What Lee Would have done!

1246712

Comments

  • Molly wouldn't have pulled Jane's stunt with the baby in the first place.

    zykelator posted: »

    So lets say that Kenny was trying to murder Molly. Would Lee let Kenny murder Molly? I think not.

  • Jane knew what was going on, Kenny didnt but he was ready to murder Jane just because of assumption, which had no evidence to back it up.

    Pride posted: »

    It was a fight to the death, and you know it. Neither of them were willing to back down by the end of it. If Jane was on top of Kenny at the end, would it be any different? They were both wrong, there's no victim there.

  • Lee is pretty big enough to restrain Kenny.

  • edited September 2014

    Lee would've probably separated them...I don't know why is the game urging an 11 year old to shot...

    Rynna posted: »

    Because what was done was done. There was nobody to save at that point. Shooting Kenny will save Jane.

  • edited September 2014

    Jane's past of leaving people behind,including her little sister, and how she was visibly cautious of the baby in EP4 wasn't proof enough? Rebecca even called her out on that. To a person like Kenny who values family above all, he would never forgive Jane for leaving her own family behind.

    Anyone would have assumed she was capable of leaving the baby behind to save herself given her history. Who's ever going to expect that she's pulling a trick to prove a point in that kind of circumstance? In the middle of a snowstorm, surrounded by walkers, zero visibility and freezing cold, who's gonna stop and think: "Maybe she hid the baby in a car and is only doing this to prove something!"

    It was a reasonable assumption for Kenny and Clem to make.

    I know that she was changing for the best now that she began to care for Clem, but there was no way Kenny could know that. Even Clem is surprised AJ is alive when she finds him, and she knows Jane better than anyone else in the group.

    zykelator posted: »

    Jane knew what was going on, Kenny didnt but he was ready to murder Jane just because of assumption, which had no evidence to back it up.

  • Jane told that aj died, and kenny made his own conclusions about how it happened. In that situation, Kenny is the one trying to murder someone innocent just because he is angry and his judgement is clouded. Jane told Kenny that she wouldnt back down, so it was Kennys fault that the fight escalated.

    Pride posted: »

    I'm not saying he was right for doing it, but neither is Jane. Killing is killing no matter what.

  • Well the point is that Kenny is trying to murder someone innocent.

    Pride posted: »

    Molly wouldn't have pulled Jane's stunt with the baby in the first place.

  • edited September 2014

    Jane told that aj died

    Actually she didn't even say that. Kenny ran outside and came back assuming the baby was dead.... err that she murdered him on purpose.

    zykelator posted: »

    Jane told that aj died, and kenny made his own conclusions about how it happened. In that situation, Kenny is the one trying to murder someo

  • Damn Pride!. You tell it like it is!

    Pride posted: »

    Jane's past of leaving people behind,including her little sister, and how she was visibly cautious of the baby in EP4 wasn't proof enough? R

  • This made me lol harder than it should've. I'm imagining Kenny as a vampire and its a funny image.

  • Moral values? Kenny has never hurt Clementine and everything he has done has been for her safety and you think it is morally right to kill him? Logic, Kenny would do anything to protect Clementine!

    zykelator posted: »

    So you actually dont have any moral values or logic/rationality behind your decisions, you are just blindly following Kenny, no matter what he does.

  • Well Jane isn't innocent. Horrible example using Molly!

    zykelator posted: »

    Well the point is that Kenny is trying to murder someone innocent.

  • edited September 2014

    But don't you agree that it would never have happened in the first place if she never hid the baby?

    There was no right or wrong , they were both acting stupid.

    Jane's at fault for hiding the baby, and Kenny's at fault for letting his rage cloud his judgement. By the middle of the fight, neither of them were willing to back down anymore.

    zykelator posted: »

    Jane told that aj died, and kenny made his own conclusions about how it happened. In that situation, Kenny is the one trying to murder someo

  • Leaving her little sister behind was justified and merciful.

    I knew (or atleast i was very sure) that she didnt kill/leave behind the baby, mainly because she couldnt have been that calm after that. After killing random russian guy, she got very emotional, so there was no way that she could kill a baby and be calm as fuck.

    And the point was exactly that Kenny doesnt listen, he makes up his mind and acts on it. She just showed that you cant rationalize with Kenny, and he gets very violent (not someone you want to be around).

