for any playability, so i didn't get the full graphics treatment for the first 2 chapters. All the more reason to be excited!
  • edited September 2009
    On an outdated but silent (no fans) P4 2.8Ghz with 1Gb RAM and an ATI 3850 with XP but i somehow like this archaic machine for those adventures. :O)
  • edited September 2009
    pilouuuu wrote: »
    I have a similar PC. I think your main problem is the video card.

    I can run the game at 1440X900 at maximum detail 9

    AMD 64 3000+
    1.5 Gb RAM
    GeForce 6600 GT

    Indeed it is. Actually I don´t even see much of a difference in quality between playing games with a Geforece 4ti and the FX5700. It´s a craptastic graphics card.

    Problem is I am stuck with AGP (or PCI, not PCI-Express), where graphic cards offer lower performance at a higher price. But maybe I´ll switch to a card of the 6000-series anyway.

    And no, I am not running Vista; I did once, but it sucked so hard I switched back to XP. :)
  • edited September 2009
    I use my stationary for playing video games:

    Intel Quad Core Q6600 4x2.4MhZ
    4GB RAM
    2x in GeForce 8800GT 512MB in SLi

    Game runs perfectly at 1680x1050 at GQ9.
  • edited September 2009
    And they say Telltale gamers are running pretty outdated computers, pfft.


    Athlon X2 5200+
    GeForce 8600GT 256 megs
    2 GB Ram
    WinXP SP2
  • edited September 2009
    Bagge wrote: »
    I use my stationary for playing video games:

    Intel Quad Core Q6600 4x2.4MhZ
    4GB RAM
    2x in GeForce 8800GT 512MB in SLi

    Game runs perfectly at 1680x1050 at GQ9.

    With that setup you could probably force 16X antialiasing and it'd still be fine. :p
  • edited September 2009
    AMD Athlon something Dualcore 4800+
    A 2 GB RAM
    ATI Radeon HD 4650
    Arch Linux

    And settings all high (9).
  • edited September 2009
    AMD Athlon 2700+
    1 GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
    WinXP SP3

    Xbox 360 controller w/ Xpadder

    Have to play it at its lowest for it to run smoothly 640x480 GQ1.
  • edited September 2009
    MacBook Pro circa late 2007
    works perfectly in crossover games with SnowLeopard and all settings maxed out
  • edited September 2009
    a custom built mac using crossover.
  • edited September 2009
    Laptop ASUS M51Sn
    Core 2 Duo T9300 2.50 GHz
    3GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
    Vista Premium 32bits SP2

    TOMI runs perfectly in 1280x720 and max details (9). :D
    Only the Prologue of Chapter 1 has a bit of lower performances.
  • edited September 2009
    intel core i7 920
    12 GB ram
    Geforce GTX 295
    Vista 64

    1680x1050, highest detail, runs fine
  • edited September 2009
    Dark Byte wrote: »
    intel core i7 920
    12 GB ram
    Geforce GTX 295
    Vista 64

    1680x1050, highest detail, runs fine

    Dang what are you doing CAD or hi-res video editing with that thing?
  • edited October 2009
    Just upgraded my PC.

    Intel Celeron 3GHz
    1 GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE
    WinXP SP3

    Xbox 360 controller w/ Xpadder

    Now runs smoothly at 1024x768 GQ3. Awesome. :)
  • edited October 2009
    Core 2 Duo 2,93 GHz
    4 GB DDR3 RAM
    640 GB HDD
    ATi Radeon HD 4580
    24" @ 1920 x 1200 px

    ...also known as Apple iMac...
  • edited October 2009
    AMD Phenom II 940 3GHZ
    XFX Geforce GTX260
    3GB Ram
    WinXP

    Running at full settings at 1680x1050 and smooth as butter :D
  • edited October 2009
    All this spec talk is making me sad =[

    AMD athlon 2700+
    1.5gb ram
    Radeon 9700 pro
    XP pro s3

    I bought all this about 7 years ago and it cost me a grand to put together... how times have changed =[

    Least, still works for ToMI : )
  • edited October 2009
    108 Stars wrote: »
    Indeed it is. Actually I don´t even see much of a difference in quality between playing games with a Geforece 4ti and the FX5700. It´s a craptastic graphics card.

    Problem is I am stuck with AGP (or PCI, not PCI-Express), where graphic cards offer lower performance at a higher price. But maybe I´ll switch to a card of the 6000-series anyway.

