The part of Gared's story I'm most interested in is him finding the North Grove. Barring that, him figuring out where it is, and heading his ass in that direction. We don't know any more about that friggin' Grove than we did before. Sylvi doesn't know for sure and she's not interested in helping him (us) find it. I didn't care about Sylvi or her backstory.
Finn doesn't die, that we know of, if we don't bring him along. I did, because I figured he could help. When I saw that he couldn't, I rewound it and deliberately pissed him off so he wouldn't.
Mira's meeting with Tyrion was frustrating because there was no way to signal to him about Cersei without her finding out. I wanted more interaction with Morgryn, and to find out whether our choice or not to keep the decree helps to get gold so that they can hire sellswords. Her scene felt rushed.
Nah, Finn's death, Sylvi's backstory, Sera abandoning Mira, a deal with Cercei and Mira meeting Tyrion again definetly didn't advance the plot.
You serious?
Yeah, what you said basically proves that the story tailors by how you play.
It's not the game's fault if you don't talk to people enough, or don't explore enough. That is, frankly your fault.
Finn's death really doesn't add anything (since he isn't there for everyone), just gets rid of a determinant character. You don't have to le… morearn Sylvi's back story if you don't talk to Cotter so it really adds nothing, for Mira I'd agree that it pushes the plot for her a bit further.
What are you talking about? I always love to explore, but what I'm saying is that Sylvi's back story contributes zilch to the overall plot. It may add to her character, but it doesn't to the plot (at least in episode 5).
Yeah, what you said basically proves that the story tailors by how you play.
It's not the game's fault if you don't talk to people enough, or don't explore enough. That is, frankly your fault.
What do you mean by an "extreme set of circumstances"?
The fact that you chose a sentinal and then sided with said sentinal every time, thats the extreme set of circumstances and with duncan as sentinal its likely the way the traitor scene makes the most sense ( though I did already cover how it still doesnt really fit). Your defending the situation specifically for how it played out for you
Gared got sent to the wall in ep 1. The traitor wasn't revealed until episode 3 so we can assume he wasn't spying on us till then
Que Duncan going to give gared advice in episode 3 and royland attempting to kill gryff if ordered in the same episode. Also the fact he doesnt mention the grove means its even more bizzare so he'll betray the family for peace but not tell of the apparent secret weapon
that only makes his betrayal more unexpected
Of course its unexpected i never said it wasnt unexpected. Unexpected doesnt mean good or well done, its clear that was the writers aim by trying to provoke emotion through shock, but it doesnt work if the shock twist has no logic or rationale behind it
Alright, you wanna dance? Let's dance!
What do you mean by an "extreme set of circumstances"? Royland and Duncan gave their opinions, I ch… moreose Royland's. Lots of times. Duncan obviously didn't like that.
Gared got sent to the wall in ep 1. The traitor wasn't revealed until episode 3 so we can assume he wasn't spying on us till then. Again I said the traitor believes he was saving your family and he said he did it for them. He didn't tell the Whitehills about the North Grove which means he still cares for the family.
Sooo just because they are determinant means they are gonna die later? If not, then your second point is nothing but prediction. So how does that make the traitor scene worse?
He was still loyal acting in every one of his scenes previously. - that only makes his betrayal more unexpected thus provides more depth to the betrayal thus making the traitor scene even better.
The part of Gared's story I'm most interested in is him finding the North Grove. Barring that, him figuring out where it is, and heading his… more ass in that direction. We don't know any more about that friggin' Grove than we did before. Sylvi doesn't know for sure and she's not interested in helping him (us) find it. I didn't care about Sylvi or her backstory.
Finn doesn't die, that we know of, if we don't bring him along. I did, because I figured he could help. When I saw that he couldn't, I rewound it and deliberately pissed him off so he wouldn't.
Mira's meeting with Tyrion was frustrating because there was no way to signal to him about Cersei without her finding out. I wanted more interaction with Morgryn, and to find out whether our choice or not to keep the decree helps to get gold so that they can hire sellswords. Her scene felt rushed.
Of course I am defending the situation specifically for how it played for me, you are doing the same thing.
