I'd like to see a similar decision like this in Season 3

edited September 2015 in The Walking Dead

I'd like to see a decision where choosing to save or kill a character in S3 who doesn't seem like they would be capable of doing anything to end in the death of one of the main characters if you let them live, similar to Shel's Story in 400 Days DLC for S1. I think it'd be a good way to challenge moral thinking - let an innocent man live who will eventually kill one of the main group members. Perhaps Clementine comes across a little girl, she seems harmless and helpless and if you choose to let her live, a few episodes later, she returns and kills one of your group members, showing that an innocent face can still tell lies.

Comments

  • Let me start ....So we talking a "Shel situation" If they live they cause death to who? I'm sorry but I don't think they'd be that obivious and rehash... wait they might. So I'm just gonna say this as a kindness. I got your point but try to edit it to be more of a complete thought. You've got over 100 views there is some interest! Bumped up :)

  • They've rehashed allot of the decisions where you choose the fate of characters only for them to die a few episodes later :p but thanks for the tip.

    Let me start ....So we talking a "Shel situation" If they live they cause death to who? I'm sorry but I don't think they'd be that obivi

Sign in to comment in this discussion.