The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
No, I don't know her name but seriously man, have some respect for her and hell, have some respect for yourself. Also, it scares me that you mention how you want to fuck her when it just so happens to be on a picture where she cosplays as a 11 year old girl and a 15 year old girl...
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smart… moreaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
Would it have been better if he said, "She's a beautiful person and I would very much enjoy it if she engaged in consensual sexual intercourse with me."
Yes, that'd actually be better. Although, it's still a bit of a 'TMI' comment. If I had a sexual fantasy, I would keep it to myself. Either way, she's still a person, not an object. It's also very objectifying to call someone "hot".
Would it have been better if he said, "She's a beautiful person and I would very much enjoy it if she engaged in consensual sexual intercourse with me."
I don't disagree that this isn't exactly the place for discussing sexual fantasies, especially not during the aftermath of the Clem porn perv. Now for the smart ass portion of my comment. "Hot" is a measurement of temperature and not a sexual object.
Really though, if you think someone is "hot" why does that automatically have to imply sexual objectification? Hot and beautiful are pretty much interchangeable, and if you find a person's physical appearance attractive why not say so. If physical attraction implies you are viewing another person as being of no more value than a sex toy, would it not be better then to never be physically attracted to anyone?
When someone admits that they find another person physically attractive the implication of course is that they would very much enjoy to engage in consensual sexual intercourse with said person, because this is the very nature of physical attraction. Everyone, male and female, experiences this. This is a fact that cannot be argued with me, because I've seen Norman Reedus's Facebook page. It's natural for people to develop sexual fantasies of a person they perceive as physically attractive, because that person meets the physical appearance criteria of their fantasy. In this way, couldn't this phenomenon be viewed as sexual personification? "She is the personification of my sexual desires." Anyone who would go out of their way to be physically attracted to a person and pursue them obviously wants a person and not an object, otherwise they could eliminate all hassle and just purchase a sex toy.
Yes, that'd actually be better. Although, it's still a bit of a 'TMI' comment. If I had a sexual fantasy, I would keep it to myself. Either way, she's still a person, not an object. It's also very objectifying to call someone "hot".
Oh man, you just made my brain dribble out my ears. I am NOT cleaning that up.
You both clearly have slightly different opinions on this particular subject, but it's fairly obvious that there wasn't any malicious intent from Eddie, so let's just move on from this, shall we?
An for the record, this is the site of the cosplayer you're talking about. There's some other TWD characters on there, so check it out. The Clem pictures are on the second page (hit 'Older posts' at the bottom of the page).
I don't disagree that this isn't exactly the place for discussing sexual fantasies, especially not during the aftermath of the Clem porn per… morev. Now for the smart ass portion of my comment. "Hot" is a measurement of temperature and not a sexual object.
Really though, if you think someone is "hot" why does that automatically have to imply sexual objectification? Hot and beautiful are pretty much interchangeable, and if you find a person's physical appearance attractive why not say so. If physical attraction implies you are viewing another person as being of no more value than a sex toy, would it not be better then to never be physically attracted to anyone?
When someone admits that they find another person physically attractive the implication of course is that they would very much enjoy to engage in consensual sexual intercourse with said person, because this is the very nature of physical attraction. Everyone, male and female, experience… [view original content]
Yeah, I wasn't trying to be a dick or anything, I was just presenting a different viewpoint. Consider the conversation done in this thread, however, if anyone would like to reply or counter anything I said feel free to learn how private messaging works and send me one.
Oh man, you just made my brain dribble out my ears. I am NOT cleaning that up.
You both clearly have slightly different opinions on this … moreparticular subject, but it's fairly obvious that there wasn't any malicious intent from Eddie, so let's just move on from this, shall we?
An for the record, this is the site of the cosplayer you're talking about. There's some other TWD characters on there, so check it out. The Clem pictures are on the second page (hit 'Older posts' at the bottom of the page).
Yeah, I wasn't trying to be a dick or anything, I was just presenting a different viewpoint. Consider the conversation done in this thread, … morehowever, if anyone would like to reply or counter anything I said feel free to learn how private messaging works and send me one.