Royland attempting to kill Gryff only happens when he is your Sentinel. In that case he couldn't have been the traitor.
Duncan's relationship with Gared CAN be called out during the traitor scene, Duncan says he did what he had to.
No, it can have logic and rationale behind it unless you yourself play unlogically and unrationally.
(Oh and please stop using simple lines from my sentences, it kinda ruins my arguments. Of course that is what you are trying to do, but please stop. Thank you)
Alright, you wanna dance? Let's dance!
What do you mean by an "extreme set of circumstances"?
The fact that you chose… more a sentinal and then sided with said sentinal every time, thats the extreme set of circumstances and with duncan as sentinal its likely the way the traitor scene makes the most sense ( though I did already cover how it still doesnt really fit). Your defending the situation specifically for how it played out for you
Gared got sent to the wall in ep 1. The traitor wasn't revealed until episode 3 so we can assume he wasn't spying on us till then
Que Duncan going to give gared advice in episode 3 and royland attempting to kill gryff if ordered in the same episode. Also the fact he doesnt mention the grove means its even more bizzare so he'll betray the family for peace but not tell of the apparent secret weapon
that only makes his betrayal more unexpected
Of course its unexpected i… [view original content]
It is entirely the game's fault, especially in a game that is marketed as being tailored by your choices.
When you choose a sentinel, you do so as Ethan. All the chances you have to pick the advice of one or the other is as Rodrik. That alone should be enough for the writers to stop and think "hey, maybe after such a shocking death some of the players will change the way they play the next lord to try to avoid him to have the same destiny". Because it is a logical thing to do.
Any possible choice is "the way it is meant to be played" and should be taken into consideration. Not doing that is why we call it "lazy writing".
But that is not the game's fault now, is it? Look, when you play it for the first time and choose Duncan as Sentinel it's logical you listen… more to him instead of Royland no?
Now, if you play the game the way that you choose one Sentinel and do the exact opposite of what he says then don't say it's the writers' fault cause that is simply the way it's not meant to be played. But what I hate the most is when some people get bad experiences, they automatically think that the game sucks and go on the forums saying how afwul it is when, in reality it really depends on how YOU play. Yes, that annoucment in the begining of the game is not a lie and has a deeper meaning.
Of course I am defending the situation specifically for how it played for me, you are doing the same thing.
Royland attempting to kill Gr… moreyff only happens when he is your Sentinel. In that case he couldn't have been the traitor.
Duncan's relationship with Gared CAN be called out during the traitor scene, Duncan says he did what he had to.
No, it can have logic and rationale behind it unless you yourself play unlogically and unrationally.
(Oh and please stop using simple lines from my sentences, it kinda ruins my arguments. Of course that is what you are trying to do, but please stop. Thank you)
Playing unlogically and unrationally means for instance that you pick Royland as sentinel and then do the exact opposite of what he says. Why would you even pick him as sentinel then?!
What are you talking about? I always love to explore, but what I'm saying is that Sylvi's back story contributes zilch to the overall plot. It may add to her character, but it doesn't to the plot (at least in episode 5).
Playing unlogically and unrationally means for instance that you pick Royland as sentinel and then do the exact opposite of what he says. Why would you even pick him as sentinel then?!
So your saying learning or adapting to past decisions (made by a different character) is not playing correctly? Your saying by choosing a character as sentinal you just 100% agree with them no matter what happens. Also choosing the sentinal is choosing an advisor it doesnt decide any policies or who you agree with.
Nice argument you got there.
I've said why its illogical numerous times above already (starting with the original comment I made). Im not going to repeat myself. And to be honest I'm replying to the one avenue you claim makes the massive shift in behaviour and character believable which seems so far to be that you need to choose certain decisions for it to make sense.
I'll answer both your questionts at once kay?
Playing unlogically and unrationally means for instance that you pick Royland as sentinel a… morend then do the exact opposite of what he says. Why would you even pick him as sentinel then?!
It really cant
-Nice argument you got there.
Alright, Im getting pretty tired of this so let's make it swift since you clearly won't accept that there are people with diffrent opinions then yours Doug.
