Why did you feel the need to back up your views with pseudo-psychology and rhetorical questions? I agree with some points, but the presentation does a disservice to the point you are trying to make.
==> But Sarah talked when Carver was talking! Ok, you're going to give her shit for not kissing the ass of a psychopath, you be my guest. But frankly, if that's truly your opinion, it says one hell of a lot more about your character (or the lack thereof) than it does about Sarah. Crack a history book, check out what always happens when groups of people humor psychopathic leaders, and then get back to me. There are many reasons why human history is basically one long tale of war, exploitation, and bloodshed. Fear, cowardice, and the abhorrence of nonconformity are three of the biggest.
As far as content goes, this is where the argument jumped the shark for me.
1) You misconstrue Sarah's lack of situational awareness as a conscious act of insubordination, which it almost certainly is not. It's far more likely that Sarah kept talking because she didn't pick up on the non-verbal cues given by Clementine and Carver.
2) You shouldn't insult your audience by claiming they're of poor character because they disagree with you over a video game character. It's immature and uncalled for.
3) The great figures in civil disobedience would never allow themselves to get beaten down over something so trivial. They chose their battles wisely and sacrificed for things that matter. Refusing to follow a degrading or immoral order is brave. Needlessly aggravating the oppressor is foolish.
One line that really made me sympathize with Sarah was "I don't know why people have to be so mean... Even when I'm really mad, I still don't want to hurt anybody...". She genuinely can't even comprehend why someone would act like Carver does, so she doesn't think to avoid his wrath. It really puts her point of view into perspective, and actually made me stop and think, why DO people have to be so mean? Why can't Carver just tell her to be quiet, or so much as give her a warning? Why does he have to imprison, torture and murder people? Why wouldn't human survivor groups help each other out in this dire time? Because he's a sadistic asshole, and because people are selfish. That doesn't even register for her, because she would treat people with respect and help them if she could, like she did when Clementine was bit. I think people are entitled to be uninterested in her character or think shes annoying, but I agree that hating her as a person is inexcusably mean spirited.
One line that really made me sympathize with Sarah was "I don't know why people have to be so mean... Even when I'm really mad, I still don'… moret want to hurt anybody...". She genuinely can't even comprehend why someone would act like Carver does, so she doesn't think to avoid his wrath. It really puts her point of view into perspective, and actually made me stop and think, why DO people have to be so mean? Why can't Carver just tell her to be quiet, or so much as give her a warning? Why does he have to imprison, torture and murder people? Why wouldn't human survivor groups help each other out in this dire time? Because he's a sadistic asshole, and because people are selfish. That doesn't even register for her, because she would treat people with respect and help them if she could, like she did when Clementine was bit. I think people are entitled to be uninterested in her character or think shes annoying, but I agree that hating her as a person is inexcusably mean spirited.
I agree that Sarah doesnt deserve hate anymore than Duck did. She can't help being unable to cope with this horrible new world she found herself in, especially if she was having problems before that. Her father didnt help sheltering her but there's no guarantee that even exposing her would have helped. She's no Clementine. She's her own self and maybe people think she's weak but not everyone is strong and can handle those kinds of horrors.
One line that really made me sympathize with Sarah was "I don't know why people have to be so mean... Even when I'm really mad, I still don'… moret want to hurt anybody...". She genuinely can't even comprehend why someone would act like Carver does, so she doesn't think to avoid his wrath. It really puts her point of view into perspective, and actually made me stop and think, why DO people have to be so mean? Why can't Carver just tell her to be quiet, or so much as give her a warning? Why does he have to imprison, torture and murder people? Why wouldn't human survivor groups help each other out in this dire time? Because he's a sadistic asshole, and because people are selfish. That doesn't even register for her, because she would treat people with respect and help them if she could, like she did when Clementine was bit. I think people are entitled to be uninterested in her character or think shes annoying, but I agree that hating her as a person is inexcusably mean spirited.
