The things you DONT want to see in Season 4

2

Comments

  • I would wanna see the Garcias.

    But.

    I don't wanna see them (Or particularly Javier) as a huge focus of season 4. This season needs to return to Clem's story. I won't mind Javi being there as long as he doesn't overshadow her again.

    Jimayo posted: »

    No. What I don't want to see is the garcia's. Cause then everyone but Javi has to die. Let's get back to clem's story. And maybe this ti

  • I could live with that. As long as they don't have to kill off the determinant survivors(ie. only javi has any plot significance while the other remain behind, that would be fine).

    I would wanna see the Garcias. But. I don't wanna see them (Or particularly Javier) as a huge focus of season 4. This season needs to return to Clem's story. I won't mind Javi being there as long as he doesn't overshadow her again.

  • I like your talk, but all this doesn't mean season 3 was bad. I did like the writing and let's say everything they did in S1&S2 including designs,dialogues, music,etc.. And I personally think that I wouldn't love to see everything in ANF exactly the same as it was in S1&2 even if I thought I would.
    Season 3 was interesting and thrilling and it had it's best moments just like in S1&2. probably had great characters, but most of us didn't mentally get attached to. frankly I think it's best to be this way. perhaps we're not supposed to be so attracted to the story line or characters of this season, cuz maybe it was meant to be a side story of other people who were surviving the Apocalypse of TWD. And every player will enjoy seeing his clementine from S1&2 being a part of this story.

    I guess that what made TWD players start to complain cuz they wanted to get more Clementine and more attachment to the story and characters and more feels like they experienced in the previous seasons.

    Now i think S4 will be perfect to continue Clementine's story and bring us back to the main story line we were separated from. And maybe add some serious characters that we would care about and want them to last longer.

    I agree with most of what I've seen in this thread so far. Personally, I don't mind if she meets up with another group or not, just so lo

  • dude you hate anf way too much calm down

    AronDracula posted: »

    * No more Javier and his family. This should be his conclusion cause ANF ending was very fitting. * No more sequel baitings * No more action focus * No more lies

  • i agree 100% on the first one

    fallandir posted: »

    Okay, let's see. * No rewrites happening mid-season, no more writers running around in chaos. One constant, devoted team working fair a

  • hubs are boring sometimes

    The new engine style, the stupid camera shakes/zooms, I want hubs in an episode, no reused music for the most part I wanna hear some new shi

  • I've been defending Telltale for years and this game ripped me off. It deserves a lot of hate.

    -Dream- posted: »

    dude you hate anf way too much calm down

  • The only thing I DON'T wanna see in Season 4 is action every 5 minutes. This season never gave us time to take a breather and enjoy the slow moments like sharing a laugh with people.

    Like when Fern had the gun to our heads and we managed to calm her down then all of a sudden it goes right back to the action when David breaks her arm. WHAT?! Damn, give us a moment!

    • The title to be: The Walking Dead Game Season Three.
    • No appearances of characters from the comics, unless they haven't appeared in the comics in a long time.
    • Clementine's story continues, if there needs to be another main lead, then the playtime should be 50-50, not 95-5.
    • Our choices actually having an effect on Clementine's personality.
    • No lies about what's supposedly going to be in the game.
    • At least five, fully fleshed out episodes, none that are cut into two and none that are shorter than 80 minutes.
    • Additional stuff to do, such as side quests, more explore-able hubs where you can interact and get to know characters.
    • More game-play such as puzzle solving.
    • The return of familiar faces from the first two seasons and maybe some from ANF and Michonne.
    • Choices we made in all previous seasons having some effect on the game.
    • Determinants being treated nicely, if they die, they're dead but if we went through allot to save them, I'd like them to be able to survive or at least affect the story, even in a small way.
    • A group that gets to know one another with characters that develop before dying and dynamic relationships.
    • Finally: Closure.
  • edited June 2017

    Agreed! If telltale gives us the ability to save characters from death, then they should be able to survive the entire season and have an effect on the story.

    MaconMajr posted: »

    NO, I repeat NO determinant characters given cheap roles or fates.

  • I just want choices to matter. Maybe the Season 1 writers should return.

