“THE WALKING DEAD: KENNY MINISERIES — LONELY, FRUITLESS FISHING; THE BORING WEDDING OF YOUR SISTER-IN-LAW THAT KATJAA FORCED YOU ALL TO GO, WHERE YOU GOT PAINFULLY DRUNK; DRIVING TO MEMPHIS AND ALL THE WAY BACK TO FORT LAUDERDALE; SICK DUDES GRABBING YOUR KID.”
A lot of sheep on here who keep on saying no because they're too scared to have an opinion or worried of being relegated, so choose to stick… more with the
Or maybe people just dont want a series about Kenny or Jane
Seeing a Kenny mini series, would be good. His life before meeting Lee.
Why? it would be about a fisherman?
About his family first off.
And second, what happened to him after he got separated would've made for a good story. Regardless of how you feel, you'd still buy it and play it. You wouldn't be able to help yourself .
A lot of sheep on here who keep on saying no because they're too scared to have an opinion or worried of being relegated, so choose to stick… more with the
Or maybe people just dont want a series about Kenny or Jane
Seeing a Kenny mini series, would be good. His life before meeting Lee.
Why? it would be about a fisherman?
“THE WALKING DEAD: KENNY MINISERIES — LONELY, FRUITLESS FISHING; THE BORING WEDDING OF YOUR SISTER-IN-LAW THAT KATJAA FORCED YOU ALL TO GO, … moreWHERE YOU GOT PAINFULLY DRUNK; DRIVING TO MEMPHIS AND ALL THE WAY BACK TO FORT LAUDERDALE; SICK DUDES GRABBING YOUR KID.”
I can already see it making millions!
Unless Michonne appears in season three, then honestly i think a backstory to Jane would be good, we don't know much about her (or maybe there was some kind of backstory so ewhere else for Jane and im just stupid), maybe like a just before clem and the group find Jane shes having flashbacks. Maybe, i don't know.
I think no matter what, people will complain on a DLC focused on one character. TT played the neutral option and picked someone that's a fan favorite of TWD, but has nothing that could interfere with their main series. It would be rather upsetting if DLC was on Kenny or Jane considering their detriment status. It would tell half the people that picked the other choice their wrong or second guess their ultimate choice. I like these characers, but DLC for one would be a bad idea.
Seriously, people need to stop complaining that the current game is useless to the main The Walking Dead Series. The Michonne Miniseries is a separate, different project. You don't really have to spend $15 and play something you don't like, but you can consider other's opinions and respect them, instead of blindly saying that you dislike it without even stating why.
A lot of sheep on here who keep on saying no because they're too scared to have an opinion or worried of being relegated
Don't start with calling people sheep just because they have different opinions. You are welcome to express constructive criticism, but leave personal attacks out of it.
Forum Guideline 1.3: Please try to keep off topic posts to a minimum. If you decide to discuss something off topic, consider making a new topic instead. If you think a certain topic is not worth discussing, don't try to destroy the ongoing discussion with arguments, off topic posts, ironic jokes, excessive use of pictures/gifs/videos, or anything else that will derail the thread. Just refrain from posting in that thread, or flag any posts if necessary.
A lot of sheep on here who keep on saying no because they're too scared to have an opinion or worried of being relegated, so choose to stick… more with the pack. Honestly, I like Michonne's series. It's better then I expected. Seeing a Kenny mini series, would be good. His life before meeting Lee. The scene where he said someone grabbed Duck and he went nuts. What happened after he got separated in No Time Left. Meeting Sarita after Season One. I think it be interesting.
They've been planning out Season 3's story for a while. You should be glad that they are taking more time on Season 3 than they did on Season 2. That is why Season 3 has been so far off, not because Michonne delayed it. Given the number of radically different endings in Season 2, it's no surprise they would have to spend more time towards figuring out how to make something work.
They've been planning out Season 3's story for a while. You should be glad that they are taking more time on Season 3 than they did on Seaso… moren 2. That is why Season 3 has been so far off, not because Michonne delayed it. Given the number of radically different endings in Season 2, it's no surprise they would have to spend more time towards figuring out how to make something work.
That's my point; Michonne is something that (very likely) has different team members on the side. If patterns from the last few years are any indication, Michonne replaced some other series we would've gotten; not Season 3.
That's my point; Michonne is something that (very likely) has different team members on the side. If patterns from the last few years are any indication, Michonne replaced some other series we would've gotten; not Season 3.
I love TWD:Michonne, personally. It's the perfect bridge between season's 2 and 3, imo.
