Why kill off Luke but keep that useless twat Mike?

2»

Comments

  • edited February 2015

    Good.

    ...It applies to twdg s2 so well though. .3.

    Lilacsbloom posted: »

    Everybody likes it on tumblr so much, the notes for it broke.

  • Luke died too simple to be honest. I would have killed Arvo after that group shooting EVEN if you didn't take the damn medicine...

  • If I had to hear one more goddamn story about Jamie I was going to flip my shit!

  • You guys DO realize the exact same argument can be applied to Tyreese's death in the television show, right?

    You mean the death they spent a whole episode on where Tyreese went through the thought process about dying, seeing dead people he cared about and hated as an internal struggle, blaming himself and then eventually letting go and having an emotional funeral after, that one? The one that leads to noah realising he has to push on and making Sasha even more reckless after? That death was one of the best the show has done.

    Yes the way he got bit was stupid but the point was he let himself get distracted by those pictures and slipped up which seems to be a theme this season. It fitted Tyreese's not built for this world arc.

    In luke's death they cross a lake for next to no reason and he drowns, the only aftermath is one scene with bonnie and a line from Jane.

    Not that the TV show doesnt have plenty of stupid deaths, pretty much every one in season 3 for example

  • Because that was the decision of the writers.
    They have the final say.

    And quite frankly, I wouldn't say that Mike was useless.
    He was pretty good in a fight.
    But he was definitely an asshole, especially when he threw in with Arvo.

  • Sir, You have gained my endless respect,

  • edited February 2015

    TV-series (Season 5 has 16 episodes) and comics have less time limitations than the game had. Telltale just couldn't spend the entire Episode 5 exploring the emotional effects of Luke's death and I think that for game's narrative pacing it was better to move on rather quickly.

    And random deaths are just part of The Walking Dead. Like you said TV-series has them and so does the comics. There's been surprising deaths of major (fan favorite) characters, which have really angered some fans of the comics. I think that the game wouldn't be very loyal to the franchise if it spared the lives of the popular characters and didn't kill them just because.

    You guys DO realize the exact same argument can be applied to Tyreese's death in the television show, right? You mean the death they

  • Mike ain't useless. Just because you don't like him, doesn't make him useless.

  • edited February 2015

    You mean the death they spent a whole episode on where Tyreese went through the thought process about dying, seeing dead people he cared about and hated as an internal struggle, blaming himself and then eventually letting go and having an emotional funeral after, that one? The one that leads to noah realising he has to push on and making Sasha even more reckless after? That death was one of the best the show has done.

    The entire episode was one gigantic arthouse cliche. At least Luke's death, while abrupt, didn't wallow in the same kind of emo bullshit for 45 freakin' minutes.

    You guys DO realize the exact same argument can be applied to Tyreese's death in the television show, right? You mean the death they

  • This!

    So much of this!

    Kid, you're gonna go places in this forum.

    Because No Going Back was emotional baiting to the lowest common denominator. TellTale effectively turning characters into death props and u

  • edited February 2015

    He was useless. He had plenty of opportune time to tell me what happened to his ear, but no.
    He was too busy fantasising about eating the shit out of raccoons.

    See how deep and meaningful Telltale writers are with their poetic juxta positioning and contrasts.

    Raccoon = opportunistic
    Mike = not opportunistic.

    Mike is actually saying he'd eat the shit out of the opportunity to be more useful.

    Gary-Oak posted: »

    Mike ain't useless. Just because you don't like him, doesn't make him useless.

  • It always gets me that they did it for shock value, and base it on the idea of the shock value death from a shark film when the guy gets eaten during his dramatic speech...but honestly, this is what Luke's death makes me think of:

    Whhhhhhhy

  • BECAUSE Season 2 was written by OTTERS.

  • If Mike is useless, I would hate to see how useless Kenny or Luke are.

    He was useless. He had plenty of opportune time to tell me what happened to his ear, but no. He was too busy fantasising about eating the s

  • Oh yeah. Definitely.

    Mike dramatically falling through ice and Luke stealing a car with Arvo makes heaps more sense in the plot.
    0_0

    But you know. People are still upset over Luke's death so we've just got to let them grieve for the rest of their lives.

    I'll just grieve for Season 2's lack of Character Development.

    Gary-Oak posted: »

    If Mike is useless, I would hate to see how useless Kenny or Luke are.

  • It wouldn't make sense though because otters know how not to drown.
    Just hold hands.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    BECAUSE Season 2 was written by OTTERS.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.