WTF Telltale?!
So i know they removed the option to shoot mike, But, Why?! Even though later you can shoot kenny in the face. LITTERALY shoot kenny, IN THE FACE, OUT OF FUCKING ANGER! So, Why not remove it the other way around?
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
You can't kill a fellow Urban.
In all seriousness it makes more sense to kill Mike than Kenny. I don't really care they took it out, but why they left shooting Kenny in the face is weird, why can't we do that to Jane? It feels out of character to shoot Ken out of anger.
Because there was a legit reason to shoot Kenny in the face (not that I agree with what Jane did.)
there is also a legit reason to shoot jane in the face after kenny dies too
This is kind of old, Maybe so there wouldn't be 2 shoot character choices or COON SHIT EATER CONFIRMED FOR SEASON 3!
I know, I wanted to kill Mike so badly after he did what he did. But the reason they took out the choice to kill him is (hopefully) because they have a use for him in S3, Arvo too. They better make it up to us by giving us the choice to kill them (and Bonnie too if you saved her). I don't care what people say, I'm going to kill them if I see them. As for the Kenny option, I too thought that keeping that in was weird, I'd rather have that taken out than the option to shoot Mike.
Well, Clem had a "Legit" reason to shoot Mike, Bonnie, Arvo, Troy, Carver, The man asking for water, and Michelle, all in the face, and we never got to do any of that...
Well it depends how you see it, You might as well say someone had the right to shoot Lee in the face depending on your choices and for killing that Senator (Not that I agree with that though)
My guess is that they have plans for Mike. I figure Mike will make a come back in Season 3 in one form or another.
Because Mike is important to the story. Maybe he's immune or something.
I believe that as well, hopefully that's when we can kill him.
They have plans for him and Arvo, maybe a DLC,or they'll find Christa or they'll join some bandits and attack Wellington/Howe's
Episode five should've ending with Clementine just going on a bloodthirsty rampage. Brutally slaughtering everyone in the main cast, it would've shown just how much Kenny's actions have rubbed off on Clementine.
"Kill to solve your problems." -Kenny, 2014
AJ's first bloodbath.
AJ's last bloodbath...
Boy, this is in bad taste. D'oh well.
I think it's because they wanted to leave Mike, Arvo and Bonnie as possible characters in Season 3.
Yeah, but i'm more pissed about how clem murdered kenny out of anger.
Are you serious? Kenny never went on a blood thirsty rampage. Killing anyone he sees... And if you dissagree, Maybe you should take a closer look at the meaning of the word, Bloodthirsty.
The meaning of Bloodthirsty from the dictonary...
eager for violence: eager to take part in or witness violence and bloodshed
Which means he would WANT to brutaly murder someone with no Logical reason behind it.
Larry: He knew he was gonna turn
Carver: That evil mother fucker would have come after them and kill them all
Wanting to kill Arvo: He kind of, you know, Led to the downfall of the whole group.
Jane: Lied to him (An unstable man) about killing a baby who meant so much to him, and then trying to kill him
all of these are logical reasons.
did i miss something? im pretty sure clem was scared when she had the option to shoot kenny, not angry
You can shoot Kenny as Clementine finally sees what a monster kenny is after he kills Jane, She finally sees it in that ending, its not "out of character"
She cant shoot mike mainly as they clearly have some plan for him in season 3, plus the situation is different Mike isnt trying to kill anyone with what hes doing nor has he killed anyone
I mean the second option to shoot kenny... She just looks at him in anger and disgust and kills him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAC0ula7dP8
Umm, It IS Out of character, Clementine has never had the character development that makes her do that. and thats NOT who he really is, but people like YOU are too stuborn to FUCKING SAVE HIM and see the Fucking amazing sacrifice that he makes in the end. and lilly shot carley and showed her true colors. Did lee shoot her and make clem learn that? No. so in what realm of Fucking mordor and fuckfaces is that choice "Not out of character?!
Dude, I like you, I really do, but most of the things you post make me pissed off.
Because it extremely aggressive, off kilter quick to do things without thinking Kenny. If you like Kenny fine let him kill that idiot Jane but I'm sick to death of him and his shit. How long before he creates more problems, hes basically destroyed the best group we've ever had with the ep 5 group.