You are saying the traitor scene was horror. I am saying it wasn't. Which at least proves the "Choices don't matter" trend is bullshit.
You are gonna tell me that you as player in ep 1 believe in Duncan. But in ep 2 you change your mind completly and say F*** it im gonna do what you say Royland cause... I can? I don't think that has anymore logic then any of my arguments.
Playing unlogically and unrationally means for instance that you pick Royland as sentinel and then do the exact opposite of what he says. Wh… morey would you even pick him as sentinel then?!
So your saying learning or adapting to past decisions (made by a different character) is not playing correctly? Your saying by choosing a character as sentinal you just 100% agree with them no matter what happens. Also choosing the sentinal is choosing an advisor it doesnt decide any policies or who you agree with.
Nice argument you got there.
I've said why its illogical numerous times above already (starting with the original comment I made). Im not going to repeat myself. And to be honest I'm replying to the one avenue you claim makes the massive shift in behaviour and character believable which seems so far to be that you need to choose certain decisions for it to make sense.
Okay literally everything you just said was irrelevant to what we were talking about.
If your seriously saying that not keeping the exact same mindset from episode 1 all the way through the game means the characters actions shouldn't make sense then fine. (even if I for some reason agree with your belief that choosing a sentinal means you 100% agree with them in the first place) I still maintain that for me the scene never makes sense in any variation based on what we saw of the characters previously in canon scenes.
"Choices don't matter"
They dont and if anything this traitor choice is relevance to that and how an attempt to make choices matter just causes issues. Again though we are not even talking about that
Alright, Im getting pretty tired of this so let's make it swift since you clearly won't accept that there are people with diffrent opinions … morethen yours Doug.
You are saying the traitor scene was horror. I am saying it wasn't. Which at least proves the "Choices don't matter" trend is bullshit.
You are gonna tell me that you as player in ep 1 believe in Duncan. But in ep 2 you change your mind completly and say F*** it im gonna do what you say Royland cause... I can? I don't think that has anymore logic then any of my arguments.
I could say the same thing.
Ugh hes not saying that, the point is non of that changes the game "tailored" does mean anything actually ever changes, you still end up in the same situation
So what you are saying is: Let's remove everything optional and take in consideration only the things that happen regardless.
If that's the way you like to play Telltale games then I think you're gonna be pretty dissapointed.
Okay literally everything you just said was irrelevant to what we were talking about.
If your seriously saying that not keeping the exact… more same mindset from episode 1 all the way through the game means the characters actions shouldn't make sense then fine. (even if I for some reason agree with your belief that choosing a sentinal means you 100% agree with them in the first place) I still maintain that for me the scene never makes sense in any variation based on what we saw of the characters previously in canon scenes.
"Choices don't matter"
They dont and if anything this traitor choice is relevance to that and how an attempt to make choices matter just causes issues. Again though we are not even talking about that
I'd say its debating you points, so I dont think its either why?
On the traitor scene im critical as I honestly cant find a way to praise it, I dont outright hate the game or constantly go on about, constructive criticism is getting an overall balance, I'm usually more positive but when somethings bad its better to just say its bad
Yeah. So what?
You're gonna sit here and whine about it?
I'd rather enjoy a good game with good characters, excellent voice-acting and amazing story then sit here listening to you and wasting time at this pointless hate crusade. Now that I think about it I think im gonna do just now. Play. An. Amazing. Telltale. Game.
So, congratulation you did it. You manged to get a loyal Telltale Fan away from thes threads. Hope it was worth it. Good day.
Ugh hes not saying that, the point is non of that changes the game "tailored" does mean anything actually ever changes, you still end up in the same situation
I'd say its debating you points, so I dont think its either why?
On the traitor scene im critical as I honestly cant find a way to praise… more it, I dont outright hate the game or constantly go on about, constructive criticism is getting an overall balance, I'm usually more positive but when somethings bad its better to just say its bad
This is why I hardly ever bother arguing you cant find and debate faults in things you like or your running a "hate crusade". I think the game is overall good, its not perfect and critcism mixed in with praise is always good.
