To people who thought Norma and Randall were reasonable

edited April 2016 in The Walking Dead

how s that going for you guys now huh? Doesnt seem from the preview Norma s gonna be ´´reasonable´´´even if you give Randall mercy
edit: i ve changed my opinion on norma she s really not that bad actually it was just a bad chain of events

«13

Comments

  • Well, yeah. We burned down her whole community, so..

  • She started this shit I'd kill that sow.

  • Well considering we killed all of her people in mass murdering genocide I'd say it's understandable. Picture seeing your friends and while community literally go up in flames. Then tell me how reasonable you'd be

  • I thought she was going to be reasonable until we set up Monroe on fire and pushed a couple of citizens to the water. Although it would be morally-wrong to kill people on our side, we're not above her.

  • Norma was the only one that was reasonable throughout. Randall was too until he started to threaten the kids.

  • We only killed 4 as far as we know

    Clemenem posted: »

    Well considering we killed all of her people in mass murdering genocide I'd say it's understandable. Picture seeing your friends and while community literally go up in flames. Then tell me how reasonable you'd be

  • Even if it didn't kill anyone else which is a big if it could have easily killed the whole community, destroying a safe haven and people's homes. Plus Monroe is built on the sea which increases the possibility of death if not by burning then by drowning

    zeke10 posted: »

    We only killed 4 as far as we know

  • True but TBH rick would have done worse to them

    Clemenem posted: »

    Even if it didn't kill anyone else which is a big if it could have easily killed the whole community, destroying a safe haven and people's h

  • To people who thought Norma and Randall were reasonable. How is that going for you guys now huh?

    I can put my answer into one word for you, and it would this:

    Whoops ^_^

  • Well, that is true. It's still wrong imo

    zeke10 posted: »

    True but TBH rick would have done worse to them

  • Well they were a threat and chonne only killed when she had too

    Clemenem posted: »

    Well, that is true. It's still wrong imo

  • edited April 2016

    I never saw Randall as a reasonable person to begin with.

    Norma, however, I still assume that she has good reasons for her actions and mistrust towards Michonne and Sam, especially after how her community ended up being set on fire when the majority of Monroe never interacted with the heroes and did nothing to them that warranted their deaths.

  • yeah lol

    Lilacsbloom posted: »

    To people who thought Norma and Randall were reasonable. How is that going for you guys now huh? I can put my answer into one word for you, and it would this: Whoops ^_^

  • I did feel like they were reasonable before and didn't think they murdered those people from the ferry but after episode 2, I was just convinced. Norma's group is gonna attack me regardless if I spared or killed her brother so I made sure Randall wouldn't hurt anybody again.

  • I never thought they were good, I just hoped they wouldn't make them ridiculously evil. I did always think they'd be revealed to be bad.

  • Lol people who say "it's justified, we destroyed the community" ....COME ON!!!!

    She literally said "I'll make what happened on the ferry look like a motherfucking picnic if you don't give me randall"

  • Weren't we a threat for them, even if it was involuntary? We were basically dragged there and unbalanced the peace in the process. I feel like Randall should've radioed Norma and ask her for an opinion—it just wasn't his call to make.

    zeke10 posted: »

    Well they were a threat and chonne only killed when she had too

  • Norma could still be reasonable. At the point of the third episode we have her brother as a hostage after burning down her community. Her reaction makes sense.

  • "I'll make what happened on the ferry look like a motherfucking picnic if you don't give me randall"

    So it is true that Randall killed those people and children from the ferry. I knew I couldn't trust Norma saying that random scavengers killed them instead and Randall gave them justice.

    Wigams posted: »

    Lol people who say "it's justified, we destroyed the community" ....COME ON!!!! She literally said "I'll make what happened on the ferry look like a motherfucking picnic if you don't give me randall"

  • They killed thatferry loads of people including children before we destroyed their community. Is killing children reasonable?

    Clemenem posted: »

    Well considering we killed all of her people in mass murdering genocide I'd say it's understandable. Picture seeing your friends and while community literally go up in flames. Then tell me how reasonable you'd be

  • They slaughtered the children on the ferry,. They aren't reasonable.

    Skiba7671 posted: »

    Norma could still be reasonable. At the point of the third episode we have her brother as a hostage after burning down her community. Her reaction makes sense.

