Well this is the difference between you and me. I have very rational/logical way to see things (very much like Jane). Taking care of a baby would just cause too much inconvenience, thus it should be left behind/killed out of mercy.
How come? Its pretty fucking stupid to keep a baby with you in a zombie apocalypse.
You can´t just throw away a life because is stupid or inconvenient, no matter the situation you are in.
Well this is the difference between you and me. I have very rational/logical way to see things (very much like Jane). Taking care of a baby would just cause too much inconvenience, thus it should be left behind/killed out of mercy.
Kenny killing her father is what made her unstable in the first place.
Does this change that Kenny was justified in killing Larry before he could turn? Nope.
Well you clearly have very irrational way to see things. Do explain why leaving a baby behind isnt the most rational/logical thing to do? The goal is to survive and the baby is a threat to that.
I have very rational/logical way to see things
Stop wwith the rational/logical bullshit. You can´t just throw away a life because is… more stupid or inconvenient, no matter the situation you are in.
And frankly, you couldn´t have the guts to kill a baby because it is a inconvenience.
It wasn't justified though, he could have at least waited a few quick moments to see if he could revive him, instead of killing him just like that.
It was justified. They were trapped in small room, weapon less, with a man that had drooped to the ground for a heart attack and they couldn´t get medical attention. Larry was as good as dead as soon as he hit the ground.
Well you clearly have very irrational way to see things. Do explain why leaving a baby behind isnt the most rational/logical thing to do? The goal is to survive and the baby is a threat to that.
It wasn't justified though, he could have at least waited a few quick moments to see if he could revive him, instead of killing him just lik… moree that.
It was justified. They were trapped in small room, weapon less, with a man that had drooped to the ground for a heart attack and they couldn´t get medical attention. Larry was as good as dead as soon as he hit the ground.
It wasn't justified though, he could have at least waited a few quick moments to see if he could revive him, instead of killing him just lik… moree that.
It was justified. They were trapped in small room, weapon less, with a man that had drooped to the ground for a heart attack and they couldn´t get medical attention. Larry was as good as dead as soon as he hit the ground.
Look, you can see that even Larry looks panicked when he drops to the ground. Him, who had who knows of many heart attacks. Larry wasn´t getting out alive without proper medical attention.
Look, imagine if you were with a group of survivors and suddenly you get sick, you are a burden and they decide to kill you. Could you be okay with that?
You're forgetting the fact that if you try to revive Larry, he actually starts breathing.
You are forgetting that is pretty ambiguous-it could be Larry reanimating as a walker- and the Kenny doesn´t have the luxury we have as players of knowing all the paths and their outcomes, so yes, it was justifiable.
Well if i had long term illness which prevented me from surviving on my own, then i would most likely just kill myself.
If its just a cold or some shit, which passes, then i dont think it would be reasonable to kill me for that.
The baby would be nothing but a trouble for many years to come. And looking at how many people die in that world, it exremely unlikely that a baby would even survive to age where he can take care of himself.
Look, imagine if you were with a group of survivors and suddenly you get sick, you are a burden and they decide to kill you. Could you be okay with that?
If it is something grave, that could not prevent you for surviving on your own, and passes, but the group decides to kill you because they don´t want the risk of you infecting the rest of the group.
The baby would be nothing but a trouble for many years to come. And looking at how many people die in that world, it exremely unlikely that a baby would even survive to age where he can take care of himself.
Well if i had long term illness which prevented me from surviving on my own, then i would most likely just kill myself.
If its just a cold … moreor some shit, which passes, then i dont think it would be reasonable to kill me for that.
The baby would be nothing but a trouble for many years to come. And looking at how many people die in that world, it exremely unlikely that a baby would even survive to age where he can take care of himself.
Well why would they kill me, if i could just leave instead? You are not making any sense.
Well again, heres the difference between you and me. I wouldnt have a baby with me, because its stupid thing to do if you want to survive. You would have the baby, because its just "wrong" to not try your best to keep it alive?
If it is something grave, that could not prevent you for surviving on your own, and passes, but the group decides to kill you because they d… moreon´t want the risk of you infecting the rest of the group.
The baby would be nothing but a trouble for many years to come. And looking at how many people die in that world, it exremely unlikely that a baby would even survive to age where he can take care of himself.
I know.
Well why would they kill me, if i could just leave instead? You are not making any sense.
Is a possibility. No everybody has to act rational, especially in a crisis situation like a zombie apocalypse.
Well again, heres the difference between you and me. I wouldnt have a baby with me, because its stupid thing to do if you want to survive. You would have the baby, because its just "wrong" to not try your best to keep it alive?
Because as long as you can take a third option, is just wrong. You know, like finding a safe place for the baby or create one. At even if you can´t do any of these things, you should only kill a baby if it becomes necessary.
Well why would they kill me, if i could just leave instead? You are not making any sense.
Well again, heres the difference between you an… mored me. I wouldnt have a baby with me, because its stupid thing to do if you want to survive. You would have the baby, because its just "wrong" to not try your best to keep it alive?
