betraying clementine at the end of episode 2 is RIGHT thing to do

135678

Comments

  • Finally someone pointing it out.

    With what did Conrad help you out exactly? Conrad saved Javi's life back at the gas station.

  • Where is the guarantee? I remember a scene not much longer than twenty minutes before this where I tried to make a trade for Francine and an entire community was destroyed regardless.

    Rishfee posted: »

    And you couldn't be more right.Considering you are playing as Javier,it is only natural to betray her.Almost guaranteed medical help for you

  • Well you think she became egoist and a liar, I don't. Let's just agree to disagree then.
    I perfectly understand why she don't want them to see her, especially since AJ is suspiciously absent beside the flashbacks and her facial expressions when Jesus said they took over Richmond.

    Rishfee posted: »

    I don't want to burst your bubble,but that was just to make her appear again with the group.Of course not everyone is bad.Ava seems cool so maybe she was talking about her.

  • but "he" its you. =)
    i dont say that this decision is wrong. but i dont like it

    I betrayed her in my game. Because it made sense. Javier can do anything for Kate. Of course, he would trade a stranger for his family. It hurt me but it was right choice. Hey, at least Clem showed the middle finger to those assholes!

  • Besides, you can pick the option "She's our friend." when Max asked who she is to Javi. Javi then said, "That's why the way we treat her right now doesn't sit very well with me." followed by acknowledged expression by Clem.
    Clementine will remember that.

    Btw, sorry for my bad English. :P

    Rishfee posted: »

    And you couldn't be more right.Considering you are playing as Javier,it is only natural to betray her.Almost guaranteed medical help for you

  • I understand why she doesn't want to see them.It's quite logical.I'm jusy saying that I don't like her actual personality.

    Well you think she became egoist and a liar, I don't. Let's just agree to disagree then. I perfectly understand why she don't want them to

  • That's a totally different context.

    Skiba7671 posted: »

    Where is the guarantee? I remember a scene not much longer than twenty minutes before this where I tried to make a trade for Francine and an entire community was destroyed regardless.

  • Well the Eleanor or Trip seems to be pretty close. Could change if there's another revelation about Eleanor in next episodes.

    TheMPerson posted: »

    And this is the problem of this season... now there are obviously right/wrong choices instead of hard choices (50/50%) like previous episodes...

  • enter image description here

    Davissons posted: »

    * Be me. * Bury Marianna fresh out of fighting back against her killers with one person who stayed to help. * Clementine helps and offers

  • His behavior there strongly reminded me of Kenny after he thought Jane killed AJ.

    And that makes up for pulling a gun on Gabe?

  • If it ends with the same outcome whatever you pick, how is that different?

    Rishfee posted: »

    That's a totally different context.

  • You don't know how it will end.

    If it ends with the same outcome whatever you pick, how is that different?

  • Unlike a lot of people, I actually didn't shoot him because of Clementine. I took the shot because he just took Javier's nephew hostage and was threatening to shoot him. For me, it made sense to take the shot. That being said, I feel guilty about it. And I'm actually glad that I do. It's been a while since a Telltale choice actually made me feel guilty.

    If you ask me, that choice actually is a relatively difficult one. The problem is that the Clementine bias makes it an easy call for pretty much everybody. If you try to put that bias aside, it actually isn't that bad of a choice.

    If you were to replace Clementine in that scene with Tripp or Eleanor, it would probably be a lot more split. The situation itself is fine-- the character used is not.

    Your Javier valued Clementine's freedom over having a higher chance to save Kate's life and to find shelter for himself, Gabe, Kate, Tripp, Eleanor and Conrad.

  • glad i wasn't the only one who thought that way, in the moment i felt that's what javier would probably do the "trade" for his family/kate but i'll admit i felt pretty bad when gabe started yelling at me lol

  • you missed the point abattoir and dont you blame clem cause she shot that
    guy that was an accident you forget she had 3 guns she had a shot gun her hand
    gun and javi's gun she ran out of bullets for the shot gun her gun had bullets that
    wouldnt fire i think when it came to it she accidentally pulled out javi's gun when
    she shot the guy and did you see her face so pure accident so she had no
    intention of killing him.

    abattoir posted: »

    i think were beating a dead horse here.. looks like some people will side with clementine no matter what. they probably think it was okay of her to shoot that innocent man in face while trying to impress javier with her badassery.

  • edited December 2016

    It's true that it makes sense to choose Conrad's plan from Javi's perspective but then it doesn't when you look at how Conrad goes about it.

    Imagine the scene if instead of pulling a gun on Gabe, Conrad instead keeps the gun on Clementine while talking to Javi. The way Telltale set it up, it was guaranteed that 95% of people would choose to kill Conrad.

    There also should have been an option to talk Conrad out of the plan. Also, Conrad should have only pulled the gun on Gabe if the player chose for Javi to pull the gun on Conrad. Things like this are the only way to prevent the massive amount of players who chose to kill Conrad. It still would have been high simply because of the love of Clem but it wouldn't have been 95%

  • To be honest I kinda figured out that David was going to be the Leader, obviously I wasnt 100% positive and didnt shoot Conrad solely on a hunch, but its also Telltale, it wont matter. Obviously taking Clem would give a higher chance for medical help, however because David is the leader, she's going to get it anyway.

    abattoir posted: »

    so you knew david was in charge when you had to make that choice?

  • His plan was good and I would've executed it but he threatened Gabe, that was unacceptable. Like you said, Javi (atleast mine) cares more about his family so he won't let anybody put a gun to his nephew's head.

  • I agree. I had Javier shoot Conrad, yet I didn't do it for Clementine, but for Gabe. I don't like Gabriel, but he's part of Javier's family.

