Disturbing pictures/fanart

1121315171821

Comments

  • edited December 2009
    I couldn't see it that well at first and was thinking Guybrush was Elaine, the man on top being either LeChuck or a rather buff Guybrush.

    And then the horrible truth hit me.
  • edited December 2009
    Huh. I'm rather underwhelmed. Then again, I have seen far more Gundam Wing fanart than anyone ever should. *shudder*
  • edited December 2009
    Scrawffler wrote: »
    Well that one's gonna haunt me for a loooooong time...

    (BTW that's a compliment!)

    I've already put this in the normal fanart thread but anyways:
    picture.php?albumid=262&pictureid=1980

    I think the most disturbing part of the picture is the gardener.

    lmao, that's disturbing in so.. soo.. many ways.

    the nice gardener thing kills me.
  • LupLup
    edited December 2009
    where are all the great disturbing artists here?! xD comn post some new stuff!
    I posted sexy voodoo lady who can top that?! xD
  • edited December 2009
    I'll post one of LeChuck on a well-known Sam & Max backdrop when I have time (trust me, it gives you very disturbed thoughts, the idea I have).
  • edited December 2009
    I posted this way back when in the old Photoshop contest thread, but I don't think it ever found its way here:

    guybrush-larry.gif
  • edited December 2009
    I posted this way back when in the old Photoshop contest thread, but I don't think it ever found its way here:

    guybrush-larry.gif

    Ooh! Put him on Chippendale's stage! :D
  • edited December 2009
    guybrush-larry.gif
    error_ohcrumbs.gif
  • edited December 2009
    Haha, nicely done! This definitely belongs here!
  • edited December 2009
    I have a fondness for Leisure Suit Larry games.. some of which having come out during my puberty years and all.
  • edited January 2010
    *cough*
  • edited January 2010
    I think this thread has died.
  • edited January 2010
    Bringing up Leisure Suit Larry and your puberty will do that
  • edited January 2010
    Maxilyah wrote: »
    I think this thread has died.

    No... no, no. Don't say that.

    C'mon thread, stay with me, stay with me, come on.

    Beep...beep....beep.....beep......beep.......beep........beep.........beep.........beep...........beep.............beep............beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....

    Yep, it's dead.
  • edited January 2010
    Nah, it'll come back when season 2 is here.
  • edited January 2010
    Yeah, it's just sleeping.

    Edit: Sleeping beauty :D.
  • LupLup
    edited January 2010
    Live, Disturbing pictures/fanart thread!!! Liiiive!

    Here is a vision I have of the greatest Mmorpg of all times! Aand for some reason a weird looking pirate who appears to be an old friend of mine ... O..ô

    mionlie.jpg
  • edited February 2010
    Nooooo, this thread can't be dead! I just read it through from the beginning, giggling so much that my flatmate thought I was crying. (well, I nearly was when it came to that Guybrush/LeChuck pic) Human girl!LeChuck is definitely my favourite. I'd hit that.
  • edited February 2010
    I could draw something, but I don't know what I should draw. Suggestions?
  • edited February 2010
    Guybrush in a corset.
  • edited February 2010
    Draw a bunch of the guys in Morgan's clothes?
  • edited February 2010
    Draw a bunch of the guys in Morgan's clothes?

    THIS x 1000!!!
  • edited February 2010
    ...okie dokie then.
  • edited February 2010
    Dude, I'm really sorry for you.
  • edited February 2010
    BeeKay84 wrote: »
    I know it's not Gothic Elaine, but I just finished this and wanted to ask: Is this disturbing?

    Tales_of_MI__LeChuck__s_Beard_by_beekay84.jpg

    Sure felt disturbing for me when I drew it...

    I like this because LeChuck is so into turning himself undead to force Elaine into loving him that he doesn't realize she's falling for him as human already. If he would've been a wee bit smarter, he'd stay human to completely rip her away from Guybrush in first place (but we all know LeChuck isn't very bright to start with, so...).
  • edited February 2010
    That's okay, I agreed to do it.
  • edited February 2010
    Right now I think it's awesome that you agreed to it. When it's done, I'll probably be cursing my brain for ever thinking of it.
  • edited February 2010
    And there are surely some talented artists in this thread. Well, beside those who "borrow" their stuff from the internets.

    I don't care if I'm two months late, still going to say it: I'd always figured that the first thing to come off Morgan would be her pants =)
  • edited February 2010
    Guybrush in a corset a la mode. I can't believe I spent all this time and resemblance of effort into this. I hope you're happy.
    whatguybrush.jpg

    The thing is, it's kinda unfinished. Should I fix it up and color it, or leave it be?
  • edited February 2010
    Giant Tope wrote: »
    Guybrush in a corset a la mode. I can't believe I spent all this time and resemblance of effort into this. I hope you're happy.
    whatguybrush.jpg

    VERY YES. A++ would LOL again.

    ...it would look nice in colour...
  • edited February 2010
    LADIES AND GENTS, THE TRUE SECRET OF MONKEY ISLAND
    Guybrush's got some pretty nice gams.
  • edited February 2010
    Giant Tope wrote: »
    :eek:
    Oh lord. This is so... wrong, yet it's pretty awesome.
  • edited February 2010
    Just read the whole thread, lots of nice stuff here. I'm glad it's not actually disturbing, I've seen much worse in other places that I'm not going to anymore xD.

    Can someone do a Stan S. Stanman, naked attorney at law? Tastefully hidden by his bench or something, of course. Bonus points if he keeps his hat on.

