Clem's slap

1356711

Comments

  • You're interpreting their actions as you see fit. They didn't need to point out that slapping her was unfortunate but needed because that's fucking clear as daylight. They didn't need to indicate that she was worthy of living because that's the player's judgement to make... To some, she isn't worthy of living. Whether she is a burden or not is up to the player to decide. It's always about the player... And Telltale discussed the player.

    TT247 posted: »

    I agree. And they said nothing to indicate that slapping her was a regrettable necessity. They said nothing in defense of Sarah and nothing to indicate that she was worthy of living. Instead, she was shown as nothing more than a burden.

  • edited August 2014

    Lol Hazzer when did anybody accuse Telltale of "being a neo-nazi organization that wants to rape people's wives and children"?

    Talk about hyperbole jesus christ

    Hazzer posted: »

    Nope. I'm not bothered either. But everyone seems intent on attacking Telltale's every move and convincing themselves that the company is so

  • "Nothing in the episode ever indicates that they consider her to be a worthy life."

    No, because that's for the player to decide. Telltale weren't going to just tell us what they think of Sarah during the episode.

    "Yes. So they're making it all about them."

    If it were all about them they wouldn't show regret... They'd only show relief. They obviously wish there was another way.

    TT247 posted: »

    It doesn't need to be 'portrayed' as a regrettable necessity because it quite blatantly is a regrettable necessity and a last-ditch effort t

  • No, that's shit writing

    It's shit writing for a character to matter? I'm sorry but you're agreeing with me in your very next sentence here:

    I want to see a character's traits and values through slow, careful development so that I can form my own opinion about what they're like and why.

    Agreed, and they did that until episode 4 when they suddenly tossed it out the window for nothing.

    Yeah... She remained an important and well-developed character. Yet another death hammering away at Clementine's humanity... An embodiment of innocence and kindness dying right before her eyes. It's sad and it served a huge purpose, which is a great thing.

    How is her death portrayed like this? No one ever mentions her death unless it's putting her down. No one ever talks about her as anything but a useless burden and a liability.

    But it doesn't. It shows that they're horrified by her death and are coming up with anything they can to make themselves feel better about their decision to let her be eaten alive.

    Exactly. They are doing what they can to make THEMSELVES feel better about it. How is that anything to do with Sarah herself?

    Having everyone up and say "Oh no, it's sad Sarah's dead. She was a good kid!" would be poor writing. Displaying upset and grief through only actions is far more impressive and realistic. People deal with death in very different ways... Having lost so much the group didn't even have anything to say... They were broken and decided to contain their sorrow to the best of their abilities.

    How do they display their grief through actions? By not saying anything about it? No actions there.

    I would have done the same thing in that situation. I wouldn't want to dwell on a decaying girl I happened to like... I'd cling onto anything positive... Anything to keep me going... And I'd try and deny that the loss ever occurred. The baby's birth prevented the group from tumbling into disarray and gave them a goal. From that they could perhaps ensure Sarah didn't die in vain.

    You wouldn't have bothered to make sure she didn't turn? You wouldn't have noticed or acknowledge that she died? The characters didn't say anything because she didn't matter, not because they were trying to avoid thinking about it. That's nothing to do with the characters. It's bad writing.

    Hazzer posted: »

    "Of course there is. It's good writing." No, that's shit writing and would make her one-dimensional. I don't want a character with a

  • Telltale didn't leave it up to us to decide. In episode 4 there is everything to indicate that Sarah was nothing more than a burden, and nothing to indicate that she wasn't.

    Hazzer posted: »

    You're interpreting their actions as you see fit. They didn't need to point out that slapping her was unfortunate but needed because that's

  • Yeah, hyperbole was kinda the point, mate. People keep reacting in an exaggerated manner to even the slightest hiccup made by Telltale and my post reflects that.

    Lol Hazzer when did anybody accuse Telltale of "being a neo-nazi organization that wants to rape people's wives and children"? Talk about hyperbole jesus christ

  • edited August 2014

    Apparently a lot of people missed the Playing Dead for Episode 4...long story short Telltale basically thought it was the funniest shit ever to force players into slapping Sarah if they wanted to save her.

    And now the name of that file comes to light and it's called " Clem_Bitch _Slap".

    Ah Telltale I remember when you used to put out quality content, what the hell happened to you people?

