Actually, we can gather from the information given just in Episode 1 that at a minimum, things are apparently pretty bad statewide. Going by the messages Clem's mother left on the answering machine Savannah evidently crapped the bed after an attempt to quarantine it, and Savannah's more or less clear on the opposite side of the state from Atlanta (which is also a pretty big indication the quarantine wasn't all that successful).
Granted, in my case I wasn't in "must repopulate!" mode, Carley just seemed more useful. At the time, she was the only person with a firearm, already helped out three or so times (of course, she loses points for saving Duck... the ditz ), whereas Doug was kinda an empty uniform aside from programming a remote.
Bad for Georgia does not necessarily mean bad EVERYWHERE. It's clear that the underlying message is that there is still hope for "rescue" from some outside entity. I think it's harder to view it that way as a player though, seeing as how we know we are only in the first episode of a five part story (couple this with anyone who knows about the Walking Dead universe from the show or the comics, and I can see where a lot of people get on with creating their new world order ). If it was a true disaster, most people wouldn't give up hope after only a few days.
To put it bluntly, if I had to make the decision in episode two, I would probably have been more inclined to be thinking about repopulation than in episode one. As it was, I saw Doug being pulled out of a window by several walkers, and Carley was grabbed by the ankle by one Walker. I definitely thought Doug needed more help.
Bad for Georgia does not necessarily mean bad EVERYWHERE.
Meanwhile in Canada Life still thrives as Canadians have closed off the borders stopped the Walker thread dead and have their universal healthcare to prevent anyone else from dying and turning.
Meanwhile in Canada Life still thrives as Canadians have closed off the borders stopped the Walker thread dead and have their universal healthcare to prevent anyone else from dying and turning.
If you promise to take Bryan Adams and Justin Beiber back to their homeland b4 you close the border it would be totally worth it!
Did my first play through last night. After trying to save Hershel's son and seeing Kenny run I thought "crap if I had saved Duck, Kenny would have helped me move the tractor." So I chose Carley, thinking she would save Doug, since she had the gun and could shoot across the room. I didn't realize the choices were so black in white.
Bad for Georgia does not necessarily mean bad EVERYWHERE. It's clear that the underlying message is that there is still hope for "rescue" from some outside entity. I think it's harder to view it that way as a player though, seeing as how we know we are only in the first episode of a five part story (couple this with anyone who knows about the Walking Dead universe from the show or the comics, and I can see where a lot of people get on with creating their new world order ). If it was a true disaster, most people wouldn't give up hope after only a few days.
To put it bluntly, if I had to make the decision in episode two, I would probably have been more inclined to be thinking about repopulation than in episode one. As it was, I saw Doug being pulled out of a window by several walkers, and Carley was grabbed by the ankle by one Walker. I definitely thought Doug needed more help.
Sorry, this isn't a Hurricane of Earthquake. If friggin' DEAD PEOPLE started to walk around and EAT THE LIVING, you're damn right we'd all be thinking long term. Especially if a whole state got wiped out. (Georgia, in terms of size and population, is as large as MOST countries! Let that sink in for a moment.)
Sorry, this isn't a Hurricane of Earthquake. If friggin' DEAD PEOPLE started to walk around and EAT THE LIVING, you're damn right we'd all be thinking long term. Especially if a whole state got wiped out. (Georgia, in terms of size and population, is as large as MOST countries! Let that sink in for a moment.)
You're speaking out of your general doom and gloom attitude, Death. Still. glad to know that some people will always jump to conclusions before being given sound evidence [/sarcasm]....
Calm down for a moment and think about what the narrative is telling you before you reach the conclusion that we're all gonna die. Doug is about the only person who notes that this might take longer than a couple of days to sort out. Less than a week in, and most people would probably still assume that the government will come in and rescue them (also made evident by the dialogue and spoken by several characters).
Sure, there will always be people who assume it's the end of the world - they do the same with other natural disasters, too. A majority of people still will hold out hope that it will all be over soon (especially as everyone is considering the fact that transmission only occurs through bites).
So yes, Georgia is large, and yes, this is a catastrophe, but it's just not reasonable for most people to be thinking they are the only hope left for the species in such a short amount of elapsed time. Georgia is NOT the entire world. It is possible for something catastrophic to happen in a place the size of Georgia and it isn't the end of the world.
Hence the episode two timeline "jump". Now (three months in with no change or contact) is when you start thinking the s*** has hit the fan. So, like I said earlier, had the Carley/Doug decision come in episode two, then I think it would be reasonable to be thinking about the longest-term survival needs such as repopulation. Less than a week after the disaster strikes, no.
You're speaking out of your general doom and gloom attitude, Death. Still. glad to know that some people will always jump to conclusions before being given sound evidence [/sarcasm]....
Calm down for a moment and think about what the narrative is telling you before you reach the conclusion that we're all gonna die. Doug is about the only person who notes that this might take longer than a couple of days to sort out. Less than a week in, and most people would probably still assume that the government will come in and rescue them (also made evident by the dialogue and spoken by several characters).
Sure, there will always be people who assume it's the end of the world - they do the same with other natural disasters, too. A majority of people still will hold out hope that it will all be over soon (especially as everyone is considering the fact that transmission only occurs through bites).
So yes, Georgia is large, and yes, this is a catastrophe, but it's just not reasonable for most people to be thinking they are the only hope left for the species in such a short amount of elapsed time. Georgia is NOT the entire world. It is possible for something catastrophic to happen in a place the size of Georgia and it isn't the end of the world.
