If they were a rapist, or killed someone not in self defense, I would execute them. If not, I would take them with me, but they would be heavily guarded.
EDIT Changed my mind, would leave the ones who didn't commit a serious offense tied up with some food and water.
What are you going to do after though? You can't just keep them prisoners forever? Or what about before? How are you going you going to unarm everyone?
Like i've mentioned before in this thread, op wasnt clear about the situation you are in. If you are a traveler, there is no point to kill the bandits, but if they attacked your base, there is a reason to kill them. You cant leave bunch of bandits alive after they attack your base, but if you just come across them while travelling, whats the point of killing them if they arent a threat to you anymore?
What are you going to do after though? You can't just keep them prisoners forever? Or what about before? How are you going you going to unarm everyone?
If I was at the base then it would likely go as I had originally typed. If I were on the road then I'm not sure. Chances are I would carry out the same task. Because the could follow me, especially with a little contempt lifting their heels.
op wasnt very clear about your situation in this scenario. If they attacked your base, then there is a reason to kill them, but if you are j… moreust a traveler, whats the point of killing bandits, you most likely wont ever see again? Would this affect how you behave, or would just you kill them simply to satisfy your own needs?
So killing makes you literally as bad as the leader of a regime that killed over 6 million people. Don't tell that to Lee, who slaughters h… morealf a dozen people in Episode 3.
When it comes to survival, killing is a matter of pragmatism. That being said, I abhor how casually it's thrown around by people who, without any irony, froth at the mouth about wanting to kill a boy whom they robbed, or wanting to visit death upon Bonnie and Mike for abandoning Clem, or delighting in causing the painful death of a traumatized innocent girl.
There are irredeemable, powerful people like Carver. Killing him is necessary, and indeed giving him a taste of the pain he's visited upon others is just. That does not make it equally right to murder everyone who stands in your way.
Like i've mentioned before in this thread, op wasnt clear about the situation you are in. If you are a traveler, there is no point to kill t… morehe bandits, but if they attacked your base, there is a reason to kill them. You cant leave bunch of bandits alive after they attack your base, but if you just come across them while travelling, whats the point of killing them if they arent a threat to you anymore?
Theif, rapist, murderer, I'd drop them off a safe distance from me and never see the fucker again. No one deserves death or mutilation, what is this, the Middle Ages?
Welcome back.
If I was at the base then it would likely go as I had originally typed. If I were on the road then I'm not sure. Chances ar… moree I would carry out the same task. Because the could follow me, especially with a little contempt lifting their heels.
I suppose people could have different decisions based on if they were traveling or not, however I was asking this question in more of a way to see how peoples morals would effect how they deal with them so in your case I guess you could say you were travelling, got attacked, but turned the tables so you and your group members had control and had them unarmed, tied up, and at gunpoint. I have always had my morality fluctuate from time to time, like if you asked me a year ago I would have said people who commit crimes like murder and rape deserve to be tortured, then if you asked me a month ago I would have said nobody ever deserves to be tortured and all that however throughout my whole life Ive always had an uncontrolable anger that is very hard to trigger and the only things that could would be something like seeing someone try to rape someone or doing something horrible to someone else or attacking me so at that point i dont really have a moral decision and im pretty much forced by myself to try to hurt them as much as possible and it might go even farther if they were bandits in the apocalypse and there were no laws restricting me from stabbing the fuck out of them
How does this make you any better than the bandits? And also, what is the situation? Are you on the road? Do you have base camp? If the band… moreits actually attack your base, then there is a reason to kill them, but if you are just a traveler, whats the point of killing them after they are no longer a threat to you?
it seems like the "moral" people are the only ones wanting to murder or harm others. I cant see any rational reason to murder or cause agony to these bandits in this scenario, i would just take their stuff and let them go.