    EDIT-
    Had to trudge through that cesspool again, but here you go people:

    http://walkingdead.wikia.com/wiki/Playing_Dead?file=Why%27d_They_Have_to_Die%3F_-_The_Walking_Dead_Season_2_Episode_4

    4:20-4:34

  • Telltale keeps pushing us to believe that Sarah was unworthy of living. There is nothing to counter that in the episode.

    Showing how her death reflects upon them and nothing else is making it all about them.

    Hazzer posted: »

    "Nothing in the episode ever indicates that they consider her to be a worthy life." No, because that's for the player to decide. Tel

  • Whatever. I'm leaving the forums.

  • valid criticism =/= whining

    Piggs posted: »

    In this thread: The Telltale Community whining at FULL FORCE

  • "It's shit writing for a character to matter?"

    No, it's shit writing for a character to be portrayed as one thing forced down my throat rather than a multi-faceted individual.

    "Agreed, and they did that until episode 4 when they suddenly tossed it out the window for nothing."

    It wasn't for nothing. Someone incredibly innocent and helpless died before Clementine. That'll affect her in future, I feel...

    "How is her death portrayed like this? No one ever mentions her death unless it's putting her down. No one ever talks about her as anything but a useless burden and a liability."

    Not everything has to be portrayed in a certain way. The player gets to take what happened and make it affect Clementine in their own way. Clem was undeniably upset by it and so I'm gonna make it influence her.

    "Exactly. They are doing what they can to make THEMSELVES feel better about it. How is that anything to do with Sarah herself?"

    Because Sarah's death led them into misery. It was her loss that caused their pain.

    "How do they display their grief through actions? By not saying anything about it? No actions there"

    Not acting can itself be a meaningful action... She was gone and there was nothing they could do. Dwelling on it would only result in more hurt.

    "You wouldn't have bothered to make sure she didn't turn? You wouldn't have noticed or acknowledge that she died? The characters didn't say anything because she didn't matter, not because they were trying to avoid thinking about it. That's nothing to do with the characters. It's bad writing."

    You've got me on this one. They should have at least shown everyone reacting in pure horror as she was eaten alive... Maybe have someone throw up or burst into tears... But other than that I personally see it as the group trying to move on and forget it happened so they can focus on what matters.

    TT247 posted: »

    No, that's shit writing It's shit writing for a character to matter? I'm sorry but you're agreeing with me in your very next sentenc

  • Yes, and that's what makes it a difficult decision for us. She's a fuck up and could get people killed but leaving her is morally wrong and there's always the possibility of training her into a worthy asset.

    TT247 posted: »

    Telltale didn't leave it up to us to decide. In episode 4 there is everything to indicate that Sarah was nothing more than a burden, and nothing to indicate that she wasn't.

  • Sorry, just got S2EP4 now on Android, so I didn't know there was a fire to fuel.

    OP added fuel to the fire just as it was starting to die down.

  • Can you link it?

    Apparently a lot of people missed the Playing Dead for Episode 4...long story short Telltale basically thought it was the funniest shit ever

  • I thought they laughed at people who wanted to slap her because they hate her and want her to die, they have to save her.

    Apparently a lot of people missed the Playing Dead for Episode 4...long story short Telltale basically thought it was the funniest shit ever

  • Is this really worth complaining about? Shouldn't we direct it to something more important then a file name?

  • No, it's shit writing for a character to be portrayed as one thing forced down my throat rather than a multi-faceted individual.

    And that's what happened in episode 4. Over and over again Telltale forces you to think of Sarah as nothing more than useless, a burden, and there is nothing to indicate that there may be a different side to this view.

    It wasn't for nothing. Someone incredibly innocent and helpless died before Clementine. That'll affect her in future, I feel...

    But it was for nothing. It was an offensive and unsatisfying end for a well-developed and sympathetic character. And it has minimal effects on anyone in the plot. Sarah is dead, and no one notices. No one ever said anything about her being innocent or helpless. They act like it's her fault, and for that she deserves to be left behind.

    Not everything has to be portrayed in a certain way.

    You just said that Telltale is supposed to let us make up our own minds. So now that they don't, it's ok because they aren't obligated to?

    The player gets to take what happened and make it affect Clementine in their own way. Clem was undeniably upset by it and so I'm gonna make it influence her.

    It's not up to the player to "make something affect Clementine". It's up to the writers. And aside from sad music and an expression of sadness when she dies the first time, there is nothing to indicate that she was affected.