Hence the episode two timeline "jump". Now (three months in with no change or contact) is when you start thinking the s*** has hit the fan. So, like I said earlier, had the Carley/Doug decision come in episode two, then I think it would be reasonable to be thinking about the longest-term survival needs such as repopulation. Less than a week after the disaster strikes, no.
Call me doom and gloom all you want, but Grandma's corpse getting up and ripping mommies face off isn't really my Idea of Rainbows and Sunshine. Also, as I stated before, my Lee doesn't know if he wants it to get better. (I chose the "Was bad before" option with Katjaa). The only people that would really hold out hope in a situation like that, are the kinda people who let what they want to be override what is the most probable scenario.
My Lee isn't that big on those hopes everyone else has. At least if the world's gone to hell, he's free.
Call me doom and gloom all you want, but Grandma's corpse getting up and ripping mommies face off isn't really my Idea of Rainbows and Sunshine. Also, as I stated before, my Lee doesn't know if he wants it to get better. (I chose the "Was bad before" option with Katjaa). The only people that would really hold out hope in a situation like that, are the kinda people who let what they want to be override what is the most probable scenario.
My Lee isn't that big on those hopes everyone else has. At least if the world's gone to hell, he's free.
The same could be said for you - wanting to see the events of episode one as the beginning of the end of the world instead of what it is. Nobody here is making light of the situation in which we find ourselves - yes, it is bad. Things may possibly get worse before they get better. But if you can't hold out hope that life may ever return to normal for even a week, or worse, you would actually PREFER what was occurring to life as it was before as a whole, you just aren't "most people".
The same could be said for you - wanting to see the events of episode one as the beginning of the end of the world instead of what it is. Nobody here is making light of the situation in which we find ourselves - yes, it is bad. Things may possibly get worse before they get better. But if you can't hold out hope that life may ever return to normal for even a week, or worse, you would actually PREFER what was occurring to life as it was before as a whole, you just aren't "most people".
I'd say the people who were in for the Long Haul on day 1 will be "most people" just short of a year later.
Or, you know, you'd be the people most likely to end up like the Bandits, or the St. John's...:D
Sorry, but preparing for the long haul doesn't mean Raping people. Eventually, the group will have to think about it. You said so yourself... Are you saying your Episode 2 Lee is destined to become a Rapist Cannibal since he's starting to think in the long term?
I'm comparing life before and after the zombie apocalypse what the hell are you on about?
I thought you were replying to me, and I was referring the Lee's situation specifically.
You have a tendency to not quote people you're replying to... It gets confusing.
I thought you were replying to me, and I was referring the Lee's situation specifically.
You have a tendency to not quote people you're replying to... It gets confusing.
Indeed I do maybe i should quote more just am hesitant to do that because it's alot quicker and easier to quick reply on this piece of fish computer
Sorry, but preparing for the long haul doesn't mean Raping people. Eventually, the group will have to think about it. You said so yourself... Are you saying your Episode 2 Lee is destined to become a Rapist Cannibal since he's starting to think in the long term?
I am only offering up the two most extreme examples we have seen of people who have put themselves in for the "long haul". I tend to think that people who automatically assume the worst in such situations to be more "extreme" than the rest.
It is the hope that you are so quick to sneer at, by the way, that gives people a reason to act more civilized and not devolve into anarchy. What's the point in keeping our morals if there will never be anything better than today? If you have no hope, why WOULDN'T you act like the bandits and the St. John's?
it's about post apocalyptic societies attempting to rebuild. new vegas had two diffrent warring factions The guys who were using ancient roman tactics and the guys who wanted modern law and order and bureaucracy and society
I have, but back to the point before. There's a difference between hope and fools hope. If you're in it for the long haul, that is to say you're planning for future generations as well, it's natural to have some hope humanity will make it through. The Saint John's and Bandits ARE NOT in it for the long haul. They're very short term, day to day, survival instinct based. They're prepared to live, but they're not long term strategists. (The Saint John's never even keep women around to continue on the family line, and the Bandits have been shown to turn on eachother for the simplest of reasons)
Just because the army won't come in and put things back to the way they were with magic, doesn't mean civilization dies. It simply means civilization as it was does. Tribal civilizations (Zulu, Apache, Celts, etc.) all had Civilization, perhaps not civilized by our standards. But they're a lot closer to what the people of this new world will need... Survivalism, Brutality, Cold-Logic, this doesn't mean you can't be civilized. It just means what you consider "civilized" has to change, as it always has. Civilization is a product of humanity, not the other way around, it changes when we will it to.
it's about post apocalyptic societies attempting to rebuild. new vegas had two diffrent warring factions The guys who were using ancient roman tactics and the guys who wanted modern law and order and bureaucracy and society
All three of them sucked, I went Wildcard. :P
Would have gone Legion if it weren't for the Sexism.
Bad for Georgia does not necessarily mean bad EVERYWHERE. It's clear that the underlying message is that there is still hope for "rescue" from some outside entity. I think it's harder to view it that way as a player though, seeing as how we know we are only in the first episode of a five part story (couple this with anyone who knows about the Walking Dead universe from the show or the comics, and I can see where a lot of people get on with creating their new world order ). If it was a true disaster, most people wouldn't give up hope after only a few days.
