It surely was reference to the game and it is there...
Not in the context of your message. What, can't accept that you did insult him?
P.S: What kind of idiot would use an insult, no matter how meager it is, and then try to hide it as a "reference to the game"? I have no doubt that this line is indeed within the game, but I seriously doubt you used it as a reference and not an insult.
Well, since my comments were removed again, ill reply here.
We all know why you called CrazyGeorge "a whiny jerk", and it was definite… morely not to reference a game.
It surely was reference to the game and it is there...
ps. what kind of idiot would "insult" someone by saying "dont be a whiny jerk" anyway?
I would never even think about insulting someone with such a stupid line. I used it only because it was in the game and he was being idiot with his "troll!" comments.
ps. I tried to find a video where someone picked that line, but after 20 videos, i gave up . Seems like no one else picked that line, except me.
It surely was reference to the game and it is there...
Not in the context of your message. What, can't accept that you did insult hi… morem?
P.S: What kind of idiot would use an insult, no matter how meager it is, and then try to hide it as a "reference to the game"? I have no doubt that this line is indeed within the game, but I seriously doubt you used it as a reference and not an insult.
Well, since my comments were removed again, ill reply here.
We all know why you called CrazyGeorge "a whiny jerk", and it was definite… morely not to reference a game.
It surely was reference to the game and it is there...
ps. what kind of idiot would "insult" someone by saying "dont be a whiny jerk" anyway?
Both of you, Stop.
Lingvort, You need to stop making pre-assumptions of your own.
zykelator, You need to stop generalizing how the opposite opinion thinks.
Both Kenny fans and Jane fans are equally making it worse.
I would never even think about insulting someone with such a stupid line. I used it only because it was in the game and he was being idiot w… moreith his "troll!" comments.
ps. I tried to find a video where someone picked that line, but after 20 videos, i gave up . Seems like no one else picked that line, except me.
Well, put into quotation marks next time, just in case. That way it can be assumed it is a quote/reference.
As I said, I do not doubt its existence, just the way you used it. But, whatever, if that (supposedly) isn't the way you would insult somebody, I can accept that... for now.
I would never even think about insulting someone with such a stupid line. I used it only because it was in the game and he was being idiot w… moreith his "troll!" comments.
ps. I tried to find a video where someone picked that line, but after 20 videos, i gave up . Seems like no one else picked that line, except me.
Both of you, Stop.
Lingvort, You need to stop making pre-assumptions of your own.
zykelator, You need to stop generalizing how the opposite opinion thinks.
Both Kenny fans and Jane fans are equally making it worse.
I'm a Jane fan, Aye. A proud one ever since In Harm's Way, Unlike many others. But that has nothing to do with me trying to stop the drama and the non-respective conversation of the ending and its choices.
Make some sense instead of trying to pick a fight with me.
Provoking people on purpose in order to make them angry at you.
In this situation, you were the one provoking me by calling me a troll. I despise trolls even more than feminist or religious fanatics. Trolls are the worst kind of people and ruining things for people like me, who actually enjoy debating and having conversations about topics which are often easy targets for trolls.
Provoking people on purpose in order to make them angry at you.
In this situation, you were the one provoking me by calling me a troll. I… more despise trolls even more than feminist or religious fanatics. Trolls are the worst kind of people and ruining things for people like me, who actually enjoy debating and having conversations about topics which are often easy targets for trolls.
Oh, I am making sense, but you don't happen to understand it, therefore I'm not "making any sense" to you.
My point is, indeed, pretty relevant. You are a Jane fan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys".
You're trying to "stop the drama", but it is because of the likes of you and other Jane fans that it is still brewing. I'm not downplaying the role of Kenny fans in this, but I've only seen Jane fans going on with it, the most shining example in this thread is OP himself, with his most fancy third sentence.
I'm a Jane fan, Aye. A proud one ever since In Harm's Way, Unlike many others. But that has nothing to do with me trying to stop the drama a… morend the non-respective conversation of the ending and its choices.
Make some sense instead of trying to pick a fight with me.
Oh, I am making sense, but you don't happen to understand it, therefore I'm not "making any sense" to you.
My point is, indeed, pretty re… morelevant. You are a Jane fan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys".
You're trying to "stop the drama", but it is because of the likes of you and other Jane fans that it is still brewing. I'm not downplaying the role of Kenny fans in this, but I've only seen Jane fans going on with it, the most shining example in this thread is OP himself, with his most fancy third sentence.
