What would you do with AJ? (poll)

http://strawpoll.me/2641148

Wanted to get some kind of idea what people would do with AJ.

Answer with certain mindset, as if you had survived zombie apocalypse for 2 years.

«134

Comments

  • Leave him behind too much of a risk.

  • I'd do anything to protect him. Those people won't die in vain protecting that baby.

  • edited September 2014

    .

    Ehkay posted: »

    Leave him behind too much of a risk.

  • Well, no one actually died trying to protect the baby. Except for Rebecca, they all died for various other reasons that had nothing to do with AJ's well-being.

    I'd do anything to protect him. Those people won't die in vain protecting that baby.

  • I'd go with "I would look for a safe haven for him, because its too dangerous to take care of him outside" or "I would find a group which could take care of him." Preferably both.

  • No, but they all had the babies well being in mind. How much of a slap to the face would it be to just throw him out like trash?

    DomeWing333 posted: »

    Well, no one actually died trying to protect the baby. Except for Rebecca, they all died for various other reasons that had nothing to do with AJ's well-being.

  • edited September 2014

    Do everything I could to keep him alive.
    When it came to abandoning Kenny at Wellington,, I chose to have Clementine and AJ stay with him.
    I just couldn't bare to separate the trio.
    Particularly Kenny and Clementine, after they had been through so much together.

    Plus, considering how far Kenny will go to protect them, I figure they would be safest with him.
    I had Lee choose Kenny to look after Clementine in Season 1.
    And my feelings on that hadn't changed.

  • I'd try and find a safe haven.

  • I would leave him behind, because he puts others in unnecessary risk 13%

    Alt text

  • Kind of a mix, Id keep him with me and try to find a safe haven but I wouldnt sacrifice my life for it, also in clems case if you sacrifice yourself arnt you dooming the baby anyway?

  • Nice way to invalidate everything Kenny tried to achieve in season 2. Dont get Clementine to safety, but rather make her sink with the boat.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    Do everything I could to keep him alive. When it came to abandoning Kenny at Wellington,, I chose to have Clementine and AJ stay with him.

  • edited September 2014

    Respectfully, I don't have to defend my choices to you.
    I'm done defending my choices, or explaining them to others.
    I played how I wanted, and made choices that I thought were best.
    Isn't that the main point of the videogame?
    And besides, it is ONLY A VIDEOGAME.

    zykelator posted: »

    Nice way to invalidate everything Kenny tried to achieve in season 2. Dont get Clementine to safety, but rather make her sink with the boat.

  • Well i meant you would save him from walkers, knowing you wouldnt get away without getting a bite or two and you'd get him to safety (possibly with someone else in your group). Of course if you are alone, this would be rather stupid decision to make.

    Kind of a mix, Id keep him with me and try to find a safe haven but I wouldnt sacrifice my life for it, also in clems case if you sacrifice yourself arnt you dooming the baby anyway?

  • Is there something wrong?

    Ellias posted: »

    I would leave him behind, because he puts others in unnecessary risk 13%

  • Well it just feels shitty thing to do for Kenny. All he cares about is your safety, but he knows he cant ensure it, so he gets you a chance to join safe community, but you decline.

    I know its a video game, but its up to me to decide how much it means to me.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    Respectfully, I don't have to defend my choices to you. I'm done defending my choices, or explaining them to others. I played how I wanted

  • edited September 2014

    It's just, I've posted comments about different choices I've made, and I've gotten a lot of hate for them.
    Not that these choices were bad, in fact they were actually quite decent ones to make.
    I explain why I made them, but then get people who want to fight me about it.
    So I've finally said: "ENOUGH! I'm done explaining myself."

    zykelator posted: »

    Well it just feels shitty thing to do for Kenny. All he cares about is your safety, but he knows he cant ensure it, so he gets you a chance

  • Read what I just quoted and see the percentage.

    Hunny, do you think something is wrong? Do you think any sane person would choose that?

    zykelator posted: »

    Is there something wrong?

  • You must be great with children.

    Ehkay posted: »

    Leave him behind too much of a risk.

  • I guess its more sane to die for nothing then?

    Ellias posted: »

    Read what I just quoted and see the percentage. Hunny, do you think something is wrong? Do you think any sane person would choose that?

  • You must be great as walker.

    You must be great with children.

