Who are the survivors live at the McCaroll Ranch? Returning Characters?

2

Comments

  • For some reason I would liked to ship Mariana and Gill.
    Unfortunately Telltale killed her.

    Gil was raised by thief Randy. So he could be a thug if still alive. What like Clem?

  • Hopefully, she doesn't eat human meat this time.#determinantcannibal

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    Lol Clem became a savage thug in the wild.. But after meeting Javi and Gabe we see the sweetpea from season one returned...

  • My Lee stopped Clem from eating Mark, so she isn't cannibal... yet

    Hopefully, she doesn't eat human meat this time.#determinantcannibal

  • Joan when she pulls a "I Surrender, Suckers" on David--he just whips it out and blows her down. Then he cries from the shock of actually doing it because I guess that makes sense.

    Never mind that he saw Mariana(his sister, mind you) and determinately Ava buy it, saw Kate and determinately Tripp get hit as well, and got some Clint on him trying to help David.

    Who is Gabe going to murder, in cold blood?

  • edited May 2017

    It's also possible,seeing that they were starving, that Christa and Clem probably resulted to eating placenta. No need to leave good meat to waste.I feel that would be a choice if there is a 16 month dlc in the future.# probablyacannibal

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    My Lee stopped Clem from eating Mark, so she isn't cannibal... yet

  • Why not..
    Cats eat it too.

    It's also possible,seeing that they were starving, that Christa and Clem probably resulted to eating placenta. No need to leave good meat to waste.I feel that would be a choice if there is a 16 month dlc in the future.# probablyacannibal

  • If Kenny shows up in there than I will go back and replay that part on season 2 just so I can get Kenny back. No I don't like going back and changing choices but I would do it.

  • But there's already concept art for the ranch...?

    OR, we won't even get to see the McCarroll Ranch and AJ at all. Maybe Episode 5 will end with Clem just starting to travel to that ranch.

  • Where?

    Clemenem posted: »

    But there's already concept art for the ranch...?

  • Sigh please stop with these returning characters posts! It happened once with Kenny and that in itself was stretching it. If a season 1 character showed up again it would be the most unrealistic crap Telltale have ever done because in reality you wouldn't find someone you once knew again. No phones or means of contact etcl. I'd believe it if Clem had stayed in Savannah or in Macon because Lilly/Molly could have showed up again if they had stayed around but even that is unlikely to be honest.

  • the very last scene of this grand finale

    Camera focuses on the door, slowly opening, we see a vague shape of a person, but it's too dark to tell who it is... We see Clementine shocked face as she recognizes the approaching figure, then the screen goes black and we hear AJ cry in the distance.

    Find out in the next season, about to be released in 4 years from now.

  • Don't say that.

    fallandir posted: »

    the very last scene of this grand finale Camera focuses on the door, slowly opening, we see a vague shape of a person, but it's too dark

  • Nah that wouldn't work or have the desired effect since they did something similar with Kenny.

    fallandir posted: »

    the very last scene of this grand finale Camera focuses on the door, slowly opening, we see a vague shape of a person, but it's too dark

  • Assuming telltale keeps to what they said whoever is at the ranch are characters we've met already since they said they won't be introducing anymore new characters. Could be the family from S2 at the end with Jane which telltale forgot about. Could be Mike and Arvo.

  • Or Lingard could be bullshitting lol?

    Chibikid posted: »

    Assuming telltale keeps to what they said whoever is at the ranch are characters we've met already since they said they won't be introducing

  • I think that is a good possibility seeing the state he was in. And considering that it's determinant to find out about the ranch I'm not sure how you'll get there in EP5 of you spared him.

    dan290786 posted: »

    Or Lingard could be bullshitting lol?

  • Yes or in Ep5 he just tells you anyway maybe? I don't know. Either way i expect there to be some reunion with AJ

    Chibikid posted: »

    I think that is a good possibility seeing the state he was in. And considering that it's determinant to find out about the ranch I'm not sure how you'll get there in EP5 of you spared him.

  • edited May 2017

    You forgot about the part where Clementine is then abruptly shot in the face right before the scene fades to black. And then we hear a voice:

    "My baby...MINE."

    fallandir posted: »

    the very last scene of this grand finale Camera focuses on the door, slowly opening, we see a vague shape of a person, but it's too dark

  • Which makes the Lingard decision absolutely pointless.

    dan290786 posted: »

    Yes or in Ep5 he just tells you anyway maybe? I don't know. Either way i expect there to be some reunion with AJ

  • Would you expect anything less from TattleTale these days? Lol

    Chibikid posted: »

    Which makes the Lingard decision absolutely pointless.

  • edited May 2017

    It is not pointless, other than make you feel like an asshole if you just murdered Lingard for a savage teenager you just met.
    Only we as gamers know about Clem's history, Javi doesn't.

