What do you mean by "you" and what do you mean by "leave?"
Are you asking whether I would rethink Clem's group if I were hypothetically transplanted into the ZA as a survivor? If so, then maybe because I have to assume that my perspective of her and her actions would be different than if I had seen it first through Lee's eyes and then Clem's.
Are you asking whether her story and/or her mindset could take a dark enough turn for me, as the player, to become disinterested in it's furthering or unsympathetic to the character? Probably not.
Are you asking about some hypothetical where I, in either role, could leave her behind or let Walkers have her? That I can't answer without more detail. There are good and bad reasons to "leave" someone in the ZA. The leaver, the left, and the situation all play a role and your question doesn't give me enough information about any of the three.
She can leave Sarah behind, simply because she was risking her and other's lives. The baby does that simply by existing, so how is it out of her character?
What do you mean by "you" and what do you mean by "leave?"
Are you asking whether I would rethink Clem's group if I were hypothetically t… moreransplanted into the ZA as a survivor? If so, then maybe because I have to assume that my perspective of her and her actions would be different than if I had seen it first through Lee's eyes and then Clem's.
Are you asking whether her story and/or her mindset could take a dark enough turn for me, as the player, to become disinterested in it's furthering or unsympathetic to the character? Probably not.
Are you asking about some hypothetical where I, in either role, could leave her behind or let Walkers have her? That I can't answer without more detail. There are good and bad reasons to "leave" someone in the ZA. The leaver, the left, and the situation all play a role and your question doesn't give me enough information about any of the three.
That would be some awesome twist if she became Carver. Time travels back to prevent the zombie apocalypse before it even happens, body-hops until she finds a stronger host body in Carver but then fails to prevent the apocalypse and becomes the thing she hates the most. It writes itself.
What do you mean by "you" and what do you mean by "leave?"
Are you asking whether I would rethink Clem's group if I were hypothetically t… moreransplanted into the ZA as a survivor? If so, then maybe because I have to assume that my perspective of her and her actions would be different than if I had seen it first through Lee's eyes and then Clem's.
Are you asking whether her story and/or her mindset could take a dark enough turn for me, as the player, to become disinterested in it's furthering or unsympathetic to the character? Probably not.
Are you asking about some hypothetical where I, in either role, could leave her behind or let Walkers have her? That I can't answer without more detail. There are good and bad reasons to "leave" someone in the ZA. The leaver, the left, and the situation all play a role and your question doesn't give me enough information about any of the three.
She can leave Sarah behind, simply because she was risking her and other's lives. The baby does that simply by existing, so how is it out of her character?
That would be some awesome twist if she became Carver. Time travels back to prevent the zombie apocalypse before it even happens, body-hops … moreuntil she finds a stronger host body in Carver but then fails to prevent the apocalypse and becomes the thing she hates the most. It writes itself.
That would be some awesome twist if she became Carver. Time travels back to prevent the zombie apocalypse before it even happens, body-hops … moreuntil she finds a stronger host body in Carver but then fails to prevent the apocalypse and becomes the thing she hates the most. It writes itself.
She can leave Sarah behind, simply because she was risking her and other's lives. The baby does that simply by existing, so how is it out of her character?
OK. While Clem is probably my favorite video game character of all time, just as she is yours, in the scenario you have laid out, I probably would. As I said, I have to take into account that my POV would be different as a member of the supporting cast than as the man with the controller.
In addition, in this case Clem is WAY old enough to be 100% accountable and AJ is old enough to be far, far less of a liability than in some scenarios I've seen laid out for Clem killing AJ. I don't agree with the survivralist mentality that says a baby is a lethal ball and chain, but I can put myself in the other guys' shoes long enough to understand it and see the validity of the other guys' viewpoint. This would be different.
The only way I could even consider condoning that is if part of this is that AJ pulled a Lizzie of some sort and proved himself to be criminally insane by hurting and/or killing a bunch of people for outlandish reasons. Not something like where Carl shot that other boy. it would have to be on a killing Mica and Judith level.
Even then it would give me pause for Clem to kill AJ in a rage, as opposed to with regret because there's no real other option for dealing with something like that in the current setting, like Carol did.
As for the other scenario, I would want try to get away from any Howe's type group at the first opportunity, no matter how many heartwarming stories the Carver persona in charge was able to tell me about her youth. If leaving her behind was anoption I would jump at it. If it wasn't, I would probably do pretty much what the cabin group did, if I could find a few others who felt the same way.
Luckily, my Clem would never ever be in either of those positions, barring wildly unforeseen circumstances (and there are some pretty heinous ordeals she could be forced to undergo in the ZA that I wouldn't call "wildly unforeseen").
