Escape From Monkey Island Remake?

Would you like to see an EMI remake with changes such as Alexandra Boyd as Elaine, better graphics, and an updated inventory system?
«1

Comments

  • edited March 2010
    A little suggestion, there should an option to vote no without implying that you hate the game. It is possible.
  • edited March 2010
    I've actually thought about an EMI remake and it could work pretty good. Telltale Tool + TMI character models + full 3D backgrounds + a Boyd voice option in the menu? Count me in. That said, I highly, highly doubt it would ever happen.
  • edited March 2010
    I think its ok as it is since a remake cant remove monkey kombat theres not much point I suppose the graphics and controls would be a gd update but thats about it I dont mind the voice of elaine in EMI
  • edited March 2010
    I chose "No, it's terrible and it would be a waste of time" but my real answer is "No, it is a good game and it would be a waste of time if Telltale will remake it".
  • edited March 2010
    I would choose "No, it's a good game so leave it how it is. Stop bitching about the minor problems and get over yourselves." - Only directed to those who continue to whinge about EfMI. Not directed at those who like the game and want a remake.
  • edited March 2010
    What could be fixed in a EMI SE wouldn't have made it a better game. Graphics and controls are very low on the lists of negatives with EMI. So if those aren't a problem, a remake is quite pointless.
  • edited March 2010
    Why don`t we just make a remake of TMI after a couple of years?

    I see no point in making a remake of "fairly new" games such as EMI.
    Actually the remakes of SMI and LCR were unnecessary too, but I understand them, as they are much older and a good way to introduce people to the series or delight some old fans.

    EMI is good as it is. No need for a remake
  • edited March 2010
    alkapel wrote: »
    I chose "No, it's terrible and it would be a waste of time" but my real answer is "No, it is a good game and it would be a waste of time if Telltale will remake it".
    Same as this.
  • edited March 2010
    Not necessary, it just needs an official patch to make sure it runs on modern machine and perhaps a hint system because if I remember rightly some of the puzzles were ridiculous!
  • edited March 2010
    I vote for "I liked it, and the few bits that are iffy aren't sufficent to make it worth bothering to change it". I think there's more grounds for doing a CMISE by reinstating all the bits that are missing
  • edited March 2010
    I would be happy with a re-release TBH. Part of the charm of retro-games are their retro-graphics. Which is why i hope MI2:SE will have the option to play with the original graphics, but with voices.
  • edited March 2010
    I haven't voted, I like it exactly how it is!
  • edited March 2010
    a butten saying you played it before and want to skip fighting the monkeys in monkey kombat would be nice
  • edited March 2010
    I would choose "No, it's a good game so leave it how it is. Stop bitching about the minor problems and get over yourselves." - Only directed to those who continue to whinge about EfMI. Not directed at those who like the game and want a remake.

    haha my thoughts exactly!
  • edited March 2010
    I don't hate Escape, but I don't see reason for new version. It still works without issues in my computer, so I don't see even a need for compatibility patch.

    I'm also against Curse remake. I like Bill Tiller's original artwork and voice acting of CMI, so new voices and art wouldn't bring anything good to that game. I wouldn't like to see Tales remake either, because Tales is fine the way it is. But if they make remake they could combine the episodes into a single game. :p

    In fact LCR is only game which could benefit from remake (I kind of liked the SMI: SE, although it wasn't perfect.) I hope that second SE is better, because it's going to be remake of one of the best adventure games ever.

