3 questions
Question 1: What is the most sensible ending? (For me: Clem, AJ and Kenny, or Clem AJ and Jane)
Question 2: Who was your favorite character? (For me: Clem, Luke, Kenny, and Jane before she got Kenny/herself killed)
Question 3: Who do you think shouldn't have been determinant? (For me: Nick, Sarah, Ben and Kenny)
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
1: Well the best choice is to probably shoot Kenny and leave with Jane, but the best ending is when Kenny and Clementine go their separate ways at Wellington.
2: Clementine and Luke
3: Nick
This is just my opinion.
1.) Clementine and AJ going into Wellington.
2.) I liked Sarah, Luke, Nick, Pete, and Arvo. (Arvo more for the potential he could have had, if that makes some sense, because I was really excited about him for some reason. What he actually amounted to in canon turned out to be extremely disappointing. So did Nick and Sarah's treatment as well, it seemed like the writers just wanted to get rid of all the characters I thought were interesting and would have had bigger roles. I still like them, no matter how little the writers cared about them.) Clementine too, of course but I assume that should be a given.
3.) Kenny and Jane shouldn't have been determinant, they should have just died.Well...I don't think Kenny should have been in s2 at all to be honest. Sarita being determinant was okay, but I'd like to have had one more conversation with her before she turned, if you don't chop her arm off. Luke, Nick, and Sarah should have lived at all costs. Bonnie's death at the lake was unneeded as well. If there was a save Sarah vs Jane thing, I'd be okay with that being determinant, I guess. (And I'd save Sarah.)
Question 1: Clementine and AJ into Wellington, the alone ending
Question 2: Who was your favorite character? my fav characters: Clementine, Doug, Lee, Vince, Omid and Luke
Question 3: Kenny. Now before the Kenny fans start attacking me out of anger please let me explain, by the conversations in the first series it seems to that the writers in the first series always intended that Kenny would come back if they did series 2. And he come back everything become un-balanced, before you met Kenny in the 2nd episode the story plot was around Cabin group and Clementine, with a mystery threat of Carver. the story was well balanced with you getting to know of character's side of the story. Then Kenny was re-introduced and story plot become about Clementine and Kenny only, apart from Luke and a caple moments from Carlos and Pete the cabins group become a small part. I don't know if it was intended by the writers or the fandom behind Kenny was the part behind the that reasoning. With the story plot become centred around two characters, the other characters didn't get a moment to explain their side, so if they flip out because their morals are tested it wasn't explained. And that's what the walking dead series need the most, people snap all the time. Kenny should have died, a heroic dead, and the other characters get their moment. I think that Luke should be a determinant character.
Nah... ignore this.
Now you have me curious.
Im very tired and failed to even read the 3rd question, but heres my aswers, just to satisfy your curiosity.
Jane & Clem (AJ...)
From season 2 probably Walter or Jane, overall it has to be Molly.
Shooting Kenny in order to save Jane. I would prefer a chance to stop Kenny before the fight escalates and tell him how he is dangerous and such and that AJ is alive. After some dialogue you walk away with Jane & Aj and the player can see as Kenny is on his knees, looking on ground depressed, because he had just lost everything and the screen fades to black. (This of course isnt anything OP was asking for. Good night.)
Thanks. Good night.
1: Stay with kenny, until the end. best ending
2: Kenny, clem, aj, and Bromid
3: i dont think Mr Parker/Travis' death should have determinant.
yeah. i guess kenny is dangerous. but he would NEVER hurt clem like jane very well most likely will do.
Besides, Jane is
so
frickin
reliable.
But kenny, lee and ben!
LOOK AT THESE BAD MOTHER FUCKERS!
Wellington.
Luke.
Nick and Sarah.
ew
no
What, wait, that's not what I meant.
I know, I was kidding.
Why would Jane hurt Clementine? She was risking her life to save Clem if she fell through the ice and was the only who put any effort to get her warm after.
And Kenny might not directly hurt Clementine, but he was constantly putting her in danger and because of his anger issues, he left Clementine in middle of herd and later ignored her when she asked for help to get warm after falling through the ice.
Q1: None.
Q2: Bill.
Q2: It was good the way it was.
Kenny can determinantly hurt Clem physically in episode 5, slamming her to the ground if she gets in his way.
Now, Jane does the same thing, but you expect it of her, right?
They're very similar people, truth be told. Just Jane exercises more self restraint.
Kenny does directly hurt Clem if you get in his way during the fight, along with Jane
But Jane doesn't promise she'd never hurt you, unlike Ken.
So trust, much loyal, wow.
Answer one: The most sensible ending is any ending that anybody could conceive that was different from the actual endings, ever.
Answer two: My favorite character (besides both game's protagonists) is Molly.
Answer three: Kenny. Kenny dying should've been canon at this point.
Well thats not much. He just pushed her to the ground as i remember, but i guess it can be counted as hurting her.
Slamming a child to the ground counts as hurting them.
I did agree on that.
1: All of the endings this season are sensible in their own way, but in my opinion, I'd go with Clementine and AJ in Wellington ending. Because that was the goal ever since the 16 month skip.
2: For Season 2, Clem, Pete, Kenny, Luke, Walter and Jane.
3: Pete and Sarah and Luke.
1: Jane Clem Aj, and the family, It's the only ending for me.
2: Jane, Duck, Reggie, Larry, and Walter
3: Luke Reggie and Walter should have had determinant fates and Ben too cause it would have been so great to see him with Christa and Omid at the beginning of Season 2.
For a second I thought it was: 'How many walkers have you killed? How many people you've killed? Why?'
1: None is the "most sensible."
2: Tie, Clem and Lee.
3: I'm fine with all the characters that were determinant.
None, they don't exist (I guess).
None yet...jk?
Because I would be imprisoned for half my life, then it would be extremly hard to resocialize and my family would hate me and disown me.
More like " Do you like stuff?" Do you like thaaangs"? "What do you like more stuff or thaaangs"?
Sensible-Wellington. But I am not sensible so I stuck with Kenny.
Excluding Lee and Clem-Kenneth.
Kenneth, Jane, Nick, Sarah and Chet.
Any ending.
Clem, Lee, Omid, Luke, Nick, Ben, Eddie, Vince, ect.
NICK.