I am not going to lie: that one was on me. I was thinking is that a term used on here, but was not sure because I have not come across it much. I do look ignorant for saying that and am now apologising genuinely. I have accepted your opinion, but okay. I did not start this argument whatsoever, but okay. Whatever suits you. ?
If you spent any time on this fourm, you would know what a Janaic is. Your foolish enough to think that is an interpretation of my writing … moreand grammar skills. Your ignorance is appalling, and you haven't accepted my opinion obviously. Hence you starting this argument and crying about things like 'context' because you have no base for your argument to stand on.
Still doesn't change the fact, that she lost to kenny. And in both those times, at least Kenny didn't start asking someone to help him when they were losing like Jane did.
I am not going to lie: that one was on me. I was thinking is that a term used on here, but was not sure because I have not come across it mu… morech. I do look ignorant for saying that and am now apologising genuinely. I have accepted your opinion, but okay. I did not start this argument whatsoever, but okay. Whatever suits you. ?
Really? Are we really going there? I responded to your message because I did not agree with some of the points you suggested — y’know, an opinion — and you had the temerity to say “how dare you comment on my post?”. No, I like to wind people up with sarcasm using that and hugs and kisses. What? Have you got a problem with gay people now?
Don't even try to go there with me, I have no problem if you were gay. I just usually don't see male users using kiss emojis as a way to wind people up. But whatever gets you off, I could care less. And this all started with you replying to me which started the argument, if you were just posting an opinion, you wouldn't of replied to me. You were looking for an argument with me.
Really? Are we really going there? I responded to your message because I did not agree with some of the points you suggested — y’know, an op… moreinion — and you had the temerity to say “how dare you comment on my post?”. No, I like to wind people up with sarcasm using that and hugs and kisses. What? Have you got a problem with gay people now?
There are different ways of being sarcastic. Maybe if you would be a bit more educated and stop insinuating rubbish, you would get on more with people. What are you on about? This is a public and again PUBLIC thread, so why can I not respond to you or anyone else?
Don't even try to go there with me, I have no problem if you were gay. I just usually don't see male users using kiss emojis as a way to wi… morend people up. But whatever gets you off, I could care less. And this all started with you replying to me which started the argument, if you were just posting an opinion, you wouldn't of replied to me. You were looking for an argument with me.
Well I dont know alot about being sarcastic because i'm not an asshole, maybe you should stop being that. Don't twist my words, I never said you can't reply to someone, there we go again with your victim mentality. If you reply to someone, you should be ready for an argument. If you don't understand this simple thing maybe you should stay off of social media.
There are different ways of being sarcastic. Maybe if you would be a bit more educated and stop insinuating rubbish, you would get on more w… moreith people. What are you on about? This is a public and again PUBLIC thread, so why can I not respond to you or anyone else?
Well I dont know alot about being sarcastic because i'm not an asshole, maybe you should stop being that. Don't twist my words, I never said… more you can't reply to someone, there we go again with your victim mentality. If you reply to someone, you should be ready for an argument. If you don't understand this simple thing maybe you should stay off of social media.
“Considering you just jumped in without knowing the context of the debate at hand. Im not going to argue on whether or not Jane was responsible for those deaths, just as Im not going to argue how Kenny was responsible for Walters death. Did both of them play a hand in said deaths, yes and you can argue that as much as you like but it is a fact. They both had their roles in each scenario and didn't make the situation better, but fate was inevitable. This was my argument for what Dex-Starr posted.”
Now tell me where I provoked this argument because it seems to me that you could not accept my opinion when just to let you know for the one hundredth time that I am entilted to.
Also, @DabigRG sometimes comments on my posts when I am having a conversation with someone else and vice versa. Do you think I am that immature to have a tantrum? Do you think I undermine him because he does not know the ‘context’? Mate, you need to get off your high horse because the attitude you have will get you no where in life and trolling on social media clearly accentuates my point.
''Jane is responsible for Luke and Sarah's death'' - Um, no, not really. She agrees with Clementine to not clump together because a person with common sense would know that the outcome is inevitable. Jane could also see how much of a liability Sarah was and thus again prevented an inevitable outcome. Have you not heard of the saying 'better safe than sorry'? Jane tried to save Sarah again at the Observation Deck and look how that ended up. It was Luke's fault for getting his leg shot; not Jane's.
That was one of your first posts to me on this thread, you replied to me on this thread first.
That's how the argument started by jumping in between the argument that me and Dex-starr were having. That isn't a problem, and i've already told you I don't mean anything by the context thing. I just wanted you to understand my point better.
After my first message, this is what you said:
“Considering you just jumped in without knowing the context of the debate at hand. Im not … moregoing to argue on whether or not Jane was responsible for those deaths, just as Im not going to argue how Kenny was responsible for Walters death. Did both of them play a hand in said deaths, yes and you can argue that as much as you like but it is a fact. They both had their roles in each scenario and didn't make the situation better, but fate was inevitable. This was my argument for what Dex-Starr posted.”