This is a tragedy.
Some people won't get their much needed education from everything I previously said.
Anyway, if anyone missed the show, just scroll through my profile.
"Comment flagged for trolling", so, responding here.
"Nope, I understand my reasons to chose Jane".
Who's making the assumptions now? You're making the assumption that I said or somehow implied that I think your choice is incorrect or you're wrong for choosing it. Never did that. My original statement referred to the points I made, but, that's not relevant at the moment.
"I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, never happened, never will."
Awesome. This, however, doesn't include that fight with @Belan a few days ago, right? You can, of course, claim he's at fault here for making that remark about Jane, but (I'm making no assumptions here) you chose to fight and argue with him. And that did happen, and that is no assumption on my part, as you are so fond of pointing out. That statement is not an assumption, either, by the way.
"No, both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums."
I'll agree with that. The forums are a battleground, which it hasn't been in a long time, and that must change. But not today, I guess.
"Again, making assumptions of my motives."
That might sometimes be the case, and if it is, I do apologize. However, I don't make assumptions for most of the time, so it only applies in some situations.
"I just want this place to be a respectful community, that's all."
Calling threads "ruined by fanboys", engaging in arguments and some other things I haven't pointed out because otherwise I'd "make an assumption", even though I wouldn't have, does not make this community more respectful. Quite the opposite, I'd say.
Nope. This statement was only said to strengthen my point of view. That my reasons have nothing to do with others'.
It was never just about that remark, It was about his faulty way of debating and settling an old debt, To be honest.
It was indeed ruined because it drifted off-topic. Why had it drifted? Because of fanboys. Jane's and Kenny's. I believe that the mods should follow a stricter policy for now in order to wipe out the trolls.
"Comment flagged for trolling", so, responding here.
"Nope, I understand my reasons to chose Jane".
Who's making the assumptio… morens now? You're making the assumption that I said or somehow implied that I think your choice is incorrect or you're wrong for choosing it. Never did that. My original statement referred to the points I made, but, that's not relevant at the moment.
"I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, never happened, never will."
Awesome. This, however, doesn't include that fight with @Belan a few days ago, right? You can, of course, claim he's at fault here for making that remark about Jane, but (I'm making no assumptions here) you chose to fight and argue with him. And that did happen, and that is no assumption on my part, as you are so fond of pointing out. That statement is not an assumption, either, by the way.
"No, both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums."
… [view original content]
Flagged for "trolling", where none was exhibited. Yeah, hurray for the mods.
This was hardly relevant to the topic at hand. Your reasons for choosing Jane may be as well your own, but that was about me supposedly making pre-assumptions (which is a strange term, assumptions before assumptions? I assume before I assume?), and, then, you bring up the fact that you chose Jane for your own reasons. How does that strengthen your point of view, when it had no relevance to the argument is a mystery to me.
And that's how you want to run a "respectful community"? Calling someone's ways of thinking/debating "faulty", and "settling old debts"? Are you a mafia of some sort?
This situation is gotta be sorted out, yeah. But in no way this place will become more "fun", so to speak, if the mods employ stricter/harsher policies for dealing with this whole debacle.
Comment flagged for trolling. Long live the mods.
Nope. This statement was only said to strengthen my point of view. That my reasons have… more nothing to do with others'.
It was never just about that remark, It was about his faulty way of debating and settling an old debt, To be honest.
It was indeed ruined because it drifted off-topic. Why had it drifted? Because of fanboys. Jane's and Kenny's. I believe that the mods should follow a stricter policy for now in order to wipe out the trolls.
What? I don't get what you're trying to prove here.
Yes. Some people need to learn how to debate probably, Nothing is wrong about that. And, No, He started this by trying to push me before, It had to bite him back. But when the time was right. I don't forgive or forget when i get mistreated.
Flagged for "trolling", where none was exhibited. Yeah, hurray for the mods.
This was hardly relevant to the topic at hand. Your reasons … morefor choosing Jane may be as well your own, but that was about me supposedly making pre-assumptions (which is a strange term, assumptions before assumptions? I assume before I assume?), and, then, you bring up the fact that you chose Jane for your own reasons. How does that strengthen your point of view, when it had no relevance to the argument is a mystery to me.
And that's how you want to run a "respectful community"? Calling someone's ways of thinking/debating "faulty", and "settling old debts"? Are you a mafia of some sort?