They thought people hated Sarah because she was being 'stupid' for speaking when the psychopath was making his grand speech. Not endorsing child violence.
Don't put words in people's mouths, especially when the context you put in paints them in a bad light.
Wouldn't you find it dumb if your friend asked how you felt after you just got kidnapped right infront of your fucking kidnapper? Your aggressive, psychotic, kidnapper?
One line that really made me sympathize with Sarah was "I don't know why people have to be so mean... Even when I'm really mad, I still don'… moret want to hurt anybody...". She genuinely can't even comprehend why someone would act like Carver does, so she doesn't think to avoid his wrath. It really puts her point of view into perspective, and actually made me stop and think, why DO people have to be so mean? Why can't Carver just tell her to be quiet, or so much as give her a warning? Why does he have to imprison, torture and murder people? Why wouldn't human survivor groups help each other out in this dire time? Because he's a sadistic asshole, and because people are selfish. That doesn't even register for her, because she would treat people with respect and help them if she could, like she did when Clementine was bit. I think people are entitled to be uninterested in her character or think shes annoying, but I agree that hating her as a person is inexcusably mean spirited.
It's like the classroom scenario of talking over the principle to your friends, you just don't fucking do it out of fear of what might happen. I had this bitch of a principle way back when, and my friend tried talking to me as we were getting lectured and I ignored him. Turns out he got a detention and missed his lunch break for talking over her :P
But Sarah talked when Carver was talking! Ok, you're going to give her shit for not kissing the ass of a psychopath, you be my guest
… more I'm giving her s**t for pissing off a psychopath. We all knew how crazy Carver was, and if he says don't talk, I would try and shut up. there's a difference between kissing the ass of a psycopath and not attempting to anger him.
Greg Miller does strike me as autistic. Loud as fuck, doesn't know how to act nice in formal social situations, and has a very Chris-Channy appearance all around.
I think Sarah was cool because she was the new Ben , don't know who was worse , Sarah or Ben but still I thought they were both interesting because they gave us sort of an obligation too try and look out for them , protect them , still I'll be honest I don't like Sarah but that doesn't mean I hate her , I did the best I could for her , but every single one you have too admit , if this was real life lol you would of stayed as far away a possible from both of them because they would of eventually got you killed ..... Don't mean too be a jerk. I feel bad now lol but admit some people are good for the group and some people are not good for the group ... truth :`[
I think Sarah was cool because she was the new Ben , don't know who was worse , Sarah or Ben but still I thought they were both interesting … morebecause they gave us sort of an obligation too try and look out for them , protect them , still I'll be honest I don't like Sarah but that doesn't mean I hate her , I did the best I could for her , but every single one you have too admit , if this was real life lol you would of stayed as far away a possible from both of them because they would of eventually got you killed ..... Don't mean too be a jerk. I feel bad now lol but admit some people are good for the group and some people are not good for the group ... truth :`[
Nah, ain't nothing American about it, he's just an unprofessional twat. There's hosts out there that can be dickish, but still lovable because they know when to pull the persona back. Miller never seems to switch it off. I'd hate to be his girlfriend when they're having sex. He'd probably be making off-handed remarks about her performance.
You can compare anything and anybody , they were both bad for the group , both caused issues , potentially did or would of gotton people killed they are sort of the same except one is worse , which one idk
None of that explains why i hate her. Sarah takes everything as a joke, Like when she asked clem how to use a gun, The way she talked, portrayed how dumb she is. That kind of behavior is what got her killed.
If you refuse to teach her, her surprisingly wise response is "Everything is dangerous. I need to know sometimes." Now where have we heard that piece of knowledge before? From Lee himself actually, in an optional dialogue choice.
Sarah was much smarter than people give her credit for. In spite of her father cripplingly coddling her, she knew that on some level that it wasn't a good thing, and was trying to take initiative to improve.
None of that explains why i hate her. Sarah takes everything as a joke, Like when she asked clem how to use a gun, The way she talked, portrayed how dumb she is. That kind of behavior is what got her killed.