If they were to do any type of prequel, or center it around the characters of S2, or 400 days. They'd have to do it legit. Deep, deep story telling, on how, why, when they got to the place(mentally) that they were going to be.
I personally would've loved a 400 Days sequel, or a story centered around Clem and Christa, after Omid tragically passed. But I think they would have had to put as much effort into it as they are S3.
TWD:Michonne is awesome. But TWD(counting S1, S2, and 400 days) isn't about flashy intros and slaying walkers without breaking a sweat. It's way deeper than that.
How many people reported me to you Blind Sniper? This is a serious question, not a "troll". How come, you pull me up for doing something wrong, but you never do with these other people? They were insulting me, more then i insulted them, and you only signal me out? When you banned me with that incident with that person a few months ago (i won't say names, because i m not going to bring them into a discussion on here) you never banned them, you only banned me, when they were in the same situation as me. Also, that time when you or another mod banned me on that topic of mine, because i "overreacted, when told to chill" and "trolling" (mind you, my thread was a serious question, in which someone replied to me with a smart ass reply), you banned me, when you can techincally call it cyber bulling, because i was cyber bullied by multiple people, yet you chose to ban the one who asked a simple question. Yes, i was out of line with the sheep comment, but you can't just tell me off, and let all those ones who insulted and abused me off with nothing. Be fair Blind Sniper. Im willing to apologize or whatever, but be fair and don't be biased. If you want to ban me for asking a simple few questions on here, which you would probably label "trolling", even though this isn't a joke, then fine. Wouldnt be the first time you've banned me when i haven;'t done anything wrong.
A lot of sheep on here who keep on saying no because they're too scared to have an opinion or worried of being relegated
Don't start… more with calling people sheep just because they have different opinions. You are welcome to express constructive criticism, but leave personal attacks out of it.
Forum Guideline 1.3: Please try to keep off topic posts to a minimum. If you decide to discuss something off topic, consider making a new topic instead. If you think a certain topic is not worth discussing, don't try to destroy the ongoing discussion with arguments, off topic posts, ironic jokes, excessive use of pictures/gifs/videos, or anything else that will derail the thread. Just refrain from posting in that thread, or flag any posts if necessary.
How many people reported me to you Blind Sniper? This is a serious question, not a "troll". How come, you pull me up for doing something wro… moreng, but you never do with these other people? They were insulting me, more then i insulted them, and you only signal me out? When you banned me with that incident with that person a few months ago (i won't say names, because i m not going to bring them into a discussion on here) you never banned them, you only banned me, when they were in the same situation as me. Also, that time when you or another mod banned me on that topic of mine, because i "overreacted, when told to chill" and "trolling" (mind you, my thread was a serious question, in which someone replied to me with a smart ass reply), you banned me, when you can techincally call it cyber bulling, because i was cyber bullied by multiple people, yet you chose to ban the one who asked a simple question. Yes, i was out of line with the sheep comment, … [view original content]
She said she didn't like the idea of the boat idea, and i said, she probably wouldn't like the length of The Michonne Series. Because people can never be satisfied.
I stayed on topic just letting certain people know.
Comments
No, those are 2 characters I have no desire to see any back story of or to play as.
“THE WALKING DEAD: KENNY MINISERIES — LONELY, FRUITLESS FISHING; THE BORING WEDDING OF YOUR SISTER-IN-LAW THAT KATJAA FORCED YOU ALL TO GO, WHERE YOU GOT PAINFULLY DRUNK; DRIVING TO MEMPHIS AND ALL THE WAY BACK TO FORT LAUDERDALE; SICK DUDES GRABBING YOUR KID.”
I can already see it making millions!
Hell no
Oh, sorry. I didn't pay attention at all. I misunderstood you
I'd like a Kenny mini-series. But seems I'm the only one though.
[removed]
[removed]
About his family first off.
And second, what happened to him after he got separated would've made for a good story. Regardless of how you feel, you'd still buy it and play it. You wouldn't be able to help yourself .
I agree. That would make telltale coin because people would buy it, yourself included (-;
And then you will whinge about how michonne only goes for an hour.
That can also apply to how you's are responding to me. Because I say something different to you, o must be wrong. Lol thanks for that one dude.
Nope, Im one of the few people on here who doesnt mind the lengths and never have I complained that it was only an hour. You have the wrong person.
You're the one calling people sheep for disagreeing with your opinion, and completely unprovoked too.
No, I want a Kenny mini series too.
