I shot Kenny too. But mostly because I thought that he'd lost too much at that point to go on. I hate that I gave up on him so quick, but I stuck with my choice and ended up rooming with Jane and a random family at Howe's. Oh well. Such is life.
You were referring to a post by #teamsarah in which he/she said that it sounds not fair to justify murdering someone because they lost his/her son and that #teamsarah wouldn't do that (because it's irrational).
Your whole argument with him/her then goes along putting things into perspective of a ZA and how it's perfectly justifiable to do exactly that in the given circumstances that Jane couldn't be trusted (which you based on false premises as well ) and Kenny's history; like it's a magic law that everyone has to go nuts including #teamsarah.
I'm sorry, but there isn't much to misinterpret there.
Sorry, no straw man here.
Yes there is, I never said that you should kill a person because you feel you can't trust them. I don't kn… moreow where you misinterpreted that from but feel free to quote it. Ironically you do it again right before you say you aren't.
Your whole argument about why Jane can't be trusted is hollow as well
I wasn't arguing on why I think she shouldn't be trusted, i'm arguing why Kenny, a broken man in the walking dead universe wouldn't trust her. Not that it even needed to be argued considering he straight up says he doesn't trust her multiple times.
I'm not justifying the killing of Jane, the point of my first reply was to help explain WHY Kenny went off the rails. Hence why I used the context card. I'm sorry but you went on a tangent.
it doesnt make murder right
But yet you murdered Kenny. See what i'm saying?
Jane pushed Kenny's triggers, she knew he would over… moreeact. She also could of stopped it at any moment by revealing the baby was actually alive. Non of this is morally right but she played with fire and got burned alive.
Once again i'm not justifying Jane's murder. She did not deserve death.
My point is that actions have consequences. She knew Kenny was a broken man and she knew his limit, but yet she still purposely triggered him. A person has the free will to poke a mad dog if they want to, they should just keep in mind that the mad dog may bite, and if it does, as wrong as it may be, it was not unprovoked.
Comments
Same. She does hint that he's still alive if you listen to her. I still left her though. She really should not have done that.
Kenny is a hothead and Jane is a poophead.
I cracked the code, case closed.
I shot Kenny too. But mostly because I thought that he'd lost too much at that point to go on. I hate that I gave up on him so quick, but I stuck with my choice and ended up rooming with Jane and a random family at Howe's. Oh well. Such is life.
You were referring to a post by #teamsarah in which he/she said that it sounds not fair to justify murdering someone because they lost his/her son and that #teamsarah wouldn't do that (because it's irrational).
Your whole argument with him/her then goes along putting things into perspective of a ZA and how it's perfectly justifiable to do exactly that in the given circumstances that Jane couldn't be trusted (which you based on false premises as well ) and Kenny's history; like it's a magic law that everyone has to go nuts including #teamsarah.
I'm sorry, but there isn't much to misinterpret there.
You have an interesting understanding of murder.
Once again i'm not justifying Jane's murder. She did not deserve death.
My point is that actions have consequences. She knew Kenny was a broken man and she knew his limit, but yet she still purposely triggered him. A person has the free will to poke a mad dog if they want to, they should just keep in mind that the mad dog may bite, and if it does, as wrong as it may be, it was not unprovoked.
Jane should have planned things out better.
jane: puts baby in a freezing cold car with no supervision and could freeze to death or attract walkers by crying
jane: i uNDERSTAND YOU'RE UPSET