    You are an asshole anyway to kill a man in this weak position. A good person would wait until he is off the drugs and talking normal again.
    I would be happy if we spare him, he would tell Clem anyway about AJ's location lol.
    I understand a desperate Clem for taking the deal, but Javi has no damn reason to just kill this doctor.

    If you still don't get it here an explanation about choices in Telltale: choices only matter in emotional experiences and dialogue. It is not like you play 60 different games in one season with 200 different possible scenes graphically. This is all about emotional game experience and personality development and dialogue. The outcome is always the same.

    Chibikid posted: »

    Which makes the Lingard decision absolutely pointless.

  • Then it cuts to Christa with a shotgun.

    RichWalk23 posted: »

    You forgot about the part where Clementine is then abruptly shot in the face right before the scene fades to black. And then we hear a voice: "My baby...MINE."

  • enter image description here

    fallandir posted: »

    Then it cuts to Christa with a shotgun.

  • You really are going to get banned soon you know if you keep on going like this.

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    It is not pointless, other than make you feel like an asshole if you just murdered Lingard for a savage teenager you just met. Only we as g

  • edited May 2017

    Hey this is my opinion.
    Why the ban threats?

    It's my point why killing Lingard is a bad thing.
    In my books killing/beating peoples in weak positions is always bad. Like you got mad because I hated the useless violence towards Arvo.
    I didn't mean to call someone personally an asshole, but killing Lingard as Javi is an asshole decision.

    If you don't like this, why are you even in a forum of discussions?

    You go back to the guy who only accept people who goes with your opinion.

    And you call Telltale 'tattletale'. This isn't offensive and childish?
    If one should be banned it is you for insulting this company creating great games for us.

    dan290786 posted: »

    You really are going to get banned soon you know if you keep on going like this.

  • That was it pretty much. You were calling a member of this board an asshole for their opinion which is why i mentioned about the ban. It was not a threat. A gentle warning to be careful.

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    Hey this is my opinion. Why the ban threats? It's my point why killing Lingard is a bad thing. In my books killing/beating peoples in w

  • but killing Lingard as Javi is an asshole decision.

    Yeah in your opinion it is, for others it is mercy killing for a man who no longer wanted to live

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    Hey this is my opinion. Why the ban threats? It's my point why killing Lingard is a bad thing. In my books killing/beating peoples in w

  • edited May 2017

    Ohh I should be scared for you now? Lol
    Get a life kid.

    And I didn't call someone asshole.
    I wrote someone is an asshole for making a decision to murder dr. Lingard in a very weak and unstable situation.
    This is something different..
    I know you try to get the opportunity to make me look more bad than it really is lol. Because you really dislike me because I couldn't agree with you before about beating a weak and powerless kid Arvo knockout is fine.

    Talk to me when you have to discuss something useful. Or just stay quiet is my advice.

    dan290786 posted: »

    That was it pretty much. You were calling a member of this board an asshole for their opinion which is why i mentioned about the ban. It was not a threat. A gentle warning to be careful.

  • Lol i will be replying to this when i finish work

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    Ohh I should be scared for you now? Lol Get a life kid. And I didn't call someone asshole. I wrote someone is an asshole for making a

  • Finish work?
    Damn you are an adult.

    dan290786 posted: »

    Lol i will be replying to this when i finish work

  • Who no longer wanted to live because he thought David was going to die wich isn't proven yet.

    It is mercy to give this man time to get clean from drugs and thinking rationally.

    Hell I am not sure I want you in my group in a ZA.
    You probably kill me when I babble bull shit in some 'high' position.

    dan290786 posted: »

    but killing Lingard as Javi is an asshole decision. Yeah in your opinion it is, for others it is mercy killing for a man who no longer wanted to live

  • I would like Kenny/Jane sitting there, and the flashbacks would only be nightmares... It is highly unlikely, sadly.

    If it isn't... Lee. Lee will be there, because he can survive every fucking thing, since he has the godlike voice of Dave Fennoy!

  • edited May 2017

    And you call Telltale 'tattletale'. This isn't offensive and childish? If one should be banned it is you for insulting this company creating great games for us.

    And isn't that also an opinion if i wish to say how I feel about a company that take my money? You buy a product and if you are not satisfied, you as the customer have a right to express how you feel and that was me expressing. How is that childish? Especially the way you act at times.

    Ohh I should be scared for you now? Lol Get a life kid.

    Jeez talk about defensive, chill your beans! Believe it or not I wasn't saying what i did to be horrible, i was genuinely giving you advice to be careful what you say so that the mods don't ban you that was all. It was not intended to be malicious. You read it wrong because you keep thinking i am attacking you when i am not.

    And I didn't call someone asshole. I wrote someone is an asshole for making a decision to murder dr. Lingard in a very weak and unstable situation. This is something different.

