I love how people justify bullshit writing with ''that's the way GOT works''. No, that is not the way Game of thrones works, that is the way Starks work. Let's think a logical decision if you wanted to ambush Ludd and his guys when he came inside for instance. Crossbowmen ready to kill him as well as his entourage right away. Instead, you get a botched assassination that goes wrong. Once again, that was just bad writing just like in episode's five ambush. There is no point missed about what the game tries to convey, it's simply bad writing.
Actually, between The Wolf Among Us and GOT, I'd probably pick GOT if we're considering immersion and actual choices. Because in TWAU, your … morechoices' primary purpose is to let you choose different ways to solve the problem whatsoever. In GOT, your choices could actually lead to a character's death. And it's immersive in such way that you're dying to save every character's life in the game. And by what you just have posted, I say that you have been successfully immersed. We all have disatisfactions and problems in the game. We beg for a proper ending, which we couldn't get even if we redo all our choices. But I suppose that's just how GOT works out, based on the original franchise. "Helplessness". The word that describes our feeling in the entire game. Whether how much we try to do our best, the sh*t will always hit the fan. And that word probably hit you in the wrong spot, that you missed the point that the game conveys.
Comments
I love how people justify bullshit writing with ''that's the way GOT works''. No, that is not the way Game of thrones works, that is the way Starks work. Let's think a logical decision if you wanted to ambush Ludd and his guys when he came inside for instance. Crossbowmen ready to kill him as well as his entourage right away. Instead, you get a botched assassination that goes wrong. Once again, that was just bad writing just like in episode's five ambush. There is no point missed about what the game tries to convey, it's simply bad writing.