Mike and Bonnie Defense Thread

13»

Comments

  • To be fair, I'm pretty sure Arvo was supposed to take them to the food in exchange for his life, so I don't think it belonged to solely him anymore.

    To me it sounded like he was coerced into giving it up. Kenny wanted him dead and he wanted to live. After Kenny nearly killed him, he decided to be a indian giver.

    technically it was Arvo's in the first place, and if he didn't want to share with Kenny/Jane/Clementine... To be fair, I'm pretty su

  • I don't like that Arvo gets trigger happy at the end

    Without Arvo shooting Clementine, the writers couldn't write that Lee scene. The fans get what they want, Arvo gets all the hate.

    Now is that fair?

    I don't blame them for leaving or stealing all the stuff I would have done the same thing if I were in that position. I don't like that Arvo

  • and a walkie talkie, with a informant telling them exactly where to go.

    Green613 posted: »

    I think I'm done arguing here since I can see this argument is going nowhere but I have to point out one thing. Why shouldn't they tak

  • I don't believe reggie had stockholm syndrome, i think it was more of he was afraid of being out on his own in the apocalypse, especially after one arm.

    Bokor posted: »

    Stockholm syndrome? The guy's lost his arm, and it's quite possible that Carver actually cut it off. Being forced to rely on your captors

  • I know right, even if nobody liked Becca/Shel, would they just let them die?

    Bokor posted: »

    Bonnie betraying a community she spent years living in makes her even more fickle than the writers likely intended.

  • For example if you stranded me out in the desert after making off with all the food and water in the night,

    I don't even know what to say to this. I wouldn't. I don't know.

    If people don't trust you, how can you trust them?

    Alt text

    Lilacsbloom posted: »

    Because that small amount of food might mean the difference between the live and death of a little kid, and inevitably the baby if there's n

  • But bonnie is bad in general, in my opinion.

    oh and also, they steal the car. and take the supplies.

    "we just gotta go away from that man" - not a valid reason to abandon them including the baby to their certain dead. not enough food to travel for longer than a day. doomed to die.

  • edited February 2015

    yeah but the consequences should be their concern though. Stealing the car and taking the supplies, which basically means that the baby wont survive. (they had a day's worth of food for the baby) I don't know about the rest of the group, but with these actions they will eventually face serious consequences.

    And if you separate from the group, then you don't take their chance to survive away. or else it's betrayal.

    but other than that, yeah its not really their concern if they intended for them to die. WHICH means that mike, bonnie and arvo are assholes.

    pcharl01 posted: »

    The ZA is a dog-eat-dog world. Once you separate from the group, their survival is none of your concern.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.