To put it bluntly, if I had to make the decision in episode two, I would probably have been more inclined to be thinking about repopulation than in episode one. As it was, I saw Doug being pulled out of a window by several walkers, and Carley was grabbed by the ankle by one Walker. I definitely thought Doug needed more help.
That's why I said that at a minimum the information we have access to gives us a pretty big clue the problem is atleast statewide, simply based on the distance between Savannah and Atlanta.
However, one could reasonably infer that the infection crossed state borders as well:
The quarantine in Savannah was unsuccessful, Savannah not only has an airport, it has access to the sea. It's also not far from South Carolina.
The lack of apparent military involvement at this point would be a pretty big clue as well that things are looking grim. Georgia's home to Ft. Benning, one of the largest military bases in the nation (incidentally, where I went for basic). Benning's not that far from Atlanta from what I remember; the fact we don't see much in the way of any sort of real military presence near the biggest city in the state implies they already failed (somehow) and couldn't deploy in force to aid the rest of the state.
A good chunk of the characters seem to have some indication the situation could potentially last longer than a few days or get worse, Carley brings up the possibility when she confronts Lee about his past and it being potentially detrimental to the group. Kenny's plan to retreat to his boat is predicated on the situation getting worse.
I have, but back to the point before. There's a difference between hope and fools hope. If you're in it for the long haul, that is to say you're planning for future generations as well, it's natural to have some hope humanity will make it through. The Saint John's and Bandits ARE NOT in it for the long haul. They're very short term, day to day, survival instinct based. They're prepared to live, but they're not long term strategists. (The Saint John's never even keep women around to continue on the family line, and the Bandits have been shown to turn on eachother for the simplest of reasons)
Just because the army won't come in and put things back to the way they were with magic, doesn't mean civilization dies. It simply means civilization as it was does. Tribal civilizations (Zulu, Apache, Celts, etc.) all had Civilization, perhaps not civilized by our standards. But they're a lot closer to what the people of this new world will need... Survivalism, Brutality, Cold-Logic, this doesn't mean you can't be civilized. It just means what you consider "civilized" has to change, as it always has. Civilization is a product of humanity, not the other way around, it changes when we will it to.
i'd like to see or read i should say your idea of the next civilization since each one builds on the achievements of the past and becomes greater then the one before it. But with the walker "virus" not having been cured.
That's why I said that at a minimum the information we have access to gives us a pretty big clue the problem is atleast statewide, simply based on the distance between Savannah and Atlanta.
However, one could reasonably infer that the infection crossed state borders as well:
The quarantine in Savannah was unsuccessful, Savannah not only has an airport, it has access to the sea. It's also not far from South Carolina.
The lack of apparent military involvement at this point would be a pretty big clue as well that things are looking grim. Georgia's home to Ft. Benning, one of the largest military bases in the nation (incidentally, where I went for basic). Benning's not that far from Atlanta from what I remember, the fact we don't see much in the way of any sort of real military presence near the biggest city in the state implies they already failed (somehow) and couldn't deploy in force to aid the rest of the state.
A good chunk of the characters seem to have some indication the situation could potentially last longer than a few days or get worse, Carley brings up the possibility when she confronts Lee about his past and it being potentially detrimental to the group. Kenny's plan to retreat to his boat is predicated on the situation getting worse.
i'd like to see or read i should say your idea of the next civilization since each one builds on the achievements of the past and becomes greater then the one before it. But with the walker "virus" not having been cured.
That'll take me a while to write out and I don't feel particularly inspired to write it right now. (In debate mode) So you might have to wait till the morrow.
All three of them sucked, I went Wildcard. :P
Would have gone Legion if it weren't for the Sexism.
A female Courier working for the Legion is the best playthrough you'll ever get. for one scene in Lonesome Road
Ulysses: Used to be You had to have a weapon between your legs to wield one for the legion.
Female Courier: Is that why you quit?
Ulysses: What do you... Oh you've got Spirit you better save it for the Divide.
A female Courier working for the Legion is the best playthrough you'll ever get. for one scene in Lonesome Road
Ulysses: Used to be You had to have a weapon between your legs to wield one for the legion.
Female Courier: Is that why you quit?
Ulysses: What do you... Oh you've got Spirit you better save it for the Divide.
I always wondered if going Female Legion would change the Sexism aspect in the long haul... Might give it a try. But let's get back on track.
it's about post apocalyptic societies attempting to rebuild. new vegas had two diffrent warring factions The guys who were using ancient roman tactics and the guys who wanted modern law and order and bureaucracy and society
I know the general idea of what they're about, I just have to be a little choosey about what games I get to play. Tight budgets and time constraints, being the working mom of a two year old!
And @Death689God, you've kind of contradicted yourself countering the point I was trying to make. Brutality? I'm pretty sure that means the opposite of civilized. Besides, the point I was trying to make wasn't that the apocalypse means that society will or won't die - just that within such a short time frame, there really is no reason to assume (unless you're religiously inclined to believe that the dead only come back during this time) that this IS the apocalypse. You want to believe that just because you're looking beyond tomorrow that you are more correct or more apt to survive? Be my guest. To me it's not the sole criterion for choosing who's life I will save (Guess I should feel sorry for Carley, as apparently one of the primary reasons she gets to live is that she is a baby-maker!:p).
