Jane or Sarah

Who would you save?

Alt text

BEST MOMENT IN NO GOING BACK!

Comments

  • Leaving a baby in a car isn't very useful

  • Sarah, any day.

  • Silence is a valid option.

    So they both die.

    :)

  • edited April 2015

    Of course Sarah. Fuck Jane forever.

  • Jane is the goddman burden. She put Clem in danger twice.

  • Agreed

    AronDracula posted: »

    Jane is the goddman burden. She put Clem in danger twice.

  • Me personally? I would save Sarah. Can't let a nice kid like her die.

  • Sarah I guess

  • Hmmmmm.

    Sarah

  • Sarah, jesus this isnt even hard haha. id save the stranger before id save jane

  • Just do nothing, silence.

    Let them both die. :)

    Neither.

  • They can finish each other off. It'd be ideal

    Just do nothing, silence. Let them both die.

  • edited April 2015

    Jane.

    Alt text

    For the record, I don't like either. But at least Jane did shit in the story and before being relegated to just a frictional centerpiece for assdick, she did have a fleshed out story and showed genuine character strengths and weaknesses making her at least feel realistic.

    Sarah was never expanded upon or given anything to do other than be annoying and dense.

  • Meh I think Nate succeeds where Jane fails. Even though the story demands you interact with both characters Nate felt more like a free will bond where Jane was constantly shoved down our throats.

    Jane. For the record, I don't like either. But at least Jane did shit in the story and before being relegated to just a frictional ce

  • Nate was a cartoony goof. I can't particularly relate to someone who drives around roads aimlessly, drinking and talking about how hot a walker is. I didn't like Nate and thought if anyone was shoved down our throat, it was him...

    "Hur, how hot is deh walkur?"

    I just don't know if they were trying to make him a comedic relief, and if so, why?

    Clemenem posted: »

    Meh I think Nate succeeds where Jane fails. Even though the story demands you interact with both characters Nate felt more like a free will bond where Jane was constantly shoved down our throats.

  • dojo32161dojo32161 Moderator

    Sarah, but I still like Jane.

  • Honestly Nate brought realism and a touch of charm in the ZA. He was what a man who had been alone and suffered from PTSD, Antisocial personality disorder and Aspergers would be in this setting and every moment with him was an interesting one. I think I'd be more invested and interested in a cool trucker who shares his whisky and tries to relate and cope way more interesting than a nearly bald headed, tom boy who doesn't shut the fuck up about her stupid sister and is an almost rip off of another one.

    Nate was a cartoony goof. I can't particularly relate to someone who drives around roads aimlessly, drinking and talking about how hot a wal

  • I bet they stole Nate's character from Tallahassee in Zombieland. I was half expecting him to angrily demand that he get his Twinkies. The difference being that Zombieland was meant to be funny and the Walking Dead isn't.

    Clemenem posted: »

    Honestly Nate brought realism and a touch of charm in the ZA. He was what a man who had been alone and suffered from PTSD, Antisocial person

  • That's a tough one....Buuut I'm not going to choose. You can't make me choose! :puts fingers in ears: Lalala, I can't hear youuu....

  • Sarah!

    Sarah!

    SARAH!

    SARAH!

  • edited April 2015

    Sarah, because Jane was a forced and lackluster character

  • The game asked me this question when I played like 6 times it gave me a prompt to not save Sarah in a way that implied that Jane would die if I chose Sarah, I chose Sarah every single time so that question is already answered in-game.

  • Sarah, easily.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.