  • Was it ever confirmed that it was a group of people including Randall that killed the scavengers, or was it just Randall alone?

    Flog61 posted: »

    They killed thatferry loads of people including children before we destroyed their community. Is killing children reasonable?

  • True that

    Weren't we a threat for them, even if it was involuntary? We were basically dragged there and unbalanced the peace in the process. I feel like Randall should've radioed Norma and ask her for an opinion—it just wasn't his call to make.

  • I bet Randall,Gabby and Cam did it

    RichWalk23 posted: »

    Was it ever confirmed that it was a group of people including Randall that killed the scavengers, or was it just Randall alone?

  • Randall implies it

    AronDracula posted: »

    "I'll make what happened on the ferry look like a motherfucking picnic if you don't give me randall" So it is true that Randall kill

  • When and how?

    zeke10 posted: »

    Randall implies it

  • Did they confirm that? Or is there still the idea that they killed the people on the ferry who already killed the inhabitants. I guess I'm still hoping for some actual morally grey characters

    Flog61 posted: »

    They slaughtered the children on the ferry,. They aren't reasonable.

  • He implies he's killed kids before

    AronDracula posted: »

    When and how?

  • Well it was probably just Randall Gabby and Cam who did it. I bet Randall lied to Norma

    Did they confirm that? Or is there still the idea that they killed the people on the ferry who already killed the inhabitants. I guess I'm still hoping for some actual morally grey characters

  • Don't know about Gabby and Cam, but they seem to be his henchman--uh, morally ambiguous followers, so it's possible that they gave him a hand on that horrific massacre. I don't think he necessarily lied to Norma. Both of them seem like straight-forward people, even if Randall can be brutal. I'm supposing that he just told her and she disagreed with what he did.

    @Firewallcano I am going with the latter, but I'm still waiting for some confirmation. Sam also said that they traded with them sometimes, so she should tell the remaining of her group—or Paige—that they died.

    zeke10 posted: »

    Well it was probably just Randall Gabby and Cam who did it. I bet Randall lied to Norma

  • Well Randall had to have help tying em all up and Gabby and Cam seem to be loyal. P.S i love Cams model what kind of hat is he wearing?

    Don't know about Gabby and Cam, but they seem to be his henchman--uh, morally ambiguous followers, so it's possible that they gave him a han

  • Who the Heck are cam and gabby? Are those the two randoms with Randall who don't even have any lines ?

    zeke10 posted: »

    Well Randall had to have help tying em all up and Gabby and Cam seem to be loyal. P.S i love Cams model what kind of hat is he wearing?

  • If you ask Sam about the radio she mention the people on the ferry were the people she and Gerg trade with. last time she was there she used the radio, whitch brought randell. she heard randell killed them. she was still on the ferry when that happen but wasn't in the same room. is that proof enough for you?

    Did they confirm that? Or is there still the idea that they killed the people on the ferry who already killed the inhabitants. I guess I'm still hoping for some actual morally grey characters

  • Sam the perpetual liar, I can't trust a word she says in episode 1

    If you ask Sam about the radio she mention the people on the ferry were the people she and Gerg trade with. last time she was there she used

  • Gabbys the girl pete knlcks into the water and Cam is tower dude and yes they have lines

    Who the Heck are cam and gabby? Are those the two randoms with Randall who don't even have any lines ?

  • Well Randall ain't any more reliable since he's a psycho

    Sam the perpetual liar, I can't trust a word she says in episode 1

  • edited March 2016

    Norma says '"I'll make what happened on the ferry look like a motherfucking picnic if you don't give me randall"' on the walkie talkie, so I guess.

    Also Randall alone couldn't take THAT many people.

    RichWalk23 posted: »

    Was it ever confirmed that it was a group of people including Randall that killed the scavengers, or was it just Randall alone?

  • fair enough.

    Sam the perpetual liar, I can't trust a word she says in episode 1

  • I'm not doubting it , I fully expected them to make them 100% good and evil .

    zeke10 posted: »

    Well Randall ain't any more reliable since he's a psycho

  • Well not everyone in Monroe is evil

    I'm not doubting it , I fully expected them to make them 100% good and evil .

Sign in to comment in this discussion.