Not to mention the other party throwing a mild "Im offended you dont agree with me" tantrum before announcing their exit
Also I'm hardly whining I replied to things you posted, if its a thread about criticising an episode that wasnt all that good then yeah thats what the discussion is going to be about, I hardly just brought it up randomly; unless your idea is that you can argue against complaints but Im not allowed to reply
Yeah. So what?
You're gonna sit here and whine about it?
I'd rather enjoy a good game with good characters, excellent voice-acting and ama… morezing story then sit here listening to you and wasting time at this pointless hate crusade. Now that I think about it I think im gonna do just now. Play. An. Amazing. Telltale. Game.
So, congratulation you did it. You manged to get a loyal Telltale Fan away from thes threads. Hope it was worth it. Good day.
So what you are saying is: Let's remove everything optional and take in consideration only the things that happen regardless.
If that's the way you like to play Telltale games then I think you're gonna be pretty dissapointed.
I liked it. Really caught me off guard numerous times. The final choice smelled a bit like pure shock value to me, but 's how it is with TTG.
I hope they handle the determinant character situation better than in previous games. It was real disappointing in their other games, so I hope they don't just
waste the opportunity of making two (almost) completely different alternative storylines. Also hoping the previous choices will matter now. What you choose hasn't been a huge
impact so far, so fingers crossed.
I liked it. Really caught me off guard numerous times. The final choice smelled a bit like pure shock value to me, but 's how it is with TTG… more.
I hope they handle the determinant character situation better than in previous games. It was real disappointing in their other games, so I hope they don't just
waste the opportunity of making two (almost) completely different alternative storylines. Also hoping the previous choices will matter now. What you choose hasn't been a huge
impact so far, so fingers crossed.
It wasn't so bad, but It wasn't good either. In my opinion, episode five was the weakest of all, it felt too short and somewhat rushed (Gryff's eye bug, for example). The whole port scene didn't make much sense... the Whitehills literally came out of nowhere with a large number of soldiers; how the Forresters, knowing of the ambush, won't notice all those men, it's strange to say the least.
About the Mira-Tyrion scene: even Cersei cannot be so lacking of common sense to left a guard outside cell where Tyrion could easily see the man, and the guard then entering and scolding Mira... it's simply excessive.
If episode six will be significantly better, I don't think it would make the whole game bad, and probably people playing the complete season in the future will not notice the not so good writing. But episode six has to be like the first four.
Yes, im am indeed serious. Finn is determinant so we all Know how that is gonna turn out. Sylvis backstory? You mean that two sentences about how everyone hates her. Sera abandoning mira? Well Yeah she Said that but 2 minutes later she is still Walking Right Next to Mira. You're Right about that Deal with cersei however you got Absolutly nothing from tyrion. We Are "hateing" got because we want it to be good.
Nah, Finn's death, Sylvi's backstory, Sera abandoning Mira, a deal with Cercei and Mira meeting Tyrion again definetly didn't advance the plot.
You serious?
And to all of you who Are defending this Game. You want Us (the Haters) to stop Hating the Game, but At the Same Time, you're Hating Us because we're "Hating" the Game. You want to stop Us opening Threads about how we Are "Hating" the Game, but you're Doing the same with how awesome this Game is! We "haters" want this Game to be As good As possible. Nothing more, nothing less. I Understand that this Forum can be toxic At times, but it's Not our fault. And sometimes it Needs to be that Way so TTG listens. It's like with your Child. Sometimes it does something wrong or stupid so you Need to Tell your Child what went wrong so it can learn from it. Because you want the best for your Child. Because we want the best for TTG.
even Cersei cannot be so lacking of common sense to left a guard outside cell where Tyrion could easily see the man, and the guard then entering and scolding Mira...
About that, I'm starting to wonder if it was Lucan's doing and not Cersei's. I mean, maybe Cersei didn't tell him to give Mira the wine or to stand there the whole time. It is as you say, it wouldn't make sense for Cersei to do that, but maybe Lucan was so eager to get Mira in trouble that he did all of that on his own, since he couldn't get her for Damien's death.