    I don't also like idea of SMI: Special Special Edition.
  • edited March 2010
    I prefer to stick my fingers in my ears and go LA LA LA when it's mentioned. :)
  • edited March 2010
    indeed.
  • edited March 2010
    I would like to see it remade simply because it came to the mac around the time of OS X, and it just refused to work properly, even in classic mode, so I never got round to finishing it.
    I do remember the control system annoying the hell out of me, probably because I was used to the previous system. But with telltales new system I can't see that being such a problem :)
  • edited March 2010
    I vote yes, because the game was OK, but the ending was terrible. Maybe they could completely remake that terrible ending :)
  • edited March 2010
    No, it doesn't need it. It's fine the way it is. And it's my favorite Monkey Island game.
  • edited March 2010
    I vote yes... the backgrounds in that game are ok but the character models are all kind of ugly.
  • edited March 2010
    Monkey Kombat's setup was just messed up and complicated. I have to know the commands to switch from one fighting style to the next. Although it's interesting for replayabilty I don't want to feel like I'm taking a test and have to invest more time than I should making a chart. It's a game, not a class. If they wanted to come up with a new way to do Insult Sword fight, they could have made the controls easier to remember. But how do you fight monkeys without "Ook epp aah"? That, the pongo dials on Lucre didn't make much sense and I hated the rock throwing game on Monkey. Those are the three things I'd adjust.
  • edited March 2010
    Irishmile wrote: »
    I vote yes... the backgrounds in that game are ok but the character models are all kind of ugly.

    full20040614081732.jpg

    thats not ugly thats smexy!
  • edited March 2010

    True, shame the game looks more like this
    escape-from-monkey-island-44.jpg

    But yeah, i think it deserves a remake. Or a re-release. I've lost my copy (PS2) and i've heard it doesn't work too well on modern PC's. Specifically the rock throwing game on monkey. Plus, the character models could use some work.
  • edited March 2010
    that Marco Polo must get all the birds..indeed he does after guybrush messes with his lotion
  • edited March 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    But yeah, i think it deserves a remake. Or a re-release. I've lost my copy (PS2) and i've heard it doesn't work too well on modern PC's. Specifically the rock throwing game on monkey. Plus, the character models could use some work.

    Yeah, the two places that the game is pretty much guaranteed to fail on me are the Mysts-o-Tyme and the rock throwing puzzle. In the former, Guybrush tries to disembark at Pegnose Pete's and completely glitches out. When I play Escape, I have to bypass it by using a save from one time when I got lucky and he actually disembarked. And in the latter, the system that manages how fast the boulders run was poorly designed, because on any computer that's too powerful, the timing won't match up with the branches. To get past that one, I used a stopwatch the first two times and I've used a save file to bypass it every time since then.

    So yeah, I want a damn remake, if only to fix those two game-breakers.
  • edited March 2010
    While a remake sounds great, I think there are way too many things that need fixing for me to actually tolerate it, so I don't even think it's possible.
  • edited March 2010
    Friar wrote: »
    I would be happy with a re-release TBH. Part of the charm of retro-games are their retro-graphics. Which is why i hope MI2:SE will have the option to play with the original graphics, but with voices.

    yeah you will be able to play with the orignal graphics with voices, but hope there is an option to turn it off aswell,cause id want to play it how it orignal was, but it mention it on lucasarts website
  • edited March 2010
    Wolfstar27 wrote: »
    yeah you will be able to play with the orignal graphics with voices, but hope there is an option to turn it off aswell,cause id want to play it how it orignal was, but it mention it on lucasarts website

    it said you can have voices in orignal implying its optinal you could allways turn voice sounds down on sound menu like most games if it has that option
  • edited March 2010
    Wow, I never realized that adventure gamers are as graphic hungry as those who play first person shooters.

    I still occasionally play old adventures from the 80's, so I don't see any reason why 10 year old game would need graphic update. It's playable as it is. All it needs is a direct download version which runs with modern systems (although I wouldn't buy even that because I have CD version and game works in my computer without issues).

    In case of games made in the early 90's, I can see how the game benefits from voice acting, but why pay just for graphic update? I would rather see new adventures from LucasArts than endless series of Special Editions, most of their games are classics as it is and don't need SE.
  • edited March 2010
    I would choose "No, it's a good game so leave it how it is. Stop bitching about the minor problems and get over yourselves." - Only directed to those who continue to whinge about EfMI. Not directed at those who like the game and want a remake.