Maybe I'm feelin' this way because I don't play a lot of zombie games, nor do I watch zombie movies or TV shows. Heck, I didn't even know about the Walking Dead until my husband suggested that it was the type of game I might like.
and @ Rommel, One thing I've always considered is that when a major disaster DOES strike, to not count on a quick or timely rescue effort from the government. Even here in CA we're told to have supplies handy for all members of your family for at least a week, and I double that to two weeks just to be safe! So from my point of view, less than a week really isn't enough time to consider outside intervention as "hopeless". I definitely would have abandoned this mindset sometime between episodes one and two.
I know the general idea of what they're about, I just have to be a little choosey about what games I get to play. Tight budgets and time constraints, being the working mom of a two year old!
And @Death689God, you've kind of contradicted yourself countering the point I was trying to make. Brutality? I'm pretty sure that means the opposite of civilized. Besides, the point I was trying to make wasn't that the apocalypse means that society will or won't die - just that within such a short time frame, there really is no reason to assume (unless you're religiously inclined to believe that the dead only come back during this time) that this IS the apocalypse. You want to believe that just because you're looking beyond tomorrow that you are more correct or more apt to survive? Be my guest. To me it's not the sole criterion for choosing who's life I will save (Guess I should feel sorry for Carley, as apparently one of the primary reasons she gets to live is that she is a baby-maker!:p).
Maybe I'm feelin' this way because I don't play a lot of zombie games, nor do I watch zombie movies or TV shows. Heck, I didn't even know about the Walking Dead until my husband suggested that it was the type of game I might like.
Yeah, the part I put in Bold really makes a big difference. But we call it the "Apocalypse", not because of any religious connotations, but because it's a word that sums up "The World has just been dashed and thrashed in such a manner it'll never be the same again" A way to say the world's ended, but not really. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZombieApocalypse
Also, you don't really have any Idea what civilized means do you? If you did you'd see there was no contradiction at all (Prepare for a Rant of Colossal Proportions): It means having civilization, and civilization takes on many forms. As with the examples I mentioned, the Zulu, Apache, and Celts were some very brutal people. (Hell the Celts kept heads of fallen enemies outside their home.) The way You're using "civilized", as in a comparative way to other cultures, is really one of the most absurd things you can do. That practice basically started with Greeks and Romans, the term "barbarian" comes from the Romans thinking Non-Romans spoke like this "Barbabrbabrbbar". It's basically like saying "Ching Chang Chong" when talking about Asians. Throughout history whole societies, and even races, were considered "Uncivilized". (Remaining "Civilized" is one of the reasons the end of slavery took so long) It's basically Cultural Tool Waving, whose tool is bigger and can please the most ladies? Anyone that doesn't conform to the persons sense of culture is "Uncivilized", as you can imagine this comes with some Unfortunate Implications. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/UnfortunateImplications http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ValuesDissonance
IMO, using "Civilized" the way you do is in itself Uncivilized. :P
I know the general idea of what they're about, I just have to be a little choosey about what games I get to play. Tight budgets and time constraints, being the working mom of a two year old!
If you don't mind used games you can try Glyde. that helps with the budget issues the time and motherhood think well ::shrug::
Yeah, the part I put in Bold really makes a big difference. But we call it the "Apocalypse", not because of any religious connotations, but because it's a word that sums up "The World has just been dashed and thrashed in such a manner it'll never be the same again" A way to say the world's ended, but not really. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZombieApocalypse
Also, you don't really have any Idea what civilized means do you? If you did you'd see there was no contradiction at all (Prepare for a Rant of Colossal Proportions): It means having civilization, and civilization takes on many forms. As with the examples I mentioned, the Zulu, Apache, and Celts were some very brutal people. (Hell the Celts kept heads of fallen enemies outside their home.) The way You're using "civilized", as in a comparative way to other cultures, is really one of the most absurd things you can do. That practice basically started with Greeks and Romans, the term "barbarian" comes from the Romans thinking Non-Romans spoke like this "Barbabrbabrbbar". It's basically like saying "Ching Chang Chong" when talking about Asians. Throughout history whole societies, and even races, were considered "Uncivilized". (Remaining "Civilized" is one of the reasons the end of slavery took so long) It's basically Cultural Tool Waving, whose tool is bigger and can please the most ladies? Anyone that doesn't conform to the persons sense of culture is "Uncivilized", as you can imagine this comes with some Unfortunate Implications. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/UnfortunateImplications
IMO, using "Civilized" the way you do is in itself Uncivilized. :P
Thanks for the rant, but I'm pretty sure the dictionary disagrees with you. The term "civilized" is used in a manner to describe what is essentially, a more "advanced society". Yes, the word "civilization" is different from "civilized", even though one derives meaning from the other. So go ahead and pull your red herring and compare me to some sort of vile racist (if it suits your ad hominem so well), but don't tell me that I used the meaning of the word wrong. Let me instead point out the word I used to contrast it with, and why I felt you were being contradictory.
You used the word "brutality"...were you NOT just trying to point out being a "long term survivor" didn't necessarily mean that you would end up like the bandits or the St. john's? I brought up "civilized" to prove my point that you are a stone's throw from becoming anarchaeic cannibals...something with which you whole heartedly deny. So what is it, exactly? That our society as we know and define it survives, or we become much more akin to our less technologically advanced members, who still do practice such things as rape, cannibalism, tribal warfare and the like?
Thanks for the rant, but I'm pretty sure the dictionary disagrees with you. The term "civilized" is used in a manner to describe what is essentially, a more "advanced society". Yes, the word "civilization" is different from "civilized", even though one derives meaning from the other. So go ahead and pull your red herring and compare me to some sort of vile racist (if it suits your ad hominem so well), but don't tell me that I used the meaning of the word wrong. Let me instead point out the word I used to contrast it with, and why I felt you were being contradictory.
