A KQ8 remake
Does anyone else want to see TT--if they're successful with this reboot--do a remake of KQ8, more adventure-esque and closer to the way Roberta originally imagined it before the direction of the game got taken out of her control.
Early photos of KQ8:
Connor:
Daventry:
Early photos of KQ8:
Connor:
Daventry:
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
Also, I like the look of the intended game! It is clearly seen that Connor was not intended to be a fighter, and he indeed looks like an adventurer. Was this model made when Connor was intended to be a living statue, or a tanner?
Living statue.
These photos are from 1996.
The game went through three different designs/builds.
The first was from 1995-1996, this version. Connor was to be a living statue made flesh. It was going to be a HUGE game with a gigantic world, spanning out with no loading sequences from Castle Daventry. Daventry was to have two huge towns, including a port town. There was also t be an underwater kingdom, as well as a silver land of the moon. The swamp witch was to have a bigger story. There were 2 whole lands cut due to budget concerns. We were going to be able to explore Castle Daventry in it's entirety. There were to be very few monsters and thus not a lot of combat.
The second was from 1996-1997, and included more action, and by this time Roberta began to lose control of the game. In this version, Connor was the son of a Fisherman.
The last version of the game was from '97 to '98 and was the released game. Roberta wanted her name taken off the project because it had so deviated from her vision and only after a few token changes were made did she allow her name to be associated with it.
Great wrong was done to Roberta here. :mad:
P.S. Who was in control of the project? How did it happen?
What happened was--Work began on Mask in 1995, right after she finished Phantasmagoria. At that time, Ken Williams, her husband, was still CEO of Sierra and so she had total creative freedom and control over her projects. However, halfway through the game's creation, in July 1996, Ken sold Sierra to CUC (which very rapidly led to Sierra losing it's own creativity autonomy). Ken had been lied to by CUC, and officially stepped down as the CEO around that Winter because he couldn't deal with seeing his company ripped apart from above with no way of stopping it.
After he resigned, Roberta lost a LOT of her creative control over the project. The game went through two more re-designs because of this.
Gradually other voices began making their presence known (Mark Seibert especially, who served as Producer and co-Director of the game), and eventually they began to truly lead the project, and the new management of Sierra wanted a more action heavy game to compete with the post-Quake world, which led to more action elements being inserted. The game as written (story, dialogue, etc) is hers, but not the action parts, nor the gore and all of that.
Also, because of budget limitations, two whole levels were cut, and a lot of stuff in the game all over was cut and shortened, hacked up in different areas, because the new Sierra didn't want to spend too much money on an adventure game, which they felt was a dead genre.
Roberta kept working and working on the game, trying to steer it back to her original vision, and she kept delaying the release to try and rectify a lot of the changes that had been made. In the end, Sierra's management threatened her with legal action if she didn't hand over the game as it was, and she let it go and it was released, and quit Sierra.
Personally, I believe that the people leading the project were Mark Seibert, and the executives at Sierra after Ken left.
Here's Ken's own words:
"KQ8 is a wild story.
KQ8 was in development at the same time that the company was sold. Basically, Sierra went through changes during the development of the game, and those changes are reflected in the game. During the first half of the game, I was the CEO - during the last half of the game my status shifted to "reasonably nice guy who used to work here". My way of doing things was different than the new way of doing things.
My #1 issue was always to maintain the "clarity of vision" of the game designer. A Sierra project, like KQ8, has nearly a hundred highly creative people on it. Many of these people were working at Sierra because they wanted their shot to be a game designer. It was not uncommon for everyone on a project to seek opportunities to "put their mark" on the game. This is a delicate issue. I recruited people who could be designers, and I was a huge supporter of creativity. Roberta wanted ideas from the team, but at some point, if you accept too many ideas, the product can become a muddy mess. There were dozens of people on KQ8 who could have been the designer, any of which would have made a great designer. But, unfortunately, if this tendency, on the part of developers, to add their creativity to a product, isn't carefully controlled, the product starts to veer into "design by committee". Roberta had her vision for the product, as did almost every person on the project.