    Conrad explicitly told a Javi that "nobody's got to shoot anybody!" Taking his nephew hostage was just a means to get Javier to agree with the most pragmatic route.

    Or did you kill Conrad so as to avoid angering Gabe?

    I agree. I had Javier shoot Conrad, yet I didn't do it for Clementine, but for Gabe. I don't like Gabriel, but he's part of Javier's family.

  • Have people forgotten that Conrad will Literally shoot Javier and Gabe if you do nothing? When I found this out I have no regrets of killing that bastards. It's always "me,me,me" with him. I'm not selling Clementine out, plain and simple.

  • But Conrad explicitly said that "nobody's got to shoot anybody!" He took Gabe hostage because he thought that would get Javier to agree to the most pragmatic plan, that would in turn benefit Kate; he wasn't planning on shooting!

    I agree that the decision was difficult! Perhaps it would have been more effective for the majority of players if Tripp or Eleanor had been placed instead, but perhaps not, since a lot of players do not even care for them anyway.

    Deltino posted: »

    Unlike a lot of people, I actually didn't shoot him because of Clementine. I took the shot because he just took Javier's nephew hostage and

  • I'm sorry but the New Frontier don't seem like the kind of people to give help just because we give a member back. So Conrad is kill.

  • edited December 2016

    Honestly...I don't really regret "betraying" Clementine...never thought I'd say that...She isn't gonna die and I'm sure we'll be "buddy buddy" again by seasons ends, just watch.

    But I don't blame people for shooting him. It's Telltale's failure at making choices. Seriously, you're pitting someone you basically just met to Clementine....Clementine!!

    she shouldn't have even been in the new frontier (the group) but they killed that choice off right after the flash back! "They were very persuasive" lol ok.

  • So they don't currently have one of our people who we would be exchanging for someone they believe needs to be brought to justice? .

    Rishfee posted: »

    That's a totally different context.

  • If he wasn't such an asshole, he wouldn't have died.

    Conrad had it coming?

  • YellowsnoYellowsno Banned
    edited December 2016

    What I've learned reading this thread is that people, Conrad included, are way too frivolous in taking hostages. Conrad had made a valid point, and I was seriously mulling it over until he put a gun to Gabe's head. I don't care that he said, "Nobody needs to shoot anybody" or whatever. If you bring a hostage into any situation you also bring it automatically from zero to one hundred. Doing so, Conrad asserted a certain power over me which conveyed, "Make the logical choice, or else I'll kill your family". Someone that bargains like that doesn't deserve words, a bullet suffices.
    Everyone is assuming if Clementine is given up then the New Frontier will be more open to negotiation. However all bets are off when you say, "I helped you, now you owe me". The New Frontier could have been angered at that power play and, since they have bigger numbers, reasonably killed everyone on the spot. And would you really want to have Clementine potentially killed? Because the New Frontier could have totally just shot her.

  • Pulling a gun on Gabe has no lasting consequences.

    Murdering Conrad has lasting consequences and is immoral.

    And that makes up for pulling a gun on Gabe?

  • Except Conrad was advocating for the reasonable course of action.

    His behavior there strongly reminded me of Kenny after he thought Jane killed AJ.

  • You forgot the part in which Conrad saved Javi's life.

    Davissons posted: »

    * Be me. * Bury Marianna fresh out of fighting back against her killers with one person who stayed to help. * Clementine helps and offers

  • Javier doesn't care that much for his family if he values the freedom of Clementine over a higher chance of getting medical help for Kate.

    His plan was good and I would've executed it but he threatened Gabe, that was unacceptable. Like you said, Javi (atleast mine) cares more about his family so he won't let anybody put a gun to his nephew's head.

  • That's not canon.

    Neither was Mike letting Clementine crush against the ground.

    Have people forgotten that Conrad will Literally shoot Javier and Gabe if you do nothing? When I found this out I have no regrets of killing that bastards. It's always "me,me,me" with him. I'm not selling Clementine out, plain and simple.

  • edited December 2016

    Yeah, but does that mean people can't play it realistically?

    AronDracula posted: »

    i prefer to play realistically I hate when people say that. Video games were never meant to be so realistic.

  • “I don't understand!”

    “I don't understand!”

    Skiba7671 posted: »

    So they don't currently have one of our people who we would be exchanging for someone they believe needs to be brought to justice? .

  • "Reasonable". Right. He lost it. Doesn't really matter since he's going to die anyway. And they managed to get inside Richmond either way.

    Except Conrad was advocating for the reasonable course of action.

  • “What does that even mean! What's the it?”

    Rishfee posted: »

    Finally someone pointing it out.

  • Exactly my thoughts!

    Davissons posted: »

    * Be me. * Bury Marianna fresh out of fighting back against her killers with one person who stayed to help. * Clementine helps and offers

  • You don't kill people for being assholes, Aron!

    AronDracula posted: »

    If he wasn't such an asshole, he wouldn't have died.

  • Taking hostage to force someone into doing something is immoral too. Just saying.

    But Conrad explicitly said that "nobody's got to shoot anybody!" He took Gabe hostage because he thought that would get Javier to agree to t

  • edited December 2016

    The difference between both scenarios is that, with Alvin Junior inside Richmond, with Clementine outside, and with Javier oblivious to the toddler's existence, we will not be able to take him with us were we to escape the settlement at some point.

    And you also killed somebody.

    "Reasonable". Right. He lost it. Doesn't really matter since he's going to die anyway. And they managed to get inside Richmond either way.

  • Totally agree.

    Yellowsno posted: »

    What I've learned reading this thread is that people, Conrad included, are way too frivolous in taking hostages. Conrad had made a valid poi

Sign in to comment in this discussion.