You used the word "brutality"...were you NOT just trying to point out being a "long term survivor" didn't necessarily mean that you would end up like the bandits or the St. john's? I brought up "civilized" to prove my point that you are a stone's throw from becoming anarchaeic cannibals...something with which you whole heartedly deny. So what is it, exactly? That our society as we know and define it survives, or we become much more akin to our less technologically advanced members, who still do practice such things as rape, cannibalism, tribal warfare and the like?
Culture & Society are Civilization, and while it does say advanced there's no set criteria for what is advanced. My message wasn't "you're a racist", it's "you're playing the "my culture is better than all other cultures" card" and I used the Stupid racism of a yesteryear, and roman Xenophobia to explain how dodgy a situation that is to be in. All you're doing is comparing other societies, cultures, *cough*civilizations*cough*, to your own and all the while deciding what you think think makes on qualified as being advanced.
Brutality can mean a lot of things, for example: Killing the Saint John's brothers. While I'd be against Rape, and Cannibalism is sort of pointless survival tactics in a landscape where everyone that dies becomes a rotten corpse, I'd still say what survives would be closer to the examples I listed than the "Innocent until proven guilty", Democracy Driven, Politically Correct, Seat Belts and Food Stamps society we live in.
If you're not willing to do the dirty work to ensure future generations come about, you die off. Being a Soccer Mom during the Zombie Apocalypse just gets you the Chomp. You die, your people die, and all of that good old fashioned American home values you've been fighting for die with you. Good Job, you've left the future in the hands of the Bandits instead of becoming Necessary Evil, "retain some Morality where it won't get us killed" 3rd option... Congratulations, your entire genetic line has been wiped out. Hope you're happy Sister.
PS: Go look up civilization in the Dictionary as well.
Seriously, there is no reason to get so personal. This is spiraling down into a "you don't know jack about ________". If you had taken the time to get to know me and my responses here, I'm pretty sure you'd realize that I am anything but those typical stereotypes you put up there.
And because I refuse to indulge in anger fests on the internet (it's so bad for your blood pressure), I think we're done here.
Seriously, there is no reason to get so personal. This is spiraling down into a "you don't know jack about ________". If you had taken the time to get to know me and my responses here, I'm pretty sure you'd realize that I am anything but those typical stereotypes you put up there.
And because I refuse to indulge in anger fests on the internet (it's so bad for your blood pressure), I think we're done here.
You're right, I don't know enough about you to make it personally fit you. But I threw those examples up because they're common, and you get the jist of what I'm saying, and that is: If you can't adapt to the new environment, you die. if you die, nothing you were fighting to preserve matters anymore.
You say it's an anger fest, but I clearly put a light hearted ribbing ":P" face at the end. But sure, you can run away from my points under the saying it's getting too personal, while in the same breath saying I don't know enough about you to make it personal, if you'd like... But yeah, you might be done, but just remember "we" aren't done until both parties are. One can, very well, just keep on typing one sided rants until they get everything they think they can say out. Then they're done.
(Oh noes, it's the P face of seriousness and rage again! XD)
You're right, I don't know enough about you to make it personally fit you. But I threw those examples up because they're common, and you get the jist of what I'm saying, and that is: If you can't adapt to the new environment, you die. if you die, nothing you were fighting to preserve matters anymore.
You say it's an anger fest, but I clearly put a light hearted ribbing ":P" face at the end. But sure, you can run away from my points under the saying it's getting too personal, while in the same breath saying I don't know enough about you to make it personal, if you'd like.
LOL, you TRIED to make it personal and failed. The anger fest would have been mine, if I cared.
LOL, you TRIED to make it personal and failed. The anger fest would have been mine, if I cared.
I tried to make it feel personal, I can't try to make it actually personal without relevant information. The difference being one puts you in a relevant situation, the other puts you in your situation.
Once again, you seem to be running from the point I was making. I take it as admitting defeat. If it really were just about it becoming too personal, you wouldn't have replied to my last post...
PS: saying I'm getting to personal and ignoring otherwise valid points is the very heart and soul of the Ad Hominem Fallacy.
I know the general idea of what they're about, I just have to be a little choosey about what games I get to play. Tight budgets and time constraints, being the working mom of a two year old!
And @Death689God, you've kind of contradicted yourself countering the point I was trying to make. Brutality? I'm pretty sure that means the opposite of civilized. Besides, the point I was trying to make wasn't that the apocalypse means that society will or won't die - just that within such a short time frame, there really is no reason to assume (unless you're religiously inclined to believe that the dead only come back during this time) that this IS the apocalypse. You want to believe that just because you're looking beyond tomorrow that you are more correct or more apt to survive? Be my guest. To me it's not the sole criterion for choosing who's life I will save (Guess I should feel sorry for Carley, as apparently one of the primary reasons she gets to live is that she is a baby-maker!:p).
Maybe I'm feelin' this way because I don't play a lot of zombie games, nor do I watch zombie movies or TV shows. Heck, I didn't even know about the Walking Dead until my husband suggested that it was the type of game I might like.
and @ Rommel, One thing I've always considered is that when a major disaster DOES strike, to not count on a quick or timely rescue effort from the government. Even here in CA we're told to have supplies handy for all members of your family for at least a week, and I double that to two weeks just to be safe! So from my point of view, less than a week really isn't enough time to consider outside intervention as "hopeless". I definitely would have abandoned this mindset sometime between episodes one and two.
