Can I just point out that if Jane hadn't of pulled Clementine out from under the ice (albeit determinantly), then Kenny wouldn't have had hi… mores chance of redemption in the final moments of the season because she would have suffered the same fate as Clem. Kenny was too busy shouting at Arvo than looking out for Clementine. Don't tell me you condone Kenny's actions towards Clem after Sarita died, because that was a horrible thing to do.
Never happened in my game, but, I'm still going to adress it.
Just because Jane did some good things before the final fight, which she did, is not a reason to wipe out everything she did afterwards and forget about it. She did some fantastic things. I don't understand what you're getting at. I've never denied that Jane helped Clem a few times...before massively fucking up. By the way, I don't agree with what Kenny said to Clementine. So, no.
Oh, going by that logic, Clementine wouldn't have made it t… [view original content]
It looked too big to be run over by some psychopath, I believe it just wouldn't be realistic if every community has that narcissistic leader that doesn't care about hurting others.
The odds of another crazy communities are too low
I would have to disagree with you here, I would think this would be common in the ZA. Every little camp has to have some sort of Eichmann running it, to some degree.
If they decide to continue from this point, we will see, this game however hasn't given me much hope to be hopeful for, like every 10 minutes someone is dying, or something bad is happening.
It looked too big to be run over by some psychopath, I believe it just wouldn't be realistic if every community has that narcissistic leader that doesn't care about hurting others.
If they decide to continue from this point, we will see, this game however hasn't given me much hope to be hopeful for, like every 10 minutes someone is dying, or something bad is happening.
I think this is the first time I've even joined into one of these Kenny vs Jane debates. To be honest I'm mutual towards both. I couldn't bring myself to shoot Kenny, but didn't like how Jane was killed as a result.
Either way its a no win situation for me. Plus we all know what happens to determinant characters, so I guess no matter who you save they'll end up dead or MIA anyway eventually.
How do you think Telltale will handle this situation going into season 3?
I'm usually in the middle of these arguments. What can I say?
Oh, I didn't want Jane to die either. She's actually one of my favorite characters of Season 2. However, I couldn't let Kenny, or anyone, die because of her. It's sad that she had to go, but, I do think she was acting selfishly at the end. I didn't appreciate how she took it upon herself to decide for me. It's like I didn't have a say in the matter.
Honestly, I'm not sure how I feel about this whole thing. Bringing Clem back and making all the endings irrelevant would be a terrible decision. Additionally, Kenny and Jane dying in the first episode would be recycled garbage, too. But then again, can Telltale be successful without Clementine? It seems like a lot of people play this game because of her and see TWDG as her story.
I think this is the first time I've even joined into one of these Kenny vs Jane debates. To be honest I'm mutual towards both. I couldn't br… moreing myself to shoot Kenny, but didn't like how Jane was killed as a result.
Either way its a no win situation for me. Plus we all know what happens to determinant characters, so I guess no matter who you save they'll end up dead or MIA anyway eventually.
How do you think Telltale will handle this situation going into season 3?
I guess we just have to wait and see what happens when Telltale releases season 3.
Fingers crossed that our decision won't be rendered as meaningless because that would take away all the magic of having 5 different endings. Look what the determinant status meant for Nick. I'd prefer Telltale to scrap the whole determinent status if it just gives us another Nick scenario. Plus it ruins the experience when you know a characters days are numbered.
I'm usually in the middle of these arguments. What can I say?
Oh, I didn't want Jane to die either. She's actually one of my favorite cha… moreracters of Season 2. However, I couldn't let Kenny, or anyone, die because of her. It's sad that she had to go, but, I do think she was acting selfishly at the end. I didn't appreciate how she took it upon herself to decide for me. It's like I didn't have a say in the matter.
Honestly, I'm not sure how I feel about this whole thing. Bringing Clem back and making all the endings irrelevant would be a terrible decision. Additionally, Kenny and Jane dying in the first episode would be recycled garbage, too. But then again, can Telltale be successful without Clementine? It seems like a lot of people play this game because of her and see TWDG as her story.
It does ruin the experience a bit when you know a character is about to die at any moment. However, I don't think it would bother me as much if they were given an actual role before their inevitable death.
Alvin and Pete, the ones who had decent deaths, had either no lines or were there for the first 10 minutes of the episode. There's no point in making us think our choices matter when the character we saved becomes a robot. I don't want my ending to be mixed with Jane's and the Alone's. What would be the point behind everyone having a different one? And god, not another timeskip, please.