This situation is gotta be sorted out, yeah. But in no way this place will become more "fun", so to speak, if the mods employ stricter/harsher policies for dealing with this whole debacle.
Look, how many times do I have to repeat myself? I did twice within the previous message. But, whatever.
I'm saying that I have never questioned your reasons for picking Jane. Ever. You had to bring it up as if I did question your reasons for that, or said that they are no different from everyone else's reasons. That is the point that I'm making as of late.
I won't argue with this point, and it's not because I agree with it wholeheartedly. The first part is reasonable, and I agree, yeah. The rest is your personal quarrel with Belan, I haven't witnessed it, so this pretty much ain't mah business. Just, again, old grudges don't help to make this community any more respectful. Just sayin' that out loud.
What? I don't get what you're trying to prove here.
Yes. Some people need to learn how to debate probably, Nothing is wrong about that. A… morend, No, He started this by trying to push me before, It had to bite him back. But when the time was right. I don't forgive or forget when i get mistreated.
"My point is, indeed, pretty relevant. You are a Jane fan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys"."
To which i replied with this comment:
"Nope. I understand and fully realize my reasons to chose Jane. I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, Never happened, Never will."
"No, Both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums."
"Again, Making assumptions of my motives. I just want this place to be a respectful community, That's all."
Just defending myself against your accusations of me attacking whoever disagrees with me.
So, You suggest i just let it slide? I don't let stuff of that kind slide.
Look, how many times do I have to repeat myself? I did twice within the previous message. But, whatever.
I'm saying that I have never que… morestioned your reasons for picking Jane. Ever. You had to bring it up as if I did question your reasons for that, or said that they are no different from everyone else's reasons. That is the point that I'm making as of late.
I won't argue with this point, and it's not because I agree with it wholeheartedly. The first part is reasonable, and I agree, yeah. The rest is your personal quarrel with Belan, I haven't witnessed it, so this pretty much ain't mah business. Just, again, old grudges don't help to make this community any more respectful. Just sayin' that out loud.
I already made a point about assumptions in one of my previous posts, they can be wrong sometimes, yeah, so I won't repeat myself again.
I may be wrong about being biased towards other Jane fans, or about attacking people with opposite point of view, but, tell me, am I wrong in saying that you don't defend Jane and her actions? And, I'll say it again, I never questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, alright? Not in the comment you quoted, that's for sure, and not anywhere else. Only that you sound biased towards Jane fans and attack Kenny fans, that much I may agree with. I might be wrong at that assumption, but I haven't questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, and that's the point you don't respond to.
Well, it's either the Old Testament's way, so to speak, "an eye for eye", or the New Testament's way. Frankly, I'm more in favour of the first one, otherwise I wouldn't be arguing with you for two days by now, but if you want a more respectful community, yeah, it's better to be the smarter side and ("Frozen" reference, lewl) let it go. Or, you could just sort this out with Belan, or whoever else may have wronged you, or whom you may have wronged, so you could let the old wounds rest and work to make this place a more respectful community you want it to be. Or, you (and, by the extension, me too) can go on arguing, and, from what I saw in almost every argument, respect between the arguing sides is borderline at best.
No, It's not like that at all.
This is a direct quote from one of you comments.
"My point is, indeed, pretty relevant. You are a Jane … morefan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys"."
To which i replied with this comment:
"Nope. I understand and fully realize my reasons to chose Jane. I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, Never happened, Never will."
"No, Both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums."
"Again, Making assumptions of my motives. I just want this place to be a respectful community, That's all."
Just defending myself against your accusat… [view original content]
I did attack Kenny fans because I've seen many of them stating their opinions as facts. I thought that the good side was a minority, But i was corrected. And I've never stated that you questioned my reasons, It was just there to strengthen my point as I've mentioned before. To prove that i have solid motives for backing Jane, But that I still respect and listen to others' motives, That I'm not biased.
An eye for an eye isn't always the right call. But i believe it was right in the situation with him. Not with you, Though.
I already made a point about assumptions in one of my previous posts, they can be wrong sometimes, yeah, so I won't repeat myself again.
… moreI may be wrong about being biased towards other Jane fans, or about attacking people with opposite point of view, but, tell me, am I wrong in saying that you don't defend Jane and her actions? And, I'll say it again, I never questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, alright? Not in the comment you quoted, that's for sure, and not anywhere else. Only that you sound biased towards Jane fans and attack Kenny fans, that much I may agree with. I might be wrong at that assumption, but I haven't questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, and that's the point you don't respond to.
