›

Why are peoples' povs so deluded in this series?

ClemenemClemenem
in The Walking Dead

Case 1: I mean I still don't understand The Stranger at all. He is a complete fucking idiot for leaving his car wide open. Then he goes as far as to say Lee is the reason Clem is traumatized but has no problems with people who tried to cause her deliberate harm (Bandits, St. John's)

Case 2: Bonnie some how blames Kenny and Clem for Luke dying but thinks Arvo is a "good person" even though who caused him to get shot in the first place.

Case 3: Arvo saying Clem robbed him and trying to get a baby killed for no good reason.

Comments

  • BeefJerkyXBeefJerkyX

    Case 1: He was a crazy man. In a society which relies on looting for survival, people will loot to survive. Wander into some supplies, take some supplies. It is the way of the world at this point. But he got shafted in the process and the results of that make him a bit crazy, although he may well have been loopy to begin with.

    Case 2: She was just upset. People get angry and say things when they're upset.

    Case 3: Writing happened.

  • MetallicaRulesMetallicaRules

    Writing happened, LOL.

    BeefJerkyX posted: »

    Case 1: He was a crazy man. In a society which relies on looting for survival, people will loot to survive. Wander into some supplies, take

  • CrazyGeorgeCrazyGeorge Banned

    Case 1: I mean I still don't understand The Stranger at all.

    I think when bad things happen. Most people do not want to take responsibility or can't mentally. The day of integrity is dead, died many years ago. Everyone always blames others, its a part of our culture now. The Strangers family died because of a circumstance. He was trying to blame Lee for that circumstance, its almost like a Straw man fallacy.

    Regardless if Lee agreed with Kenny or not, it wasn't his fault that his son went missing.

    Case 2: Bonnie some how blames Kenny and Clem for Luke dying but thinks Arvo is a "good person" even though who caused him to get shot in the first place

    She was just having her Kenny breakdown moment. She was upset. I don't hold any anger for bonnie/mike. Other than them taking all the food, i understand why they did what they did.

    Case 3: Arvo saying Clem robbed him and trying to get a baby killed for no good reason.

    Well this is determinant if she did rob him, then he was correct. If she didn't rob him, then their could be tons of explanations. I think it was just easier for the writers to just accuse then writing extra dialogue. Sure it was lazy, but I'm sure they saved a few thousand dollars with that small decision.

    It really doesn't effect the story at all.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.