I really wish to say something good about this episode, but I just can't. Don't get me wrong I think it's not that bad as some people say but it definetly is worst episode in game so far (hopefuly episode six won't be worse). This episode was made just to make things clear before last episode of game/season.
I've heard a lot of people saying that telltale should do better because the choices don't matter and there aren't enough choices. You have to think...In GoT there are very little choices that matter. And I prefer less choices that make you think about what you're doing rather than choices that matter. And that there's a lot of them.
And to all of you who Are defending this Game. You want Us (the Haters) to stop Hating the Game, but At the Same Time, you're Hating Us beca… moreuse we're "Hating" the Game. You want to stop Us opening Threads about how we Are "Hating" the Game, but you're Doing the same with how awesome this Game is! We "haters" want this Game to be As good As possible. Nothing more, nothing less. I Understand that this Forum can be toxic At times, but it's Not our fault. And sometimes it Needs to be that Way so TTG listens. It's like with your Child. Sometimes it does something wrong or stupid so you Need to Tell your Child what went wrong so it can learn from it. Because you want the best for your Child. Because we want the best for TTG.
Oh really? Well you don't know that about Finn, I guess we will see. Sylvi's backstory is a completly optional matter that simply enriches the lore. Ugh yeah she was there but then she left, she wasn't seen the entire rest of the episode implying she doesn't give a crap about us. And you get 2 outcomes with Tyrion- either he tells you that no-one will testify or he lies to you.
You are "hateing" (yeah that's not a word) because you want it to be good? It is far better then "good". It's excellent and currently the best GoT game to date.
Yes, im am indeed serious. Finn is determinant so we all Know how that is gonna turn out. Sylvis backstory? You mean that two sentences abou… moret how everyone hates her. Sera abandoning mira? Well Yeah she Said that but 2 minutes later she is still Walking Right Next to Mira. You're Right about that Deal with cersei however you got Absolutly nothing from tyrion. We Are "hateing" got because we want it to be good.
Comments
The part of Gared's story I'm most interested in is him finding the North Grove. Barring that, him figuring out where it is, and heading his ass in that direction. We don't know any more about that friggin' Grove than we did before. Sylvi doesn't know for sure and she's not interested in helping him (us) find it. I didn't care about Sylvi or her backstory.
Finn doesn't die, that we know of, if we don't bring him along. I did, because I figured he could help. When I saw that he couldn't, I rewound it and deliberately pissed him off so he wouldn't.
Mira's meeting with Tyrion was frustrating because there was no way to signal to him about Cersei without her finding out. I wanted more interaction with Morgryn, and to find out whether our choice or not to keep the decree helps to get gold so that they can hire sellswords. Her scene felt rushed.
Yeah, what you said basically proves that the story tailors by how you play.
It's not the game's fault if you don't talk to people enough, or don't explore enough. That is, frankly your fault.
What are you talking about? I always love to explore, but what I'm saying is that Sylvi's back story contributes zilch to the overall plot. It may add to her character, but it doesn't to the plot (at least in episode 5).
Nope, people are just assholes...
The fact that you chose a sentinal and then sided with said sentinal every time, thats the extreme set of circumstances and with duncan as sentinal its likely the way the traitor scene makes the most sense ( though I did already cover how it still doesnt really fit). Your defending the situation specifically for how it played out for you
Que Duncan going to give gared advice in episode 3 and royland attempting to kill gryff if ordered in the same episode. Also the fact he doesnt mention the grove means its even more bizzare so he'll betray the family for peace but not tell of the apparent secret weapon
Of course its unexpected i never said it wasnt unexpected. Unexpected doesnt mean good or well done, its clear that was the writers aim by trying to provoke emotion through shock, but it doesnt work if the shock twist has no logic or rationale behind it
Well, then if you don't care about the details or the subplots that's not anyone's problem but yours.
Yeah. Its called a choice and and an outcome. You either bring Finn or you don't. And as you can see the outcomes quite wary.
We don't always get what we want in life now, do we? Well, I can say Morgryn is confirmed for ep six so we'll find out.
Of course I am defending the situation specifically for how it played for me, you are doing the same thing.