I guess we just have to wait and see what happens when Telltale releases season 3.
Fingers crossed that our decision won't be rendered as… more meaningless because that would take away all the magic of having 5 different endings. Look what the determinant status meant for Nick. I'd prefer Telltale to scrap the whole determinent status if it just gives us another Nick scenario. Plus it ruins the experience when you know a characters days are numbered.
If Telltale had of killed him off as a hero (perhaps saving someone's life and getting bitten as a result of his heroics) then I and most of the Nick fans would have been some what more satisfied and plus he would have determinently had a major role in this season beyond his possible demise in episode 2.
It does ruin the experience a bit when you know a character is about to die at any moment. However, I don't think it would bother me as much… more if they were given an actual role before their inevitable death.
Alvin and Pete, the ones who had decent deaths, had either no lines or were there for the first 10 minutes of the episode. There's no point in making us think our choices matter when the character we saved becomes a robot. I don't want my ending to be mixed with Jane's and the Alone's. What would be the point behind everyone having a different one? And god, not another timeskip, please.
I don't think the death itself bothered me that much. Unlike most people, I understand that not everyone can go out in a heroic way. It would somewhat lose it's importance. However, the fact that he got neither a relevant role or a superior death is a disappointment. They should've at least given him one of the two.
Yes. Back to Nicks off screen death.
If Telltale had of killed him off as a hero (perhaps saving someone's life and getting bitten as a r… moreesult of his heroics) then I and most of the Nick fans would have been some what more satisfied and plus he would have determinently had a major role in this season beyond his possible demise in episode 2.
That is determinant, so it doesn't count. You have to choose a specific dialogue to get that response, where as with the dialogue in the tent, you get that either way. And as others are saying, he doesn't want to be left behind, he just doesn't want to slow them down if he didn't wake up. And he did wake up, so it's pretty much irrelevant.
You aren't being fair, each of those times he said something about everyone being better off without him, he's either just lost a loved one … moreright in front of him that day, or he was sacrificing himself so the children have a safe place to live. And the point about him being in a coma is just ridiculous, when did he even have a chance to tell them to leave him? While he was in a coma, or while he was getting the shit beaten out of him by Carver?
Go to 18:45
Will you guys stop talking trash now?
That is determinant, so it doesn't count. You have to choose a specific dialogue to get that response, where as with the dialogue in the ten… moret, you get that either way. And as others are saying, he doesn't want to be left behind, he just doesn't want to slow them down if he didn't wake up. And he did wake up, so it's pretty much irrelevant.
Wanting "us to leave", which means everyone but him leaving, is the same of being left behind, isn it?
I still stand up and say my point is correct, sorry.
Now you even edit your stupid post so it says the same stupid shit. I already anwered the question that you edited in there, so I urge you to try at learn to read properly this time:
That line is him saying that if nothing could have be done for him it could have be best to leave him behind not that he wanted to be left behind.
Also, by SaltLick305:
He doesn't want to be left behind, like you're implying. He's just so selfless, caring, and genuinely noble that he would stay behind for the safety of others. That line has nothing to do with him considering himself a liability or anything like that. He's simply saying that, if it came to it, he'd put everyone ahead of himself. Is this common sense pattern that hard to follow?
Clem: "Kenny would want us to leave"
Wanting "us to leave", which means everyone but him leaving, is the same of being left behind, isn it?
I still stand up and say my point is correct, sorry.
You don't understand.
Let me translate it for you:
"Why are you all being so smart? I just want to post my silly opinions and only get positive responses. Pls, don't call it garbage."
like i've previously said in a last thread, i followed Kenny in my whole gameplay lol despite him being pissed off bout some situations at times, i was still with him, cuz of how he was try'n to protect Clem and AJ, and try'n to get'em to Willington. I guess in da first season, when we first met Kenny, i never rly liked him all dat much, cuz i know he and Lee had alotta differences bout what to do during certain situations and such; but now in da 2nd season, i think i'm kinda start'n to like appreciate Kenny and how he tries to help Becca with deliver'n da baby…well dats my 2 cents on him lol ^^
Sorry to tell you, but you're thinking with your heart more than with your brain.
Even though Kenny wanted them to stay in Wellington, so… more technically if you think what is best for Kenny, he told you himself he wants to know the kids are safe, so going into Wellington will fulfill him like he said.