    The way i read it was "you are an asshole" to whom you were speaking to about their decision. If you weren't then i do apologise.

    I know you try to get the opportunity to make me look more bad than it really is lol. Because you really dislike me because I couldn't agree with you before about beating a weak and powerless kid Arvo knockout is fine.

    I don't dislike you for not agreeing with me. I already told you that your opinion is yours and it is fine that you think otherwise and i have never once said i was annoyed that you didn't agree with me. I don't even know you to like or dislike you. What i found frustrating though was that you weren't prepared to listen to my valid arguments behind Kenny's actions towards Arvo and instead just blindly have one viewpoint about the violence and then criticise what i said without answering the questions i asked or counter my arguments to do with the scene itself.

    Talk to me when you have to discuss something useful. Or just stay quiet is my advice.

    Which is my point exactly. In the other conversation, what i was discussing "was" a useful insight into the scene and a very valid argument that you couldn't answer when i challenged your view. And now you are the one being rude telling me to be quiet because you are offended with what i say.

    Finish work? Damn you are an adult.

    And? Are adults not allowed to play games? So you're a kid then? Figures.
    It makes sense now why i can't strike a civil conversation with you. Shame really. This is why you have a different mindset than me so i get the contrast now.

    Who no longer wanted to live because he thought David was going to die wich isn't proven yet.

    He knew enough to feel that David wouldn't make it out alive. Not just that though, the addiction took a hold of his life and had obviously affected him greatly once too often. The point is he asked for Javier to kill him in kindness. Why should a man suffer if he cannot get over his addiction? Don't get me wrong, I would try to help him too but if he was beyond helping then i would kindly do as he wished.

    Don't forget that he blackmailed them saying he won't tell Clem where AJ is unless they killed him. How are we to know he would tell Clem anyway? Maybe he will if his life is spared but if he did, then our choice won't feel like it mattered much for those who spared or killed him.

    It is mercy to give this man time to get clean from drugs and thinking rationally.

    Once again you are only looking at it from one viewpoint and instantly thinking anything else is wrong. If people think it is mercy to kill a suffering man then that is fine as well as your opinion. You have said so yourself that no one is right or wrong when it comes to opinions.

    Hell I am not sure I want you in my group in a ZA. You probably kill me when I babble bull shit in some 'high' position.

    Thanks for being horrible again. Proven how little you think of me despite not knowing me in real life when in actual fact i am probably not the way you think of me. I'm actually a very nice person but you don't give me enough credit and we may even have a lot in common besides walking dead. I guess i would feel the same way about you in a ZA currently seeing as you don't want to listen to other rational viewpoints. Killing you for babbling? No i wouldn't. Not unless you had been bitten or being eaten alive, i'd stop you from suffering or if you became a threat and started killing everyone in my group, i would then to protect my people. It would also depend on how long i have known you and whether i trust you enough.

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    Hey this is my opinion. Why the ban threats? It's my point why killing Lingard is a bad thing. In my books killing/beating peoples in w

  • I like to think that Christa is still alive, but if you tried to sneak away it doesn't exactly seem realistic she's alive. I do want most unknown characters to come back to some extent, but plopping them into the main series seems pretty stupid.

  • I would have you in a group in the ZA though, don't worry.

    While I spared Lingard's life, I get both view points. I just tried to make him see another day. And maybe it is, as Jane would put it, a forced march through hell. But since David survived the initial execution, there is hope for Lingard.
    I wouldn't call someone an asshole though for granting Lingard's wish. As I said, I understand both decisions.

    Oh and, are we at it again? Haha. (JK.)

    dan290786 posted: »

    And you call Telltale 'tattletale'. This isn't offensive and childish? If one should be banned it is you for insulting this company creating

  • There's probably no one there honestly I just imagine AJ locked in a room somewhere or something

  • Your wrong. Telltale has games where choices matter a lot more then usual, and not just for the emotional experience. Tales being the best example. The little/big choices you make made a difference whether big or small. So the fact that their able to pull off choices like that but then decide not to in other games just shows how they don't put effort in some games.

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    It is not pointless, other than make you feel like an asshole if you just murdered Lingard for a savage teenager you just met. Only we as g

  • Your wrong. Telltale has games where choices matter a lot more then usual, and not just for the emotional experience. Tales being the best example. The little/big choices you make made a difference whether big or small. So the fact that their able to pull off choices like that but then decide not to in other games just shows how they don't put effort in some games.

    Bonbon80 posted: »

    It is not pointless, other than make you feel like an asshole if you just murdered Lingard for a savage teenager you just met. Only we as g

  • edited May 2017

    I would be so happy if it where Kenny. I know it's probably not going to be a nightmare that he dies but one can dream. But if we're being realistic here it better be Lilly. She is like my most wanted one to come back I hope it's her (if Kenny isn't there ;))

Sign in to comment in this discussion.