I get that, But her way of handling that change was naive, And in the ZA, That'd get you killed. That's my point. If i really saw a potential in her, I'd be ranting with you guys about her death.
If you refuse to teach her, her surprisingly wise response is "Everything is dangerous. I need to know sometimes." Now where have we heard t… morehat piece of knowledge before? From Lee himself actually, in an optional dialogue choice.
Sarah was much smarter than people give her credit for. In spite of her father cripplingly coddling her, she knew that on some level that it wasn't a good thing, and was trying to take initiative to improve.
I've been saying this same exact thing about Ben ever since I played Season 1. People hate characters like this because they're forced to be confronted with their greatest insecurities--that they won't be badass and pragmatic like Jane, that they'll make mistakes and get scared and be deemed useless and burdensome by others. They tell a side of the story that's genuinely frightening to some people.
Wait, what? You get that she was surprisingly wise, but you still think she handled change naively? And naivety will get you killed in the ZA? Seems like you agree with Telltale's recent "cold-hearted survivalist" philosophy that everyone's upset about... Anyhow, how exactly was Sarah naïve and, more importantly, how did it get people killed? The one time Sarah was even remotely naïve (helping Clem, a complete stranger) saved someone's life.
I get that, But her way of handling that change was naive, And in the ZA, That'd get you killed. That's my point. If i really saw a potential in her, I'd be ranting with you guys about her death.
I get that she wants to change, But the way she handles it would get people killed. Like the amount of time she spent recovering after her father hit her, And the way she reacted after her father was killed. It was a stupid mistake to run away as it'd clearly get her killed. Sarah might have survived in S1, But in S2, Things gone to complete shit, A single mistake would cost you your life. I believe she "may" have evolved periodically under Clem's supervision IF it was under different circumstances.
Wait, what? You get that she was surprisingly wise, but you still think she handled change naively? And naivety will get you killed in the Z… moreA? Seems like you agree with Telltale's recent "cold-hearted survivalist" philosophy that everyone's upset about... Anyhow, how exactly was Sarah naïve and, more importantly, how did it get people killed? The one time Sarah was even remotely naïve (helping Clem, a complete stranger) saved someone's life.
Coincidentally, Kenny made that exact same mistake when he saw Sarita get eaten. Screaming in a herd and going pretty much catatonic. Sarah's reaction to Carlos' death had nothing to do with naivety. It was how any person would have reacted to seeing a loved one being horribly devoured. Well, most people at least.
And is that really the only thing you have against Sarah? She showed herself to be a kind child who tried to survive in spite of her father's hindrance and a possible mental condition, and then she made one "mistake" so she deserves to be hated? I completely understand why some people dislike her or think she's "annoying", but wishing her a horrible death is something I could never agree with. Food for thought: Sarah suffered a more painful death than Carver, who died pretty much instantly.
EDIT: And one more thing. You claimed at first that you saw absolutely no potential in her, which is why you weren't "ranting with us". Then you back-pedal and say that you believe she may have evolved under Clem's supervision in certain circumstances? So you're basically saying that she did have potential...
I get that she wants to change, But the way she handles it would get people killed. Like the amount of time she spent recovering after her f… moreather hit her, And the way she reacted after her father was killed. It was a stupid mistake to run away as it'd clearly get her killed. Sarah might have survived in S1, But in S2, Things gone to complete shit, A single mistake would cost you your life. I believe she "may" have evolved periodically under Clem's supervision IF it was under different circumstances.
Coincidentally, I'm a survivalist myself.
Well, Grieving because her father was killed is fine, "Though I wouldn't do it in the ZA", But separating Yourself from the group to go into the unknown is pretty much a death sentence, And a stupid decision.