I suppose people could have different decisions based on if they were traveling or not, however I was asking this question in more of a way … moreto see how peoples morals would effect how they deal with them so in your case I guess you could say you were travelling, got attacked, but turned the tables so you and your group members had control and had them unarmed, tied up, and at gunpoint. I have always had my morality fluctuate from time to time, like if you asked me a year ago I would have said people who commit crimes like murder and rape deserve to be tortured, then if you asked me a month ago I would have said nobody ever deserves to be tortured and all that however throughout my whole life Ive always had an uncontrolable anger that is very hard to trigger and the only things that could would be something like seeing someone try to rape someone or doing something horrible to someone else or attacking me so at that point i dont really have a m… [view original content]
Well you can still be a good person but sometimes do bad things, for example in the show when Rick, Carl, Daryl, and Michonne were attacked and held at gunpoint by bandits, after Rick fought back and a majority of the other bandits were already shot he saw one of the bandits trying to rape Carl and he ran over, took out his knife and mutilated the dude even though he could have used the gun that he used on the other bandits, does that mean Rick is a bad and immoral guy? No, he had a understandable rage, he didn't really even choose to do that, he just had to, even after when Daryl talked to him about it Rick said that what he did was a part of who he is, that still doesn't mean hes as bad as those bandits for going out of control when seeing his son about to be raped, I was just as mad as Rick was and the whole thing was just in a TV show
it seems like the "moral" people are the only ones wanting to murder or harm others. I cant see any rational reason to murder or cause agony to these bandits in this scenario, i would just take their stuff and let them go.
Well you can still be a good person but sometimes do bad things, for example in the show when Rick, Carl, Daryl, and Michonne were attacked … moreand held at gunpoint by bandits, after Rick fought back and a majority of the other bandits were already shot he saw one of the bandits trying to rape Carl and he ran over, took out his knife and mutilated the dude even though he could have used the gun that he used on the other bandits, does that mean Rick is a bad and immoral guy? No, he had a understandable rage, he didn't really even choose to do that, he just had to, even after when Daryl talked to him about it Rick said that what he did was a part of who he is, that still doesn't mean hes as bad as those bandits for going out of control when seeing his son about to be raped, I was just as mad as Rick was and the whole thing was just in a TV show
So if it was your kid that you were about to be forced to watch be raped, your telling me you wold honestly be able to control your anger? Sometimes good people can do bad things, everyone has so are you saying everyones evil?
So if it was your kid that you were about to be forced to watch be raped, your telling me you wold honestly be able to control your anger? Sometimes good people can do bad things, everyone has so are you saying everyones evil?
No? I think Ricks a good person because he never does anything really evil and if you brutally murder someone for no reason and have complete self control at the time then your a bad person, but if someone attacks you, tries to both rob and kill you as well as attempts to rape someone you care about and you get mad and brutally slaughter them, that doesn't make you a bad person, its a completely understandable course of action to do that to someone after what they did to you and others you care about.
So your opinion about Rick is based on one scene?
Good people can do bad things, but theres difference between just "accidently" killing someone in anger and brutally murdering someone.
I think Ricks a good person because he never does anything really evil and if you brutally murder someone for no reason and have complete self control at the time then your a bad person
So only emotional people are justified to murder others? Ok.
but if someone attacks you, tries to both rob and kill you as well as attempts to rape someone you care about and you get mad and brutally slaughter them, that doesn't make you a bad person
Killing someone to save yourself isnt bad, causing pain to satisfy your own selfish needs is bad and pretty sick.
No? I think Ricks a good person because he never does anything really evil and if you brutally murder someone for no reason and have complet… moree self control at the time then your a bad person, but if someone attacks you, tries to both rob and kill you as well as attempts to rape someone you care about and you get mad and brutally slaughter them, that doesn't make you a bad person, its a completely understandable course of action to do that to someone after what they did to you and others you care about.
Something heated must have gone down in order for me to have captured them in the first place. Just because you doubt it doesn't mean it won't happen... Arvo.
Something heated must have gone down in order for me to have captured them in the first place. Just because you doubt it doesn't mean it won't happen... Arvo.