    Because Sarah's death led them into misery. It was her loss that caused their pain.

    Which is making it all about them.

    Not acting can itself be a meaningful action... She was gone and there was nothing they could do. Dwelling on it would only result in more hurt.

    You're excusing Telltale's bad writing. A character failing to react does not mean they are consciously trying not to. It means the writers were lazy.

    Hazzer posted: »

    "It's shit writing for a character to matter?" No, it's shit writing for a character to be portrayed as one thing forced down my thr

  • That's very disrespectful and belittling to her character. She had never been portrayed so irredeemably and one-dimensional until this episode. And even then, she has a moment of usefulness, such as if you save her the first time, and she alerts Clem to the approaching walkers.

    There is nothing to indicate that it's morally wrong to leave her behind. Everyone in the game and now these new interviews say that it was the "right" call to abandon her.

    Hazzer posted: »

    Yes, and that's what makes it a difficult decision for us. She's a fuck up and could get people killed but leaving her is morally wrong and there's always the possibility of training her into a worthy asset.

  • Or, it could be you just editing the name. :/

  • Cool your goddamn jets, Rambo. If the ZA was real, people would have actually done that just to save her life. So you can calm the fuck down.

    bloop posted: »

    TelTale are assholes you know, slapping a girl and saving her life because of it. TellTale should be tortured forever by Satan.

  • i hope clementine can bitch slap arvo about 20 times in a row

    TT247 posted: »

    Showing Clem to be angry and then never apologizing indicates that we're supposed to feel annoyed at Sarah's helplessness. There was no concern or caring shown toward Sarah herself.

  • Wow. That's hilarious.

  • You have quite the sense of humor.

    Wow. That's hilarious.

  • Are you actually this morose in real life?

    For crying out loud, it's just a file name.

    TT247 posted: »

    You have quite the sense of humor.

  • That very same file is found in episode 3 and is whem Carver and Troy slap Clem

    TT247 posted: »

    & just when I thought I couldn't possibly be any more disappointed in them

  • On the contrary. The value of human life is incomprehensible to me. I laugh at pain and frown upon human emotion. These characters exist because I allow it. And they will end because I demand it.

    Are you actually this morose in real life? For crying out loud, it's just a file name.

  • I believe he was being sarcastic.

    Cool your goddamn jets, Rambo. If the ZA was real, people would have actually done that just to save her life. So you can calm the fuck down.

  • edited August 2014

    I didn't know that. Do you have a source? But anyway it really doesn't change anything, to me. This was just one more nail in the coffin

    That very same file is found in episode 3 and is whem Carver and Troy slap Clem

  • ...What?

    TT247 posted: »

    On the contrary. The value of human life is incomprehensible to me. I laugh at pain and frown upon human emotion. These characters exist because I allow it. And they will end because I demand it.

  • that was a mass effect quote

    ...What?

  • Oh.

    Well, I never played it.

    TT247 posted: »

    that was a mass effect quote

  • Goddamnit, I always do that. lmao. Sorry.

    I believe he was being sarcastic.

  • Okay guys.

    The file is called bitch slap.

    It's used multiple times. Not just specifically for Sarah.
    It's a vulgar term. Yeah. But it's meant as humor. People can find immature things humorous. We're all entitled to that. These files were never intended to be read or viewed as such.

    It was never meant in a way to harm people's self-esteem or the like. To take offense to it, is to be extremely sensitive and censor what you don't like. And those ideals can be pushed on more important issues than something as minor as the name of a slap 'file' in a video game.

  • Are people now actually complaining over this? This has barely anything to do with the game anymore and nothing with valid critcism.

  • People are actually complaining about this? Go back to Tumblr.

  • Actually, I think we're not that far from having some users wishing that Telltale should be eaten by Walkers to know what it feels like to be Sarah. It's gotten pretty extreme.

    Spooch posted: »

    Did you actually believe they were being serious when they said that "Telltale should be tortured forever by Satan" XD.

  • Did you actually believe they were being serious when they said that "Telltale should be tortured forever by Satan" XD.

    Goddamnit, I always do that. lmao. Sorry.

  • You should. They're great :).

    Oh. Well, I never played it.

  • YES. SHHH.

    Spooch posted: »

    Did you actually believe they were being serious when they said that "Telltale should be tortured forever by Satan" XD.

  • I love all three of them. I don't understand the hate about the third game.

    Spooch posted: »

    You should. They're great .

This discussion has been closed.