You're missing the point, I'm a Survivalist, I don't have time to babysit a girl that makes stupid decisions, She's always proven to be of no value or help at any circumstance. Besides, She isn't even a compelling character that makes save her because she could be something of value later. That's pretty much the difference between Clem and Sarah, Clem's character was unique, Smart and resourceful. Sarah was stupid, Unadaptive and naive.
Coincidentally, Kenny made that exact same mistake when he saw Sarita get eaten. Screaming in a herd and going pretty much catatonic. Sarah'… mores reaction to Carlos' death had nothing to do with naivety. It was how any person would have reacted to seeing a loved one being horribly devoured. Well, most people at least.
And is that really the only thing you have against Sarah? She showed herself to be a kind child who tried to survive in spite of her father's hindrance and a possible mental condition, and then she made one "mistake" so she deserves to be hated? I completely understand why some people dislike her or think she's "annoying", but wishing her a horrible death is something I could never agree with. Food for thought: Sarah suffered a more painful death than Carver, who died pretty much instantly.
EDIT: And one more thing. You claimed at first that you saw absolutely no potential in her, which is why you weren't "ranting with us". Th… [view original content]
I've been saying this same exact thing about Ben ever since I played Season 1. People hate characters like this because they're forced to be… more confronted with their greatest insecurities--that they won't be badass and pragmatic like Jane, that they'll make mistakes and get scared and be deemed useless and burdensome by others. They tell a side of the story that's genuinely frightening to some people.
And yet literally everyone in the group separated from each other while escaping the herd. So everyone was stupid, you can’t single out Sarah here. Like I said, Kenny reacted no better to watching a loved one get eaten.
I and many others found Sarah compelling because she was relatable and unique. She possibly had a debilitating mental condition and a father who was actively holding her back from reaching her full potential. In spite of this, she was still kind-hearted, tried to be helpful, and nowhere near as huge a liability or threat as people claim. Sarah's fans were cheering for her because she could've proved that even if you're "weak", that doesn't mean you're worthless or deserve to die.
And, you have yet to answer my question of how Sarah was “stupid, unadaptive, or naïve”. She was surprisingly intelligent (she knew when Clem was lying to her), she was trying to adapt to the ZA in spite of her father’s idiocy and her possible condition (urging Clem that she needs to know how to defend herself), and was not naïve at any point (except helping a complete stranger, which ended up saving a life). Seems to me that you’re simply intolerant of anyone who isn’t a raging, zombie-destroying badass.
This is somewhat on topic, but I find it incredibly hilarious that some people blame Sarah for getting people killed, when she got a whopping zero people killed in the entire game. Ben and Kenny had a far worse track record than her. Seriously, when can we get rid of Kenny???
Well, Grieving because her father was killed is fine, "Though I wouldn't do it in the ZA", But separating Yourself from the group to go into… more the unknown is pretty much a death sentence, And a stupid decision.
You're missing the point, I'm a Survivalist, I don't have time to babysit a girl that makes stupid decisions, She's always proven to be of no value or help at any circumstance. Besides, She isn't even a compelling character that makes save her because she could be something of value later. That's pretty much the difference between Clem and Sarah, Clem's character was unique, Smart and resourceful. Sarah was stupid, Unadaptive and naive.
None of that explains why i hate her. Sarah takes everything as a joke, Like when she asked clem how to use a gun, The way she talked, portrayed how dumb she is. That kind of behavior is what got her killed.
None of that explains why i hate her. Sarah takes everything as a joke, Like when she asked clem how to use a gun, The way she talked, portrayed how dumb she is. That kind of behavior is what got her killed.
I've been saying this same exact thing about Ben ever since I played Season 1. People hate characters like this because they're forced to be… more confronted with their greatest insecurities--that they won't be badass and pragmatic like Jane, that they'll make mistakes and get scared and be deemed useless and burdensome by others. They tell a side of the story that's genuinely frightening to some people.
No. Their separation was planned in order to get to the other side, Sarah separated herself deliberately which will cause her to get devoured by walkers and get bitten. And I don't like Kenny either, He's self-righteous.