When I lost control of Sierra, Roberta's ability to maintain her control over KQ8 was also eroded. The product that shipped is very different than what would have shipped had the company not been sold.
There was another issue at work on KQ8. Roberta is a perfectionist (I'm guilty of the same sin). Whenever she would play the game, she would turn in lists of hundreds of "bugs". Perfectionist can be a pseudonym for nit-picker. When a development team gets a long list, the natural tendency can be to look at some bugs as nit-picky. I always supported my designers. I wouldn't let a game go until the designer was happy (with a couple of exceptions that I regretted later), even when it seemed like we were spending lots of money to fix stuff no one cared about. It was critical to me that the game our customers played represented the game our designer wanted produced. When I left Sierra, Roberta's ability to get bugs fixed diminished.
Ultimately, the last year of KQ8 development was a tough one for Roberta. For a long time, she refused to let the game ship and there was threatened litigation floating around.
This is not to say that the game that shipped isn't a good game. Roberta was reasonably happy with it at the end - but, it reflected a much wider product vision, than Robertas alone. People other than Roberta influenced its development, in a greater capacity than in her previous products. There will be some gamers who see the change as positive, and some who wanted a Roberta product more consistent with her prior products.
There is an example I used to use on this point. One of my favorite authors is: Steven King. I also like Peter Straub. Each alone is a bestselling (mega-selling in Kings case) author. They cowrote a book; the Talisman, which bombed. Either alone could have sold plenty of copies, but together, the whole becomes less than the parts. KQ8 had wonderful people on it. This message should not be construed as being derogatory to anyone (other than that I am definitely critical of the management changes that took place.) My belief is that if the new owners had taken a couple of days to ask about "what made Sierra special" in the days after acquiring it (they could have asked me, or better yet, its customers) before dramatically changing things, things would have gone a lot smoother in the transition.
-Ken W"
and
"As was pointed out, MOE had a very different flavor from the earlier Kings Quest games. The 'rest of the story' is that it was developed after I left Sierra, and that there were multiple opinions as to what the game should be. When I was running the company, these differences were not an issue, because everyone knew my position on the matter. I always felt that a game is like a book, and that there should only be one author, or one creative vision, for the product, and that the game needs to sink or swim with a single vision. It was Roberta's game, and needed to be her vision. Typically, on a game, there are 100s of people, and most of them are 'wanna be’ game designers. They look for every opportunity to show off their creativity, and prove to the world that they should be the next hot designer. I understand and respect this, but it really just screws up the product. I would argue that if you were to publish a book, with the top 200 authors who ever lived each writing one page, it might have good press value, but would be an unreadable book.
With me gone from Sierra, Roberta's ability to force the project to be her vision, alone, was compromised. It suddenly became a group effort, with lots of smart people each having their own ideas. Sierra hired only the best, so they weren't bad ideas, but they weren't Roberta's ideas. The game became a mish mash of lots of people's good ideas, but clearly not a Roberta game. There was even a period where Sierra wanted to release the game, and Roberta wouldn’t allow her name on it. After a bunch of negotiation, and changes to the product, to mosey it back towards what she designed, it did finally release."
I truly admire his views and comments on letting each project be a single designer's vision. I have to say, I think anyone who did not want to contribute to Roberta's vision should not have worked on her game. Seems just common sense to me.
Then I realized that I'm lazy, and I'd be a horrible game designer. :P
I have always wished a talented group of fans would do just that.
Why don't you vote for it then?
I'd actually like to see MOE remade as something more resembling Morrowind or Oblivion.
I think it makes him look cool. He looks like a Knight Templar or a Bedouin, and it's a different look. I don't see why every KQ hero has to fit a certain look/style of clothes.
You don't have to. That's just my preference.
I never made the connection with the Templar gear, though. Doesn't really resemble it to me. Either way I don't think it's fitting.