It depends on the form of disaster - we're not talking about a Hurricane or Earthquake where you're waiting on guys like Engineers to rebuild infrastructure or FEMA to hand out blankets, supplies, etc. Hell, I'm not even talking about rescue. We're essentially looking at an invasion in this scenario. You're looking at the deployment of combat troops the instant there's reports that crazy folks have effectively conquered a major city. Getting boots on the ground in that sort of scenario occurs within the same day, not weeks, particularly when one of the main infantry training centers of the country is within 3 hours of it.
As I said, my motivation in saving Carley over Doug was that she had simply demonstrated herself to be more useful at that point, in addition to the fact she had the only firearm in the group. By the same token, it's why Duck's dead last on my list of priorities until/unless he shows something resembling usefulness.
As the saying goes, "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst". Even short term, a good chunk of the values we hold dear in the U.S. will need to go out the window, simply because we'd no longer be able to afford them. In general, things are going to become a lot more harsh just out of necessity. We're looking at a situation where if some shmuck steals your food stocks, they could very well be condemning you and those you care about to death... and incarcerating the guy isn't a realistic option, which leaves either just letting him go, or killing him.
This has to be the longest, most drawn-out, pointless off-topic argument I've ever seen in any thread ever. *grabs popcorn* Please continue *munch munch munch*
This has to be the longest, most drawn-out, pointless off-topic argument I've ever seen in any thread ever. *grabs popcorn* Please continue *munch munch munch*
I've seen worse. This is still quite alright - although, my eyes tend to glaze over when faced with a wall of words.
Comments
Bad for Georgia does not necessarily mean bad EVERYWHERE. It's clear that the underlying message is that there is still hope for "rescue" from some outside entity. I think it's harder to view it that way as a player though, seeing as how we know we are only in the first episode of a five part story (couple this with anyone who knows about the Walking Dead universe from the show or the comics, and I can see where a lot of people get on with creating their new world order
To put it bluntly, if I had to make the decision in episode two, I would probably have been more inclined to be thinking about repopulation than in episode one. As it was, I saw Doug being pulled out of a window by several walkers, and Carley was grabbed by the ankle by one Walker. I definitely thought Doug needed more help.
Meanwhile in Canada Life still thrives as Canadians have closed off the borders stopped the Walker thread dead and have their universal healthcare to prevent anyone else from dying and turning.
If you promise to take Bryan Adams and Justin Beiber back to their homeland b4 you close the border it would be totally worth it!
Bieber can stay in the states with Selena Gomez
Sorry, this isn't a Hurricane of Earthquake. If friggin' DEAD PEOPLE started to walk around and EAT THE LIVING, you're damn right we'd all be thinking long term. Especially if a whole state got wiped out. (Georgia, in terms of size and population, is as large as MOST countries! Let that sink in for a moment.)
You're speaking out of your general doom and gloom attitude, Death. Still. glad to know that some people will always jump to conclusions before being given sound evidence [/sarcasm]....
Calm down for a moment and think about what the narrative is telling you before you reach the conclusion that we're all gonna die. Doug is about the only person who notes that this might take longer than a couple of days to sort out. Less than a week in, and most people would probably still assume that the government will come in and rescue them (also made evident by the dialogue and spoken by several characters).
Sure, there will always be people who assume it's the end of the world - they do the same with other natural disasters, too. A majority of people still will hold out hope that it will all be over soon (especially as everyone is considering the fact that transmission only occurs through bites).
So yes, Georgia is large, and yes, this is a catastrophe, but it's just not reasonable for most people to be thinking they are the only hope left for the species in such a short amount of elapsed time. Georgia is NOT the entire world. It is possible for something catastrophic to happen in a place the size of Georgia and it isn't the end of the world.
Hence the episode two timeline "jump". Now (three months in with no change or contact) is when you start thinking the s*** has hit the fan. So, like I said earlier, had the Carley/Doug decision come in episode two, then I think it would be reasonable to be thinking about the longest-term survival needs such as repopulation. Less than a week after the disaster strikes, no.
Call me doom and gloom all you want, but Grandma's corpse getting up and ripping mommies face off isn't really my Idea of Rainbows and Sunshine. Also, as I stated before, my Lee doesn't know if he wants it to get better. (I chose the "Was bad before" option with Katjaa). The only people that would really hold out hope in a situation like that, are the kinda people who let what they want to be override what is the most probable scenario.
My Lee isn't that big on those hopes everyone else has. At least if the world's gone to hell, he's free.
The same could be said for you - wanting to see the events of episode one as the beginning of the end of the world instead of what it is. Nobody here is making light of the situation in which we find ourselves - yes, it is bad. Things may possibly get worse before they get better. But if you can't hold out hope that life may ever return to normal for even a week, or worse, you would actually PREFER what was occurring to life as it was before as a whole, you just aren't "most people".
I'd say the people who were in for the Long Haul on day 1 will be "most people" just short of a year later.
Internet and Air Conditioning Vs Survival
Or, you know, you'd be the people most likely to end up like the Bandits, or the St. John's...:D
Yeah, cause you get good Food and Internet in the pin. NOPE! Only Shivs, shanks, prison gangs, and Soap Dropping await you.
Sorry, but preparing for the long haul doesn't mean Raping people. Eventually, the group will have to think about it. You said so yourself... Are you saying your Episode 2 Lee is destined to become a Rapist Cannibal since he's starting to think in the long term?