    QFW. :cool:
  • edited March 2010
    I would rather see new adventures from LucasArts than endless series of Special Editions, most of their games are classics as it is and don't need SE.
    now if only lucasarts actually made any new adventures
  • edited March 2010
    Duate wrote: »
    now if only lucasarts actually made any new adventures

    I'm going to say what I've been saying all along. The LucasArts of today is not the same LucasArts that produced the amazing adventure games we know and love. Hell, Telltale currently employs more of the people responsible for those games than LucasArts does. This isn't to say that they couldn't produce a decent adventure game, it's just that they don't have the awesome track record everyone assumes they have. Today's LucasArts hasn't proven itself either way as far as adventure games are concerned. In my opinion, they're doing the best thing they could be doing: improving games that are already great and releasing their licenses for making the new games to companies that have proven themselves, like Telltale.

    Basically, Lucasarts is currently equally likely to put out a bad adventure game as it is to put out a good one.
  • edited March 2010
    at least they finally got a president that KIND OF likes the idea of returning to classic adventure roots, even though it doesnt seem like they're actually going to. he also hinted at a new x-wing game but i think that's very unlikely too.

    so i guess he's a lateral step compared to the last president.
  • edited March 2010
    I believe Lucasarts still has it regarding adventure games. If the Internet was not available no one would be judging them by now but internet boosted hostility towards Lucasarts. Its' good they are trying to revive the old franchises and put additions on them and new (as they said in numerous interviews). We begged for Lechucks Revenge SE and now that is coming out I see a lot of people unfortunately misdjudging that Lucasarts will now ruin the game!!! Are you people serious??? I would no mind seing EMI in Special Edition with newer graphics and point and click interface. It would be a blast and boost the game which a lot of people did not like so much. Also I would not change the original voices because that would be very rude to the original creators idea (no matter how good or bad you thing it was).
    Demetris
  • edited March 2010
    dthoupis wrote: »
    I believe Lucasarts still has it regarding adventure games. If the Internet was not available no one would be judging them by now but internet boosted hostility towards Lucasarts.
    We aren't judging them, because the current LA team never made an adventure game. How can we judge something that doesn't exist?

    However, that doesn't mean we got blind faith that it'll be good if they decide to make one. Well, most of us have.
  • edited March 2010
    I don't foresee a remake happening. While it's only about 10 years old, it's still too recent of a game. Also, the workload to redo it would be too much trouble for a game that many of the fans are hostile towards anyway.

    That said, I always thought it was a shame how that high-polygon model of Guybrush posted above, turns into the low-poloygon model for the rest of the game. Elaine should have looked like this
  • edited March 2010
    I'd only really want an EMI remake if it were more like a "Director's Cut," but even if it were just higher res BGs and high poly models, I'd still buy it, so I have no point really.
  • edited March 2010
    Duate wrote: »
    now if only lucasarts actually made any new adventures

    Who knows, maybe they'll do new adventure games some day. At least there are people who are gaining experience about adventures when they work with remakes. Now all they have to do is to learn how to write a decent story and puzzles (it make take some time and first attempts may not be as polished as old classics).
  • edited March 2010
    Wow, I never realized that adventure gamers are as graphic hungry as those who play first person shooters.

    I still occasionally play old adventures from the 80's, so I don't see any reason why 10 year old game would need graphic update.

    I'm definitely not graphic hungry. I love 2d games and simple 3d games. Note that people don't complain like this about, say, CMI. The problem is that the graphics in EMI, particularly the character models, were just BAD.

    For pretty much all of the late 90s there was a blind belief among game companies that ALL GAMES MUST BE 3D, or they will not sell, the companies will atrophy and die and be laughed at. Unfortunately, this was despite the fact that 3d graphics and accelerators were pretty immature, GOOD 3d artists were hard to find (and the game 3d production process was pretty new) and games looked much, much worse than they would have if they'd just stuck with more traditional methods for the time.

    There were a number of games from this era that went 3d and were successful (and were actually a big reason why all the game companies started insisting on 3d for everything). Mario 64, for example, has pretty primitive 3d graphics by today's standards. But they're really well-done and appropriate, and I don't see any reason why that game should be remade.

    Of course, I think I'm a little jaded because my graphics card when EMI came out was underpowered (I think I still had still had a Voodoo 2) and so the graphics were especially bad for me. Looking on it now they're probably not QUITE as bad as I remember. But still pretty bad. And combined with the horribleness of the rest of the game, it adds up to FAIL for a lot of us (not everyone!).
Sign in to comment in this discussion.