I would say that @Everyone'sClemInTime is one of the most biased users. Satire can never be unbiased, since its very essence relies on hyperbolizing a subject's flaws; that is pretty biased to me.
I think this is probably my favorite comment on this thread. Because you aren't biased towards one side or the other and it's somewhat accurate in almost every way. +1 for that one.
I suppose, but that comment is still pointing out (intentionally or not) that the two have more in common than they realize and that they could've be friends if they took the time to talk to each other and sort out their issues.
Could they have been less prickly about it? Sure, but they still made a relative astute observation in the process.
you aren't biased
I would say that @Everyone'sClemInTime is one of the most biased users. Satire can never be unbiased, since its very essence relies on hyperbolizing a subject's flaws; that is pretty biased to me.
It makes feel sad that you're most likely right about that. Sarah's comments after being saved makes it abundantly clear that she knows she has a problem and that Jane doesn't like having her around and she seems to sadly accept that.
Sarah was inwardly very smart. She knew very well what everyone thought of her and she took note of how she was treated. She felt unwanted and unappreciated even if she didn't show it, and people like Jane just solidified Sarah's feelings of worthlessness. It is sad because Sarah was so sweet and gentle, and she just got shoved aside and never included.
It makes feel sad that you're most likely right about that. Sarah's comments after being saved makes it abundantly clear that she knows she has a problem and that Jane doesn't like having her around and she seems to sadly accept that.
Yeah, she way she got treated really does suck and it makes what happens with her feel all the more hypocritical considering what the rest of the games operated by.
Sarah was inwardly very smart. She knew very well what everyone thought of her and she took note of how she was treated. She felt unwanted a… morend unappreciated even if she didn't show it, and people like Jane just solidified Sarah's feelings of worthlessness. It is sad because Sarah was so sweet and gentle, and she just got shoved aside and never included.
A third or so of your comments are overly sarcastic.
With the passage of time, I've just assumed numerous people manage this account and they just explain that they're Carlos Memencia while also being an insightful poster while also being the master of Kenny-esque satire.
Unless, in the case of season 2, they're written poorly. Then I'd say it's very much an appropriate response to have.
Or it could've been I was exaggerating a tiny bit too strong for your sarcasm meter to detect?
I suppose, but that comment is still pointing out (intentionally or not) that the two have more in common than they realize and that they co… moreuld've be friends if they took the time to talk to each other and sort out their issues.
Could they have been less prickly about it? Sure, but they still made a relative astute observation in the process.
A third or so of your comments are overly sarcastic.
With the passage of time, I've just assumed numerous people manage this account and … morethey just explain that they're Carlos Memencia while also being an insightful poster while also being the master of Kenny-esque satire.
Comments
Holy shit...! And then:
Determinately of course. Because "your choices matter," not to mention that Clementine isn't the type to completely agree with such a choice.
EDIT: Okay, holy shit, I know you were just being jokingly spiteful about that, but considering the look on Jane's face there....
That's exactly what she would do if she had the chance lol.
That's a... good attitude?
That is the worst attitude to have while consuming a franchise that prompts people to sympathize with characters.
I would say that @Everyone'sClemInTime is one of the most biased users. Satire can never be unbiased, since its very essence relies on hyperbolizing a subject's flaws; that is pretty biased to me.
Are you saying that the application of an ideology in one specific location determines how said ideology works in other places, Rich?
I suppose, but that comment is still pointing out (intentionally or not) that the two have more in common than they realize and that they could've be friends if they took the time to talk to each other and sort out their issues.
Could they have been less prickly about it? Sure, but they still made a relative astute observation in the process.
Unless, in the case of season 2, they're written poorly. Then I'd say it's very much an appropriate response to have.
Or it could've been I was exaggerating a tiny bit too strong for your sarcasm meter to detect?
Sarah knew Jane didn't have patience or appreciation for her, Sarah felt it, so I don't think a friendship between them would have ever worked.
It makes feel sad that you're most likely right about that. Sarah's comments after being saved makes it abundantly clear that she knows she has a problem and that Jane doesn't like having her around and she seems to sadly accept that.
I see it more as a likely possibility than not, considering that Crawford's own rules did end up leading to its own downfall.
And so far, I don't think there is a currently active community in the universe that lives with this ideology without consequences.
Sarah was inwardly very smart. She knew very well what everyone thought of her and she took note of how she was treated. She felt unwanted and unappreciated even if she didn't show it, and people like Jane just solidified Sarah's feelings of worthlessness. It is sad because Sarah was so sweet and gentle, and she just got shoved aside and never included.
They are opposites, so, no.
Yeah, she way she got treated really does suck and it makes what happens with her feel all the more hypocritical considering what the rest of the games operated by.
A third or so of your comments are overly sarcastic.
With the passage of time, I've just assumed numerous people manage this account and they just explain that they're Carlos Memencia while also being an insightful poster while also being the master of Kenny-esque satire.
That is a view with which I coincide, actually.
I'm not three people, I'm a hyper intelligent chipmunk.
There are not many people whom I consider to be multiple people. Are you sure you'd rather be a chipmunk?
What about multiple chipmunks?
Ta-da!
i dont see your point buddy lol