I felt like I beat Gryff enough by refusing to submit to him, and he ended up humiliating himself by throwing a tantrum like that. There was no need to treat him like he treated us.
I stopped when Lady Forrester insisted as well, I felt justified when Talia asked Rodrick how he knew when to stop and He replies "I knew th… moreat wasn't the kind of lord I wanted to be"
Also he didn't physically maim him when he dragged Rodrick through the mud, he just humiliated him. Just in case tables turned once again I don't want the reply to be as severe.
Its entertaining to hear what happens if you try to attack, I knew it'd be bad so I didn't think to try. I called Ludds bluff and made the deal
I didn't hit Gryff at all. Of course, he's an arrogant prick, but Rodrik is a true Lord, his father's son. Gryff wouldn't have shown such me… morercy to the Forresters, but Rodrik is not like him. When the time comes, I will gladly chop his head off. But there's no need to mutilate pathetic and unarmed kid.
I know it was supposed to be a reverse of roles type of thing since he beat me down so harshly in the previous episode but I couldn't help but feel sorry for the boy. I nearly killed a poor, very mentally damaged kid I wish I showed mercy.
Comments
Sure there was, he's a bully and deserved it so he'd learn some manners.
That's unlikely, the tables won't be turned again and after what Gryff did, he needed a lesson on why he shouldn't mess Rodrik.
Then again, i also had Rodrik stand up to Gryff instead of submitting, because i don't think Rodrik would act like a Craven.
No, Maiming is karmic justice. Considering how much he likes to mock Rodrik for being "crippled".
So you let him get away with beating up the Maester?
He's a bully and he's an Adult, not a kid. His responsible for his own actions.
I don't regret beating him up.