Now tell me where I provoked this argument because it seems to me that you could not accept my opinion when just to let you know for the one hundredth time that I am entilted to.
''Jane is responsible for Luke and Sarah's death'' - Um, no, not really. She agrees with Clementine to not clump together because a person w… moreith common sense would know that the outcome is inevitable. Jane could also see how much of a liability Sarah was and thus again prevented an inevitable outcome. Have you not heard of the saying 'better safe than sorry'? Jane tried to save Sarah again at the Observation Deck and look how that ended up. It was Luke's fault for getting his leg shot; not Jane's.
That was one of your first posts to me on this thread, you replied to me on this thread first.
That's how the argument started by jumping in between the argument that me and Dex-starr were having. That isn't a problem, and i've already told you I don't mean anything by the context thing. I just wanted you to understand my point better.
What do you mean it is not a ‘problem’? This whole argument started because you did not like that I made an opposing remark in a conversation between you and Dex-Starr. @Dex-Starr, I know this is not your argument, but please for the love of God back me up on this one.
''Jane is responsible for Luke and Sarah's death'' - Um, no, not really. She agrees with Clementine to not clump together because a person w… moreith common sense would know that the outcome is inevitable. Jane could also see how much of a liability Sarah was and thus again prevented an inevitable outcome. Have you not heard of the saying 'better safe than sorry'? Jane tried to save Sarah again at the Observation Deck and look how that ended up. It was Luke's fault for getting his leg shot; not Jane's.
That was one of your first posts to me on this thread, you replied to me on this thread first.
That's how the argument started by jumping in between the argument that me and Dex-starr were having. That isn't a problem, and i've already told you I don't mean anything by the context thing. I just wanted you to understand my point better.
More like your inability to allow anybody to have an opinion on Jane, if anyone's ignorant and loves these characters, it's you. You've replied to me on two different threads about my comments on Jane. Your the one who can't accept another opinion not me.
What do you mean it is not a ‘problem’? This whole argument started because you did not like that I made an opposing remark in a conversatio… moren between you and Dex-Starr. @Dex-Starr, I know this is not your argument, but please for the love of God back me up on this one.
More like your inability to allow anybody to have an opinion on Jane, if anyone's ignorant and loves these characters, it's you. You've repl… moreied to me on two different threads about my comments on Jane. Your the one who can't accept another opinion not me.
Woah woah woah slow down there guys, Papa Dex is here . What's going on? I'm really confused as to what this "problem" is
Also, I didn't read into you guy's argument just then, so im lost
Yeah and you cant help yourself when someone says something bad about Jane, that's your problem, just stop having a temper tantrum when you get the argument you were looking for.
Woah woah woah slow down there guys, Papa Dex is here . What's going on? I'm really confused as to what this "problem" is
Also, I didn't read into you guy's argument just then, so im lost
Yeah and you cant help yourself when someone says something bad about Jane, that's your problem, just stop having a temper tantrum when you get the argument you were looking for.
Episodes 1, 2, & 5 are easily better than all of the ANF episodes.
*Episodes 1 & 2.
But to try and give you an answer, ANF is... in a sense, worse than Season Two. But personally, it doesn't piss me off the way Season Two does, seeing as how I don't consider this series canon anymore. Plus ANF is fucking hilarious if you treat it as one of those parody-type games. Admit it, the game, despite how bad it is, genuinely can make you laugh at times.
Seeing as how there's no such thing as a thread where only certain people are allowed to talk in, it's absolutely A-okay for anyone to get involved in any conversation.
Seeing as how there's no such thing as a thread where only certain people are allowed to talk in, it's absolutely A-okay for anyone to get involved in any conversation.
Comments
I am not going to lie: that one was on me. I was thinking is that a term used on here, but was not sure because I have not come across it much. I do look ignorant for saying that and am now apologising genuinely. I have accepted your opinion, but okay. I did not start this argument whatsoever, but okay. Whatever suits you. ?
And Molly and the Cancer Group.
"gEt HEr oFf!"
Janiac is a pretty clever nickname, tbf.
OMG I forgot. thank you
Can't believe he got his ass whooped by GEEZERS.
Well at least he manages to get her off of him by himself, Jane on the other hand not so lucky.
Because Clementine intervenes. And he only kills Jane if Clementine doesn't shoot
Really? Are we really going there? I responded to your message because I did not agree with some of the points you suggested — y’know, an opinion — and you had the temerity to say “how dare you comment on my post?”. No, I like to wind people up with sarcasm using that and hugs and kisses. What? Have you got a problem with gay people now?
Clementine doesn't need to intervene, for kenny to get Jane off him. Kenny still kills Jane and doesn't need help form Clementine.