I'll save you the trouble. I have failed your test.
Luckily I have passed the test of having some kind of sense and not accepting an adorable air and a cute purple hat as an excusable reason for any sin, no matter how egregious.
OK. While Clem is probably my favorite video game character of all time, just as she is yours, in the scenario you have laid out, I probabl… morey would. As I said, I have to take into account that my POV would be different as a member of the supporting cast than as the man with the controller.
In addition, in this case Clem is WAY old enough to be 100% accountable and AJ is old enough to be far, far less of a liability than in some scenarios I've seen laid out for Clem killing AJ. I don't agree with the survivralist mentality that says a baby is a lethal ball and chain, but I can put myself in the other guys' shoes long enough to understand it and see the validity of the other guys' viewpoint. This would be different.
The only way I could even consider condoning that is if part of this is that AJ pulled a Lizzie of some sort and proved himself to be criminally insane by hurting and/or killing a bunch of people for outlandish reasons. Not so… [view original content]
I don't give a fuck if she kills someone important or a baby, I've never cared more about a video game character in my life well besides Ellie from TLOU. I wouldn't even be here if she was not in the game at all.
My Clem isn't like that. And if they ever made that a non-optional choice then I would be more worried about if I was going to keep playing the game vs if I would leave Clem or not.
Well I've been waiting for a ditch AJ option so by all means if that option means Clem kills AJ I'd be fine with it, and if she becomes Carver I'd support her there as well because I loved Carver as a character and I love antagonists.
She can leave Sarah behind, simply because she was risking her and other's lives. The baby does that simply by existing, so how is it out of her character?
OK. While Clem is probably my favorite video game character of all time, just as she is yours, in the scenario you have laid out, I probabl… morey would. As I said, I have to take into account that my POV would be different as a member of the supporting cast than as the man with the controller.
In addition, in this case Clem is WAY old enough to be 100% accountable and AJ is old enough to be far, far less of a liability than in some scenarios I've seen laid out for Clem killing AJ. I don't agree with the survivralist mentality that says a baby is a lethal ball and chain, but I can put myself in the other guys' shoes long enough to understand it and see the validity of the other guys' viewpoint. This would be different.
The only way I could even consider condoning that is if part of this is that AJ pulled a Lizzie of some sort and proved himself to be criminally insane by hurting and/or killing a bunch of people for outlandish reasons. Not so… [view original content]
I'll save you the trouble. I have failed your test.
Luckily I have passed the test of having some kind of sense and not accepting an adorable air and a cute purple hat as an excusable reason for any sin, no matter how egregious.
Okay her "turning into Carver" is something that seems way too out of character. I would only imagine she leaves AJ "out of anger" if perhaps he cries when she's walking through a herd almost getting her killed or the baby keeps crying. Once again slightly out of character, but I wouldn't leave Clementine for doing so.
Kills AJ? For what reason? Because if it's a lilly doug situation then yes , I would leave her. Yes she's the clem we know and love but if she did that for no valid reason then who the fuck cares? I have a limit. Killing someone because they insulted you , that's my limit.
I don't give a fuck if she kills someone important or a baby, I've never cared more about a video game character in my life well besides Ellie from TLOU. I wouldn't even be here if she was not in the game at all.
Kills AJ? For what reason? Because if it's a lilly doug situation then yes , I would leave her. Yes she's the clem we know and love but if s… morehe did that for no valid reason then who the fuck cares? I have a limit. Killing someone because they insulted you , that's my limit.
Why would Clem kill anyone out of anger? Leaving that baby would be objective and calculative decision, just like leaving Sarah behind, or taking cover instead of trying to save AJ.
Comments
What do you mean by "you" and what do you mean by "leave?"
Are you asking whether I would rethink Clem's group if I were hypothetically transplanted into the ZA as a survivor? If so, then maybe because I have to assume that my perspective of her and her actions would be different than if I had seen it first through Lee's eyes and then Clem's.
Are you asking whether her story and/or her mindset could take a dark enough turn for me, as the player, to become disinterested in it's furthering or unsympathetic to the character? Probably not.
Are you asking about some hypothetical where I, in either role, could leave her behind or let Walkers have her? That I can't answer without more detail. There are good and bad reasons to "leave" someone in the ZA. The leaver, the left, and the situation all play a role and your question doesn't give me enough information about any of the three.
Clementine would NEVER kill Aj....... I think the only time she would kill Aj is if Aj was bit.....