  • How about no more goddamn forced romances huh? COUGHCOUGHKateCOUGHCOUGHGabeCOUGH (tbf Gabentine only happens in the Jane ending, buuuut I imagine some Jane ending players were a bit pissed)

    • short, 90-minute episodes
    • not being able to learn more about characters
    • a lack of flashbacks
    • PEOPLE NOT EATING FOR WHAT SEEMS LIKE DAYS AT A TIME
    • disabled characters getting thrown to the walkers
    • a lack of disabled characters
    • antagonistic disabled characters
    • a lack of positive queer characters
    • Kenny again (UNLESS other characters are also shown in whatever flashback/dream he's in--but AJ and Clem don't count for this)
    • a lack of reference to Chromid
    • rewrites and scene cuts without at least keeping those as bonus content
    • telling us we'll get to play as someone when we pretty much won't get to
    • lack of puzzles and hub exploration/relaxation
    • lack of choice impact
    • being mislead about dialogue options
    • lack of humor
    • switching out writers
    • QTE, especially redundant ones
    • not having silence as a fifth, time-out option instead of as a fourth, immediately chooseable option
    • lack of bonus content--action figures, DLC, and a few track releases do not count on their own
    • lack of a rewind feature
    • lack of reviewable stats
    • character models reused in areas where the character would not have been there or in crowds
    • "food bar" -labeled food bars
  • edited June 2017

    I'm not 100% sure if this is controversial thing to mention but.

    Please Telltale Games, let us PLAY your games. Let us move around more (Life is Strange) and code some basic combat system when the zombies attack, making it a bit more interactive. See various arcade shooters where the camera moves around and you shoot what's on screen. I doubt missing a dialogue option because you struggle to stay awake is intended by design.

    Also, I have found out that your games are much better when you play them after all the episodes are out.

  • I'm not attached to any of them, though I would love to finally see TT actually keeping their promises and making ANF's endings significant/affecting the future gameplay. After all that TT's pulled out, I've got the feeling they're gonna use only Javier, if at all, which makes the whole "fresh blood" idea completely pointless and ridiculous. But let's not jump to conclusions.

    I'm just curious, how do you feel on the Garcias? Do you not want them to return?

  • edited June 2017

    Literally the same, exact, critiques before this spin-off series came out.


    I doubt they are gonna listen to us, they didn't for the past 3 years....

  • 100% Agreed. I want this too

    Maybe a new close friend to Clementine like Lee that is also close to us and sticks with her till the end of the series. Or maybe a character that knows a damn about what happened to the world and made it be like this.

  • I am just tired of people crying she was pushed aside in ANF

    We wouldn't be if Telltale didn't push her aside in ANF

    Renkyys posted: »

    I know.... Look I like her I am just tired of people crying she was pushed aside in ANF

  • That would be cool. I think everyone's tired of getting into groups just for all of them to die or become determinants. Plus if she met only one or two people it what be easier for telltale to develop their characters because they wouldn't have to focus on what happens to the other characters that die fast and no one cares about.

    MRSHYGUY45 posted: »

    I agree, I hope she doesn't run into a new group of survivors. However, I hope she does run into ONE more new person, someone who's her own

  • edited June 2017

    [removed]

  • That's because she was pushed aside in ANF.

    Renkyys posted: »

    I know.... Look I like her I am just tired of people crying she was pushed aside in ANF

  • Heh. "Take their time" you say...

    ANF had 2.5 years.

    MRSHYGUY45 posted: »

    What Telltale really needs to do is TAKE THEIR TIME when developing a new season. They need to read fan and YouTube feedback so they can fix

  • No love triangles

    No characters doing things just to force a certain outcome (like David going postal when we could've left peacefully)

    No deciding ships of characters we aren't in control of

    No characters whose disposition and feelings are completely plot convienient (Like Tripp instantly forgiving you after you brought the bandits who destroyed his home, killing his friend, and CONDEMNING HIM TO DEATH)

    Let go if the idea that anything one minute longer than an hour is a long episode

    Stop with the flashbacks, unless they actually can make something better than a five minute sliver that feels cheap

    No adverts at the end of a rushed episode...

  • And was shorter than season 2

    Heh. "Take their time" you say... ANF had 2.5 years.