Royland attempting to kill Gryff only happens when he is your Sentinel. In that case he couldn't have been the traitor.
Duncan's relationship with Gared CAN be called out during the traitor scene, Duncan says he did what he had to.
No, it can have logic and rationale behind it unless you yourself play unlogically and unrationally.
(Oh and please stop using simple lines from my sentences, it kinda ruins my arguments. Of course that is what you are trying to do, but please stop. Thank you)
It is entirely the game's fault, especially in a game that is marketed as being tailored by your choices.
When you choose a sentinel, you do so as Ethan. All the chances you have to pick the advice of one or the other is as Rodrik. That alone should be enough for the writers to stop and think "hey, maybe after such a shocking death some of the players will change the way they play the next lord to try to avoid him to have the same destiny". Because it is a logical thing to do.
Any possible choice is "the way it is meant to be played" and should be taken into consideration. Not doing that is why we call it "lazy writing".
Late edit: Grammar.
It really cant
How do you do that?
I'll answer both your questionts at once kay?
Playing unlogically and unrationally means for instance that you pick Royland as sentinel and then do the exact opposite of what he says. Why would you even pick him as sentinel then?!
-Nice argument you got there.
Not that I'm saying the episode is bad but do you really need to call people assholes for having an opinion?
I didn't think finding out about Sylvi's backstory did much for the overall plot either.
So your saying learning or adapting to past decisions (made by a different character) is not playing correctly? Your saying by choosing a character as sentinal you just 100% agree with them no matter what happens. Also choosing the sentinal is choosing an advisor it doesnt decide any policies or who you agree with.
I've said why its illogical numerous times above already (starting with the original comment I made). Im not going to repeat myself. And to be honest I'm replying to the one avenue you claim makes the massive shift in behaviour and character believable which seems so far to be that you need to choose certain decisions for it to make sense.
Not for having an opinion, for overreacting and making 100 rant pages...
Take you for instance...
Alright, Im getting pretty tired of this so let's make it swift since you clearly won't accept that there are people with diffrent opinions then yours Doug.
You are saying the traitor scene was horror. I am saying it wasn't. Which at least proves the "Choices don't matter" trend is bullshit.
You are gonna tell me that you as player in ep 1 believe in Duncan. But in ep 2 you change your mind completly and say F*** it im gonna do what you say Royland cause... I can? I don't think that has anymore logic then any of my arguments.
I could say the same thing.
ouch
So what you are saying is: Let's remove everything optional and take in consideration only the things that happen regardless.
If that's the way you like to play Telltale games then I think you're gonna be pretty dissapointed.
Okay literally everything you just said was irrelevant to what we were talking about.
If your seriously saying that not keeping the exact same mindset from episode 1 all the way through the game means the characters actions shouldn't make sense then fine. (even if I for some reason agree with your belief that choosing a sentinal means you 100% agree with them in the first place) I still maintain that for me the scene never makes sense in any variation based on what we saw of the characters previously in canon scenes.
They dont and if anything this traitor choice is relevance to that and how an attempt to make choices matter just causes issues. Again though we are not even talking about that
Ugh hes not saying that, the point is non of that changes the game "tailored" does mean anything actually ever changes, you still end up in the same situation
Do you think what you just said counts as constructive criticism? Please, Yes or No.
I'd say its debating you points, so I dont think its either why?
On the traitor scene im critical as I honestly cant find a way to praise it, I dont outright hate the game or constantly go on about, constructive criticism is getting an overall balance, I'm usually more positive but when somethings bad its better to just say its bad
Yeah. So what?
You're gonna sit here and whine about it?
I'd rather enjoy a good game with good characters, excellent voice-acting and amazing story then sit here listening to you and wasting time at this pointless hate crusade. Now that I think about it I think im gonna do just now. Play. An. Amazing. Telltale. Game.
So, congratulation you did it. You manged to get a loyal Telltale Fan away from thes threads. Hope it was worth it. Good day.
Let me contructively criticize your non-constructive criticizm.
I don't care.
This is why I hardly ever bother arguing you cant find and debate faults in things you like or your running a "hate crusade". I think the game is overall good, its not perfect and critcism mixed in with praise is always good.