Well why would they kill me, if i could just leave instead? You are not making any sense.
Is a possibility. No everybody has to act … morerational, especially in a crisis situation like a zombie apocalypse.
Well again, heres the difference between you and me. I wouldnt have a baby with me, because its stupid thing to do if you want to survive. You would have the baby, because its just "wrong" to not try your best to keep it alive?
Because as long as you can take a third option, is just wrong. You know, like finding a safe place for the baby or create one. At even if you can´t do any of these things, you should only kill a baby if it becomes necessary.
Well i wouldnt be in a group full or irrational/illogical people in the first place, so problem like this wouldnt exist.
They don´t have to be irrational people, sometimes even the most rational people act irrational in a crisis. Also, they could be thinking of killing you to cannibalize your body just in case.
Well luckily moral values are subjective, and in my books, killing/leaving behind a baby wouldnt be that bad thing.
I am no saying that killing a baby or leaving him behind is unthinkable in a zombie apocalypse, but I think you at least should try to find a safe place for the baby or create one, at only kill the baby or leave it behind if nothing else is possible.
Well i wouldnt be in a group full or irrational/illogical people in the first place, so problem like this wouldnt exist.
Well luckily moral values are subjective, and in my books, killing/leaving behind a baby wouldnt be that bad thing.
Well i wouldnt be in a group full or irrational/illogical people in the first place, so problem like this wouldnt exist.
Well luckily moral values are subjective, and in my books, killing/leaving behind a baby wouldnt be that bad thing.
They don´t have to be irrational people, sometimes even the most rational people act irrational in a crisis. Also, they could be thinking of killing you to cannibalize your body just in case.
Im sick and its contagious, which is the reason they want me dead, why would they eat my body?
I dont think that a baby would be worth the trouble.
Well i wouldnt be in a group full or irrational/illogical people in the first place, so problem like this wouldnt exist.
They don´t … morehave to be irrational people, sometimes even the most rational people act irrational in a crisis. Also, they could be thinking of killing you to cannibalize your body just in case.
Well luckily moral values are subjective, and in my books, killing/leaving behind a baby wouldnt be that bad thing.
I am no saying that killing a baby or leaving him behind is unthinkable in a zombie apocalypse, but I think you at least should try to find a safe place for the baby or create one, at only kill the baby or leave it behind if nothing else is possible.
So every survivor in zombie apocalypse are psychopaths? Leaving a baby behind is no more psychopathic act than letting a girl get eaten so you can get more food from a store. In world like that, you have to do whats necessary in order to survive, even if you dont like it.
So every survivor in zombie apocalypse are psychopaths? Leaving a baby behind is no more psychopathic act than letting a girl get eaten so y… moreou can get more food from a store. In world like that, you have to do whats necessary in order to survive, even if you dont like it.
They don´t have to be irrational people, sometimes even the most rational people act irrational in a crisis. Also, they could be thinking of… more killing you to cannibalize your body just in case.
Im sick and its contagious, which is the reason they want me dead, why would they eat my body?
I dont think that a baby would be worth the trouble.
Im sick and its contagious, which is the reason they want me dead, why would they eat my body?
I say just in case. Which kind of implies a idiot move only done when they don´t have anymore food. Also, if the sickness is survivable, why not?
It's not the same thing.
it is.
Do you know that girl?
No, but i dont know AJ either, since he is unable to talk and d… moreoesnt have a personality.
Did you watch her being born?
Completely irrelevant
Did you bond with her mother?
I didnt bond with Rebecca.
I am hateful person because i dont like other humans and babies? Thats a bit harsh. I just prefer to be alone.
I only care about myself and people close to me.
i liked Jane and Kenny, and yes i do like Kenny more than Jane. i know that going with Jane is probably a more reasonable way to choose but when i played threw the game i choose Kenny, only because of their past. Jane and my Clem were getting close, i thought telltale was going to make it that Kenny died and there was no way to save him but when i saw that option not to shoot him i didn't because after all Kenny wouldn't leave Clem, like Jane has already once.
I think of it as people's view points of the world. Some people will like and agree with nearly every course of action that Kenny does, some… more will be a bit hesitant and sometimes disagree with him but will still like him, others will disagree with him and hate him. I have an odd viewpoint where I like characters who aren't prepared to handle the world but still try to the best of their abilities. Which is why my three favorite characters are Ben, Nick and Arvo, respectively, and I'm OK with people disagreeing with my views, because they have their own ideas on how they view the world.
I just wanted to say that this argument is pointless, but are GREAT characters who do STUPID things for good reasons.
We just need to come together and remember the one true hero...Lee.
Comments
Well this is the difference between you and me. I have very rational/logical way to see things (very much like Jane). Taking care of a baby would just cause too much inconvenience, thus it should be left behind/killed out of mercy.
Stop wwith the rational/logical bullshit. You can´t just throw away a life because is stupid or inconvenient, no matter the situation you are in.
And frankly, you couldn´t have the guts to kill a baby because it is a inconvenience.
