The personality and temperament of the characters

To be exact, I mean the results of MBTI-test and Four-Temperament-test of the people in TWD. What do you think they will be?

For example, I think Luke is Sanguine and gets ENTP. He's outgoing and smart. He gets leadership and is able to think further (eg. before the cabin group's first escape from Carver) and to take action. Personal feeling doesn't always bother him. However his attention can change very fast (such as leaving Clem alone up in the high place), and it's possible that he doesn't hold on so tight to his plans.

Nick may be Melancholic and ISFP. He's pessimistic, sentimental and sympathetic. He gets a "whatever" attitude to plans, and just hold on to those he trust.

Kenny may be Choleric and ENFP. Short temper, full of energy, more than willing to take the charge, getting lots of ideas which are never thorough, and never stuck to one place.

Chuck may be Sanguine and ESTP. He's easy-going and always gets good mood, no matter what the life gives him. He's honest and frank, and thanks to that, he can give Lee those useful suggestions.

Christa may be Phlegmatic and ISTJ. She's rational and calm, and not easy to trust others. She holds on to her standard and plan. She can also think further than others, so that she can teach a lot to Clem.

These are what I can get now. Other ideas?

Comments

  • That's really a big Pic... But sorry that I don't understand your meaning...

  • I've been down this road trying to do these sort of personality tests for my own characters, so I give you applause for doing so much research friend.

    Alt text

  • edited September 2014

    ...Actually I learnt that from my college course, Organization Behavior... We take the test in the class, and I get Choleric & INTP. It's interesting but I don't think it's that useful as people say.

    I've been down this road trying to do these sort of personality tests for my own characters, so I give you applause for doing so much research friend.

  • sigh

    Myers Briggs typology is BS. The only two attributes that actually exist on a continuum are introversion vs extroversion. Nothing else, when plotted with samples, reflects the belle curve distribution that you'd need for them to exist on a continuum, and the entire theory relies on opposing attributes to actually be on a continuum.

  • Thanks for the advise. Do you mean that sensing/intuition & thinking/feeling & judging/perception do not exist on a continuum?

    sigh Myers Briggs typology is BS. The only two attributes that actually exist on a continuum are introversion vs extroversion. Nothing

  • edited September 2014

    Yes. When you plot out many people's test results you see the bell curve like you'd expect for Introversion vs Extroversion, but all other results have randomized distribution which implies that they are not on a continuum.

    24601 posted: »

    Thanks for the advise. Do you mean that sensing/intuition & thinking/feeling & judging/perception do not exist on a continuum?

  • This is the first time I know about that! Thank you so much! :)

    Yes. When you plot out many people's test results you see the bell curve like you'd expect for Introversion vs Extroversion, but all other results have randomized distribution which implies that they are not on a continuum.

  • My personality is so complex that attributes listed thereof don't characterize, describe nor depict me. The outcome of the test is rather unsatisfactory due it it's inaccuracy and inexactness.

  • Leave it to the one who has a picture of Doug lol, hey Doug is that you???

  • I'm just gonna let you smart people talk... yeah...

Sign in to comment in this discussion.