Luke, more interesting, has more self-control, was not overused and is not a supporter of unneeded violence nor murder (to clarify commit murder is not the same thing as kill someone).
Luke, more interesting, has more self-control, was not overused and is not a supporter of unneeded violence nor murder (to clarify commit murder is not the same thing as kill someone).
Luke of course, I trusted him more and he seemed the type that was easier to reason with than Kenny. But, I would've kept an extra save on the side for Kenny just to see what'd happen with him.
I'm not sure just saying 'I'm loyal' is a justification to side with Kenny. You could easily say 'I sided with Luke because I'm loyal' since he and Clem had more interaction together than Kenny and Clem before episode 2. Certainly not enough to imply that those who don't side with Kenny are 'disloyal'.
I wouldn't of ruled it out. It really depends on the situation, what's at stakes and what would bring those two characters to such a point to trigger something off like that. People can do some really stupid things when they're angry. I could've seen a concept like that working, not it's what I would've wanted to see in the game. The whole fight scenario between Jane and Kenny for a final major decision on Season 2 with who to save was a buzzkill for me in general.
Luke was a nice, good hearted person that I liked having around. Made the bleak moments feel more......hopeful. Kenny, although on the fringe of being a loose cannon, ultimately wanted what was good for Clem.
Well, that's easy --- Luke. He wasn't as volitle or emotional as Kenny. Luke lost his entire group within about a week and he was handling himself pretty; way better then Kenny. He had good resilience and mental fortitude. And he cared about Clementine; I don't think he would ever try to deceive Clementinedid, the way Jane did.
Please don't imply that my opinion is wrong or it sounds like you are saying it is. It's a good enough reason for me and that's that. I don't/wouldn't kill someone who i consider a friend no matter how unstable he or she may be. I wouldn't kill people who may have a mental health problem like those in nursing homes with dementia. You try your best to help them, stand by them. That is why i would always choose Kenny. As a player I haven't got to know Luke long enough, Kenny i did. Clementine only knew Luke for like a week or 2 was it? It's reason enough for me to choose Kenny so again if you were doing so, please don't imply that i am wrong for it, thanks. Also (if you were towards me) i did not imply those that didn't side with Kenny were disloyal.
ClementIne isn't Lee but i can certainly choose to be as close to being like him as i can
I'm not sure just saying 'I'm loyal' is a justification to side with Kenny. You could easily say 'I sided with Luke because I'm loyal' since… more he and Clem had more interaction together than Kenny and Clem before episode 2. Certainly not enough to imply that those who don't side with Kenny are 'disloyal'.
Clementine isn't Lee.
Also if we are talking about favouritism, i would still choose Kenny over Luke. I didn't find any of the cabin survivors that interesting. That was the problem with season 2 writing, lack of character development. Each episode, a character had a virtually different personality than the last
I'm not sure just saying 'I'm loyal' is a justification to side with Kenny. You could easily say 'I sided with Luke because I'm loyal' since… more he and Clem had more interaction together than Kenny and Clem before episode 2. Certainly not enough to imply that those who don't side with Kenny are 'disloyal'.
Clementine isn't Lee.
Luke had five episodes and had little to no development other than his college degree since his debut, and also lacked competence and was not all that reliable, aside from his long journey from Kenny's new home to Carver's community that was quickly brushed off. While I was holding out for him for the majority of the season, I eventually stopped caring for him once he prioritized sex over keeping his group safe in Episode 4, though I did find his death sad, even if it was contrived and was added for shock value.
As for Kenny, I'll just use simple words. Unstable, irrational, and obstinate. I was netural towards him in Season 1, but found him insufferable and intolerable in Season 2.
Luke, good guy, made a few mistakes but cared for Clem a great deal, lost a bit of respect for the character for choosing sex over doing his job and checking for Walkers, which leads to a whole other problem for the group but I was pulling for him all throughout the season.
As for Kenny, was nice to see him again but 2 years has passed, he calls Clem Duck so isn't over that then loses his eye and his new woman and ends up being suicidal. He's unstable, irrational, quick to anger and dismiss people and stubbon when it comes to what he thinks is right and people disagree with him. Not to mention he blames Clem for Sarita's death when Clem first tried to save her life and then (potentially depending on gamer choice) making sure she wouldn't turn, he blames her. It more seems like Clem will be looking out for Kenny more than Kenny for her, whereas Luke would look out for Clem as much as Clem would for Luke.