I'm comparing life before and after the zombie apocalypse what the hell are you on about?
I thought you were replying to me, and I was referring the Lee's situation specifically.
You have a tendency to not quote people you're replying to... It gets confusing.
Indeed I do maybe i should quote more just am hesitant to do that because it's alot quicker and easier to quick reply on this piece of fish computer
I am only offering up the two most extreme examples we have seen of people who have put themselves in for the "long haul". I tend to think that people who automatically assume the worst in such situations to be more "extreme" than the rest.
It is the hope that you are so quick to sneer at, by the way, that gives people a reason to act more civilized and not devolve into anarchy. What's the point in keeping our morals if there will never be anything better than today? If you have no hope, why WOULDN'T you act like the bandits and the St. John's?
Now.
Haven't played either of them.
it's about post apocalyptic societies attempting to rebuild. new vegas had two diffrent warring factions The guys who were using ancient roman tactics and the guys who wanted modern law and order and bureaucracy and society
I have, but back to the point before. There's a difference between hope and fools hope. If you're in it for the long haul, that is to say you're planning for future generations as well, it's natural to have some hope humanity will make it through. The Saint John's and Bandits ARE NOT in it for the long haul. They're very short term, day to day, survival instinct based. They're prepared to live, but they're not long term strategists. (The Saint John's never even keep women around to continue on the family line, and the Bandits have been shown to turn on eachother for the simplest of reasons)
Just because the army won't come in and put things back to the way they were with magic, doesn't mean civilization dies. It simply means civilization as it was does. Tribal civilizations (Zulu, Apache, Celts, etc.) all had Civilization, perhaps not civilized by our standards. But they're a lot closer to what the people of this new world will need... Survivalism, Brutality, Cold-Logic, this doesn't mean you can't be civilized. It just means what you consider "civilized" has to change, as it always has. Civilization is a product of humanity, not the other way around, it changes when we will it to.
All three of them sucked, I went Wildcard. :P
Would have gone Legion if it weren't for the Sexism.
That's why I said that at a minimum the information we have access to gives us a pretty big clue the problem is atleast statewide, simply based on the distance between Savannah and Atlanta.
However, one could reasonably infer that the infection crossed state borders as well:
The quarantine in Savannah was unsuccessful, Savannah not only has an airport, it has access to the sea. It's also not far from South Carolina.
The lack of apparent military involvement at this point would be a pretty big clue as well that things are looking grim. Georgia's home to Ft. Benning, one of the largest military bases in the nation (incidentally, where I went for basic). Benning's not that far from Atlanta from what I remember; the fact we don't see much in the way of any sort of real military presence near the biggest city in the state implies they already failed (somehow) and couldn't deploy in force to aid the rest of the state.
A good chunk of the characters seem to have some indication the situation could potentially last longer than a few days or get worse, Carley brings up the possibility when she confronts Lee about his past and it being potentially detrimental to the group. Kenny's plan to retreat to his boat is predicated on the situation getting worse.
i'd like to see or read i should say your idea of the next civilization since each one builds on the achievements of the past and becomes greater then the one before it. But with the walker "virus" not having been cured.
Good Catch.
That'll take me a while to write out and I don't feel particularly inspired to write it right now. (In debate mode) So you might have to wait till the morrow.
A female Courier working for the Legion is the best playthrough you'll ever get. for one scene in Lonesome Road
Ulysses: Used to be You had to have a weapon between your legs to wield one for the legion.
Female Courier: Is that why you quit?
Ulysses: What do you... Oh you've got Spirit you better save it for the Divide.
I always wondered if going Female Legion would change the Sexism aspect in the long haul... Might give it a try. But let's get back on track.
I know the general idea of what they're about, I just have to be a little choosey about what games I get to play. Tight budgets and time constraints, being the working mom of a two year old!
And @Death689God, you've kind of contradicted yourself countering the point I was trying to make. Brutality? I'm pretty sure that means the opposite of civilized. Besides, the point I was trying to make wasn't that the apocalypse means that society will or won't die - just that within such a short time frame, there really is no reason to assume (unless you're religiously inclined to believe that the dead only come back during this time) that this IS the apocalypse. You want to believe that just because you're looking beyond tomorrow that you are more correct or more apt to survive? Be my guest. To me it's not the sole criterion for choosing who's life I will save (Guess I should feel sorry for Carley, as apparently one of the primary reasons she gets to live is that she is a baby-maker!:p).
Maybe I'm feelin' this way because I don't play a lot of zombie games, nor do I watch zombie movies or TV shows. Heck, I didn't even know about the Walking Dead until my husband suggested that it was the type of game I might like.
and @ Rommel, One thing I've always considered is that when a major disaster DOES strike, to not count on a quick or timely rescue effort from the government. Even here in CA we're told to have supplies handy for all members of your family for at least a week, and I double that to two weeks just to be safe! So from my point of view, less than a week really isn't enough time to consider outside intervention as "hopeless". I definitely would have abandoned this mindset sometime between episodes one and two.