"Improbable," not impossible. If any of them are slightly trained in tracking I could have a huge backlash in the making. Something I'm probably not willing to chance.
Theif, rapist, murderer, I'd drop them off a safe distance from me and never see the fucker again. No one deserves death or mutilation, what is this, the Middle Ages?
But then you are a murderer, taking their life. Then someone has to kill you, then someone kill them and so on. Infinite regression.
No, no one deserves death. Not even Hitler.
No. That's different. The murderer took away someones life without a reason , we kill the murderer for justice , for a suitable punishment. He deserves to die because he killed someone without a valid reason , we kill him because we have a valid reason. Killing someone for no reason is a horrible act and should not go unpunished / they should get a fair punishments. Getting what you gave , I think that's a fair punishment.
But then you are a murderer, taking their life. Then someone has to kill you, then someone kill them and so on. Infinite regression.
No, no one deserves death. Not even Hitler.
Kenny surviving in that alley was improbable, finding wellington was improbable, surviving that long in the za was improbable. twdg writers love to make improbable things to happen.
Bandits, which you allowed to live, wouldnt have any motives to first go back to their base camp (if they had one) and get supplies and guns, just so they could track you down and kill you as "revenge".
"Improbable," not impossible. If any of them are slightly trained in tracking I could have a huge backlash in the making. Something I'm probably not willing to chance.
Kenny surviving in that alley was improbable, finding wellington was improbable, surviving that long in the za was improbable. twdg writers … morelove to make improbable things to happen.
Bandits, which you allowed to live, wouldnt have any motives to first go back to their base camp (if they had one) and get supplies and guns, just so they could track you down and kill you as "revenge".
So what did i do now? I gave you good examples which came to my mind. I could give you more examples, if that satisfies you and convinces that im not trying to go off-topic.
Comments
If they were a rapist, or killed someone not in self defense, I would execute them. If not, I would take them with me, but they would be heavily guarded.
EDIT Changed my mind, would leave the ones who didn't commit a serious offense tied up with some food and water.
You have captured them (for some reason) and they are unarmed. Killing them wouldnt be self defense.
What are you going to do after though? You can't just keep them prisoners forever? Or what about before? How are you going you going to unarm everyone?
Like i've mentioned before in this thread, op wasnt clear about the situation you are in. If you are a traveler, there is no point to kill the bandits, but if they attacked your base, there is a reason to kill them. You cant leave bunch of bandits alive after they attack your base, but if you just come across them while travelling, whats the point of killing them if they arent a threat to you anymore?
Welcome back.
If I was at the base then it would likely go as I had originally typed. If I were on the road then I'm not sure. Chances are I would carry out the same task. Because the could follow me, especially with a little contempt lifting their heels.
kill everyone. no matter who...
My point is: What you do, and how you do it, defines who and what you are as a person.
I was speaking about the principle.
They could follow you though.
Theif, rapist, murderer, I'd drop them off a safe distance from me and never see the fucker again. No one deserves death or mutilation, what is this, the Middle Ages?
I'd handcuff them, take their clothes off and make them read the Bible... oh, wait, that's DayZ...
Armchair commando, huh?
I would drive him far, far away and never see him again. We don't kill the living!
Well i doubt they would spend time tracking someone who could have killed them but decided to spare their lives.
After you spare their lives? Unlikely.
I suppose people could have different decisions based on if they were traveling or not, however I was asking this question in more of a way to see how peoples morals would effect how they deal with them so in your case I guess you could say you were travelling, got attacked, but turned the tables so you and your group members had control and had them unarmed, tied up, and at gunpoint. I have always had my morality fluctuate from time to time, like if you asked me a year ago I would have said people who commit crimes like murder and rape deserve to be tortured, then if you asked me a month ago I would have said nobody ever deserves to be tortured and all that however throughout my whole life Ive always had an uncontrolable anger that is very hard to trigger and the only things that could would be something like seeing someone try to rape someone or doing something horrible to someone else or attacking me so at that point i dont really have a moral decision and im pretty much forced by myself to try to hurt them as much as possible and it might go even farther if they were bandits in the apocalypse and there were no laws restricting me from stabbing the fuck out of them
it seems like the "moral" people are the only ones wanting to murder or harm others. I cant see any rational reason to murder or cause agony to these bandits in this scenario, i would just take their stuff and let them go.