Comments
YES! LET THE HILARIOUS PICS WASH OVER THIS FORUM!
That closet's empty.
As shit hits the fan: "It's pretty rare to see a burner like this.."
Hilarious? I'd say they're disturbing, lol.
Disturbingly hilarious
The girl who did the Nick cosplay strikes again (and again and again)
She's done a Clementine cosplay, and its fantastic:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83423796742/i-did-a-clementine-cosplay-as-suggested-by-an
also, Sarah:
http://smartaveragebears.tumblr.com/post/83335282226/someone-said-they-wanted-to-see-a-sarah-cosplay-so
That would go better with my "maybe yes squared times infinity" comment :P
Lol, damn! I didn't think of that before.
Her eyes ;3
Her Clementine is amazing and i love the fact her Sarah has the polaroid.
Pretty useless video but eh... um... that happened.
Love Clem's face when Sarah says "We're friends."
[removed]
iv just realized what they look like.... Deathclaws.
[removed]
[removed]
Did someone say "boat"?
That's a very vulgar way of talking about her. She wasn't invented for you, so you should be talking about her as a person not as a thing.
Dat ending doh.
Credits to @vivec for gif
She's hot, what else can I say? So I'm assuming you don't know her name?
No, I don't know her name but seriously man, have some respect for her and hell, have some respect for yourself. Also, it scares me that you mention how you want to fuck her when it just so happens to be on a picture where she cosplays as a 11 year old girl and a 15 year old girl...
Telltale needs to make this happen.
She's gorgeous!
Ignore double post!
Yeah christmas trees are bad. Listen to Carlos, hes a doctor.
Would it have been better if he said, "She's a beautiful person and I would very much enjoy it if she engaged in consensual sexual intercourse with me."
Yes, that'd actually be better. Although, it's still a bit of a 'TMI' comment. If I had a sexual fantasy, I would keep it to myself. Either way, she's still a person, not an object. It's also very objectifying to call someone "hot".
Don't trust him, Clem! He's a clone!
I don't disagree that this isn't exactly the place for discussing sexual fantasies, especially not during the aftermath of the Clem porn perv. Now for the smart ass portion of my comment. "Hot" is a measurement of temperature and not a sexual object.
Really though, if you think someone is "hot" why does that automatically have to imply sexual objectification? Hot and beautiful are pretty much interchangeable, and if you find a person's physical appearance attractive why not say so. If physical attraction implies you are viewing another person as being of no more value than a sex toy, would it not be better then to never be physically attracted to anyone?
When someone admits that they find another person physically attractive the implication of course is that they would very much enjoy to engage in consensual sexual intercourse with said person, because this is the very nature of physical attraction. Everyone, male and female, experiences this. This is a fact that cannot be argued with me, because I've seen Norman Reedus's Facebook page. It's natural for people to develop sexual fantasies of a person they perceive as physically attractive, because that person meets the physical appearance criteria of their fantasy. In this way, couldn't this phenomenon be viewed as sexual personification? "She is the personification of my sexual desires." Anyone who would go out of their way to be physically attracted to a person and pursue them obviously wants a person and not an object, otherwise they could eliminate all hassle and just purchase a sex toy.
...Shit.
Leemid was real.
Oh man, you just made my brain dribble out my ears. I am NOT cleaning that up.
You both clearly have slightly different opinions on this particular subject, but it's fairly obvious that there wasn't any malicious intent from Eddie, so let's just move on from this, shall we?
An for the record, this is the site of the cosplayer you're talking about. There's some other TWD characters on there, so check it out. The Clem pictures are on the second page (hit 'Older posts' at the bottom of the page).
Yeah, I wasn't trying to be a dick or anything, I was just presenting a different viewpoint. Consider the conversation done in this thread, however, if anyone would like to reply or counter anything I said feel free to learn how private messaging works and send me one.
Uh... the private messaging system doesn't um... work.
Ahem.
I thought it did but was insanely difficult to figure out. My mistake, lol.