In my opinion, She's no where near unique.
Your question has already been answered. My type of conversation is to give you the data and let you understand its value. Sarah doesn't act as she's supposed to do in order to survive, That's why she's unadaptive and naive. I respect a character when they can look out for themselves and analyze the situation very well and benefit from it. For example, Clem, Lee, Molly ... Etc. I don't have time for stupid people, Or tyrants like Carver. Sarah has proved a multiple time, That she doesn't even have the potential to analyze and act well to survive, She need a LOT of time in order to change. So, She's not my concern. Killing her was a right call from Telltale.
Well, Sarah caused a mess, But let's not get into that type of conversation.
And yet literally everyone in the group separated from each other while escaping the herd. So everyone was stupid, you can’t single out Sara… moreh here. Like I said, Kenny reacted no better to watching a loved one get eaten.
I and many others found Sarah compelling because she was relatable and unique. She possibly had a debilitating mental condition and a father who was actively holding her back from reaching her full potential. In spite of this, she was still kind-hearted, tried to be helpful, and nowhere near as huge a liability or threat as people claim. Sarah's fans were cheering for her because she could've proved that even if you're "weak", that doesn't mean you're worthless or deserve to die.
And, you have yet to answer my question of how Sarah was “stupid, unadaptive, or naïve”. She was surprisingly intelligent (she knew when Clem was lying to her), she was trying to adapt to the ZA in spite of her father’s idiocy and her possible c… [view original content]
Comments
well even if you weren't applying it to me, claiming that people blame her because she is a girl is pretty pathetic
Why did you feel the need to back up your views with pseudo-psychology and rhetorical questions? I agree with some points, but the presentation does a disservice to the point you are trying to make.
As far as content goes, this is where the argument jumped the shark for me.
1) You misconstrue Sarah's lack of situational awareness as a conscious act of insubordination, which it almost certainly is not. It's far more likely that Sarah kept talking because she didn't pick up on the non-verbal cues given by Clementine and Carver.
2) You shouldn't insult your audience by claiming they're of poor character because they disagree with you over a video game character. It's immature and uncalled for.
3) The great figures in civil disobedience would never allow themselves to get beaten down over something so trivial. They chose their battles wisely and sacrificed for things that matter. Refusing to follow a degrading or immoral order is brave. Needlessly aggravating the oppressor is foolish.
One line that really made me sympathize with Sarah was "I don't know why people have to be so mean... Even when I'm really mad, I still don't want to hurt anybody...". She genuinely can't even comprehend why someone would act like Carver does, so she doesn't think to avoid his wrath. It really puts her point of view into perspective, and actually made me stop and think, why DO people have to be so mean? Why can't Carver just tell her to be quiet, or so much as give her a warning? Why does he have to imprison, torture and murder people? Why wouldn't human survivor groups help each other out in this dire time? Because he's a sadistic asshole, and because people are selfish. That doesn't even register for her, because she would treat people with respect and help them if she could, like she did when Clementine was bit. I think people are entitled to be uninterested in her character or think shes annoying, but I agree that hating her as a person is inexcusably mean spirited.
That line really hit me too. Sarah had a pure heart and couldn't comprehend such pointless violence.
I agree that Sarah doesnt deserve hate anymore than Duck did. She can't help being unable to cope with this horrible new world she found herself in, especially if she was having problems before that. Her father didnt help sheltering her but there's no guarantee that even exposing her would have helped. She's no Clementine. She's her own self and maybe people think she's weak but not everyone is strong and can handle those kinds of horrors.
Along with that line, another line that made me sympathize with her was one of hers in 'Amid The Ruins:'
'You say that like it's so easy...not everyone can be like you.'
They thought people hated Sarah because she was being 'stupid' for speaking when the psychopath was making his grand speech. Not endorsing child violence.
Don't put words in people's mouths, especially when the context you put in paints them in a bad light.