It wasn't justified though, he could have at least waited a few quick moments to see if he could revive him, instead of killing him just like that.
Well you clearly have very irrational way to see things. Do explain why leaving a baby behind isnt the most rational/logical thing to do? The goal is to survive and the baby is a threat to that.
It was justified. They were trapped in small room, weapon less, with a man that had drooped to the ground for a heart attack and they couldn´t get medical attention. Larry was as good as dead as soon as he hit the ground.
I don´t care if is logical or not, you just don´t do shit like that.
Yeah, because cpr NEVER works.
You have to be more explanatory than that.
You're forgetting the fact that if you try to revive Larry, he actually starts breathing.
Look, you can see that even Larry looks panicked when he drops to the ground. Him, who had who knows of many heart attacks. Larry wasn´t getting out alive without proper medical attention.
Look, imagine if you were with a group of survivors and suddenly you get sick, you are a burden and they decide to kill you. Could you be okay with that?
Kenny fans say its walker breathing or something.
You are forgetting that is pretty ambiguous-it could be Larry reanimating as a walker- and the Kenny doesn´t have the luxury we have as players of knowing all the paths and their outcomes, so yes, it was justifiable.
Well if i had long term illness which prevented me from surviving on my own, then i would most likely just kill myself.
If its just a cold or some shit, which passes, then i dont think it would be reasonable to kill me for that.
The baby would be nothing but a trouble for many years to come. And looking at how many people die in that world, it exremely unlikely that a baby would even survive to age where he can take care of himself.
If it is something grave, that could not prevent you for surviving on your own, and passes, but the group decides to kill you because they don´t want the risk of you infecting the rest of the group.
I know.
Looking at the comments,decides to reply but eventually becomes speechless.This feud is so futile and insignificant.
zykelator I want to say that JANE is awesome.
Well why would they kill me, if i could just leave instead? You are not making any sense.
Well again, heres the difference between you and me. I wouldnt have a baby with me, because its stupid thing to do if you want to survive. You would have the baby, because its just "wrong" to not try your best to keep it alive?
Is a possibility. No everybody has to act rational, especially in a crisis situation like a zombie apocalypse.
Because as long as you can take a third option, is just wrong. You know, like finding a safe place for the baby or create one. At even if you can´t do any of these things, you should only kill a baby if it becomes necessary.
Well i wouldnt be in a group full or irrational/illogical people in the first place, so problem like this wouldnt exist.
Well luckily moral values are subjective, and in my books, killing/leaving behind a baby wouldnt be that bad thing.
They don´t have to be irrational people, sometimes even the most rational people act irrational in a crisis. Also, they could be thinking of killing you to cannibalize your body just in case.
I am no saying that killing a baby or leaving him behind is unthinkable in a zombie apocalypse, but I think you at least should try to find a safe place for the baby or create one, at only kill the baby or leave it behind if nothing else is possible.
Some Jane fans aren't completely manipulative liers.
Zykelator confirmed psycopath... How can you say it was a shame Jane didn't kill the baby? Just wow.
Im sick and its contagious, which is the reason they want me dead, why would they eat my body?
I dont think that a baby would be worth the trouble.
So every survivor in zombie apocalypse are psychopaths? Leaving a baby behind is no more psychopathic act than letting a girl get eaten so you can get more food from a store. In world like that, you have to do whats necessary in order to survive, even if you dont like it.
It's not the same thing. Do you know that girl? Did you watch her being born? Did you bond with her mother?
I say just in case. Which kind of implies a idiot move only done when they don´t have anymore food. Also, if the sickness is survivable, why not?
it is.
No, but i dont know AJ either, since he is unable to talk and doesnt have a personality.
Completely irrelevant
I didnt bond with Rebecca.
Your imaginary scenarios were stupid and not well thought, just deal with it and dont talk about it anymore.
Okay.
Good to know.
Completely irrelevant? Either you are a really hateful person who don't care about anything but yourself or you can't feel the same emotions we do.
I am hateful person because i dont like other humans and babies? Thats a bit harsh. I just prefer to be alone.
I only care about myself and people close to me.
Idk it's hard to tell but it seems that way.
eden doesn't care how you see it....it's his choice/view...
THERE IS NO WRONG WAY
Everybody needs to get over this...there is no wrong path...or answer. anything you choose is CORRECT....
So going with mentally unstable violent man is wise choice?
I just wanted to say that this argument is pointless, but are GREAT characters who do STUPID things for good reasons.
We just need to come together and remember the one true hero...Lee.
i liked Jane and Kenny, and yes i do like Kenny more than Jane. i know that going with Jane is probably a more reasonable way to choose but when i played threw the game i choose Kenny, only because of their past. Jane and my Clem were getting close, i thought telltale was going to make it that Kenny died and there was no way to save him but when i saw that option not to shoot him i didn't because after all Kenny wouldn't leave Clem, like Jane has already once.
why do you like arvo? just wondering.
To be honest, Kenny does stupid things all the time and for bad reasons.
No bodys perfect...