Disturbing pictures/fanart

11516171921

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    20p5ymr.jpg
    wish granted
  • edited May 2010
    I'm...not entirely certain what I'm seeing here. But it definitely disturbs me. And what disturbs me even further is that your art is so good that I actually like the image.

    ...are those apples in the corset cups?
  • edited May 2010
    I'm...not entirely certain what I'm seeing here. But it definitely disturbs me. And what disturbs me even further is that your art is so good that I actually like the image.

    ...are those apples in the corset cups?

    It's Guybrush as Elaine's V3.
    And yes.
  • edited May 2010
    Yay! More disturbing pictures!:D
  • edited May 2010
    Can anyone think of something disturbing besides crossdressing?
  • edited May 2010
    Can anyone think of something disturbing besides crossdressing?

    What is acceptable within the confines of the forum is rather limiting
  • edited May 2010
    Can anyone think of something disturbing besides crossdressing?

    Winslow crossdressing?:D
  • edited May 2010
    Can anyone think of something disturbing besides crossdressing?
    I actually agree with this. I ain't posting any more of it.
  • edited May 2010
    Let's have them cosplay each other then. And avoiding crossplay, I guess.
    Or, ooO, I know, have them switch personalities/minds, and you need to draw them in such a way that we know who's "inside" whom.
  • edited May 2010
    Someone (or me) should draw something about showing' murray's paste smeared arm to him.
  • edited May 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    and you need to draw them in such a way that we know who's "inside" whom.


    :eek:
  • edited May 2010
    guuuy1.png
  • edited May 2010
    Totally not disturbing but utterly cute. :D
  • edited May 2010
    Totally not disturbing but utterly cute. :D

    Foiled again!


    :cool:
  • edited May 2010
    I'm a bit disturbed, if it makes you feel any better.

    But yeah, it looks like something out of a Disney movie. Sort of like Robin Hood.
  • edited May 2010
    I'm a bit disturbed, if it makes you feel any better.

    But yeah, it looks like something out of a Disney movie. Sort of like Robin Hood.

    A bit disturbed?:eek: Yeah, I was kind of thinking Robin Hood among other things.
  • edited May 2010
    Totally not disturbing but utterly cute. :D
    That
  • edited May 2010
    Cute!. . .but what's so disturbing about it is that I just know that somewhere there's a bunch of furries jerking off to it. :(
  • edited May 2010
    There are people jerking off to pretty much anything, somewhere.
  • edited May 2010
    I wasn't disturbed until just... right...about....now.
  • edited May 2010
    Jen Kollic wrote: »
    I did not draw this, but I am a terrible, TERRIBLE influence.

    000498yw

    i know it sounds bad, but Elaine looks kinda sexy in that sketch, why cant she look that sexy in the game, no wonder Morgan was more of sex icon for guys lol
  • edited May 2010
    disturbingguybrushelaine.jpg
  • edited May 2010
    Love me!
  • edited May 2010
    Wolfstar27 wrote: »
    i know it sounds bad, but Elaine looks kinda sexy in that sketch, why cant she look that sexy in the game, no wonder Morgan was more of sex icon for guys lol

    I think it's awesome to be honest. I love it.
  • edited May 2010
    Wolfstar27 wrote: »
    i know it sounds bad, but Guybrush looks really sexy in that sketch, why cant he dress in lingeree in the game..?

    fix'd. . *whistles innocently*
  • edited May 2010
    brus.png
  • edited May 2010
    not disturbing at all. in fact, it doesnt even look like guybrush anymore!
  • edited May 2010
    not disturbing at all. in fact, it doesnt even look like guybrush anymore!

    You see many 8 year olds with 5 o'clock shadow?
  • edited May 2010
    Ignis wrote: »
    Cute!. . .but what's so disturbing about it is that I just know that somewhere there's a bunch of furries jerking off to it. :(
    Don't believe everything they say about us... seriously.

    I still wonder why being a furry (a non-sexual fandom) is totally "bad", while it's totally okay to love yaoi (which is a totally sexual fandom). To me, that seems a lot more disturbing...
  • edited May 2010
    I know that the furry subculture isn't supposed to be sexual, but I think the thing that bothers me is those who draw super sexualized versions of childhood cartoon characters. But that's not just for furries, and even the ones who are don't represent the subculture, and even further above that, its just my personal taste.

    And although I'm somewhat indifferent about yaoi, I think that the reason why its more socially excepted is because its between humans. And I feel that most people who say they're into yaoi are actually more shonen-ai, but I have no idea as I'm really not interested.
  • edited May 2010
    For the last time, enough with the chit chat! Post DiStUrBiNg fanart.
  • edited May 2010
    I'll never understand why the second anthropomorphic characters got the name "Furry" (which you'll admit is easier to use in everyday conversation) it went from "most of Disney movies, comics and cartoons" to "OMG that's so perverted".