I think Kenny will be like a father to Clementine and Clementine will be like a Lee to Aj
I think Clementine is going to protect Aj not kill him
I can imagine Clem leaving AJ after something really bad happens to her, but killing him? No, she wouldn't do that.
Hell yeah I'd leave her if she did that. Really doubt she would though
I would never leave her.
"Would You Leave Clem If..."
She can leave Sarah behind, simply because she was risking her and other's lives. The baby does that simply by existing, so how is it out of her character?
as i said in a previous post...
you have failed the test.
I wouldn't blame her if she did.
Nuisances have no place being protected.
you have passed the test.
you have passed the test.
you have passed the test
That would be some awesome twist if she became Carver. Time travels back to prevent the zombie apocalypse before it even happens, body-hops until she finds a stronger host body in Carver but then fails to prevent the apocalypse and becomes the thing she hates the most. It writes itself.
if clem purposely killed AJ out of anger, and you were in her group, would you cut her loose? also, clem would be 20 and AJ would be 8
you have passed the test.
oh my god jane not everyone can be as evil and sacrifical as you. XD
what?
wtf are you talking about?
also,
OK. While Clem is probably my favorite video game character of all time, just as she is yours, in the scenario you have laid out, I probably would. As I said, I have to take into account that my POV would be different as a member of the supporting cast than as the man with the controller.
In addition, in this case Clem is WAY old enough to be 100% accountable and AJ is old enough to be far, far less of a liability than in some scenarios I've seen laid out for Clem killing AJ. I don't agree with the survivralist mentality that says a baby is a lethal ball and chain, but I can put myself in the other guys' shoes long enough to understand it and see the validity of the other guys' viewpoint. This would be different.
The only way I could even consider condoning that is if part of this is that AJ pulled a Lizzie of some sort and proved himself to be criminally insane by hurting and/or killing a bunch of people for outlandish reasons. Not something like where Carl shot that other boy. it would have to be on a killing Mica and Judith level.
Even then it would give me pause for Clem to kill AJ in a rage, as opposed to with regret because there's no real other option for dealing with something like that in the current setting, like Carol did.
As for the other scenario, I would want try to get away from any Howe's type group at the first opportunity, no matter how many heartwarming stories the Carver persona in charge was able to tell me about her youth. If leaving her behind was anoption I would jump at it. If it wasn't, I would probably do pretty much what the cabin group did, if I could find a few others who felt the same way.
Luckily, my Clem would never ever be in either of those positions, barring wildly unforeseen circumstances (and there are some pretty heinous ordeals she could be forced to undergo in the ZA that I wouldn't call "wildly unforeseen").
Is it more evil to get everyone else killed, because of a baby, than leaving a baby behind?
I'll save you the trouble. I have failed your test.
Luckily I have passed the test of having some kind of sense and not accepting an adorable air and a cute purple hat as an excusable reason for any sin, no matter how egregious.
I don't give a fuck if she kills someone important or a baby, I've never cared more about a video game character in my life well besides Ellie from TLOU. I wouldn't even be here if she was not in the game at all.
I don 't think Clem would do something like that, unless you make her do that. But I guess you never know this days. I trust them though.
That's funny. I like how Carver is definition of the worst possible Clem's transformation.
Please never post this image again. It will haunt my dreams.
My Clem isn't like that. And if they ever made that a non-optional choice then I would be more worried about if I was going to keep playing the game vs if I would leave Clem or not.
Well I've been waiting for a ditch AJ option so by all means if that option means Clem kills AJ I'd be fine with it, and if she becomes Carver I'd support her there as well because I loved Carver as a character and I love antagonists.
She'll do that if she is manipulated by someone.
You'd stay with a murderer just because they're a little girl? Fuck that
why would she kill a baby out of anger? how is that in character?
no.
its a what if situation, clem would kill AJ out of anger,
its a test to prove how much you love clem
i do.
Okay her "turning into Carver" is something that seems way too out of character. I would only imagine she leaves AJ "out of anger" if perhaps he cries when she's walking through a herd almost getting her killed or the baby keeps crying. Once again slightly out of character, but I wouldn't leave Clementine for doing so.
Kills AJ? For what reason? Because if it's a lilly doug situation then yes , I would leave her. Yes she's the clem we know and love but if she did that for no valid reason then who the fuck cares? I have a limit. Killing someone because they insulted you , that's my limit.
Ellie?
Ha, Thats Cute Ellie, but let me take it from here.
you have failed the test.
Why would Clem kill anyone out of anger? Leaving that baby would be objective and calculative decision, just like leaving Sarah behind, or taking cover instead of trying to save AJ.