Well, it's either the Old Testament's way, so to speak, "an eye for eye", or the New Testament's way. Frankly, I'm more in favour of the first one, otherwise I wouldn't be arguing with you for two days by now, but if you want a more… [view original content]
Well, I've seen some of your recent comments (with Zykelator, for example) and you do seem to be more or less neutral. That does negate some of my points, and for that I apologize.
Well, is it? "Turn the other cheek" in my opinion isn't always the best call, either. There should be some kind of balance between those, I reckon.
And why do you think you weren't right in the situation with me?
I did attack Kenny fans because I've seen many of them stating their opinions as facts. I thought that the good side was a minority, But i w… moreas corrected. And I've never stated that you questioned my reasons, It was just there to strengthen my point as I've mentioned before. To prove that i have solid motives for backing Jane, But that I still respect and listen to others' motives, That I'm not biased.
An eye for an eye isn't always the right call. But i believe it was right in the situation with him. Not with you, Though.
Well, I've seen some of your recent comments (with Zykelator, for example) and you do seem to be more or less neutral. That does negate some… more of my points, and for that I apologize.
Well, is it? "Turn the other cheek" in my opinion isn't always the best call, either. There should be some kind of balance between those, I reckon.
And why do you think you weren't right in the situation with me?
Nice guy? Well, I might disagree, I can be a dick sometimes, and the Lounge people (some of them, at least) won't agree either.
Well, I guess I did have a misconception about you. Our argument stands out a little bit due to me being able to check the evidence for some of your points in real time, without you pointing me in where to look, or giving me evidence within the posts. I could find some on my own, and this is good.
Well, I wouldn't call it "didn't retaliate", you pretty much went along till this very point. And I actually now respect you a bit more for that. Some of the guys I argued with before (cough Tobi-Is-A-Good-Boy cough) simply backed out of argument once they had nothing to say and simply started accusing me of something. You kept going, kudos to you for that.
Nice guy? Well, I might disagree, I can be a dick sometimes, and the Lounge people (some of them, at least) won't agree either.
Well, I g… moreuess I did have a misconception about you. Our argument stands out a little bit due to me being able to check the evidence for some of your points in real time, without you pointing me in where to look, or giving me evidence within the posts. I could find some on my own, and this is good.
Well, I wouldn't call it "didn't retaliate", you pretty much went along till this very point. And I actually now respect you a bit more for that. Some of the guys I argued with before (cough Tobi-Is-A-Good-Boy cough) simply backed out of argument once they had nothing to say and simply started accusing me of something. You kept going, kudos to you for that.
Now...
The Word is clear!
But originally, You're a respectful person. People snap, We have to understand that.
Believe me, That's the least retaliation i can do. But thanks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqbal6gF1Sg
But originally, You're a respectful person. People snap, We have to understand that.
Believe me, That's the least retaliation i can do. But thanks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqbal6gF1Sg
Let's face it, we're all douchebags at one point.
It's the ability to apologize, sort things out, and move on that really define us.
O… moreh, look! We got a hardcore Kenny fan, a Jane lover, and the one in the middle not throwing stones at each other.
Comments
Not in the context of your message. What, can't accept that you did insult him?
P.S: What kind of idiot would use an insult, no matter how meager it is, and then try to hide it as a "reference to the game"? I have no doubt that this line is indeed within the game, but I seriously doubt you used it as a reference and not an insult.
I would never even think about insulting someone with such a stupid line. I used it only because it was in the game and he was being idiot with his "troll!" comments.
ps. I tried to find a video where someone picked that line, but after 20 videos, i gave up
. Seems like no one else picked that line, except me.
Not "trolling" really. You just haven't shown the ability to consistently keep your responses civil.
Both of you, Stop.
Lingvort, You need to stop making pre-assumptions of your own.
zykelator, You need to stop generalizing how the opposite opinion thinks.
Both Kenny fans and Jane fans are equally making it worse.
Well should they be marked as offensive or something else, since its not trolling?
I generalize, because its much easier than adding "some, most which ive seen" infront every sentence about Kenny fans.
Still going. I haven't said anything that wasn't true.
Well, put into quotation marks next time, just in case. That way it can be assumed it is a quote/reference.
As I said, I do not doubt its existence, just the way you used it. But, whatever, if that (supposedly) isn't the way you would insult somebody, I can accept that... for now.