Yeah, the part I put in Bold really makes a big difference. But we call it the "Apocalypse", not because of any religious connotations, but because it's a word that sums up "The World has just been dashed and thrashed in such a manner it'll never be the same again" A way to say the world's ended, but not really. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZombieApocalypse
Also, you don't really have any Idea what civilized means do you? If you did you'd see there was no contradiction at all (Prepare for a Rant of Colossal Proportions): It means having civilization, and civilization takes on many forms. As with the examples I mentioned, the Zulu, Apache, and Celts were some very brutal people. (Hell the Celts kept heads of fallen enemies outside their home.) The way You're using "civilized", as in a comparative way to other cultures, is really one of the most absurd things you can do. That practice basically started with Greeks and Romans, the term "barbarian" comes from the Romans thinking Non-Romans spoke like this "Barbabrbabrbbar". It's basically like saying "Ching Chang Chong" when talking about Asians. Throughout history whole societies, and even races, were considered "Uncivilized". (Remaining "Civilized" is one of the reasons the end of slavery took so long) It's basically Cultural Tool Waving, whose tool is bigger and can please the most ladies? Anyone that doesn't conform to the persons sense of culture is "Uncivilized", as you can imagine this comes with some Unfortunate Implications. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/UnfortunateImplications
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ValuesDissonance
IMO, using "Civilized" the way you do is in itself Uncivilized. :P
If you don't mind used games you can try Glyde. that helps with the budget issues the time and motherhood think well ::shrug::
Thanks for the rant, but I'm pretty sure the dictionary disagrees with you. The term "civilized" is used in a manner to describe what is essentially, a more "advanced society". Yes, the word "civilization" is different from "civilized", even though one derives meaning from the other. So go ahead and pull your red herring and compare me to some sort of vile racist (if it suits your ad hominem so well), but don't tell me that I used the meaning of the word wrong. Let me instead point out the word I used to contrast it with, and why I felt you were being contradictory.
You used the word "brutality"...were you NOT just trying to point out being a "long term survivor" didn't necessarily mean that you would end up like the bandits or the St. john's? I brought up "civilized" to prove my point that you are a stone's throw from becoming anarchaeic cannibals...something with which you whole heartedly deny. So what is it, exactly? That our society as we know and define it survives, or we become much more akin to our less technologically advanced members, who still do practice such things as rape, cannibalism, tribal warfare and the like?
Brutality can mean a lot of things, for example: Killing the Saint John's brothers. While I'd be against Rape, and Cannibalism is sort of pointless survival tactics in a landscape where everyone that dies becomes a rotten corpse, I'd still say what survives would be closer to the examples I listed than the "Innocent until proven guilty", Democracy Driven, Politically Correct, Seat Belts and Food Stamps society we live in.
If you're not willing to do the dirty work to ensure future generations come about, you die off. Being a Soccer Mom during the Zombie Apocalypse just gets you the Chomp. You die, your people die, and all of that good old fashioned American home values you've been fighting for die with you. Good Job, you've left the future in the hands of the Bandits instead of becoming Necessary Evil, "retain some Morality where it won't get us killed" 3rd option... Congratulations, your entire genetic line has been wiped out. Hope you're happy Sister.
PS: Go look up civilization in the Dictionary as well.
And because I refuse to indulge in anger fests on the internet (it's so bad for your blood pressure), I think we're done here.
You're right, I don't know enough about you to make it personally fit you. But I threw those examples up because they're common, and you get the jist of what I'm saying, and that is: If you can't adapt to the new environment, you die. if you die, nothing you were fighting to preserve matters anymore.
You say it's an anger fest, but I clearly put a light hearted ribbing ":P" face at the end. But sure, you can run away from my points under the saying it's getting too personal, while in the same breath saying I don't know enough about you to make it personal, if you'd like... But yeah, you might be done, but just remember "we" aren't done until both parties are. One can, very well, just keep on typing one sided rants until they get everything they think they can say out. Then they're done.
(Oh noes, it's the P face of seriousness and rage again! XD)
LOL, you TRIED to make it personal and failed. The anger fest would have been mine, if I cared.
I tried to make it feel personal, I can't try to make it actually personal without relevant information. The difference being one puts you in a relevant situation, the other puts you in your situation.
Once again, you seem to be running from the point I was making. I take it as admitting defeat. If it really were just about it becoming too personal, you wouldn't have replied to my last post...
PS: saying I'm getting to personal and ignoring otherwise valid points is the very heart and soul of the Ad Hominem Fallacy.
It depends on the form of disaster - we're not talking about a Hurricane or Earthquake where you're waiting on guys like Engineers to rebuild infrastructure or FEMA to hand out blankets, supplies, etc. Hell, I'm not even talking about rescue. We're essentially looking at an invasion in this scenario. You're looking at the deployment of combat troops the instant there's reports that crazy folks have effectively conquered a major city. Getting boots on the ground in that sort of scenario occurs within the same day, not weeks, particularly when one of the main infantry training centers of the country is within 3 hours of it.
As I said, my motivation in saving Carley over Doug was that she had simply demonstrated herself to be more useful at that point, in addition to the fact she had the only firearm in the group. By the same token, it's why Duck's dead last on my list of priorities until/unless he shows something resembling usefulness.
As the saying goes, "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst". Even short term, a good chunk of the values we hold dear in the U.S. will need to go out the window, simply because we'd no longer be able to afford them. In general, things are going to become a lot more harsh just out of necessity. We're looking at a situation where if some shmuck steals your food stocks, they could very well be condemning you and those you care about to death... and incarcerating the guy isn't a realistic option, which leaves either just letting him go, or killing him.
I've seen worse. This is still quite alright - although, my eyes tend to glaze over when faced with a wall of words.
In other news, Carley all the way!