Why would Clem kill anyone out of anger? Leaving that baby would be objective and calculative decision, just like leaving Sarah behind, or taking cover instead of trying to save AJ.
Why would Clem kill anyone out of anger? Leaving that baby would be objective and calculative decision, just like leaving Sarah behind, or taking cover instead of trying to save AJ.
Why would Clem kill anyone out of anger? Leaving that baby would be objective and calculative decision, just like leaving Sarah behind, or taking cover instead of trying to save AJ.
Well I've been waiting for a ditch AJ option so by all means if that option means Clem kills AJ I'd be fine with it, and if she becomes Carver I'd support her there as well because I loved Carver as a character and I love antagonists.
If Clem becomes Carver then she isn't Clem anymore so that's pointless...
Jokes aside, that is SERIOUSLY out of character for Clementine, Clem would only kill the baby if it was bitten.
JANE! serriously! not evryone can be okay with a baby starving to death in the cold, what you saying right now is wrong! i know its your opinion, but a FUCKING BABY?! im starting to think some of you people here need therapy
I care about Clem's survival more than a baby I have no connections too. I will quote a very wise man "That girl and I have been through more than you can imagine! ANYBODY WHO GETS BETWEEN ME AND HER ARE GONNA WIND UP DEAD!!!" this means I will sacrifice a baby for her survival.
JANE! serriously! not evryone can be okay with a baby starving to death in the cold, what you saying right now is wrong! i know its your opinion, but a FUCKING BABY?! im starting to think some of you people here need therapy
She would start to become very unlikeable if she killed innocent people for bad reasons like Cravers (over blue berries seriously!?!?). Then again Clementine is you (the player) so making your choices that would make you kill a baby or at the very least become like Carver, you the payer would just want to leave.... yourself. But if you weren't playin as Clem as everyone has said it would just seem out of character.
I understand your point, however, without babies or offspring, any race would die. While I would not leave Clem behind, I would still chastise her for killing or leaving AJ behind. Even though raising a baby in the ZA would be difficult, it is necessary in order for the survivors to live on.
I care about Clem's survival more than a baby I have no connections too. I will quote a very wise man "That girl and I have been through mor… moree than you can imagine! ANYBODY WHO GETS BETWEEN ME AND HER ARE GONNA WIND UP DEAD!!!" this means I will sacrifice a baby for her survival.
Comments
If Clem becomes Carver then she isn't Clem anymore so that's pointless...
Jokes aside, that is SERIOUSLY out of character for Clementine, Clem would only kill the baby if it was bitten.
Ask the OP.
no i think the OP meant like kill on purpose not leaving it behind.
Its the same thing basically. Except if you leave it behind, it dies from natural causes. Starvation & cold.
for the last time people!! WHAT IF SITUATION!
so you would kill a baby????
Da Fauq is wrong with you?!
but the thing is, if clem becomes like carver the only one she cares about would be your character.
JANE! serriously! not evryone can be okay with a baby starving to death in the cold, what you saying right now is wrong! i know its your opinion, but a FUCKING BABY?! im starting to think some of you people here need therapy
What do you mean?
So if I was a character called "X" she would only care for him?
And if so, if she cares about me, then its not that much of a problem then.
You can kill kenny out of anger after he murders Jane. Just saying.
I care about Clem's survival more than a baby I have no connections too. I will quote a very wise man "That girl and I have been through more than you can imagine! ANYBODY WHO GETS BETWEEN ME AND HER ARE GONNA WIND UP DEAD!!!" this means I will sacrifice a baby for her survival.
(?) AJ may or may not remember that
Test? What test? The test of keeping a person who murders people without a valid reason in your group because of nostalgia?
Yeah, obviously.
Obviously most people arent ok with such act. It doesnt make it wrong still, since right and wrong are very subjective.
She would start to become very unlikeable if she killed innocent people for bad reasons like Cravers (over blue berries seriously!?!?). Then again Clementine is you (the player) so making your choices that would make you kill a baby or at the very least become like Carver, you the payer would just want to leave.... yourself. But if you weren't playin as Clem as everyone has said it would just seem out of character.
I like your profile picture Green!!! New Season starts tomorrow!! :DD
Thank you! And I'm so hype too lol!
It's going to be awesome!:)
It will be, after what they set from book 3, I expect nothing less.
I understand your point, however, without babies or offspring, any race would die. While I would not leave Clem behind, I would still chastise her for killing or leaving AJ behind. Even though raising a baby in the ZA would be difficult, it is necessary in order for the survivors to live on.
uhhhh what is dis?
i love what you said there,
loving clem no matter what.
yep, i accidently did that than and i flipped the fuck out... so i kicked my xbox and it turned off so i could try again
I'll always have her back no matter what she does!
Haha that was an intense turn in her character, if you chose to do it and go through with it, that ending plays different music than all the others.
F YEAH! CLEMENTINE!!!
and TOPH
Clementine wouldn't do that in the first place...?
serriously. WHAT. IS. DIS?