    Pride posted: »

    Jane's past of leaving people behind,including her little sister, and how she was visibly cautious of the baby in EP4 wasn't proof enough? R

  • Kenny's heart was in the right place. Jane was evil and toyed with his heart to prove a stupid point that ultimately killed her!

    Jane and Kenny are both insane. Jane was trying to show Clementine that Kenny is broken. that kenny will get everyone killed with his behavi

  • Well she said "He's..." I think we all can assume that the next word would have been "dead"

    Rockworm posted: »

    Jane told that aj died Actually she didn't even say that. Kenny ran outside and came back assuming the baby was dead.... err that she murdered him on purpose.

  • Yes. Not like Kenny would hear a word she had to say on the matter. His rage would not let up until she was a corpse. I thought that was obvious from the start.

    zykelator posted: »

    Well she said "He's..." I think we all can assume that the next word would have been "dead"

  • Yeah.. he was going to let go of the fact that he strongly thought that Jane had murdered his adopted baby. That really isn't reasonable. It was up to both of them to work it out, but Jane didn't do that because it went against her agenda. She wanted to fight, not rationalize.

    And her saying that she "won't back down" doesn't make what she did okay under any circumstance. Even when Kenny backed away from her she decided to use that opportunity to try and kill him. The fight could have ended there.

    zykelator posted: »

    Jane clearly stated that she wont back down. It was up to Kenny to cool down and let it go.

  • This.

    "his actions wouldve put Alvin JR in danger." HNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG. Not like Jane put Alvin

  • I dunno.... Its not like there were flesh eating zombies and slippery frozen water everywhere.

    Belan posted: »

    Well obviously if she didn't have the baby then what else could have possibly happened in terms of an "accident"?

  • edited September 2014

    Well obviously if she didn't have the baby then what else could have possibly happened in terms of an "accident"?

    Rockworm posted: »

    Jane told that aj died Actually she didn't even say that. Kenny ran outside and came back assuming the baby was dead.... err that she murdered him on purpose.

  • So if i would murder 2 of your friends, would it not hurt you?

    Its not morally right to let him murder Jane, in my opinion. (i know there are no absolute moral values, so talking about it is a bit subjective).

    Iacoucci77 posted: »

    Moral values? Kenny has never hurt Clementine and everything he has done has been for her safety and you think it is morally right to kill him? Logic, Kenny would do anything to protect Clementine!

  • edited September 2014

    But you're judging it as an expectator, if you were in that stressful situation, would you be able to stop and deduce that it was all just a test?

    Like I said, even Clementine, who was arguably Jane's best friend in the group, assumed the baby was dead 'til she found him on the car.

    "He's alive?!"

    zykelator posted: »

    Leaving her little sister behind was justified and merciful. I knew (or atleast i was very sure) that she didnt kill/leave behind the bab

  • How is Jane not innocent? She wasnt the one that tried to kill Kenny on purpose right from start. She tried to show that Kenny isnt safe to be around. Kenny is the one who escalated the fight to next level.

    ps. Molly was just an example. Kennys victim could be anyone...

    Iacoucci77 posted: »

    Well Jane isn't innocent. Horrible example using Molly!

  • There is so much more to it than that..

    zykelator posted: »

    Well the point is that Kenny is trying to murder someone innocent.

  • But she didn't assume she murdered the baby. I asked Kenny to hear Jane out.

    Pride posted: »

    But you're judging it as an expectator, if you were in that stressful situation, would you be able to stop and deduce that it was all just a

  • I dunno... Not like there were flesh eating zombies and frozen water all over the place.

    Belan posted: »

    Well obviously if she didn't have the baby then what else could have possibly happened in terms of an "accident"?

  • Then why was she surprised when she found the baby?

    If she asks "He's alive?!" I can only assume that she thought he was dead :T

    Rockworm posted: »

    But she didn't assume she murdered the baby. I asked Kenny to hear Jane out.

  • Jane stated right in the start that she wouldnt back down.

    You could ask yourself this, do you think Kenny wouldnt have tried to kill her, even if the baby died because of walkers? He wanted to Kill ben, even though he didnt directly cause his family to die. And if the baby died because of walkers, Jane was much more innocent than Ben.