Don't even try to go there with me, I have no problem if you were gay. I just usually don't see male users using kiss emojis as a way to wind people up. But whatever gets you off, I could care less. And this all started with you replying to me which started the argument, if you were just posting an opinion, you wouldn't of replied to me. You were looking for an argument with me.
I mean, there were four of em, to be fair.
And they apparently weren't that old.
There are different ways of being sarcastic. Maybe if you would be a bit more educated and stop insinuating rubbish, you would get on more with people. What are you on about? This is a public and again PUBLIC thread, so why can I not respond to you or anyone else?
...........Alright. y'all win this round.......
We can all be winners.
Cause it's still funny.
Guys, I was just celebrating No Going Back. No need to argue
Well I dont know alot about being sarcastic because i'm not an asshole, maybe you should stop being that. Don't twist my words, I never said you can't reply to someone, there we go again with your victim mentality. If you reply to someone, you should be ready for an argument. If you don't understand this simple thing maybe you should stay off of social media.
That is rich coming from you. Why should I be ‘ready’ for an argument if I was not instigating an argument in the first place?
You were instigating an argument by replying to me with your opposing view. I can't see how your not getting this.
Not sure what you were expecting; making a post about Season Two. Especially when bringing up the choice that split the community.
After my first message, this is what you said:
“Considering you just jumped in without knowing the context of the debate at hand. Im not going to argue on whether or not Jane was responsible for those deaths, just as Im not going to argue how Kenny was responsible for Walters death. Did both of them play a hand in said deaths, yes and you can argue that as much as you like but it is a fact. They both had their roles in each scenario and didn't make the situation better, but fate was inevitable. This was my argument for what Dex-Starr posted.”
Now tell me where I provoked this argument because it seems to me that you could not accept my opinion when just to let you know for the one hundredth time that I am entilted to.
Only because you could not accept my view down to your ignorance and ‘love’ for Kenny. So again: you are the reason for this.
Also, @DabigRG sometimes comments on my posts when I am having a conversation with someone else and vice versa. Do you think I am that immature to have a tantrum? Do you think I undermine him because he does not know the ‘context’? Mate, you need to get off your high horse because the attitude you have will get you no where in life and trolling on social media clearly accentuates my point.
''Jane is responsible for Luke and Sarah's death'' - Um, no, not really. She agrees with Clementine to not clump together because a person with common sense would know that the outcome is inevitable. Jane could also see how much of a liability Sarah was and thus again prevented an inevitable outcome. Have you not heard of the saying 'better safe than sorry'? Jane tried to save Sarah again at the Observation Deck and look how that ended up. It was Luke's fault for getting his leg shot; not Jane's.
That was one of your first posts to me on this thread, you replied to me on this thread first.
That's how the argument started by jumping in between the argument that me and Dex-starr were having. That isn't a problem, and i've already told you I don't mean anything by the context thing. I just wanted you to understand my point better.
Uh oh...* Jaws theme plays *
Looking back, I really don’t get how people actually liked ANF better than S2. Episodes 1, 2, & 5 are easily better than all of the ANF episodes.
What do you mean it is not a ‘problem’? This whole argument started because you did not like that I made an opposing remark in a conversation between you and Dex-Starr. @Dex-Starr, I know this is not your argument, but please for the love of God back me up on this one.
More like your inability to allow anybody to have an opinion on Jane, if anyone's ignorant and loves these characters, it's you. You've replied to me on two different threads about my comments on Jane. Your the one who can't accept another opinion not me.
meanwhile
No, not by liking my post. ?
Which therefore included you in said argument, when you decided to reply to me. like how dense are you?
Says you. I do, but okay. Yes because these are two threads that are centred on these characters.
Woah woah woah slow down there guys, Papa Dex is here
. What's going on? I'm really confused as to what this "problem" is
Also, I didn't read into you guy's argument just then, so im lost
Yeah and you cant help yourself when someone says something bad about Jane, that's your problem, just stop having a temper tantrum when you get the argument you were looking for.
Different strokes, different folks.
ANF is technically not as dark or miserable as Season 2 got, so there's that for one.
Apparently it is against the ‘law’ to comment with an opposing opinion on a conversation that has not got your name written on.
Whatever floats your boat. Oh look: a reference to Kenny. Am I going to get scrutinised now for making a joke about a character I despise? ???
*Episodes 1 & 2.
But to try and give you an answer, ANF is... in a sense, worse than Season Two. But personally, it doesn't piss me off the way Season Two does, seeing as how I don't consider this series canon anymore. Plus ANF is fucking hilarious if you treat it as one of those parody-type games. Admit it, the game, despite how bad it is, genuinely can make you laugh at times.
Seeing as how there's no such thing as a thread where only certain people are allowed to talk in, it's absolutely A-okay for anyone to get involved in any conversation.
Am I going to get scurnised everytime by you, for saying something bad about Jane?
@DEMVIDEOGAMESAREGOOD1728, do you understand now? Do you? Thank you Dex-Starr for having common sense.