    (I never know on North-American forums what's ok or not, what with the whole "all nudity is considered sexual nudity" thing going on. But I'm assuming it would be fine as long as you don't actually see anything.)
  • edited February 2010
    Hmm, I have an idea. Three words:

    Like a volcano!

    Make of that what you will.
  • edited February 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    Can someone do a Stan S. Stanman, naked attorney at law? Tastefully hidden by his bench or something, of course. Bonus points if he keeps his hat on.
    Been done. Look at p. 6 or so.
    Avistew wrote: »
    (I never know on North-American forums what's ok or not, what with the whole "all nudity is considered sexual nudity" thing going on. But I'm assuming it would be fine as long as you don't actually see anything.)
    But we're both canucks, dude! How can you not have known that? lol
  • edited February 2010
    Uzrname wrote: »
    Been done. Look at p. 6 or so.

    Nah. First he's in a swimsuit (and his jacket), second he's not in the courtroom, third I want one that's all drawn :P
    I'm picky that way.
    But we're both canucks, dude! How can you not have known that? lol

    I was actually born and raised in France, where movies with full frontal nudity (male or female) can be rated all audiences and nobody will protest, and naturist camp sites have parents with their kids spend their holidays among other people and their kids. All naked of course.
    And people film music videos with naked women in the street without needing a special permission (the video is censored, and safe for work as a result)

    So the concept of "oh my God that person is naked it's gross" is pretty foreign to me.

    (My husband is Canuck, although he's not usually disturbed by nudity either).
  • edited February 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    Nah. First he's in a swimsuit (and his jacket), second he's not in the courtroom, third I want one that's all drawn :P
    I'm picky that way.
    Do you draw? =)
    Avistew wrote: »
    So the concept of "oh my God that person is naked it's gross" is pretty foreign to me.
    I don't think that's the issue of this thread. "Disturbing" in this way is more like "It makes me want to do something else than laugh". That's how I see it, at least, because if you put Morgan in a swimsuit, it's natural than a male seeing this would rather go "errr..." implying something we all know about =)
    And if you do the same thing with Sister Agnes, the reaction will be "Where's my bucket?!?!?!" but rarely laughable either. See my point?

    That's what "disturbing" is to me, at least. But I can tell you that the TTG team must be very open-minded to that, seeing as many forums I've visited in the past had a rule GTFO applied to rule 34. If you see what I mean.
    Avistew wrote: »
    (My husband is Canuck, although he's not usually disturbed by nudity either).
    Ummm okay, this forum really needs some proper user gender identification...
    Sorry for "dude" calling thou, I didn't know you were a married woman with two guys on your avatar =)
    No hard feelings?
  • edited February 2010
    Uzrname wrote: »
    Do you draw? =)

    Not well enough to do it myself, sadly. I like drawing but I'm getting worse and worse for lack of practice, and I'm too lazy to really get into it 100%.
    Uzrname wrote: »
    I don't think that's the issue of this thread. "Disturbing" in this way is more like "It makes me want to do something else than laugh".

    Yeah, I totally get that. I didn't mean for this thread specifically, but sometimes I don't get jokes (I mean, I understand them but can't relate to them) when there is a naked man, and all men around are like "ugh, please cover yourself" or "I don't need to see that" or something.
    I keep thinking "well, then don't look there". Plus I can't imagine they've never seen other men naked in change rooms and stuff.
    Anyway, that's a totally different subject. What I mean is sometimes I have trouble being able to tell what's out of line and what isn't because I don't know exactly where the line is for you guys.
    Uzrname wrote: »
    Sorry for "dude" calling thou, I didn't know you were a married woman with two guys on your avatar =)
    No hard feelings?

    That's perfectly fine. I am indeed female, although to be honest since I'm in Canada I'm not sure my being married to a male means I have to be female. Of course, since I'm French, there would be complications (only civil unions are legal in France for same-sex couples at this time).
    Anyways, I wanted an avatar because I find it better than not having any, and I dug up the first thing I could find, which is sprites of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert I had on my computer. Aren't they adorable?

    I'll change for a more feminine avatar, actually I think I know what I can use.

    EDIT: changed my avatar, so here is a picture of the old one for those wondering what we're talking about: jonstephen.png
  • edited February 2010
    If anyone draws Stan naked, then for the record I think that if he has chest hair, it'll be in the shape of an S, either by nature or design. Just sayin'.
  • edited February 2010
    Avistew wrote: »
    and all men around are like "ugh, please cover yourself" or "I don't need to see that" or something
    Well, personally I can relate to that. Especially if that man wants me to look at his belongings and comment on them. If there would be a fork to gouge my own eyes with at the moment, I'd gladly use it.

    No, really, to the humblest reaches of my experience, I could only say that seeing a naked woman for another woman is way less disgusting that seeing a naked man for another man. Once again, I'm talking straight heterosexual thought here, which today is, more or less, still the p.o.v. of the majority of people.
    Avistew wrote: »
    That's perfectly fine. I am indeed female, although to be honest since I'm in Canada I'm not sure my being married to a male means I have to be female.
    You're not mistaken. But neither am I, because if you were to say to me "my significant other", maybe I would've had doubts about your gender. But seeing as you replied "my husband", I can hardly picture a man say that.

    Not that I've got anything against same-sex marriage, it's just that I'm still uncommon to two men calling themselves "husbands" or two women "wifes". Albeit I've never seen that happen either.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.