Wouldn't you find it dumb if your friend asked how you felt after you just got kidnapped right infront of your fucking kidnapper? Your aggressive, psychotic, kidnapper?
[removed]
She's naive, that's what she is.
No need to be a dick about it.
No one is disputing that. It doesn't make her a bad person.
It's like the classroom scenario of talking over the principle to your friends, you just don't fucking do it out of fear of what might happen. I had this bitch of a principle way back when, and my friend tried talking to me as we were getting lectured and I ignored him. Turns out he got a detention and missed his lunch break for talking over her :P
That's not Autism, he suffers from a severe case of asshole/American
I think Sarah was cool because she was the new Ben , don't know who was worse , Sarah or Ben but still I thought they were both interesting because they gave us sort of an obligation too try and look out for them , protect them , still I'll be honest I don't like Sarah but that doesn't mean I hate her , I did the best I could for her , but every single one you have too admit , if this was real life lol you would of stayed as far away a possible from both of them because they would of eventually got you killed ..... Don't mean too be a jerk. I feel bad now lol but admit some people are good for the group and some people are not good for the group ... truth :`[
Great post
You can't compare Ben and Sarah. They are two different people.
Trying to be a badass, as your name suggests. But you are being an asshole.
Nah, ain't nothing American about it, he's just an unprofessional twat. There's hosts out there that can be dickish, but still lovable because they know when to pull the persona back. Miller never seems to switch it off. I'd hate to be his girlfriend when they're having sex. He'd probably be making off-handed remarks about her performance.
You can compare anything and anybody , they were both bad for the group , both caused issues , potentially did or would of gotton people killed they are sort of the same except one is worse , which one idk
None of that explains why i hate her. Sarah takes everything as a joke, Like when she asked clem how to use a gun, The way she talked, portrayed how dumb she is. That kind of behavior is what got her killed.
If you refuse to teach her, her surprisingly wise response is "Everything is dangerous. I need to know sometimes." Now where have we heard that piece of knowledge before? From Lee himself actually, in an optional dialogue choice.
Sarah was much smarter than people give her credit for. In spite of her father cripplingly coddling her, she knew that on some level that it wasn't a good thing, and was trying to take initiative to improve.
I get that, But her way of handling that change was naive, And in the ZA, That'd get you killed. That's my point. If i really saw a potential in her, I'd be ranting with you guys about her death.
I've been saying this same exact thing about Ben ever since I played Season 1. People hate characters like this because they're forced to be confronted with their greatest insecurities--that they won't be badass and pragmatic like Jane, that they'll make mistakes and get scared and be deemed useless and burdensome by others. They tell a side of the story that's genuinely frightening to some people.
Wait, what? You get that she was surprisingly wise, but you still think she handled change naively? And naivety will get you killed in the ZA? Seems like you agree with Telltale's recent "cold-hearted survivalist" philosophy that everyone's upset about... Anyhow, how exactly was Sarah naïve and, more importantly, how did it get people killed? The one time Sarah was even remotely naïve (helping Clem, a complete stranger) saved someone's life.
I get that she wants to change, But the way she handles it would get people killed. Like the amount of time she spent recovering after her father hit her, And the way she reacted after her father was killed. It was a stupid mistake to run away as it'd clearly get her killed. Sarah might have survived in S1, But in S2, Things gone to complete shit, A single mistake would cost you your life. I believe she "may" have evolved periodically under Clem's supervision IF it was under different circumstances.
Coincidentally, I'm a survivalist myself.
Coincidentally, Kenny made that exact same mistake when he saw Sarita get eaten. Screaming in a herd and going pretty much catatonic. Sarah's reaction to Carlos' death had nothing to do with naivety. It was how any person would have reacted to seeing a loved one being horribly devoured. Well, most people at least.
And is that really the only thing you have against Sarah? She showed herself to be a kind child who tried to survive in spite of her father's hindrance and a possible mental condition, and then she made one "mistake" so she deserves to be hated? I completely understand why some people dislike her or think she's "annoying", but wishing her a horrible death is something I could never agree with. Food for thought: Sarah suffered a more painful death than Carver, who died pretty much instantly.
