No Episode 5: No Going Back Review from IGN?

I was just curious, does anybody know why IGN never did a review for No Going Back? They reviewed all the episodes of the last season and then did a full season review of it after that too...but I'm just finding it odd that about two months down the line after Season 2 finished, they still haven't done any kind of video review on the finale, despite having covered every episode until then and being the ones behind the Playing Dead shows too.

Does anybody know why? o_o

Comments

  • They did a review.

    It's right here.

  • Oh, um....I-I knew that was there, honest T_T oops..

    But I meant like the video reviews, I'm just surprised they didn't do one. But thanks for the link anyways :)

    HarjKS posted: »

    They did a review. It's right here.

  • Its not like IGN reviews aren't paid reviews.

  • I'm sorry, what?

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    Its not like IGN reviews aren't paid reviews.

  • IGN writers are paid for giving good reviews. I wouldn't trust their shit.

    HarjKS posted: »

    I'm sorry, what?

  • Wait, that's the review? I thought it was this one:

    http://ie.ign.com/articles/2014/08/26/the-walking-dead-season-2-episode-5-review

    Lilacsbloom posted: »

    Oh, um....I-I knew that was there, honest T_T oops.. But I meant like the video reviews, I'm just surprised they didn't do one. But thanks for the link anyways

  • I never believed that to be honest, even if one reviewer gives the game a way too high of a score for it's quality. Every reviewer there has their own opinions.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    IGN writers are paid for giving good reviews. I wouldn't trust their shit.

  • CrazyGeorgeCrazyGeorge Banned
    edited October 2014

    Proof, If you don't understand this please ask. I will explain it.

    Rome 2 Review @ release on IGN.

    Rome 2 Real Review

    CathalOHara posted: »

    I never believed that to be honest, even if one reviewer gives the game a way too high of a score for it's quality. Every reviewer there has their own opinions.

  • There was also an instance where an ign employee wrote a bad review of Kane and lynch while they were advertising it on their main site and lost his job over it. It was quite controversial.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    Proof, If you don't understand this please ask. I will explain it. Rome 2 Review @ release on IGN. Rome 2 Real Review

  • That was a gamespot employee.

    Krazy8 posted: »

    There was also an instance where an ign employee wrote a bad review of Kane and lynch while they were advertising it on their main site and lost his job over it. It was quite controversial.

  • hahaha the facial animation bit at 18:00

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    Proof, If you don't understand this please ask. I will explain it. Rome 2 Review @ release on IGN. Rome 2 Real Review

  • IGN Review-

    5/5: Terrible.

  • Another example of IGN giving fake reviews.

    They gave this walking simulator 9.5/10.00

    Gone Home

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    Proof, If you don't understand this please ask. I will explain it. Rome 2 Review @ release on IGN. Rome 2 Real Review

  • CathalOHaraCathalOHara Moderator
    edited October 2014

    I know many people hate it, but to be honest, I know many people who LOVED and didn't shut up about it. Think implying that was a paid review is not really nonsensical. Especially since that's your opinion on the game. Having played it, I do think it was a waste of time. But many people thought the unravelling aspect was very enjoyable, although it was pretty shit.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    Another example of IGN giving fake reviews. They gave this walking simulator 9.5/10.00 Gone Home

  • whoops my mistake

    BoatsNHoes posted: »

    That was a gamespot employee.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.