Comments
OK. Thanks for enlightening me
I just wanted to see how many likes you can get this time. You're on a roll.
It looked too big to be run over by some psychopath, I believe it just wouldn't be realistic if every community has that narcissistic leader that doesn't care about hurting others.
If they decide to continue from this point, we will see, this game however hasn't given me much hope to be hopeful for, like every 10 minutes someone is dying, or something bad is happening.
Yeah, I hope it will be ok..
I think her story is over, I don't see how they continue the game with 5 different endings and pleasing everyone, and honestly I want to play as Molly
Kenny is my bestfriend so i will stuck with him forever
Pinkyswear4ever
To be fair, anyone can get 20+ likes against a poster like him.
I think you made better points in one reply than he did in 20.
I think this is the first time I've even joined into one of these Kenny vs Jane debates. To be honest I'm mutual towards both. I couldn't bring myself to shoot Kenny, but didn't like how Jane was killed as a result.
Either way its a no win situation for me. Plus we all know what happens to determinant characters, so I guess no matter who you save they'll end up dead or MIA anyway eventually.
How do you think Telltale will handle this situation going into season 3?
I'm usually in the middle of these arguments. What can I say?
Oh, I didn't want Jane to die either. She's actually one of my favorite characters of Season 2. However, I couldn't let Kenny, or anyone, die because of her. It's sad that she had to go, but, I do think she was acting selfishly at the end. I didn't appreciate how she took it upon herself to decide for me. It's like I didn't have a say in the matter.
Honestly, I'm not sure how I feel about this whole thing. Bringing Clem back and making all the endings irrelevant would be a terrible decision. Additionally, Kenny and Jane dying in the first episode would be recycled garbage, too. But then again, can Telltale be successful without Clementine? It seems like a lot of people play this game because of her and see TWDG as her story.
I guess we just have to wait and see what happens when Telltale releases season 3.
Fingers crossed that our decision won't be rendered as meaningless because that would take away all the magic of having 5 different endings. Look what the determinant status meant for Nick. I'd prefer Telltale to scrap the whole determinent status if it just gives us another Nick scenario. Plus it ruins the experience when you know a characters days are numbered.
It does ruin the experience a bit when you know a character is about to die at any moment. However, I don't think it would bother me as much if they were given an actual role before their inevitable death.
Alvin and Pete, the ones who had decent deaths, had either no lines or were there for the first 10 minutes of the episode. There's no point in making us think our choices matter when the character we saved becomes a robot. I don't want my ending to be mixed with Jane's and the Alone's. What would be the point behind everyone having a different one? And god, not another timeskip, please.
Yes. Back to Nicks off screen death.
If Telltale had of killed him off as a hero (perhaps saving someone's life and getting bitten as a result of his heroics) then I and most of the Nick fans would have been some what more satisfied and plus he would have determinently had a major role in this season beyond his possible demise in episode 2.
I don't think the death itself bothered me that much. Unlike most people, I understand that not everyone can go out in a heroic way. It would somewhat lose it's importance. However, the fact that he got neither a relevant role or a superior death is a disappointment. They should've at least given him one of the two.
That is determinant, so it doesn't count. You have to choose a specific dialogue to get that response, where as with the dialogue in the tent, you get that either way. And as others are saying, he doesn't want to be left behind, he just doesn't want to slow them down if he didn't wake up. And he did wake up, so it's pretty much irrelevant.
You don't understand.
Let me translate it for you:
"Why are you all being so smart? I just want to post my silly opinions and only get positive responses. Pls, don't call it garbage."
Now you even edit your stupid post so it says the same stupid shit. I already anwered the question that you edited in there, so I urge you to try at learn to read properly this time:
Also, by SaltLick305:
Unlike most people, Kenny knows hes losing it and can be dangerous.
I love you now.
TeamKenny
Aw, that's not very nice, man lol.
like i've previously said in a last thread, i followed Kenny in my whole gameplay lol despite him being pissed off bout some situations at times, i was still with him, cuz of how he was try'n to protect Clem and AJ, and try'n to get'em to Willington. I guess in da first season, when we first met Kenny, i never rly liked him all dat much, cuz i know he and Lee had alotta differences bout what to do during certain situations and such; but now in da 2nd season, i think i'm kinda start'n to like appreciate Kenny and how he tries to help Becca with deliver'n da baby…well dats my 2 cents on him lol ^^
Because Kenny is love. Kenny is life.
He doesn't get to martyr himself. We lost enough friends.