If they were gunna do another Mini-Series I would much prefer it be another comic character.
I really wish I could see your picture.
I think you're gonna have to rely on the meme.
I don't know the meme
The one that I posted 4 comments above...nevermind here's my picture
[removed]
Such a dumb reply from a sad troll
oh wow oh no you totally got me i'm forever fucked
((
Unless Michonne appears in season three, then honestly i think a backstory to Jane would be good, we don't know much about her (or maybe there was some kind of backstory so ewhere else for Jane and im just stupid), maybe like a just before clem and the group find Jane shes having flashbacks. Maybe, i don't know.
So you've never complained about the lengths. Im sorry, i find that hard to believe. Usually there is always something people have complained about.
[removed]
[removed]
I think no matter what, people will complain on a DLC focused on one character. TT played the neutral option and picked someone that's a fan favorite of TWD, but has nothing that could interfere with their main series. It would be rather upsetting if DLC was on Kenny or Jane considering their detriment status. It would tell half the people that picked the other choice their wrong or second guess their ultimate choice. I like these characers, but DLC for one would be a bad idea.
Seriously, people need to stop complaining that the current game is useless to the main The Walking Dead Series. The Michonne Miniseries is a separate, different project. You don't really have to spend $15 and play something you don't like, but you can consider other's opinions and respect them, instead of blindly saying that you dislike it without even stating why.
I dont like the lengths of michonne, Im not sure how that relates to wanting a series about kenny or jane?
Don't start with calling people sheep just because they have different opinions. You are welcome to express constructive criticism, but leave personal attacks out of it.
Forum Guideline 1.3: Please try to keep off topic posts to a minimum. If you decide to discuss something off topic, consider making a new topic instead. If you think a certain topic is not worth discussing, don't try to destroy the ongoing discussion with arguments, off topic posts, ironic jokes, excessive use of pictures/gifs/videos, or anything else that will derail the thread. Just refrain from posting in that thread, or flag any posts if necessary.
They've been planning out Season 3's story for a while. You should be glad that they are taking more time on Season 3 than they did on Season 2. That is why Season 3 has been so far off, not because Michonne delayed it. Given the number of radically different endings in Season 2, it's no surprise they would have to spend more time towards figuring out how to make something work.
Well they did say it's gonna be considerably larger maybe that's why it's taking considerably longer
That's my point; Michonne is something that (very likely) has different team members on the side. If patterns from the last few years are any indication, Michonne replaced some other series we would've gotten; not Season 3.
High five brother! XD
Hmmm. I hear you.
High five!!!!!!
I love TWD:Michonne, personally. It's the perfect bridge between season's 2 and 3, imo.
If they were to do any type of prequel, or center it around the characters of S2, or 400 days. They'd have to do it legit. Deep, deep story telling, on how, why, when they got to the place(mentally) that they were going to be.
I personally would've loved a 400 Days sequel, or a story centered around Clem and Christa, after Omid tragically passed. But I think they would have had to put as much effort into it as they are S3.
TWD:Michonne is awesome. But TWD(counting S1, S2, and 400 days) isn't about flashy intros and slaying walkers without breaking a sweat. It's way deeper than that.
How many people reported me to you Blind Sniper? This is a serious question, not a "troll". How come, you pull me up for doing something wrong, but you never do with these other people? They were insulting me, more then i insulted them, and you only signal me out? When you banned me with that incident with that person a few months ago (i won't say names, because i m not going to bring them into a discussion on here) you never banned them, you only banned me, when they were in the same situation as me. Also, that time when you or another mod banned me on that topic of mine, because i "overreacted, when told to chill" and "trolling" (mind you, my thread was a serious question, in which someone replied to me with a smart ass reply), you banned me, when you can techincally call it cyber bulling, because i was cyber bullied by multiple people, yet you chose to ban the one who asked a simple question. Yes, i was out of line with the sheep comment, but you can't just tell me off, and let all those ones who insulted and abused me off with nothing. Be fair Blind Sniper. Im willing to apologize or whatever, but be fair and don't be biased. If you want to ban me for asking a simple few questions on here, which you would probably label "trolling", even though this isn't a joke, then fine. Wouldnt be the first time you've banned me when i haven;'t done anything wrong.
I did flag other people's comments too in this exchange. I didn't focus exclusively on you.
She said she didn't like the idea of the boat idea, and i said, she probably wouldn't like the length of The Michonne Series. Because people can never be satisfied.
I stayed on topic just letting certain people know.