I think Arvo is a bad kid

2»

Comments

  • This is not spam. I have the right to express an opinion forum!

  • LOL

    Excellent.

  • True, but if you cannot handle criticism or opinions that opposes yours in a level-headed matter, then this place isn't for you.

    I'd suggest you calm down and take a break.

    CuteClem posted: »

    This is not spam. I have the right to express an opinion forum!

  • Is someone paying attention to my previous comment

  • [removed]

    CuteClem posted: »

    This is not spam. I have the right to express an opinion forum!

  • I don't understand why he would or should care about Clementine. Considering he doesn't know her very well and she either goes along with robbing everything he has, or is hanging around with a woman that steals his gun. I didn't bother trying to defend him or make friends with him when he joined the group, because there was no point.

  • -.-

    RichWalk23 posted: »

    True, but if you cannot handle criticism or opinions that opposes yours in a level-headed matter, then this place isn't for you. I'd suggest you calm down and take a break.

  • So, I think we can confirm CuteClem is a troll.

  • ok ... sorry

    AgentZ46 posted: »

    Not even true I love Clementine! Just because I don't hate everyone who wrongs her or debate with anyone that disagrees with you doesn't mean I don't love her!

  • :D

    Duck_Hunt posted: »

    No shit, sherlock

  • Hey, mind calming it down there? There is no need to act so rude towards someone.

  • i am not ... im just a kid >:

    Brodester08 posted: »

    So, I think we can confirm CuteClem is a troll.

  • thank you :(

    Hey, mind calming it down there? There is no need to act so rude towards someone.

  • I don't know why people are getting so rude, you already said English wasn't your first language and that you're a kid, seems like good excuses for not having great grammar or perfect arguments.

    CuteClem posted: »

    thank you

  • Yes you are right. But I'm really not good at English and I'm only 16 years old.

    I don't know why people are getting so rude, you already said English wasn't your first language and that you're a kid, seems like good excuses for not having great grammar or perfect arguments.

  • Here's some advice, just ignore the rude asses and chat with those who want to.

    CuteClem posted: »

    Yes you are right. But I'm really not good at English and I'm only 16 years old.

  • Oh I am rude? Unlike our friend here, I'm not swearing (tho i might soon) and I tried to be reasonable. And English isn't my first language either. CuteClem is spamming like hell and If he/she is a kid what's he/she doing here? So mister white-kinght saving damsels in diarrhea... Mind calming it down?

    I don't know why people are getting so rude, you already said English wasn't your first language and that you're a kid, seems like good excuses for not having great grammar or perfect arguments.

  • You're a nice man (:

    Here's some advice, just ignore the rude asses and chat with those who want to.

  • Did you actually look at what you wrote? That's not reasonable. Also, I'm not white knighting, I'm telling you to calm down before you get banned.

    Oh I am rude? Unlike our friend here, I'm not swearing (tho i might soon) and I tried to be reasonable. And English isn't my first language

  • And I'm a girl

    Oh I am rude? Unlike our friend here, I'm not swearing (tho i might soon) and I tried to be reasonable. And English isn't my first language

  • Instead of making faces, you could actually try to respond to my message.

    CuteClem posted: »

    -.-

  • I'm not seeing it.

    Nowhere did I tell her to get traumatized and nowhere did I imply she lacks braincells. At worst my post means "You're annoying" and at best it means "The way you post and the amount of posts you make severely hurt my enjoyment of this forum."

    You yourself just took issue with her posting directly above. Don't be so sensitive.

    AgentZ46 posted: »

    That's unecessarily rude.

  • You are not technically doing anything wrong, but people usually prefer that you limit yourself to only making a few discussions about certain topics. If you make several discussions in a short time, people will sometimes feel bothered by that since they want to see new discussions from more than just one person. You are not in trouble, but perhaps you can try to limit yourself to making one or two new discussions a week and focus more on responding to discussions from other people.

    By the way, welcome to the forums!

    CuteClem posted: »

    i am not ... im just a kid >:

  • Just stop. She's not 2 years old.

  • ok. thank you :)

    You are not technically doing anything wrong, but people usually prefer that you limit yourself to only making a few discussions about certa

  • CuteClemCuteClem Banned
    edited October 2015

    She is not a baby, but she a young girl \ little.

    Clemenem posted: »

    Just stop. She's not 2 years old.

  • edited October 2015

    You should be thanking Arvo for missing Clem's heart or head and for not using a shotgun. Just saying.

  • Good point. If it was one of them she woud'nt be alive

    You should be thanking Arvo for missing Clem's heart or head and for not using a shotgun. Just saying.

  • ARVO isn't a bad kid. You should be thanking him. If he wasn't a crap shot we wouldn't have Clem in season 3

  • She almost died.

    Anthorn posted: »

    ARVO isn't a bad kid. You should be thanking him. If he wasn't a crap shot we wouldn't have Clem in season 3

  • I don't think Avro was a "bad guy" in that he reacted to escape the group and Kenny who beat the hell out of him. The same group that just killed his sister and friends. Look at it from Arvo's perspective and he could have seen Kenny as a Carver.

    However, the little prick did shoot Clem the moment she put down the gun, when she was unarmed and defenceless. For that, if given the option, he dies at the first possible opportunity!

  • I always looked at Arvo as being the "Ben" of his group. He didn't strike me as being a good fighter, he didn't strike me as being very smart, and he certainly didn't strike me as being well-respected by the other members of his group (his sister excepted). True, he was the only member of the group capable of speaking English, but you don't need to speak someone's language to kill and rob them, which is how the other members of his group (again, with the possible exception of his sister) seemed to prefer to operate. I'm probably filling in a lot of blanks on my own here, but I got the impression that his sister had been carrying him (metaphorically) through the entire apocalypse.

    My theory on Arvo (and this is all complete speculation on my part) was that before they left for America, his sister (Natasha, according to the wiki) was involved (either romantically, or just as a friend) with one of the other two guys (Vitali and Buricko) in their group. Eventually, the situation in Russia must've gotten bad enough that Buricko and Vitali decided they'd be better off making their way to America. They invited Natasha to come with them, but she refused to leave without her brother, so they grudgingly agreed to take him along too. Once in America, their lack of respect for Arvo's abilities as a survivor probably meant that Vitali and Buricko weren't as concerned about what happened to him, as long as he kept out of their way. In fact, they probably would have seen Arvo's dying as a good thing - whatever nominal protection they did offer him was likely only because of his sister's insistence.This was probably why he was allowed to go off scouting on his own, as we saw when we first encountered him in episode four. That said, they certainly would have had no qualms about going to bat for him if they themselves had something to gain from it. When he told them about Jane's theft of either his gun or his drugs, they were more than happy to use this as an excuse to rob another group of their supplies. During that robbery, Arvo was basically a pawn of Vitali and Buricko. Yes, he was "bad" in that he led his group to our group in the first place, but once that robbery got under way, he had virtually no say in how it proceeded.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.