  • I don't want any more stupid love triangle stuff. Or any more characters that get introduced just to do nothing really.

  • edited June 2017

    No forced romances thank you. The whole mess with Kate with the forced conflict in the end despite me rejecting her 100%... ughh... Speaking of which...

    No forced conflict / making characters act in a completely plot convenient way. See the above. Also, they reaaally wanted us to hate David in the last episode. Yes, some might say that's how he always was but my Javi had been building something with his brother, shared some pretty heartfelt moments with him, BUT in the last Ep it seemed like none of it mattered and David would act the same if I had antagonized him through the whole season and messed around with his wife. Don't give me an option to make these choices if they aren't going to matter anyway. Forced drama like this has a jarring effect which makes character progression seem inconsistent.

    No more determinant characters who die in the next damn episode anyways. Conrad is a legend, we all know that and I must give some props for TT for that. However, I'm sick of seeing decisions paying out like Ava/Tripp. It cheapens the whole experience. Get some more Conrads in there or just stop making these "Who will live ...although they both die anyway?" choices.

  • Get out

    -Dream- posted: »

    hubs are boring sometimes

  • Gabe: Clementine...?

    Clem: Yes Gabe?

    Gabe: I...well...

    Clem: What is it? Speak my love.

    Gabe: The thing is...well...

    Clem: Go on.

    Gabe: I WANT YOUR BABY!

    Clem:....OKAY!

    Gabe: REALLY!?

    Clem: YEAH! LET'S BE PARENTS!

    Gabe: YAY! I'M GONNA BE A MAN!

    Clem: AND I'M GONNA HAVE STRETCH MARKS BEFORE I'M 18! Quick! Let's make out some more in front of the camera! WE CAN USE TONGUES THIS TIME!

    Gabe: I'M A MAN!

    Lilly/Christa:

    enter image description here

  • Don't give David/Kate/Gabe the Kenny/Jane treatment is season 4. If Clem goes back to Richmond I don't want to hear Javier say "X" died, ran away, or some crap. Telltale should have learned their lesson from this season.

  • Anything that remotely even relates to ANF. Complete waste of time for everyone involved.

    I want to see:

    More Clementine
    Less Action
    Character Development
    No Comic Book Characters
    AJ - Because damn wasn't that the main purpose of Season 3?

  • Yet Another Angry Dad Climax.

  • Yeah, how many of those did we have in the last 3 seasons again? 4?

    DabigRG posted: »

    Yet Another Angry Dad Climax.

  • Well, 3 unless I'm forgetting one but it's still way past tiresome, not to mention overplayed.

    MRSHYGUY45 posted: »

    Yeah, how many of those did we have in the last 3 seasons again? 4?

  • Let's see:

    Larry and Kenny in S1

    Carlos in S2

    David in ANF.

    I was going to add Carver since he's AJ's possible father, but ruled him out because AJ looks nothing like him.

    DabigRG posted: »

    Well, 3 unless I'm forgetting one but it's still way past tiresome, not to mention overplayed.

  • Well, I specified climax since it's pretty much the ending that the Seasons/installments are building to, but most of those do indeed count for the general Angry Dad and Kenny-type/clone categories.

    MRSHYGUY45 posted: »

    Let's see: Larry and Kenny in S1 Carlos in S2 David in ANF. I was going to add Carver since he's AJ's possible father, but ruled him out because AJ looks nothing like him.

  • Why Lilacs...why do you have to hurt us?

    Lilacsbloom posted: »

    Gabe: Clementine...? Clem: Yes Gabe? Gabe: I...well... Clem: What is it? Speak my love. Gabe: The thing is...well... Clem: Go

  • Dude how can u not like action?

    AronDracula posted: »

    * No more Javier and his family. This should be his conclusion cause ANF ending was very fitting. * No more sequel baitings * No more action focus * No more lies

  • I hate lazy-written action.

    Melton23 posted: »

    Dude how can u not like action?

  • How can action be lazy? :/

    AronDracula posted: »

    I hate lazy-written action.

  • They're so forgettable.

    Melton23 posted: »

    How can action be lazy?

Sign in to comment in this discussion.