[removed]
So do you know the definition of word "trolling"?
I'm a Jane fan, Aye. A proud one ever since In Harm's Way, Unlike many others. But that has nothing to do with me trying to stop the drama and the non-respective conversation of the ending and its choices.
Make some sense instead of trying to pick a fight with me.
Do you?
Wow, guys. Aren't you slowly getting exhausted?
I'm pretty much done. I'm too smart to fall for Ondore's lies.
You don't know how others form their own opinions. Everyone has pretty much different interpretations of the choice and how they'll handle it and why.
This is a tragedy.
Some people won't get their much needed education from everything I previously said.
Anyway, if anyone missed the show, just scroll through my profile.
Provoking people on purpose in order to make them angry at you.
In this situation, you were the one provoking me by calling me a troll. I despise trolls even more than feminist or religious fanatics. Trolls are the worst kind of people and ruining things for people like me, who actually enjoy debating and having conversations about topics which are often easy targets for trolls.
I'm done with you.
Oh, I am making sense, but you don't happen to understand it, therefore I'm not "making any sense" to you.
My point is, indeed, pretty relevant. You are a Jane fan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys".
You're trying to "stop the drama", but it is because of the likes of you and other Jane fans that it is still brewing. I'm not downplaying the role of Kenny fans in this, but I've only seen Jane fans going on with it, the most shining example in this thread is OP himself, with his most fancy third sentence.
Well i surely hope you do. If you see my comments, just dont reply and ill do the same for you.
Nope. I understand and fully realize my reasons to chose Jane. I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, Never happened, Never will.
No, Both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums.
Again, Making assumptions of my motives. I just want this place to be a respectful community, That's all.
We shall mourn the loss at dawn
"Comment flagged for trolling", so, responding here.
Who's making the assumptions now? You're making the assumption that I said or somehow implied that I think your choice is incorrect or you're wrong for choosing it. Never did that. My original statement referred to the points I made, but, that's not relevant at the moment.
Awesome. This, however, doesn't include that fight with @Belan a few days ago, right? You can, of course, claim he's at fault here for making that remark about Jane, but (I'm making no assumptions here) you chose to fight and argue with him. And that did happen, and that is no assumption on my part, as you are so fond of pointing out. That statement is not an assumption, either, by the way.
I'll agree with that. The forums are a battleground, which it hasn't been in a long time, and that must change. But not today, I guess.
That might sometimes be the case, and if it is, I do apologize. However, I don't make assumptions for most of the time, so it only applies in some situations.
Calling threads "ruined by fanboys", engaging in arguments and some other things I haven't pointed out because otherwise I'd "make an assumption", even though I wouldn't have, does not make this community more respectful. Quite the opposite, I'd say.
Comment flagged for trolling. Long live the mods.
Nope. This statement was only said to strengthen my point of view. That my reasons have nothing to do with others'.
It was never just about that remark, It was about his faulty way of debating and settling an old debt, To be honest.
It was indeed ruined because it drifted off-topic. Why had it drifted? Because of fanboys. Jane's and Kenny's. I believe that the mods should follow a stricter policy for now in order to wipe out the trolls.
Flagged for "trolling", where none was exhibited. Yeah, hurray for the mods.
This was hardly relevant to the topic at hand. Your reasons for choosing Jane may be as well your own, but that was about me supposedly making pre-assumptions (which is a strange term, assumptions before assumptions? I assume before I assume?), and, then, you bring up the fact that you chose Jane for your own reasons. How does that strengthen your point of view, when it had no relevance to the argument is a mystery to me.
And that's how you want to run a "respectful community"? Calling someone's ways of thinking/debating "faulty", and "settling old debts"? Are you a mafia of some sort?
This situation is gotta be sorted out, yeah. But in no way this place will become more "fun", so to speak, if the mods employ stricter/harsher policies for dealing with this whole debacle.
What? I don't get what you're trying to prove here.
Yes. Some people need to learn how to debate probably, Nothing is wrong about that. And, No, He started this by trying to push me before, It had to bite him back. But when the time was right. I don't forgive or forget when i get mistreated.
Those two combined gave me a hardcore laugh.
Look, how many times do I have to repeat myself? I did twice within the previous message. But, whatever.
I'm saying that I have never questioned your reasons for picking Jane. Ever. You had to bring it up as if I did question your reasons for that, or said that they are no different from everyone else's reasons. That is the point that I'm making as of late.