EDIT: And one more thing. You claimed at first that you saw absolutely no potential in her, which is why you weren't "ranting with us". Then you back-pedal and say that you believe she may have evolved under Clem's supervision in certain circumstances? So you're basically saying that she did have potential...
Whats wrong with being american? I dont like what youre implying here...
Well, Grieving because her father was killed is fine, "Though I wouldn't do it in the ZA", But separating Yourself from the group to go into the unknown is pretty much a death sentence, And a stupid decision.
You're missing the point, I'm a Survivalist, I don't have time to babysit a girl that makes stupid decisions, She's always proven to be of no value or help at any circumstance. Besides, She isn't even a compelling character that makes save her because she could be something of value later. That's pretty much the difference between Clem and Sarah, Clem's character was unique, Smart and resourceful. Sarah was stupid, Unadaptive and naive.
Ben was my favorite character because he reminded me of my little brother.
badassm is pulling out the big guns, guise
(((
And yet literally everyone in the group separated from each other while escaping the herd. So everyone was stupid, you can’t single out Sarah here. Like I said, Kenny reacted no better to watching a loved one get eaten.
I and many others found Sarah compelling because she was relatable and unique. She possibly had a debilitating mental condition and a father who was actively holding her back from reaching her full potential. In spite of this, she was still kind-hearted, tried to be helpful, and nowhere near as huge a liability or threat as people claim. Sarah's fans were cheering for her because she could've proved that even if you're "weak", that doesn't mean you're worthless or deserve to die.
And, you have yet to answer my question of how Sarah was “stupid, unadaptive, or naïve”. She was surprisingly intelligent (she knew when Clem was lying to her), she was trying to adapt to the ZA in spite of her father’s idiocy and her possible condition (urging Clem that she needs to know how to defend herself), and was not naïve at any point (except helping a complete stranger, which ended up saving a life). Seems to me that you’re simply intolerant of anyone who isn’t a raging, zombie-destroying badass.
This is somewhat on topic, but I find it incredibly hilarious that some people blame Sarah for getting people killed, when she got a whopping zero people killed in the entire game. Ben and Kenny had a far worse track record than her. Seriously, when can we get rid of Kenny???
But that behavior isn't what got her killed at all... if anything, she died once she started taking things seriously.
Name one situation in which Sarah was 'naïve'. Outside of her helping a complete stranger (Clem), which actually saved a life.
What got her killed is her losing the will to live after her dad died or a balcony falling down on her. Not her behavior.
Ben and Nick are my favorite characters precisely because they aren't bad ass.
This is my favorite Gif in my TWD collection. I can sit and laugh at it for hours.
No. Their separation was planned in order to get to the other side, Sarah separated herself deliberately which will cause her to get devoured by walkers and get bitten. And I don't like Kenny either, He's self-righteous.
In my opinion, She's no where near unique.
Your question has already been answered. My type of conversation is to give you the data and let you understand its value. Sarah doesn't act as she's supposed to do in order to survive, That's why she's unadaptive and naive. I respect a character when they can look out for themselves and analyze the situation very well and benefit from it. For example, Clem, Lee, Molly ... Etc. I don't have time for stupid people, Or tyrants like Carver. Sarah has proved a multiple time, That she doesn't even have the potential to analyze and act well to survive, She need a LOT of time in order to change. So, She's not my concern. Killing her was a right call from Telltale.
Well, Sarah caused a mess, But let's not get into that type of conversation.
I know it's almost 10, but I think I can afford to play this gif on my television until 2015.
Your point has been addressed very carefully before. I'm deeply analyzing why Telltale chose to kill her, Not just giving general concepts.
They already crushed my dreams by killing off Nick, Sarah and Ben.
There is no hope.. Ever For Redemption.