What do you look like? (Post a Pic!)

1262729313260

Comments

  • edited January 2011
    Here is a picture of me as a sea caption, for reasons that require no explanation!

    n7438248221520035355282.jpg
  • edited January 2011
    You earn points for the Futurama poster, but you lose double points for the South Park ones.
  • edited January 2011
    That photo was taken a few years ago now. None of those posters are up anymore :o I'm likely to be moving out soon so I haven't really bothered redecorating my room.
  • edited February 2011
    You earn points for the Futurama posters but gain quadruple for the South Park ones. South Park is, on the whole, a far more intelligent and mature show.
  • edited February 2011
    You earn points for the Futurama posters but gain quadruple for the South Park ones. South Park is, on the whole, a far more intelligent and mature show.

    South park's only as funny as the current events it's mocking. When the news story gets old the episode usually gets old as well.

    Some are timeless though, no examples spring to mind though as i'm focusing on my dinner and counting down til it's ready
  • edited February 2011
    You earn points for the Futurama posters but gain quadruple for the South Park ones. South Park is, on the whole, a far more intelligent and mature show.

    Really? I know I'm pretty biased, fifth grade having been hell due to sharing a name with a certain kid in an orange parka, but I have a hard time believing this.
  • edited February 2011
    South Park, Mature? how?
  • edited February 2011
    Remolay wrote: »
    South Park, Mature? how?

    All the satire of recent events possibly? That is basically South Parks schtick these days
  • edited February 2011
    South Park is a fantastic show, though its quality has been waning a bit these last couple of seasons. People who don't like it usually don't get what it's really about or are just too put off by its crude content.

    It's actually an extremely intelligent social commentary that points out the flaws in many aspects of society, as well poking fun at a verity celebrities who usually have it coming. (Tom Cruise and Paris Hilton for example.)
  • edited February 2011
    It's been a while since I've posted a picture, so Here's one of me in the mid 90's!

    attachment.php?attachmentid=2326&stc=1&d=1296848966

    Thank god I never bought any more dungarees...
    I do miss those shoes though: They lit up! I just wish they did light up shoes in size 13...
  • edited February 2011
    Friar wrote: »
    blah blah boring talk

    Do you resent your parents?
  • edited February 2011
    Silly boy, those dungarees are not your sleeves!
  • edited February 2011
    TomPravetz wrote: »
    Do you resent your parents?
    What? No! Dungaree's are just impractical. Especially when worn around your arms!
    Besides, they bought me that cool trainset in the background, and cars to go on it!
  • edited February 2011
    This is me in some awesome pizza cafe some place in Cornwall on a road trip I did with some friends. Check out my huge nose:
    4751673573_5c412bdbde.jpg
  • edited February 2011
    Really? I know I'm pretty biased, fifth grade having been hell due to sharing a name with a certain kid in an orange parka, but I have a hard time believing this.
    For all the crudity of the humor on the surface(which, for the record, I find hilarious), the show has one of the most measured and intelligent social observations. It is quite possibly one of the most moral shows on television, since at the end of it all the whole show is a frame around messages of tolerance, common sense, compromise, and self-reflection. The show and its creators are very quick to question their own biases, seen very prominently(though certainly not only) in the famous Mormon episode. If not one of the more intelligent shows that television has ever seen, it's certainly one of the most ethical ones.
  • edited February 2011
    I finally have a recent picture!
    F9bbv.jpg

    And without glasses, too. I'm not sure if I had ever posted my glassless face on here until just now.
  • edited February 2011
    Wow, what a difference.
  • edited February 2011
    taumel wrote: »
    Wow, what a difference.

    Really? I guess broken glasses can change your look then!
  • edited February 2011
    You're looking well there Avi I must say
  • edited February 2011
    Ditto
  • edited February 2011
    Avistew wrote: »
    Really? I guess broken glasses can change your look then!
    Yes, really, big really.
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited February 2011
    taumel wrote: »
    Yes, really, big really.

    Enormous
  • edited February 2011
    This word could have had the potential getting me into trouble.
  • edited February 2011
    I thought Avistew was a man!!! 0_o

    Also....the person above looks like Ben Jordan.
  • edited February 2011
    Avistew wrote: »
    And without glasses, too. I'm not sure if I had ever posted my glassless face on here until just now.

    I just look weird without my glasses. You, on the other hand, look good.
  • edited February 2011
    Origami wrote: »
    I thought Avistew was a man!!! 0_o

    ... How long have you been here? Really? Because if you though Avi was a man... You must be... I mean... You thought... The threads about.... Avi.... Boobs.... A man... Really? Really?
  • edited February 2011
    Yes, obviously he missed the height of popularity for "Boobs: an artistic discussion".
  • edited February 2011
    TomPravetz wrote: »
    ... How long have you been here? Really? Because if you though Avi was a man... You must be... I mean... You thought... The threads about.... Avi.... Boobs.... A man... Really? Really?
    Look at the join date. Last October. Give the guy some slack.
  • edited February 2011
    Still, I would think that Avi's avatar would be a giveaway if talking about her boyfriend wasn't.
  • edited February 2011
    Look at the join date. Last October. Give the guy some slack.

    No! No slack!


    Ok, maybe a little.
  • edited February 2011
    Still, I would think that Avi's avatar would be a giveaway if talking about her boyfriend wasn't.
    Why would talking about a boyfriend indicate that a user is female? At it indicates is that the user's boyfriend is male.
  • edited February 2011
    True, it's not a given, but it is the norm. Nothing wrong with deviating from the norm, but that doesn't change it from influencing most people's initial perceptions.
  • edited February 2011
    True, it's not a given, but it is the norm.
    Right. And if you talk about any spot, it's American football. If you talk about any television broadcast, it's the Super Bowl or Glee. If you're talking about music, you're referring to Bieber or whoever's popular now. If you mention that you read a book, it was Harry Potter. If you say you're going to spend a weekend playing video games, you're referring to Call of Duty: Black Ops or Angry Birds.
  • edited February 2011
    Right. And if you talk about any spot, it's American football. If you talk about any television broadcast, it's the Super Bowl or Glee. If you're talking about music, you're referring to Bieber or whoever's popular now. If you mention that you read a book, it was Harry Potter. If you say you're going to spend a weekend playing video games, you're referring to Call of Duty: Black Ops or Angry Birds.

    GuruGuru just got Dashing'd!
  • edited February 2011
    Naw, I won't consider myself to have been Dashing'd until the man bothers to use logic against me. There's a difference between a cultural norm and something just being popular. One's a psychological principle, the other's just...something being popular.
  • edited February 2011
    Naw, I won't consider myself to have been Dashing'd until the man bothers to use logic against me. There's a difference between a cultural norm and something just being popular. One's a psychological principle, the other's just...something being popular.
    How is assuming a person with a boyfriend is female not assuming a popular idea without any other evidence? How is homosexuality "cultural"? What the hell is a "psychological principle" anyway?
  • edited February 2011
    Go take two years of college-level psychology classes and then we'll have this discussion.
  • edited February 2011
    So basically, "I can't explain what the hell I'm saying, so I'ma take my toys and go home". Nice conversational ragequit.
  • edited February 2011
    ...what does that have to do with how having a boyfriend is solid evidence that the person is female?
  • edited February 2011
    Giant Tope wrote: »
    ...what does that have to do with how having a boyfriend is solid evidence that the person is female?
    You'd understand if you were enough of a high-brow intellectual to take college-level courses in high school. You'll have to at LEAST go to community college for two whole years before you could possibly understand. Please, don't bother with my massive brain until you can display your Town Name State College associate's diploma with a minor in psychology.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.