Why did Crawford kill their own children?
They said that they would be burdens on their society, but how would their society prosper if there are no children to grow up and continue the community for future generations? Oh and the people who were running Crawford would need someone younger to execute them when they got too old as they would become a burden as well.
It never made sense to me.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
well, Dr. Logan/Ashe tells Anna Correa that maybe in a few years things will be different, so I think Crawford was trying to wait until the apocalypse blew over....but it does seem counter-intuitive
Because of STORY.
No one would kill their own children i wouldn't think too hard about it. The last time i remember a society killing their children, were the Carthaginians, and look what happened to them. TAKE THAT BAAL.
I think they just sent the kids away along with their family. Potentially opposite of Wellington, not giving any food or supplies just leave and never come back mentality.
The Crawford community was probably thinking about the "what to do now" situation and would worry about the "kids are our future" problem later...like way later. Little did these idiots know that people like to fuck and accidents happen. When shit gets real, some adults don't want to lose the reason for living and go crazy and kill everyone when denied, as we all have seen.
Because they kept leaving flaming bags of dogsh*t on obersons porch
That's another thing, does anyone else find the name Crawford Oberson a bit odd?
Sounds like an evil name for an evil person.