Scientific Proof That Jane > Kenny (Blatant Spoiler Warning)

edited September 2014 in The Walking Dead

Scientific Proof That Jane > Kenny

1) In season 1, Kenny was able to "Willfully Murder" Larry, who was evidently going to SURVIVE. (Literally, Kenny's first instinct was "Willful Murder").

2) In season 1, Kenny would literally let everyone die a slow painful death unless you did exactly what he wanted. (As Lee soon came to find out, in the event that he didn't agree with Kenny 100%).

3) When Clem falls through the ice... Who's there to help her? (JANE was)
-Meanwhile, Kenny is going BERSERK trying to kill some handicapped Russian kid, all the while neglecting Clem.

4) After Clem falls through the ice and is potentially DYING from hypothermia... Who's there to help her? (JANE was)
-Meanwhile, Kenny is going BERSERK and nearly torturing some handicapped Russian kid, all the while neglecting Clem.

5) Kenny is again willing to Murder Jane, where there's no scientific evidence showing Jane would have actually "went all the way" and murdered Kenny.

6) Kenny is statistically dangerous, and is always agitating the group. (This isn't really scientific, but we could all agree Kenny had a personality disorder that's detrimental to overall harmony and group ecology).

7) Kenny was irrational with the death of Sarita, and was on the verge of attacking / "Willfully Murdering" Clem.

8) At the end of season 2, when Clem is forced to defend Jane, Kenny actually admits to Clem, "You did the right thing". (What more evidence do you need that Kenny is irrational, erratic, dangerous, and the statistically poor choice?)

9) More evidence directly from Kenny when he admits that he can't be "Trusted" to protect AJ and Clem at the end of season 2.

10) Jane actually saved the entire group during the Russian attack, meanwhile Kenny was going "Berserk" yet again and arguably was "dead set" on "Willfully murdering" an innocent child. (Arvo).

11) -Speaking Russian-

«1

Comments

  • edited September 2014

    Alt text

  • Another hate thread...

    Wow

  • Posts his opinion @ calls it "Scientific proof" while bringing almost no good arguments.

    Bravo, sir, bravo.

  • Point 11 really made me see his side of things.

    Lingvort posted: »

    Posts his opinion @ calls it "Scientific proof" while bringing almost no good arguments. Bravo, sir, bravo.

  • but there is still a difference between Kenny's violent Loyalty and Janes (YOLO) tactics. Kenny thinks for the group while in my opinion Jane tared the group apart

  • You know, you might have sold me if you had said "willfully" a couple dozen more times.

  • And i thought i am the only one.

    Point 11 really made me see his side of things.

  • Yeah, really smart of him. It does indeed remove the veil from my eyes.

    Point 11 really made me see his side of things.

  • edited September 2014

    nikto ne zabotitsya o Dzheyn protiv Kenni

  • English motherfucker!

    -XYAB- posted: »

    nikto ne zabotitsya o Dzheyn protiv Kenni

  • I KILL EVERY ONE OF YOU... I mean nobody cares about jane against kenny

    lee4life posted: »

    English motherfucker!

  • I agree with pretty much everything you said, but this is not scientific. It's 100% opinionated and subjective and there is no "right choice". Only what we believe.

  • It's truly an irrefutable point.

    Slither29 posted: »

    And i thought i am the only one.

  • GET OUT HERE , OR I WON'T PUT A BULLET IN @Redwizards HEAD"

    -XYAB- posted: »

    I KILL EVERY ONE OF YOU... I mean nobody cares about jane against kenny

  • Alt text

    Lingvort posted: »

    Yeah, really smart of him. It does indeed remove the veil from my eyes.

  • i would go further and say it's the most important point ever

    It's truly an irrefutable point.

  • Pisat' translitom ochen' udobno, pravda?

