Eddie/Nate/Tavia possible returns?
I've noticed that these character, no matter your choices are unknown (and not determinate!!!), that means there is a chance they could return in season 3.
I personally would love Nate to return, he was a hilarious but crazy character. Eddie had amazing character and personality.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
I'd love for Eddie and Nate to return!
I really, really hope we see Nate again. He's too cool a villain to just discard.
Ya know what, I actually wouldn't mind getting some follow-up on Taavia.
Eddie and Nate can stay a mystery, tho.
Gotta see my boy Nate again at some point. Favourite character in the games.
I don't want to see Tavia ever again. She killed my homie, Nick.
But I'd love to see Eddie and Nate.
I believe that a lot more could've been done with Tavia's character, but she is out of the story and I don't want her back in Season Three.
Nate was fucking demential asshole who couldn't stop talking about the cleavage of a corpse, ambushed a couple of elders, refrained from telling the truth about them to Russell, and proceeded to shoot both elders, one of them not even in the head. He also wanted to take their supplies afterwards. I don't see the charm in him at all.
Hes entertaining, the walking dead is a depressing series a lot of the time it needs some humour and black humour especially
Thats part of the weird humour
Im not exactly agreeing with what he did but they shot at them both to try and kill them, there isnt really any proof he was the guy who robbed them before.
It can be both, if you stay silent he'll blast them both in the neck and they both end up tied up outside
I think 400 days people were underused however im not sure about them returning
Nate was pretty interesting as a wild card and Becca was probably one of the more realistic characters in the whole series even if I dont like her all that much. Vince, shel and russel were all alright. I wasnt that big a fan of wyatt or eddie though, dumb stoners.
BetterToSleep
Kenny or Nate? Hahaha sorry couldn't resist
Even though I dislike Kenny to a degree, I believe that he is a much better-written and complex character than Nate. For one, he is at least sympathetic.
Ah, come on, that's what makes him such an interesting character. Sure, he's a complete sociopath with few redeeming qualities, but at the same time, he did help Russell and even if you stand up to him about the elderly couple (who do shoot at them, btw), he never once actually harms him. And as @Firewallcano said, he added a bit of much needed humour in the game.
I do not see a bit of humour in his character nor behavior, even though I'm all for humour in both Telltale's games and The Walking Dead franchise. Of course, comedy is subjective, so while he might have provided some relief to some players, I am definitely not among them.
Nate cuts Russell off if the latter asks about whether he knows the elders, and the old man had already said that Nate had been there earlier. Nate's truck's particular headlights were a recurring theme throughout 400 Days. And we also know that Nate is not above stealing.
Just in my perspective, everything points to Nate having stolen beforehand.
Okay, that makes me feel even worse, that the hell!
Yeah there can be three different possible walkers tied up outside based on choices in the other stories. Black cop, Old man or random walker.
I know there isnt much detail however it seems eddie killed nates friend because he was drugged up/hyped up (kinda like how nick shoots matthew).
I agree kenny is more sympathetic however we see a lot more of his character over the series
The issue with Shel, Becca, Vince, Wyatt Russel and especially Bonnie, is that they were all determinate characters. Given the treatment of determintes I don't think we'll see them again, if we do they'll probably have at maximum a 30 second cameo.
That's why the unknowns are so significant because you can't decide on what happens to them. Granted this is a story driven game, but not all characters should be in the players choices and it gives them a chance to come back. Heck if Kenny could come back from that ridiculous Ben alley way scene, then I don't see why characters like Nate, Eddie, Lilly, Tavia shouldn't. The 400 day characters didn't get much of a cameo, at least not in episode fashion. But god do I love how they did Eddie and especially Nate.
I also really liked Romans character and got kind of annoyed when he was confirmed dead in Season 2. Because he could of returned as well.
Yes to Nate, but no to making him a villain. That would be so predictable. Make him someone Clem could ultimately learn from. By making him an example of some sort or have him teach Clem how to be a little like him.
...So,like Jane?
I'd be surprised if either one of the three even shows up at all in Season 3.
No. Jane can't even compare to Nate. Nate has a deplorable outlook. He takes what he wants, and kills who he wants. I'd like for there to be choices on rather or not you'd agree and go along with things Nate do, or you don't. And as you go along in the story, this would ultimately shape Clem's outlook more. I don't see the comparison to Jane, she was an awful and boring character.
Marijuana can make people paranoid. It sounds kind of like the situation with Nick and Matthew.
I think Telltale passed up on their chance to build Nate's character by excluding him from Season 2. His appearance in Season 3 would feel forced in my opinion. Eddie, like it or not, was Wyatt's sidekick; a supporting character. If Wyatt pretty much got the brush-off in Season 2/appearance was determinant, why would Telltale bring Eddie back? Tavia is also unlikely. I agree with @BetterToSleep that there was more that could have been done with her......she's actually quite underrated by the fan base......but now is not the time to do it.
Well, you definitely got half of that right.
Can't even compare? To me it seems that you want Nate to be a second Jane with more psychopathic actions. What you just described was exactly what Jane was to Season 2 Clem: the devil on her shoulder.
So, if I'm reading this right, you'd want Nate to do immoral things and have Clementine get the option to agree with him or not, right? Jane already did that. She wants to steal from a kid and Clem gets the choice to steal with her or be against her. She wants to leave Sarah and Clem gets the choice to do as she says or go against her. She manipulated Kenny and Clem gets the choice to agree with her and forgive her or leave her. She wants to leave a family out in the cold and Clem gets the choice to make the family leave as she says or go against her and let them in.
What you want to see in Nate was already done in Jane.
(This second part of my comment is less directed to your comment and more to people who whorship Nate as a ''''great'''' character.)
The only divergence between this hypothetical Nate and Jane is that Nate wouldn't be above murder and other seriously immoral things. Which leads me to ask why people find characters like this so apealing? It happens everywhere. Game of Thrones, with Ramsey. The Walking Dead, with Negan. Borderlands, with Handsome Jack. I just can't see the appeal. They are such plain and two dimensional characters (although they tried to give Handsome Jack a proper reason to be a psycho and they are (finally) giving Negan a less predictable and generic plot) yet people seem to love them! What's so interesting? 'I wonder what this two dimensional vilanious character will do next! Something bad and immoral or something immoral and bad? Such suspense. Much wow!!!'
With that being said, they are usually the most easy to write and predictable characters. The people writting Jane (or any other character really, this is just an example) take their time to give her dept, a proper character arc, inner struggles and all. But then someone writes Nate, a dude that in the whole series just killed two elders, and people go mad over him! Praising his 'dept'. And then when they compare these two characters, the former is called 'boring and awful' while the latter 'OMG, best character!! So interesting. 10/10'.
I can understand finding his jokes funny (I actually don't, but whatever), perhaps he'd be a good character to add that dark humour, but an interesting character? No thanks, that's beyond my reach apparently.
If anything id say Nate was more like Kenny than Jane, erratic and almost uncaring about what he was doing, Jane was cold but it was all thought out. Nate didnt appear to plan anything out all that much he was just even more crazy than jane or kenny