While I agree that it would have been better game if it was pure old school adventure, I would rather see new adventures of Connor than remake of MoE. MoE is enjoyable game even with it's flaws. Personally I think that MoE had three big flaws:
1. Lack of puzzles, although couple of puzzles which were included were good ones and took some thinking before I solved them. Game would have been more enjoyable with more puzzles.
2. Fighting. I don't oppose it per se, but if you include fighting you should make it challenging. In MoE even the "boss monsters" are ridiculously easy to kill.
3. Lands have too much empty space and running around becomes quite tedious soon. Some of the lands were interesting and I would have wished to see more interaction in there, rather than just killing the monsters and trying to find few items which allow you to pass into the next land.
Yeah it wouldn't really be all that fitting, unless he was a knight for the Pope.
No artwork from the statue stage (the character didn't have a name at that point) has been released. That prototype idea was actually late 1994-1995 brainstorming around the time Phantasmagoria was in development (way before they even started working on designing any game models). So that idea never went very far, and was quickly replaced with an early version peasant Connor.
Those magazines also speak of "changing armor", so what you see in the image is actually just a placeholder, starting outfit, or one of the armors he finds along the way. Its unclear. But even back then, they had plans for much of what you see in the finished game. The game just would have been even longer, had more battles.
What you don't see in those images, but show up in some of the others from the magazines at that time, is that same model, standing around with monsters, that he would have fought. They didn't even have a playable game at that point, they were just using the level editor from Dynamix (and placing "objects" in the world), there was no animation, or interactivity.
You can see the level editor in use here as well as some of the enemies;
Making of video
The above video seems to show interviews from various points during the development around 1995-1996 (during the boardroom meeting, during the prototype art stage, and level editing stage). Some of those ideas (like the large world) were dropped pretty early on as well, as being too ambitious for the technology they had.
You can even see, in that video some of her staff kept on telling Roberta her ideas were too ambitious and couldn't be done with the technology they had. That was some of the start of the problems where others in the staff were undermining her control.
If you want to hear the most details explanations about the development difficulties Roberta was having (and material that was cut), listen to her own words;
Interview 1
Interview 2
Both are pretty long, but interesting. There was a part three that specifically about cut material and development nightmares in great detail, but unfortunately that's missing.
Thanks for posting those Talkspot files! I remember those shows fondly (I actually called in to talk to Roberta, and she was extremely nice and lovely to speak with).
I was wondering if you have the links/files for the other show(s)? You posted one with Roberta and another with Roberta and Mark together. I think there may have been one more with Roberta alone? Is there any way to browse the Sierragamers files archive?
Also for those who may be interested, Talkspot's Sierra reunion featuring Roberta, Ken, Jane, Scott and others is available on Sierragamers: http://www.sierragamers.com/aspx/blob2/blobpage.aspx/msgid/637692
Back to the question, do I want to see a KQ8 remake?
No, not really, I'd rather see Telltale games continues where MOE left off, with all new adventures. At some point, i'd like play as Connor again.
Back in the day, Roberta had alot of neat ideas for what would have went into KQ1, but were cut due to limitations in the game. Many of those ideas were then recycled and put into KQ2.
Similar to how Spielburg and Lucas had alot of interesting ideas to toss into Raiders of the Lost Ark, but were cut, and then adapted into Temple of Doom.
Ideas that made the cutting room floor of MOE? I'd say if the ideas still exist, they should be adapted it into a sequel!
However, if Activision decided to make a KQ8 Enhanced (updating the game for the modern PC/consoles/etc), with new material, improved nextgen graphics, new and better ending, etc, I would be very surprised, but I wouldn't turn it down either.
Still it would be interesting to know what was cut from each KQ game in the series, and what cuts were readapted into later games, and which never were reused again.
Actually this is a good thread, from what I can see, I don't think it necessarily needs to be merged as per forums policy;
As per GuruGuru's thread policy;
But it is another discussion that needs new life, it looks to be separate enough, topic idea compared to the other "King's Quest 8" threads.
The "Bedouin Connor" thread though looks like it could be merged into this one, and still be on topic.