they reverted it all like "no way that's not how it happened" so I just gave up before it got worse
That's...pretty disgusting actually. Especially when a lot of people go to wiki for reference or even take it as "fact." :shaking my head: At least you tried, though.
I'd suggest doing some edits to it to better reflect the truth and increase the overall quality, but the people on TWD wiki have a tendency … moreto be really stingy bastards about that stuff
I tried editing a small part of his page related to his death to fix something they got wrong once, and they reverted it all like "no way that's not how it happened" so I just gave up before it got worse
Truth be told, most of the admins on there are pretty cool (and a few of the regular users too)
But it seems like a majority of the admins are comic fans, so there's a bit of a bias there when it comes to them doing admin stuff
My change was reverted by a regular user that decided that my edit wasn't true enough, and he acted like a prick when he reverted it as well
And I agree about the wiki stuff. I mainly joined it because I wanted to try and fix a lot of the articles on there, namely ones related to the video game. On top of a lot of articles just not being written all that well, there's a fair amount of personal bias in a lot of them. I haven't done much work on there, but I've tried to make edits where I see fit. Wikis have an obligation to be a credible and impartial source of information, right? So that obligation should be upheld as best as possible.
they reverted it all like "no way that's not how it happened" so I just gave up before it got worse
That's...pretty disgusting actua… morelly. Especially when a lot of people go to wiki for reference or even take it as "fact." :shaking my head: At least you tried, though.
You defend her actions. From people who are Kenny fans that's exactly what you do. Most people consider leaving a baby to die is pretty messed up, but you have defended that saying it's the right thing to do. A lot of people would consider you a psycho to do something like that.
Defending and and making them look prettier are 2 different things. I never said it was right thing to do, only said it was wise thing to do in case you value your life more than some random babys. I rarely claim to have moral high ground on these things, so its much easier to debate.
You defend her actions. From people who are Kenny fans that's exactly what you do. Most people consider leaving a baby to die is pretty me… moressed up, but you have defended that saying it's the right thing to do. A lot of people would consider you a psycho to do something like that.
Defending and and making them look prettier are 2 different things. I never said it was right thing to do, only said it was wise thing to do… more in case you value your life more than some random babys. I rarely claim to have moral high ground on these things, so its much easier to debate.
How exactly? Lets say im acknowledging that im more evil and support cold and rational actions, how does that make me claim i have the moral high ground?
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior because to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
How exactly? Lets say im acknowledging that im more evil and support cold and rational actions, how does that make me claim i have the moral high ground?
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior because to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior becaus… moree to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior because… more to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
Nothing you're saying is making any sense.
Lets say there are 2 absolute evil options and i choose one of them, does that make the other option morally inferior? Try to think this through because you seem really confused.
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior becaus… moree to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
Sorry. Not that difficult to understand. I'm not going to chew your food so you can swallow it. If you can't understand something that simple you aren't worth responding to.. good day
Okay. You too, as I report you for your rude behavior. ^_^
Comments
That's...pretty disgusting actually. Especially when a lot of people go to wiki for reference or even take it as "fact." :shaking my head: At least you tried, though.
Truth be told, most of the admins on there are pretty cool (and a few of the regular users too)
But it seems like a majority of the admins are comic fans, so there's a bit of a bias there when it comes to them doing admin stuff
My change was reverted by a regular user that decided that my edit wasn't true enough, and he acted like a prick when he reverted it as well
And I agree about the wiki stuff. I mainly joined it because I wanted to try and fix a lot of the articles on there, namely ones related to the video game. On top of a lot of articles just not being written all that well, there's a fair amount of personal bias in a lot of them. I haven't done much work on there, but I've tried to make edits where I see fit. Wikis have an obligation to be a credible and impartial source of information, right? So that obligation should be upheld as best as possible.
You defend her actions. From people who are Kenny fans that's exactly what you do. Most people consider leaving a baby to die is pretty messed up, but you have defended that saying it's the right thing to do. A lot of people would consider you a psycho to do something like that.
Defending and and making them look prettier are 2 different things. I never said it was right thing to do, only said it was wise thing to do in case you value your life more than some random babys. I rarely claim to have moral high ground on these things, so its much easier to debate.
By defending one persons actions while persecuting another persons actions you are in fact claiming the moral high ground.
How exactly? Lets say im acknowledging that im more evil and support cold and rational actions, how does that make me claim i have the moral high ground?
By claiming Kenny is in fact a worse person than Jane, you are judging him. By judging him you are claiming you are morally superior because to say you are morally inferior would make you incapable of arguing against Kenny as you would invalidate anything you say because you would be morally inferior.
Nothing you're saying is making any sense.
lol I can't help it if you don't understand something that isn't difficult to grasp.
I can't help it if you can't communicate what you want to say.
[removed]
Lets say there are 2 absolute evil options and i choose one of them, does that make the other option morally inferior? Try to think this through because you seem really confused.
Okay. You too, as I report you for your rude behavior. ^_^