    -XYAB- posted: »

    nikto ne zabotitsya o Dzheyn protiv Kenni

  • gr8 b8t m8 i r8 8/8

  • Then I won't leave.

    lee4life posted: »

    GET OUT HERE , OR I WON'T PUT A BULLET IN @Redwizards HEAD"

  • edited September 2014

    Sure , kot ste rekli moji kolegi commenter , 'translitom ochen '

    Lingvort posted: »

    Pisat' translitom ochen' udobno, pravda?

  • All other arguments, and all other points are now moot.

    Alt text

    Slither29 posted: »

    i would go further and say it's the most important point ever

  • You forgot the 8 in "i"

    gr8 b8t m8 i r8 8/8

  • Google recognizes your statement as Slovenian. Are you Slovenian?

    -XYAB- posted: »

    Sure , kot ste rekli moji kolegi commenter , 'translitom ochen '

  • psss...i'll you a secret...both sides are RIGHT....

  • edited September 2014

    I know how Kenny can leave Lee to die if he doesn't agree with everything he says or does in season 1. I didn't really know what to make of him in season 1 because of that and I wasn't sure how to feel about him in season 2 because he seemed different and I didn't know if it was in a good way or in a bad way.

    But for me the final choice of episode 5 was more about the present and who I felt was wrong in that particular situation, and for me it was Jane. I didn't like the way she lied, I felt betrayed and I was disappointed in her plus I couldn't bring myself to let Clem kill someone like that. And even if they were not close in season 1, she knows him better than Jane, he is her last connection to Lee and to what happened in season 1.

    I chose to stay with Kenny and leave Wellington and while I'm pretty satisfied with my ending I have seen the others and they are all valid. It's not a competition, there is no right or wrong choice, all endings have their positive and negative sides and all of then could prove to be either good or bad for Clem in the long run. All endings are interesting and allow us to see the different Clems that can potentially exist.

  • Da je pravilna , lahko vprašam , kje jeime Arvo iz ?

    Lingvort posted: »

    Google recognizes your statement as Slovenian. Are you Slovenian?

  • which argument you mean ?
    number 11 shine so bright ... i can't see anything

    Alt text

    All other arguments, and all other points are now moot.

  • edited September 2014

    I just thought you were writing in Russian (your original statement sounded too much like a Russian phrase), so I decided to respond. But, since you're not, we can resume speaking English, because I don't your sentence in it's entirety. "Da je pravilna" is "Yes, that is right", I guess, and Google helped me with the rest. Where Arvo is from? Russia, I guess, even though his name is Finnish in origin.

    -XYAB- posted: »

    Da je pravilna , lahko vprašam , kje jeime Arvo iz ?

  • edited September 2014

    The first thing i wrote was slovak, however i AM slovenian. I know many languages.

    Lingvort posted: »

    I just thought you were writing in Russian (your original statement sounded too much like a Russian phrase), so I decided to respond. But, s

  • edited September 2014

    I know many phrases from countries surrounding Russia, but i do not know much russian. And also that pisat translitom ochen sentence would be said slightly differently in slovenian

    Lingvort posted: »

    Well it's funny that the exact same statement can be said in Russian (even though it wouldn't be entirely correct, like with the "Nikto ne zabotitsya", it would've been "Nikogo ne volnuet", but that... is a story for another day).

  • Well it's funny that the exact same statement can be said in Russian (even though it wouldn't be entirely correct, like with the "Nikto ne zabotitsya", it would've been "Nikogo ne volnuet", but that... is a story for another day).

    -XYAB- posted: »

    The first thing i wrote was slovak, however i AM slovenian. I know many languages.

  • Do you have any idea what scientific proof actually is?

  • the translitom ochen sentence could also be said slightly different in slovenian

    Lingvort posted: »

    Well it's funny that the exact same statement can be said in Russian (even though it wouldn't be entirely correct, like with the "Nikto ne zabotitsya", it would've been "Nikogo ne volnuet", but that... is a story for another day).

  • I guess so.

    -XYAB- posted: »

    the translitom ochen sentence could also be said slightly different in slovenian

This discussion has been closed.