Eat them.
Who knows, people are different.
Well you can still be a good person but sometimes do bad things, for example in the show when Rick, Carl, Daryl, and Michonne were attacked and held at gunpoint by bandits, after Rick fought back and a majority of the other bandits were already shot he saw one of the bandits trying to rape Carl and he ran over, took out his knife and mutilated the dude even though he could have used the gun that he used on the other bandits, does that mean Rick is a bad and immoral guy? No, he had a understandable rage, he didn't really even choose to do that, he just had to, even after when Daryl talked to him about it Rick said that what he did was a part of who he is, that still doesn't mean hes as bad as those bandits for going out of control when seeing his son about to be raped, I was just as mad as Rick was and the whole thing was just in a TV show
I'd kill a rapist/murderer and beat thief to let him go later.
No you cant and Rick isnt a good guy. You cant be good guy and just sometimes brutally murder others.
So if it was your kid that you were about to be forced to watch be raped, your telling me you wold honestly be able to control your anger? Sometimes good people can do bad things, everyone has so are you saying everyones evil?
So your opinion about Rick is based on one scene?
Good people can do bad things, but theres difference between just "accidently" killing someone in anger and brutally murdering someone.
No? I think Ricks a good person because he never does anything really evil and if you brutally murder someone for no reason and have complete self control at the time then your a bad person, but if someone attacks you, tries to both rob and kill you as well as attempts to rape someone you care about and you get mad and brutally slaughter them, that doesn't make you a bad person, its a completely understandable course of action to do that to someone after what they did to you and others you care about.
THIS.
So only emotional people are justified to murder others? Ok.
Killing someone to save yourself isnt bad, causing pain to satisfy your own selfish needs is bad and pretty sick.
Something heated must have gone down in order for me to have captured them in the first place. Just because you doubt it doesn't mean it won't happen... Arvo.
That situation was improbable, since how would they known where they are going and where to ambush them? That happened just for sake of story.
"Improbable," not impossible. If any of them are slightly trained in tracking I could have a huge backlash in the making. Something I'm probably not willing to chance.
Well i am insane. Sometimes when i get in fights i don't want to stop. I really hate thieves. I probably would just cut a hand off, and let them go.
So no one? Not even a murderer deserves death? Why? If they took someones life I'd say it's pretty fair to take theirs.
But then you are a murderer, taking their life. Then someone has to kill you, then someone kill them and so on. Infinite regression.
No, no one deserves death. Not even Hitler.
Hitler doctor's were prescribing him all sorts of mind altering drugs. Makes you wonder if he wasn't on the drugs, would the holocaust of happened.
No. That's different. The murderer took away someones life without a reason , we kill the murderer for justice , for a suitable punishment. He deserves to die because he killed someone without a valid reason , we kill him because we have a valid reason. Killing someone for no reason is a horrible act and should not go unpunished / they should get a fair punishments. Getting what you gave , I think that's a fair punishment.
Kenny surviving in that alley was improbable, finding wellington was improbable, surviving that long in the za was improbable. twdg writers love to make improbable things to happen.
Bandits, which you allowed to live, wouldnt have any motives to first go back to their base camp (if they had one) and get supplies and guns, just so they could track you down and kill you as "revenge".
Interesting, didn't know that. Guess we'll never know.
He was on Crystal Meth. Here is the article if your interested. Food for thought.
"Meth Harm
SHORT-TERM EFFECTS
LONG-TERM EFFECTS
Spagetti SAUCE
Another Sauce
And there it is. Whatever zyke.
Viva out.
So what did i do now? I gave you good examples which came to my mind. I could give you more examples, if that satisfies you and convinces that im not trying to go off-topic.