I would say Luke. Kenny seems to prefer to just kill people to solve the problem and Luke seems to be the opposite. I'm not saying that Kenny is a bad man, but Luke felt like he would have been a better influence on Clem. That said, if Luke did the Jane thing by hiding AJ, then I would side with Kenny. So my choice is more on circumstance I guess.
Even though I chose to stay with him at the end, Kenny is kinda unstable and sufferable, he suffered a lot in Season 2 and him in Season 1 was better. I gave him a chance to stay with Clem to see if he still can handle himself, besides I can't stand that stupid girl, Jane. If Telltale makes Kenny and Jane pointless in Season 3, then the ending I will stand for in Season 2 is the Alone one.
Despite him having appearances in the whole season, Luke is a pointless character, he was completely good in episode 1-3 and he became pathetic in episode 4-5. I started to lose his respect when he choose a sex time over his job to keep a lookout for walkers which put the group in danger. Hell, Lee didn't even need to sleep with a girl to get over his family's death.
Luke was a nice, good hearted person that I liked having around. Made the bleak moments feel more......hopeful. Kenny, although on the fringe of being a loose cannon, ultimately wanted what was good for Clem.
In other words, I have no damn idea.
In my opinion Luke, he was a good and realistic character, Mr. perfection with some flaws(Oxymoron), but I didn't feel like his death did him justice, I mean if they're betting everything on the ice getting cracked due to him limping, wouldn't the combined weight of Kenny and Arvo since they were the closest together as Kenny was less than an arms length near Arvo have cracked the ice at some point to? Because it just seems overly convenient that the only times the ice cracks is when Arvo trips or when Luke stands still. Especially considering Mike was also shot(which is forgotten almost immediately after he yells he's been hit). It feels like he was killed off just to get the story to progress the way it did, with the group disbanding and Jane VS Kenny scenario occurring.
Kenny. I liked Luke but his character was all over the place. At least Kenny stayed consistent. I was hoping for a Kenny vs Luke situation instead of Kenny vs Jane it would have been much harder to decide which one to kill/let die. Letting jane die hardly was a decision she should have stayed gone.
Luke, definitively. I like the big brother/little sister relationship with Clem in season 2.Sigh Such a pointless death, but I guess this is TWD for you.
Comments
No idea, I liked both, but realistically I dont think Kenny and Luke would ever even reach a point where they were fighting to the death.
Luke, easily.
Luke is young and dumb, Kenny is a bitter asshole. Honestly they'd both slow someone down
Luke, but seeing as he was already hurt, he might be in trouble anyway.
Luke.
Steve
Luke, more interesting, has more self-control, was not overused and is not a supporter of unneeded violence nor murder (to clarify commit murder is not the same thing as kill someone).
Kenny because i'm loyal and because i hardly got to know Luke
Luke of course, I trusted him more and he seemed the type that was easier to reason with than Kenny. But, I would've kept an extra save on the side for Kenny just to see what'd happen with him.
I'm not sure just saying 'I'm loyal' is a justification to side with Kenny. You could easily say 'I sided with Luke because I'm loyal' since he and Clem had more interaction together than Kenny and Clem before episode 2. Certainly not enough to imply that those who don't side with Kenny are 'disloyal'.
Clementine isn't Lee.
I wouldn't of ruled it out. It really depends on the situation, what's at stakes and what would bring those two characters to such a point to trigger something off like that. People can do some really stupid things when they're angry. I could've seen a concept like that working, not it's what I would've wanted to see in the game. The whole fight scenario between Jane and Kenny for a final major decision on Season 2 with who to save was a buzzkill for me in general.
Kenny - Better character and made the story far more interesting for me.
Depends on the situation I'm being forced to choose
Luke was a nice, good hearted person that I liked having around. Made the bleak moments feel more......hopeful. Kenny, although on the fringe of being a loose cannon, ultimately wanted what was good for Clem.
In other words, I have no damn idea.
Well, that's easy --- Luke. He wasn't as volitle or emotional as Kenny. Luke lost his entire group within about a week and he was handling himself pretty; way better then Kenny. He had good resilience and mental fortitude. And he cared about Clementine; I don't think he would ever try to deceive Clementinedid, the way Jane did.
I'd still go with Kenny I think
Luke.