    And no, I am not running Vista; I did once, but it sucked so hard I switched back to XP. :)

    The 6600GT is an excellent AGP card! I can even run Bioshock, Fallout 3, The Sims 3 and Street Fighter IV! Maybe you could find a cheap one. Or you could even go for the 8600 although I don' know how much better it is. And I use Windows 7 and it works like a charm.
  • edited October 2009
    Probably the best card you can get on AGP is the ATI 3850, should be in a sub $100 range.
  • edited October 2009
    Core 2 Duo 8600 3.66 GHz
    ATI Radeon HD 4870 512mb
    3.5 GB RAM
    Windows XP sp3

    I thought it is enough to run ToMI on highest settings, but I can't set quality above 9.
  • edited November 2009
    Cyphox wrote: »
    Pentium E5200 2,5Ghz @ 4Ghz
    8GB DDR2-800 RAM
    ATI Radeon 4870 1024MB
    Win7 64bit

    1920x1080

    If you have DDR2, then how are you able to run a DDR3 graphics card?
  • edited November 2009
    Core 2 Quad 2.45
    4 giga RAM <- DDR2
    Windows Vista
    Nvidia 9600GT <-- DDR3

    1440x900 and max graphics quality ( 9 )


    RAM and graphics memory have nothing to do with each other
  • edited November 2009
    Old custom built PC, AMD Athlon 64 3500+ OC'd to 2.3GHz. Sapphire Radeon X1950XT, Windows XP 1.5GB RAM. For once I have actually never changed the setting for tyhe graphics...No idea why. I think I will got see how well my comp handles full graphics.
  • edited November 2009
    Amiga 500

    Motorola 68000
    512kb RAM
    AmigaOS 1.2
    4096 colours
  • edited November 2009
    Amiga 500

    Motorola 68000
    512kb RAM
    AmigaOS 1.2
    4096 colours

    HA!
  • edited November 2009
    AMD Athlon X2 4200+
    4GB RAM But on Vista 32-bit I can only use 3.5GB of it.
    nVidia GeForce 7800GS 512MB

    It would be better if I could max out the settings but I suppose I need to upgrade to a better PC.

    OK, so I went and got a new PC and Chapter 4 was the first Telltale game I played on it.

    Intel Core i7 920 bloomfield nehalem quad-core with hyperthreading @2.8Ghz
    6GB triple channel DDR3 RAM
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    OCZ Vertex Solid State Hard Drive
    ATI Radeon HD 5850 with 1024MB DDR5 DirectX11 compliance

    The game ran awesome at 1920x1200 res with maximum level 9 graphics settings.
  • edited November 2009
    If you have DDR2, then how are you able to run a DDR3 graphics card?
    The 8GB of DDR2 RAM are his main memory, which has zilch to do with the 1GB of DDR3 RAM on his graphics card. One is used by his CPU and mainboard, the other by his graphics card, and the only connection between those two is the PCI-Express bus that doesn't care one way or another which memory technology is used on both ends...
  • edited November 2009
    Leak wrote: »
    The 8GB of DDR2 RAM are his main memory, which has zilch to do with the 1GB of DDR3 RAM on his graphics card. One is used by his CPU and mainboard, the other by his graphics card, and the only connection between those two is the PCI-Express bus that doesn't care one way or another which memory technology is used on both ends...

    That is so awesome to here! i thought i'd be stuck having to look for DDR2 only graphics cards. my 9400gt doesn't like to run tmi on full settings:( after examination (ignore my last post about this). What's a good graphics card to play it on full?
  • edited November 2009
    thin029 wrote: »
    Core 2 Quad 2.45
    4 giga RAM <- DDR2
    Windows Vista
    Nvidia 9600GT <-- DDR3

    1440x900 and max graphics quality ( 9 )


    RAM and graphics memory have nothing to do with each other

    Mine is pretty similar to this.
  • edited November 2009
    Just upgraded my "slowly evolving" computer (I like that term PaleMan). TMI on 9, but it's not that much of a power hog. I played Modern Warfare 2 this weekend, maxed out everything - played like butter. It's the first time I've been able to play a brand new game that has top notch graphics and max it out. It's nice once you become an "adult" and can actually semi-afford nice toys.

    Windows 7 64-bit
    AMD Phenom xII 955 (quad core, 3.2Ghz)
    4 GB DDR3 Ram
    ATI Radeon HD 4870 (1 GB DX10)

    The Commissioner - your video card makes me drool.
  • edited November 2009
    Armand1880 wrote: »
    The Commissioner - your video card makes me drool.

    I wonder how many people are out there with HD 5870 cards... *Homer Simpson style drool* :p
Sign in to comment in this discussion.