I won't argue with this point, and it's not because I agree with it wholeheartedly. The first part is reasonable, and I agree, yeah. The rest is your personal quarrel with Belan, I haven't witnessed it, so this pretty much ain't mah business. Just, again, old grudges don't help to make this community any more respectful. Just sayin' that out loud.
The same reason people fight over the existence of a creator. It is just a matter on who is right.
No, It's not like that at all.
This is a direct quote from one of you comments.
"My point is, indeed, pretty relevant. You are a Jane fan, and that's fine. But, every time you come in such threads, you are obviously biased towards your compatriots, so to speak, and that is no pre-assumption on my part. You defend Jane and her actions, attack people with opposite point of view than yours, and post in random threads talking about "Kenny vs. Jane" choice that it is "ruined by fanboys", which are, of course, Kenny's "fanboys"."
To which i replied with this comment:
"Nope. I understand and fully realize my reasons to chose Jane. I've never judged anyone for choosing the opposite side, Never happened, Never will."
"No, Both sides have biased fans that ruin the fun of the forums."
"Again, Making assumptions of my motives. I just want this place to be a respectful community, That's all."
Just defending myself against your accusations of me attacking whoever disagrees with me.
So, You suggest i just let it slide? I don't let stuff of that kind slide.
I already made a point about assumptions in one of my previous posts, they can be wrong sometimes, yeah, so I won't repeat myself again.
I may be wrong about being biased towards other Jane fans, or about attacking people with opposite point of view, but, tell me, am I wrong in saying that you don't defend Jane and her actions? And, I'll say it again, I never questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, alright? Not in the comment you quoted, that's for sure, and not anywhere else. Only that you sound biased towards Jane fans and attack Kenny fans, that much I may agree with. I might be wrong at that assumption, but I haven't questioned your reasons for choosing Jane, and that's the point you don't respond to.
Well, it's either the Old Testament's way, so to speak, "an eye for eye", or the New Testament's way. Frankly, I'm more in favour of the first one, otherwise I wouldn't be arguing with you for two days by now, but if you want a more respectful community, yeah, it's better to be the smarter side and ("Frozen" reference, lewl) let it go. Or, you could just sort this out with Belan, or whoever else may have wronged you, or whom you may have wronged, so you could let the old wounds rest and work to make this place a more respectful community you want it to be. Or, you (and, by the extension, me too) can go on arguing, and, from what I saw in almost every argument, respect between the arguing sides is borderline at best.
I did attack Kenny fans because I've seen many of them stating their opinions as facts. I thought that the good side was a minority, But i was corrected. And I've never stated that you questioned my reasons, It was just there to strengthen my point as I've mentioned before. To prove that i have solid motives for backing Jane, But that I still respect and listen to others' motives, That I'm not biased.
An eye for an eye isn't always the right call. But i believe it was right in the situation with him. Not with you, Though.
Well, I've seen some of your recent comments (with Zykelator, for example) and you do seem to be more or less neutral. That does negate some of my points, and for that I apologize.
Well, is it? "Turn the other cheek" in my opinion isn't always the best call, either. There should be some kind of balance between those, I reckon.
And why do you think you weren't right in the situation with me?
You're a nice guy, You're the mad prophet.
I figured that you had a misconception about me, That's why i didn't retaliate.
Nice guy? Well, I might disagree, I can be a dick sometimes, and the Lounge people (some of them, at least) won't agree either.
Well, I guess I did have a misconception about you. Our argument stands out a little bit due to me being able to check the evidence for some of your points in real time, without you pointing me in where to look, or giving me evidence within the posts. I could find some on my own, and this is good.
Well, I wouldn't call it "didn't retaliate", you pretty much went along till this very point. And I actually now respect you a bit more for that. Some of the guys I argued with before (cough Tobi-Is-A-Good-Boy cough) simply backed out of argument once they had nothing to say and simply started accusing me of something. You kept going, kudos to you for that.
Now...
The Word is clear!
But originally, You're a respectful person. People snap, We have to understand that.
Believe me, That's the least retaliation i can do. But thanks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wqbal6gF1Sg
Well, I'm definitely glad we sorted this out.
Let's face it, we're all douchebags at one point.
It's the ability to apologize, sort things out, and move on that really define us.
Oh, look! We got a hardcore Kenny fan, a Jane lover, and the one in the middle not throwing stones at each other.
Look, I've had a lovely supper with my wife, and all I said to my wife was "That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah!".