I dont care about the "sacrifice" he makes at the end in that over the top cheesy ending that has nothing about the walking dead even remotely in it. Want tp talk about out of character see Kenny at the end of ep 5 after you dont shoot Jane I dont like Kenny and my main gripe with this season is how the game forced you to be kennys pal
Hey, I'm not one of those "Kenny is god" People, I like kenny, He's My only memory of lee. But what I am sick of is when people say kenny is stupid and boring, without having any reason behind that thought. I'm sorry if i pissed you off man.
Also, My main arguement is that it is completely out of character for clem to murder kenny, If my lee was there and witnessed that shit, My lee woulda Bitch slapped clem. Because clem didn't learn that shit, FROM ANYONE. (Except maybe kenny, but my clem still would not be okay with that) That was one of the 6000 things i hated about season 2, they changed Clem, and She is NOT Clem anymore.
I know your not
, I never said Kenny was stupid and boring he isnt as a character hes interesting, he is getting boring though after a season of little to no development and I personally dont like him
Also if your Lee wants to slap clem for that fine, mine dosnt in fact if he learnt that clem killed the man to save another life and this man was the one that left him to die brutally twice, tried to get Ben killed, didnt help find clementine and acted like an irrational angry idiot for the wntire of the seasn I think my Lee would cheer. Especially as I wasnt really anit Kenny in season 1, in fact all I did was try to save Larry and Ben and that made him act like a douche.
I know, i was talking about other people.
And in conclusion, I am very sorry for being an asshole.
I... don't know what to say...
You're right though, Kenny always had a reason for his bloodth- I mean "logical homicides."
He's a good man that only wants to be loved while he simultaneously kills people for "good reasons."
Okay, Ha ha, Nice sarcasm. I wasn't saying it was okay, I was saying that it's logical....He kills people for rational reasons in the ZA... You didn't have to be an ass.
EDIT: also, Yes, he went WAY overboard with the execution of the deaths. it's kind of fucked up. I agree.
Except he actually didn't. He either justifiably or unjustifiably brought his group to threaten yours and take your stuff (or hell, maybe it was justifiable both times because Jane took his gun either way and made him traverse the miles back to his group completely defenseless), and failed at it. No "downfall of the group" happening there. Then Kenny tried to kill him either way even when he was at everybody's mercy and no threat to anybody. Even if you want to blame him for Luke's death (serious stretch), it can easily be argued that if Kenny hadn't been such a hot-headed dumbfuck who yelled at and shoved Arvo around constantly, he may not have ran off at all. Not that it matters, because Luke dying was a complete accident, and then Kenny went overboard once again because Arvo finally stood up for himself. And then it was Mike and Bonnie who took the initiative in splitting the group up, not Arvo.
Wanting to kill Arvo after he shot Clementine would be perfectly justifiable, so naturally we never saw that happen.
Of course it's "logical" for Kenny to smash Larry's head in-front of a stressed daughter and a scared young girl. But is it logical for the stressed daughter or the scared young girl? No.
Anything can be relegated to understanding if you're biased enough to believe.
I was actually siding with Kenny's actions in dealing with Arvo. Crazy? Probably, but the way I saw it, he fucked up by sticking us up at a time when I had no compassion left for anyone and at a time where I wouldn't allow anyone to walk over me anymore. With that being said, I could still understand Arvo's position (at first, anyway). I just wasn't "having it" as the young kids say.
Does that make Arvo a definitive evil? No, it just makes him (in my eyes at least) a slimy little leech. Completely untrustworthy.
Didn't Kenny kill Jane?
Pretty good reason to kill someone in my opinion.
Arvo was always planning something, remember his english when you first meet him at the deck? It isnt that bad, after that when you meet him with his groups he speaks perfect english and somehow after his group died (rofl everyone at gunpoint) His english breaks, i bet he is using the language barrier on purpose.
Later on the lake remember when he ran away? I think theres a reason for that, that night Arvo, Mike and Bonnie (determinant) were leaving, Arvo pulls a Rifle from the conductors seat, the group did not have a rifle. So he did have stashed weapons and was on to something.
I don't have any thoughts on the [Shoot Mike] matter, but the option to shoot Kenny after he stabbed Jane does piss me off.