Please don't imply that my opinion is wrong or it sounds like you are saying it is. It's a good enough reason for me and that's that. I don't/wouldn't kill someone who i consider a friend no matter how unstable he or she may be. I wouldn't kill people who may have a mental health problem like those in nursing homes with dementia. You try your best to help them, stand by them. That is why i would always choose Kenny. As a player I haven't got to know Luke long enough, Kenny i did. Clementine only knew Luke for like a week or 2 was it? It's reason enough for me to choose Kenny so again if you were doing so, please don't imply that i am wrong for it, thanks. Also (if you were towards me) i did not imply those that didn't side with Kenny were disloyal.
ClementIne isn't Lee but i can certainly choose to be as close to being like him as i can
Also if we are talking about favouritism, i would still choose Kenny over Luke. I didn't find any of the cabin survivors that interesting. That was the problem with season 2 writing, lack of character development. Each episode, a character had a virtually different personality than the last
I'd choose neither.
Luke had five episodes and had little to no development other than his college degree since his debut, and also lacked competence and was not all that reliable, aside from his long journey from Kenny's new home to Carver's community that was quickly brushed off. While I was holding out for him for the majority of the season, I eventually stopped caring for him once he prioritized sex over keeping his group safe in Episode 4, though I did find his death sad, even if it was contrived and was added for shock value.
As for Kenny, I'll just use simple words. Unstable, irrational, and obstinate. I was netural towards him in Season 1, but found him insufferable and intolerable in Season 2.
Luke, good guy, made a few mistakes but cared for Clem a great deal, lost a bit of respect for the character for choosing sex over doing his job and checking for Walkers, which leads to a whole other problem for the group but I was pulling for him all throughout the season.
As for Kenny, was nice to see him again but 2 years has passed, he calls Clem Duck so isn't over that then loses his eye and his new woman and ends up being suicidal. He's unstable, irrational, quick to anger and dismiss people and stubbon when it comes to what he thinks is right and people disagree with him. Not to mention he blames Clem for Sarita's death when Clem first tried to save her life and then (potentially depending on gamer choice) making sure she wouldn't turn, he blames her. It more seems like Clem will be looking out for Kenny more than Kenny for her, whereas Luke would look out for Clem as much as Clem would for Luke.
I would say Luke. Kenny seems to prefer to just kill people to solve the problem and Luke seems to be the opposite. I'm not saying that Kenny is a bad man, but Luke felt like he would have been a better influence on Clem. That said, if Luke did the Jane thing by hiding AJ, then I would side with Kenny. So my choice is more on circumstance I guess.
None of them.
Even though I chose to stay with him at the end, Kenny is kinda unstable and sufferable, he suffered a lot in Season 2 and him in Season 1 was better. I gave him a chance to stay with Clem to see if he still can handle himself, besides I can't stand that stupid girl, Jane. If Telltale makes Kenny and Jane pointless in Season 3, then the ending I will stand for in Season 2 is the Alone one.
Despite him having appearances in the whole season, Luke is a pointless character, he was completely good in episode 1-3 and he became pathetic in episode 4-5. I started to lose his respect when he choose a sex time over his job to keep a lookout for walkers which put the group in danger. Hell, Lee didn't even need to sleep with a girl to get over his family's death.
Do you think Luke ultimately wanted bad things to happen to Clem?
No but he did danger her indirectly
In my opinion Luke, he was a good and realistic character, Mr. perfection with some flaws(Oxymoron), but I didn't feel like his death did him justice, I mean if they're betting everything on the ice getting cracked due to him limping, wouldn't the combined weight of Kenny and Arvo since they were the closest together as Kenny was less than an arms length near Arvo have cracked the ice at some point to? Because it just seems overly convenient that the only times the ice cracks is when Arvo trips or when Luke stands still. Especially considering Mike was also shot(which is forgotten almost immediately after he yells he's been hit). It feels like he was killed off just to get the story to progress the way it did, with the group disbanding and Jane VS Kenny scenario occurring.
To me I would choose Kenny, No matter what the situation is.
Kenny. I liked Luke but his character was all over the place. At least Kenny stayed consistent. I was hoping for a Kenny vs Luke situation instead of Kenny vs Jane it would have been much harder to decide which one to kill/let die. Letting jane die hardly was a decision she should have stayed gone.
Luke, definitively. I like the big brother/little sister relationship with Clem in season 2.Sigh Such a pointless death, but I guess this is TWD for you.