Not to mention the other party throwing a mild "Im offended you dont agree with me" tantrum before announcing their exit
Also I'm hardly whining I replied to things you posted, if its a thread about criticising an episode that wasnt all that good then yeah thats what the discussion is going to be about, I hardly just brought it up randomly; unless your idea is that you can argue against complaints but Im not allowed to reply
I think you meant extraneous. And yes, I do consider Sylvi's storyline to be extraneous. Extraneous=unnecessary.
Okay then I was just asking you to clarify what you meant
I liked it. Really caught me off guard numerous times. The final choice smelled a bit like pure shock value to me, but 's how it is with TTG.
I hope they handle the determinant character situation better than in previous games. It was real disappointing in their other games, so I hope they don't just
waste the opportunity of making two (almost) completely different alternative storylines. Also hoping the previous choices will matter now. What you choose hasn't been a huge
impact so far, so fingers crossed.
Really? cause I thought the Gared parts were the weakest.
I like your optimism.
It wasn't so bad, but It wasn't good either. In my opinion, episode five was the weakest of all, it felt too short and somewhat rushed (Gryff's eye bug, for example). The whole port scene didn't make much sense... the Whitehills literally came out of nowhere with a large number of soldiers; how the Forresters, knowing of the ambush, won't notice all those men, it's strange to say the least.
About the Mira-Tyrion scene: even Cersei cannot be so lacking of common sense to left a guard outside cell where Tyrion could easily see the man, and the guard then entering and scolding Mira... it's simply excessive.
If episode six will be significantly better, I don't think it would make the whole game bad, and probably people playing the complete season in the future will not notice the not so good writing. But episode six has to be like the first four.
it was good, just short. one scene i didnt care for
I especially enjoyed playing episode four, and in comparison five was awful.
Yes, im am indeed serious. Finn is determinant so we all Know how that is gonna turn out. Sylvis backstory? You mean that two sentences about how everyone hates her. Sera abandoning mira? Well Yeah she Said that but 2 minutes later she is still Walking Right Next to Mira. You're Right about that Deal with cersei however you got Absolutly nothing from tyrion. We Are "hateing" got because we want it to be good.
And to all of you who Are defending this Game. You want Us (the Haters) to stop Hating the Game, but At the Same Time, you're Hating Us because we're "Hating" the Game. You want to stop Us opening Threads about how we Are "Hating" the Game, but you're Doing the same with how awesome this Game is! We "haters" want this Game to be As good As possible. Nothing more, nothing less. I Understand that this Forum can be toxic At times, but it's Not our fault. And sometimes it Needs to be that Way so TTG listens. It's like with your Child. Sometimes it does something wrong or stupid so you Need to Tell your Child what went wrong so it can learn from it. Because you want the best for your Child. Because we want the best for TTG.
About that, I'm starting to wonder if it was Lucan's doing and not Cersei's. I mean, maybe Cersei didn't tell him to give Mira the wine or to stand there the whole time. It is as you say, it wouldn't make sense for Cersei to do that, but maybe Lucan was so eager to get Mira in trouble that he did all of that on his own, since he couldn't get her for Damien's death.
I really wish to say something good about this episode, but I just can't. Don't get me wrong I think it's not that bad as some people say but it definetly is worst episode in game so far (hopefuly episode six won't be worse). This episode was made just to make things clear before last episode of game/season.
I've heard a lot of people saying that telltale should do better because the choices don't matter and there aren't enough choices. You have to think...In GoT there are very little choices that matter. And I prefer less choices that make you think about what you're doing rather than choices that matter. And that there's a lot of them.
Oh really? Well you don't know that about Finn, I guess we will see. Sylvi's backstory is a completly optional matter that simply enriches the lore. Ugh yeah she was there but then she left, she wasn't seen the entire rest of the episode implying she doesn't give a crap about us. And you get 2 outcomes with Tyrion- either he tells you that no-one will testify or he lies to you.
You are "hateing" (yeah that's not a word) because you want it to be good? It is far better then "good". It's excellent and currently the best GoT game to date.
Thats the forums for ya.