    I also don't get why it would be more disturbing to think of Lola Bunny as attractive than Marge Simpson, when Lola Bunny looks more like a human anyways.
    I took that argument from Dan Shive, because I can't be bothered to look for other famous cartoon characters, but the point still stands that if someone sees a totally humanised non-human animal and says something like "she's cute" or "she's hot", people will go "oooh, you pervert!" while you take a human cartoon characters who looks nothing human, be it in proportions, colours or features, and it's totally acceptable to say "she's cute" or "she's hot".

    Makes no sense to me.

    I also don't get why it's been so sexualised. It's as sexual as anything else on the Internet. You don't hear people go around saying "Ugh, these Monkey Island fans are so disgusting!" yet there is probably the same proportion of perverts, and porn fanart isn't hard to find.

    So, since we're on the subject, why don't we draw the whole cast as furries or, since it's more politically correct, "anthropomorphic animals"?
  • edited May 2010

    I still wonder why being a furry (a non-sexual fandom) is totally "bad", while it's totally okay to love yaoi (which is a totally sexual fandom). To me, that seems a lot more disturbing...

    All I've ever seen of the furry fandom (and I've seen a lot) has been nothing but sexual and the really disturbingly perverse kind of sexual. :(
    But yeah, the main thing that's disturbing about it to me is the fact that it's animals, whereas in yaoi or regular guy-on-guy, etc, it's not only humans but consenting adult humans.
    Furry-ism edges just a little too close to bestiality for me to feel comfortable about it---I'm not saying people who are into it are all people who have sex with animals, but it flirts with that line too closely for me.
  • edited May 2010
    I finished another disturbing fan art
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/48093051@N03/4634074171/sizes/o/

    Because I have no scanner it's a camera photo at a weird angle...
  • edited May 2010
    I dunno, to me it's similar to finding elves (Tolkien-style) or aliens hot. It's a creature with human characteristics who isn't human. While I wouldn't be attracted to a character because they're an anthropomorphic animal, it certainly wouldn't stop me if they awesome in every way that matters.
    I personally don't think it means the people are attracted to animals any more than the people who like Yaoi are attracted to humans whose eyes are 30% of their face.

    Of course, if I have to think about it, I fail to see how I could kiss someone who doesn't have lips, only a mussle. I wouldn't want to do that. On the other hand, I thought the point was that furries don't feel like humans and feel like they're closer to their true selves when they're their animal alter egos. Which probably isn't that far from people who prefer being their cleric dwarf or barbarian ogre.

    As someone who often feels like humans are the worst animals in many ways, I can certainly understand why someone would want to pretend they aren't one.
    And even when it's sexual, isn't it between two non-humans anyways?

    I'm not sure why yaoi should be wrong though. It's just a subcategory of hentai (manga porn). It's gay (male) porn, and well, what's wrong with that? Lots of people like gay (female) porn too (yuri in the manga version).
    For the little hentai I've read, the only thing that really disturbed me was males constantly saying "Ahh, my penis is melting!" and it supposed to be something good. Er, okay? That's more likely to make me actually run away if your little guy is melting, but whatev'.
    I don't know if yaoi is super-different in a weird, disturbing way, since I haven't ever read any (although I've read some shonen ai) but I personally don't really see a reason why it would be.

    Unless Hassat's problem is the idea of a sexual fandom to begin with?

    (If we keep going on about that, we might cause another topic to be split!)
  • edited May 2010
    Get it right.

    Furries = Animal fans; goto furry conventions; dress as anthropomorphic animals.
    Trekkies = Star Trek Fans; goto Star Trek Conventions; dress as Star Trek characters
    Zoophiles(Bestiality) = People physically attracted to real animals, period.



    Oh, and disturbing pictures/fanart says hi.
  • edited May 2010
    Furries = Animal fans; goto furry conventions; dress as anthropomorphic animals.
    Trekkies = Star Trek Fans; goto Star Trek Conventions; dress as Star Trek characters

    I wonder if that makes Monkey Island fans Monkies.
  • edited May 2010
    No, I think those are Monk fans. They go to conventions and act obsessive-compulsive.
  • edited May 2010
    Zoophiles(Bestiality) = People physically attracted to real animals, period.

    Ah, that's what I have the problem with.
    I admit furryism seriously squicks me out, but I don't think it's technically any more "wrong" or abominable than say, homosexuality and there are plenty of other technically healthy sexual fetishes out there that gross me out more. Eh.

    P.S. I used to love yaoi, except now I've pretty much lost my attraction to Anime characters. :p
  • edited May 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    Unless Hassat's problem is the idea of a sexual fandom to begin with?
    More that a non-sexual fandom is automatically seen as only sexual, while the actual sexual fandoms don't get that kind of response that everyone is fucking off each other :S.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.