    Theres a lot "ifs", but knowing how Kenny usually acts, i think he would have tried to kill Jane no matter how the baby died.

    Pride posted: »

    But don't you agree that it would never have happened in the first place if she never hid the baby? There was no right or wrong , they we

  • edited September 2014

    After killing random russian guy, she got very emotional

    That's a pretty big exaggeration.

    She had no problem with killing Troy as painfully as she could. Her only issue was killing the Russian guy was the fact that she didn't know him at all. I don't really think its a ringing endorsement for her being a good person.

    zykelator posted: »

    Leaving her little sister behind was justified and merciful. I knew (or atleast i was very sure) that she didnt kill/leave behind the bab

  • True, even if Clem tells her to run when Kenny gets stabbed and starts staggering around, she pushes her aside.

    At that point, she was going for the kill, too.

    Alt text

    Belan posted: »

    Yeah.. he was going to let go of the fact that he strongly thought that Jane had murdered his adopted baby. That really isn't reasonable. It

  • Jane is no friend to my Clem. She hasn't proven herself more then Kenny has!

    zykelator posted: »

    So if i would murder 2 of your friends, would it not hurt you? Its not morally right to let him murder Jane, in my opinion. (i know there are no absolute moral values, so talking about it is a bit subjective).

  • Alright, but that has nothing to do with the baby being alive or not. If the baby was alive why would she not have it? I'm not saying that an accident could not have happened, I'm only saying it would make no sense for her not to have the baby if it was still alive.

    Rockworm posted: »

    I dunno... Not like there were flesh eating zombies and frozen water all over the place.

  • edited September 2014

    Can you not distinguish between murder and accident? I said my Clem did not assume Jane murdered the baby. I did not say that she knew the baby was alive. The babies not dead? My reaction was "Great that proves you didn't murder him!" instead of "that fucking bitch how dare she manipulated Kenny like that!" Its always about how it effects Kenny... ALWAYS....

    I can't help but wonder what if the baby truly was dead and it was truly an accident? More than that what would you think of her then.

    Pride posted: »

    Then why was she surprised when she found the baby? If she asks "He's alive?!" I can only assume that she thought he was dead :T

  • She provoked him and at any point could have stopped the fight. She started by making fun of his family and the. His what he cared about most and knew it would lead to a fight. I went to stop her when the fight went outside, instead she tossed me to the ground and said " not happening" ! Jane is the one who started the fight and wanted it to go on no matter how much Kenny escalated it!

    zykelator posted: »

    How is Jane not innocent? She wasnt the one that tried to kill Kenny on purpose right from start. She tried to show that Kenny isnt safe to

  • Well if he would have actually stopped and wanted her to explain herself better, i dont think she would have had reason to provoke him to fight, but then her plan would have failed, and Kenny & Clem would most likely abandon her.
    She wanted to show that Kenny isnt able to change and that he is only going to get worse over time. Clearly Kenny did as she assumed and didnt want to listen.

    Kenny backed down because he just got slashed on stomach area with a knife.

    Belan posted: »

    Yeah.. he was going to let go of the fact that he strongly thought that Jane had murdered his adopted baby. That really isn't reasonable. It

  • I don't think I get your meaning. She showed what she did with the very much alive baby because its not dead.

    Belan posted: »

    Alright, but that has nothing to do with the baby being alive or not. If the baby was alive why would she not have it? I'm not saying that a

  • why are u having an argument

    wasnt lee YOU? ur basically talking about what you would do lol.

  • Well talking about how much Jane showed her emotions in the game, id say she was very emotional after killing that russian guy.

    Like ive told you before, Troy probably raped her or something, since she was so angry at him. You dont just shoot someone to dick for no reason.

    Belan posted: »

    After killing random russian guy, she got very emotional That's a pretty big exaggeration. She had no problem with killing Troy a

  • Clearly Jane was Clems friend in the game, no matter what you say. She saved her from the lake and taught you some survival skills and showed that she really cares about you. She was Clementines friend, but Clementine had known Kenny for longer time so obviously she and Kenny were closer than Jane and Clementine.

    Iacoucci77 posted: »

    Jane is no friend to my Clem. She hasn't proven herself more then Kenny has!

Sign in to comment in this discussion.