  • edited September 2014

    If i had to i'd trow him 30 feet away in the grass, rather a few bruises then dying ...
    then i can use both my hands and pick AJ up later

  • I'd do anything to protect him, I wish there had been an option to leave him in Wellington, at least if they had, had families that could take him in.

    As it stands I went with Kenny and hope he and Clem can pull it off.

  • Well, this all depends on the specific situation. Kind of those "mind or heart" choice for me.

  • edited September 2014

    I chose "keep him as a distraction."

    You got to think ahead, and I'm not going down for some baby I don't know or care about because Clementine wants to be found as a mangled corpse besides a whiny brat crying in a ditch or something.

    She's come too damn far for her legacy to ended by an eight pound walker snack...

  • Lee?
    What the hell happened to your beard man? Lol!

    fallandir posted: »

    Well, this all depends on the specific situation. Kind of those "mind or heart" choice for me.

  • I shaved it off. With that bloody glass shard I found near the Marsh House.

    Kenny/Lee posted: »

    Lee? What the hell happened to your beard man? Lol!

  • I voted to find another group to take care of him. Even though I hate those types of humans, I'm not that cruel. If it did however come down to a situation where it's just me and the child and there was too many walkers for me to get out alive, the child will have to be sacrificed for my survival. No, I'm not being selfish, survival is the main priority of the apocalypse, plus if I do end up saving it, it will just continue to whine and draw more attention to the walkers on the coming days.

    Finding somebody else to take care of it would be the best option because having it on my own will just put me at risk just about every day.

  • For nothing? Survival isn't everything. When survival is everything, you get people like Carver.

    zykelator posted: »

    I guess its more sane to die for nothing then?

  • Enjoying life is everything, survival is just required to do so. If i wouldnt enjoy my life, i would just end it, simple as that.

    For nothing? Survival isn't everything. When survival is everything, you get people like Carver.

  • I would keep him as walker distraction, in case i got cornered

  • You must be great at keeping your morals.

    zykelator posted: »

    You must be great as walker.

  • edited September 2014

    I enjoy life too, but I also don't enjoy leaving defenseless babies to their death because of it. That's just plain wrong. If you have to throw an innocent baby to the dogs in order to enjoy life, something is wrong with you. I also assume you are atheist.

    No matter what you do, you're going to be dead a LOT LONGER than alive. George Washington died a couple hundred years ago, and guess what? He's still dead.

    zykelator posted: »

    Enjoying life is everything, survival is just required to do so. If i wouldnt enjoy my life, i would just end it, simple as that.

  • Of course I'll take care of him. I didn't even hesiatte to choose this option.

  • I enjoy life too, but I also don't enjoy leaving defenseless babies to their death because of it

    I see it as necessary thing to do to ensure my own survival. Where did i say i would enjoy doing it?

    That's just plain wrong.

    Thats subjective. Is it right to get yourself and other people killed just so 1 baby would be alive?

    If you have to throw an innocent baby to the dogs in order to enjoy life, something is wrong with you.

    Yeah, its called wanting to exist. Is there something wrong with that?

    I also assume you are atheist.

    correct

    No matter what you do, you're going to be dead a LOT LONGER than alive. George Washington died a couple hundred years ago, and guess what? He's still dead.

    Cant see whats the point of this comment.

    I enjoy life too, but I also don't enjoy leaving defenseless babies to their death because of it. That's just plain wrong. If you have to

  • Yeah sure, i live by my moral values.

    You must be great at keeping your morals.

  • Like Kenny said, "you care about nobody but yourself, that makes you a nobody"

    I gtg to school now. Don't go anywhere.

    zykelator posted: »

    I enjoy life too, but I also don't enjoy leaving defenseless babies to their death because of it I see it as necessary thing to do t

  • Like Kenny said, "you care about nobody but yourself, that makes you a nobody"

    Well this is not the only stupid thing Kenny has said.

    I gtg to school now. Don't go anywhere.

    Dont you worry. Im always here.

    Like Kenny said, "you care about nobody but yourself, that makes you a nobody" I gtg to school now. Don't go anywhere.

  • I voted keep him with me but not risk life to save him.

  • I would try to get AJ to a safe haven. Think its the most moral choice while also being safe as well.

  • If you could find somewhere safe for him, I dont see why anyone wouldnt do that.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.